Building a Beachfront Home at 18 years old; first deal ever!

Building a Beachfront Home at 18 years old; first deal ever!

Lender · Fort Lauderdale, FL · Member since 2017 · 83 posts · 33 votes

This is my first BP post, just wanted to preface this post with that fact. I'll give you a little insight into my personal situation so you have a better idea of what I'll be dealing with.

I am 18, currently a licensed mortgage broker, my stepmother is building a beachfront neighborhood in Ecuador, South America, and I'm looking to invest.

What I'm hoping someone can answer for me is as follows: Should I buy and hold, or build and sell? I sincerely want to build a duplex after purchasing a small lot in my stepmother's developing neighborhood, and house hack. However, on the other hand, I feel as though the rents will be too low and my potential profits will be far greater by simply building a single family home and selling it right off the bat. I'll go into the numbers below so you can offer a clearer opinion.

If I build a duplex, it will likely cost $60,000 for the land, construction, furniture, and everything. Each unit would be 1000-1500 square feet, and the lot is about 7000 square feet. I will have this capital readily available in its entirety within a matter of about 6 months. The rent will be about $800 each unit, though only one will be rented out until I build a new property or find somewhere else to live and have both units rented, in that case, it would be $1600. Seeing as the property will be brand new and managed by myself, CapX and other expenses won't be necessary, but I will still be putting about 50% of the cash flow into reserve funds. So, to summarize, if I go with the Duplex House Hacking option I will be making $4800-$9600 in cash flow a year, with the same amount of reserves, which likely won't be touched much for at least 3 years. With this method, I would be buying and holding. So, based on your opinion, is this a good deal? Let's see which one you think will be better after you read the second option.

My second option involves roughly the same expenses, but I would be building a single-family home (for 60k). The same lot and square footage (3000 home and 7000 lot). Here's the first problem. My area has very little information about pricing, because it's such a small market, though from what I've gathered I could estimate the property selling for 150-300k, realistically. Homes are far cheaper to build in Ecuador than to buy, and my builder is world-class. The benefit of having an insider relationship with the owner of the neighborhood is I would know exactly how much all similar properties are going for, be able to see all of them in person, and know how fast the lots and homes are selling for.

I really want to go with the first option, as my ultimate goal is to be making 5k a month from passive real estate investments, therefore I'd need 12 units just like the first. This would require a lot of working capital, and obtaining a loan is out of the question as Ecuador has very high rates compared to the US, and I'm quite averse to debt. That being said, if I were to go with option 2, then use that profit to then go for option 1, that seems like a better option to me. 

I'm conflicted because I want to have my own home, I'll be 19 or 20 when the entire process is complete. But, making 100k on a real estate deal in just a year sounds incredible.

Any thoughts, suggestions, etc. are very welcomed. This would be my first ever real estate deal so any help you can give me would be much appreciated.

Note* I forgot to mention that I already have a contractor and architect lined up, as well as the exact lot, the only thing I need to proceed is the capital and to figure out what I am going to build.

0Reply
18 views

2 Replies

Jump to latestLatest
  • Mike ReynoldsPro Member
    construction · Nacogdoches, TX · Member since 2011 · 2k+ posts · 1k+ votes
    9y

    @Dominic Balconi One thing that stands out for me is the selling price. If builders can build it there for 60k someone would be there to sell it for 100k. Thats almost double the money. Supply and demand would have to be accounted for somewhere down the road. Otherwise everyone there would be builders. I'm not saying this to be mean its just that you said you were unsure of the prices. I would err on the side of caution in that case. I might even say 85k retail at best just to keep you in the black. If it is better and you see that you can make that so much the better. 

    Otherwise I would put a sign up that says for sale or lease and see what pops. If you rent it you [may?] have tax advantage. Not sure the tax laws down there after all. If you sell you would likely have to pay tax on all profits that year. 

  • Lender · Fort Lauderdale, FL · Member since 2017 · 83 posts · 33 votes
    9y

    thanks for responding!

    Let's just say taxes are virtually non existent there, for selling or leasing. 

    Demand would be extremely high as I will be building in a very highly marketed neighborhood. Houses are much more than 85k, for the size I'm going for, and most people aren't builders there because they're American or Canadian retirees. They only have enough money saved up to build their ideal home or buy one to avoid the hassle, or rent, and most commonly not enough to build regularly. 

    I agree with almost everything you said, I just suppose I'm by sure whether to go for a large sum upfront or smaller, regular income. 

Join the conversationCreate a free account to reply, vote on answers and follow this thread.