Hi guys, I'm brand new here (both to R/E investing and w/ BP) and I have a quick question as I'm reviewing deals from all sources. While my plan and financials does include property management for any location - for my first home, should I ONLY look locally in Dallas Tx area for my first deal, or can I look nationwide for the best deal? My plan is to focus on cash flow since the plan is to replace my W2 and Texas r/e taxes are high so tough on the cash flow but amazing on equity. Any advice? Anyone start with their first deal in another state?
Thank you guys!
Hello Diogenes,
Excellent questions. I split my answer into two parts:
Location is the most important investment decision you will make, not the property. I recommend selecting a location that best meets the following criteria.
To demonstrate the impact property taxes and insurance can have on return, I put together the following example. This comes from an article I wrote a few years ago comparing two similar properties, one in Austin and one in Las Vegas. The formulas used in the example are:
Note:
Below are the assumptions for both properties.
Calculations for the Austin property:
Calculations for the Las Vegas property:
As you can see, the higher cost of insurance and property taxes in Austin had a huge impact on profitability. You have to consider all the costs when you are evaluating properties.
Wherever you decide to invest, you will need a good investment team. If you needed surgery, you would not start medical school. You would go to a surgeon. The same is true with real estate investing. The diagram below shows the skills and resources required for successful real estate investing.
Working with an investment team costs you nothing and will save you time, money, and risk. If you would like qualification questions for evaluating a potential investment Realtor, contact me.
Also, if you have a good investment team in your chosen location, it does not matter whether you invest locally or remotely.
Whether it is better to focus on cash flow or appreciation depends on the location. Look at the pre-COVID appreciation rate. During COVID, locations that have had flat or declining property prices started increasing. So, ignore this period of insanity. Over the next few years, appreciation rates will likely fall back to what it was before COVID.
If a location has a high appreciating rate, focus on high appreciating properties. Rents will increase proportionately to prices, so cash flow will increase over time as well. When you have accumulated enough equity, refinance the property and buy another property. Refi loans are not taxed, so you can use all the accumulated equity. This is the fastest and most reliable way to acquire a long-term reliable income stream.
If the appreciation rate was below the inflation rate, buy properties for high cash flow. Inflation is constantly eroding buying power, so your initial cash flow will be the highest you will ever receive (adjusted for inflation) from that property. If the cash flow is high enough and you plan to hold the property for a short period, this approach also works. Just factor into your calculations that all rental income is taxed at regular income rates, and you will have additional costs when you sell the property.
I frequently hear, "You can only count on initial cash flow." To a degree, this is true. However, suppose you buy in a location that appreciates below the inflation rate. Almost nothing can reverse the downward trend; you can count on the market to continue declining along with your inflation-adjusted income.
Can you count on a rapidly appreciating market to continue? It depends on what is driving the appreciation. If appreciation is driven by an increasing population combined and an increasing number of good jobs, it will likely continue. The best indicator of a solid market is if inventory levels are symmetrical to price increases. Below are two charts: one showing appreciation and the other months of inventory for the property profile we target in Las Vegas.
Sales - Median $/SF by Month
Sales - Months of Supply
As long as you see such symmetry between prices and inventory, it is real, not a bubble. During the 2008 crash, prices were rising rapidly, and so were inventory levels. This demonstrated that prices increases were driven by speculation, not real demand. It was a bubble.
Diogenes, I hope this helped.
...Eric
Stay local until you have the experience, knowledge and relationships to expand to other areas. Paying a PM for a single property in another state or city (more than one hour away from you personal residence) won't make financial sense and will eat up cash flow, and many PM's have to be watched over carefully to ensure they're doing their jobs.
The vast majority of people start local to gain experience and limit the downside risk. On top of that, it's easier to know areas or visit potential properties in your own backyard. I'm biased towards DFW, but starting local doesn't mean you always have to invest locally, and there's plenty of opportunities to start in DFW especially in single family. Hope this helps!
If you buy locally are you going to house-hack it? If so that advantage makes it worth staying local. If you can self-manage locally and are willing I'd also stay local for that reason, saving 8-10% on a PM and getting firsthand knowledge of how to properly manage a property will help you a ton once you do upgrade to using a PM.
As others have said, there are other risks associated with buying out of state, if you have the capital to manage and weather any storms you may run into from afar its not out of the question as to whether it is worth it but as a new investor you truly do not know what you do not know so I wouldn't recommend investing long-distance. That being said its not impossible for it to not work out and for many investors living in places like San Francisco or LA it only really makes sense for them to invest long-distance.
Stay local. DFW is a fantastic area with lots of great appreciation so figure it out in your area first and then expand. You are correct on the cash flow issue here, but that’s not necessarily a bad thing. Just don’t plan on the cash flow retiring you. It’s the appreciation you get from the home that will eventually retire you. It’s a get rich slow play and there’s nothing wrong with that!
@Diogenes M. I started out of state. I think there are pros to learning about RE on a place you live in but you can learn about it without living in RE. Whatever it takes to get started!
Hello Diogenes,
Excellent questions. I split my answer into two parts:
Location is the most important investment decision you will make, not the property. I recommend selecting a location that best meets the following criteria.
To demonstrate the impact property taxes and insurance can have on return, I put together the following example. This comes from an article I wrote a few years ago comparing two similar properties, one in Austin and one in Las Vegas. The formulas used in the example are:
Note:
Below are the assumptions for both properties.
Calculations for the Austin property:
Calculations for the Las Vegas property:
As you can see, the higher cost of insurance and property taxes in Austin had a huge impact on profitability. You have to consider all the costs when you are evaluating properties.
Wherever you decide to invest, you will need a good investment team. If you needed surgery, you would not start medical school. You would go to a surgeon. The same is true with real estate investing. The diagram below shows the skills and resources required for successful real estate investing.
Working with an investment team costs you nothing and will save you time, money, and risk. If you would like qualification questions for evaluating a potential investment Realtor, contact me.
Also, if you have a good investment team in your chosen location, it does not matter whether you invest locally or remotely.
Whether it is better to focus on cash flow or appreciation depends on the location. Look at the pre-COVID appreciation rate. During COVID, locations that have had flat or declining property prices started increasing. So, ignore this period of insanity. Over the next few years, appreciation rates will likely fall back to what it was before COVID.
If a location has a high appreciating rate, focus on high appreciating properties. Rents will increase proportionately to prices, so cash flow will increase over time as well. When you have accumulated enough equity, refinance the property and buy another property. Refi loans are not taxed, so you can use all the accumulated equity. This is the fastest and most reliable way to acquire a long-term reliable income stream.
If the appreciation rate was below the inflation rate, buy properties for high cash flow. Inflation is constantly eroding buying power, so your initial cash flow will be the highest you will ever receive (adjusted for inflation) from that property. If the cash flow is high enough and you plan to hold the property for a short period, this approach also works. Just factor into your calculations that all rental income is taxed at regular income rates, and you will have additional costs when you sell the property.
I frequently hear, "You can only count on initial cash flow." To a degree, this is true. However, suppose you buy in a location that appreciates below the inflation rate. Almost nothing can reverse the downward trend; you can count on the market to continue declining along with your inflation-adjusted income.
Can you count on a rapidly appreciating market to continue? It depends on what is driving the appreciation. If appreciation is driven by an increasing population combined and an increasing number of good jobs, it will likely continue. The best indicator of a solid market is if inventory levels are symmetrical to price increases. Below are two charts: one showing appreciation and the other months of inventory for the property profile we target in Las Vegas.
Sales - Median $/SF by Month
Sales - Months of Supply
As long as you see such symmetry between prices and inventory, it is real, not a bubble. During the 2008 crash, prices were rising rapidly, and so were inventory levels. This demonstrated that prices increases were driven by speculation, not real demand. It was a bubble.
Diogenes, I hope this helped.
...Eric