I attended business school in Ann Arbor, so I am familiar with the Detroit area. The point I am trying to make is that "cheap" assets is not always good and I believe that Detroit has the cheapest housing in the country. Out of all the top 30 metro city areas with a population of 2 million +, only Detroit metro and Cleveland metro have lost population from 2010 - 2013 and I see this trend continuing in the future. My other question is if your $500/month rent and your asset value is sustainable over the next 10 - 20 years?
The question should not be, "Where to invest these days?" but the question should be "Where can I invest were I can have cash flow and maximum appreciation potential."
This topic has been excessively talked about in the thread below.
http://www.biggerpockets.com/forums/48/topics/1441...
Real wealth in real estate is not built on solely on cash flow, but on appreciation in asset value. For me, appreciation is a must and cash flow is an icing on the cake.
I bought my primary residence in the $400s 3 years ago, and homes in my street with similar square footage is unloading quickly in the $600s. This purchase was not an accident, but strategic. My research in the metro Atlanta area since 2006 have shown me that my home within this specific location will see unprecedented appreciation never seen in the history of Georgia.
No problem finding tenants in the Detroit area. Great cash flowing properties. The value jumps up and down . During the disaster and meltdown my parents properties were never vacant. At some point it doesn't matter in the value goes down. Unless it turns into a warzone.
Originally posted by @Joe Villeneuve:
If you are cash flowing a property over 500/month, with property manager in place, why would you sell it? The idea that "... if my property becomes almost impossible to unload in the future or if the asset value deteriorates over time."..means little or nothing to me.