Investor · Tampa, FL · Member since 2015 · 530 posts · 92 votes
Have there been any horror stories about renting out in-law-suites that don't have a separate address? I'm contemplating renting an in-law-suite that doesn't have a separate address. While I know many people do this with their rental properties, I am wondering if anyone has had any horror stories as a result of doing so?
@Jon S, most of the issues I've seen boils down to HOA / code enforcement / underestimation of utility usage. Most properties covered by HOAs with in law suites can't be rented out without running afoul HOA regulations. Those can be really, really terrible if you violate them.
@Jon S, most of the issues I've seen boils down to HOA / code enforcement / underestimation of utility usage. Most properties covered by HOAs with in law suites can't be rented out without running afoul HOA regulations. Those can be really, really terrible if you violate them.
Just as clarification, I, as the owner, am not occupying the main house, the main house is being rented to good tenants, and I would like to also rent out the in-law suite, which is a really nice little 2/1. I am trying to learn what problems others have had, what to avoid, etc.
I have a locked privacy fence placed between the main house and the in-law suite, and separate yard entrances for them, so I am trying to provide maximum privacy.
Without a separate address for the in-law suite, the back tenant won't be able to get mail.
The utilities will have to remain in my name. Rent will have to include water, electric, sewer and garbage.
I'm worried about the lease language, identifying in the lease, access to the main house only, and access to the in-law suite only. How would you word that?
I'm worried about, in the event of an eviction, how would the sheriff be told to only evict the tenant in the in-law suite, not the tenant in the main house, or visa-versa, when there is only one address?
@Jon S, most of the issues I've seen boils down to HOA / code enforcement / underestimation of utility usage. Most properties covered by HOAs with in law suites can't be rented out without running afoul HOA regulations. Those can be really, really terrible if you violate them.
Thanks Christopher. Fortunately, there is no HOA involved.
@Jon S. the ADU's are the rage in High end new construction in our market.. our city is pro cramming density ... and buyers like the added income many times it might pay 50% of your monthly nut
Can't you just make it unit "B?" Put up a mailbox?
I could call it unit B if the property were zoned as a duplex or zoned to have two units for rent, but it is zoned as SFR. It doesn't look like I can change the zoning.
@Jon S. the ADU's are the rage in High end new construction in our market.. our city is pro cramming density ... and buyers like the added income many times it might pay 50% of your monthly nut
If this doesn't work out as a rental, I might use the ADU to increase the property's market value and sell it. However, if it does work out as a rental, my calculations indicate that I will earn significantly more by renting and holding the property for a few years before selling.
It would be better if the tenants in the main unit found tenants for the in-law. We were surprised how many tenants are looking for that type of setup for extended families etc. So we have done this on some smaller duplexes we own.
Then they could sort out the utilities themselves (I would never have them in my name) as well as the mail box issue. We had a tenant blow us into the USPS because a couple of tenants were using a common mailbox at a rural multi.
Can't you just make it unit "B?" Put up a mailbox?
I could call it unit B if the property were zoned as a duplex or zoned to have two units for rent, but it is zoned as SFR. It doesn't look like I can change the zoning.
Well there's your answer. If you can't change the zoning to make it legal, don't do it. It is a MIL, not a second dwelling unit. Does it have a stove in it?
Can't you just make it unit "B?" Put up a mailbox?
I could call it unit B if the property were zoned as a duplex or zoned to have two units for rent, but it is zoned as SFR. It doesn't look like I can change the zoning.
Well there's your answer. If you can't change the zoning to make it legal, don't do it. It is a MIL, not a second dwelling unit. Does it have a stove in it?
Good point !!!!
We had a home that was rendered SFH by the Bldg Dept., after it was a duplex for many years. It was a huge home with a full sized 1 bed unit in the rear. We were told we couldn't sell it with the premium a 2 unit pulls but we kept it at our price & found buyers who were taking care of a disabled wheel chair bound Vet. By simply opening a wall & installing a doorway the city allowed it as well as leaving the second kitchen etc in place.
It would be better if the tenants in the main unit found tenants for the in-law. We were surprised how many tenants are looking for that type of setup for extended families etc. So we have done this on some smaller duplexes we own.
Then they could sort out the utilities themselves (I would never have them in my name) as well as the mail box issue. We had a tenant blow us into the USPS because a couple of tenants were using a common mailbox at a rural multi.
I like this idea, of letting tenants in the main unit find tenants for the in law suite. Thanks for this idea.
Can't you just make it unit "B?" Put up a mailbox?
I could call it unit B if the property were zoned as a duplex or zoned to have two units for rent, but it is zoned as SFR. It doesn't look like I can change the zoning.
Well there's your answer. If you can't change the zoning to make it legal, don't do it. It is a MIL, not a second dwelling unit. Does it have a stove in it?
Good point !!!!
We had a home that was rendered SFH by the Bldg Dept., after it was a duplex for many years. It was a huge home with a full sized 1 bed unit in the rear. We were told we couldn't sell it with the premium a 2 unit pulls but we kept it at our price & found buyers who were taking care of a disabled wheel chair bound Vet. By simply opening a wall & installing a doorway the city allowed it as well as leaving the second kitchen etc in place.
Exactly. The opening of the fire barrier meant that the second unit was gone.