South Bend, IN · Member since 2016 · 50 posts · 6 votes
I'm using an FHA loan to purchase a small multifamily as a primary residence. I have found a property that is currently 100% leased to month to month tenants. I am buying a property as my primary residence and know that I have to occupy the residence within 60 days of purchase. Is it unethical to buy a property and legally kick otherwise decent tenants out to occupy the residence?
The property is yours. Just make sure you respect them by giving reasonable notice to vacate. They should understand, especially if they have been renting month to month.
The property is yours. Just make sure you respect them by giving reasonable notice to vacate. They should understand, especially if they have been renting month to month.
It's definitely not unethical if you give them a nice heads up. Before you kick them out though, this is a multifamily unit and you only need to inhabit one of the units. Could you occupy one of the other units to keep the 'best' tenants of the bunch?
A lease is a contract between two parties. Once the terms of the contract expire, it is up to both parties to agree to renew the contract. As a landlord, its no different for you to end the terms of the contract as it is for them. If the tenants wanted the guarantee that they wouldn't be asked to leave, they could sign a long term contract. In this case, they didn't, so it would be no different than if they unexpectedly gave their notice to vacate.
That being said, I'd pick a unit based on the financials, and have their vacation as terms of the sale. As mentioned above, your only requirement is to be a decent human being, and follow the law.
It may not make you feel good, but there is nothing unethical about it. If they are on a month to month, then they should expect that a notice could come at any time. That same flexibility that they enjoy goes both ways.
Just make sure that your contract stipulates ONLY a 30 day notice. Many contracts stipulate a 60 day notice to vacate, even though the terms are month to month. So be clear on that.
Also, make sure to account for any eviction time if they don't move out. That can add another month.
I would ask the Seller to give them notice during your escrow period, so that the clock has started as early as possible.
In terms of selecting, what will you choose? Best place that meets your needs? Lowest rental rate? Tenant who has been there the least amount of time? Just curious how you will choose who to boot.
I had the same issue with our first multi-family purchase. We needed to kick one of the tenants out so we could move in. Because I communicated with them they understood my position and everything went smoothly. If they are month to month they know that either tenant or landlord can put in a 30 day notice at anytime, and because of that it would not be unethical.
Not unethical. Personally, if I would voluntarily give them as much time over the 30 days, after i close, as I could. And promptly help them out with a reference, if called upon.
I make the call on which tenant leaves. I think at this point I may choose to live in the unit that needs the most work first unless there is a huge difference in quality of tenant. I'm so grateful for BP. Other investors here have been a huge help in putting my emotions at ease. Thanks
Why don’t you ask them to sign a term lease if they are good tenants? Maybe you offer a concession if they’ll stay as vacancy is literally the worst.
If not, can you get a long term tenant now/at closing? Otherwise table the longer lease until Feb/Mar.
I’ve MTM tenants now but what’s the point of not collecting rent? Losses?
So if I can wanted to do a house hack on let’s say a duplex but it is fully occupied and the tenants both have long term leases, then I can’t break those leases and I will not be able to House hack this property? Correct?
That is correct unless they voluntarily leave, you pay them to leave etc. Also if the duplex has 2 tenants with long term leases you will not be able to get financing that requires you to owner occupy (FHA/USDA/VA)
Alex K. I plan to occupy one of the units for a few years at least and owner occupancy is also a requirement for FHA/VA loans. Ideally other good tenants would qualify and sign a long term lease.
It is not unethical for month to month tenants to legally give notice, move out, and leave you with a vacant unit, so why would you perceive that you are doing something unethical by not renewing them, provided you give them required notice per their original Lease?
It's not unethical at all. You own the property, and you can do what you like with it, within the law.
What sucks is when here in LA you can buy a property but not be allowed to kick someone out of a unit without paying them $19,300 in "tenant relocation assistance."
@Cheryl Butler I talked myself into being overly emotional. I was really starting to feel bad about the idea of putting someone out of a space that they’ve made feel like their home. I know legally there isn’t anything wrong with it, but from a personal standpoint this is a level of confrontation I’ve been hesitant to deal.
You could always put in your purchase contract that one unit needs to be delivered empty at the time of close and put it on the seller if your not comfortable with getting them out.