Investor · San Diego, CA · Member since 2014 · 79 posts · 17 votes
Which option would you pick, and WHY?? Also, if you can think of Option C, you are a rock-star! :)
So, condo is 2 BR, 2 BA in North Pacific Beach area in San Diego, CA. Great location, walkable to the beach. I bought with only 5% down, and my monthly payment (principal, insurance, taxes) $2700/month + HOA is an additional $400
Option A. Keep as a rental, probably rent for $2700-$2800/month, so a negative flow of $400-$500/month
Option B. Sell it now, net gain about $40-$60K after taxes, commissions, listing price, etc
Option C - Stay in the house and get a roommate to share some of the payment until you have lived there for 2 years. Then sell and take the $40K tax free using the sec 121 primary residence exclusion.
for bonus points, Air BNB it for weekends at the beach. Have friend you can stay with for those occasional weekends (HOA willing of course). But keep it as your residence per option C.
Which option would you pick, and WHY?? Also, if you can think of Option C, you are a rock-star! :)
So, condo is 2 BR, 2 BA in North Pacific Beach area in San Diego, CA. Great location, walkable to the beach. I bought with only 5% down, and my monthly payment (principal, insurance, taxes) $2700/month + HOA is an additional $400
Option A. Keep as a rental, probably rent for $2700-$2800/month, so a negative flow of $400-$500/month
Option B. Sell it now, net gain about $40-$60K after taxes, commissions, listing price, etc
1031 exchange and sell your condo for a cash flowing property!
Which option would you pick, and WHY?? Also, if you can think of Option C, you are a rock-star! :)
So, condo is 2 BR, 2 BA in North Pacific Beach area in San Diego, CA. Great location, walkable to the beach. I bought with only 5% down, and my monthly payment (principal, insurance, taxes) $2700/month + HOA is an additional $400
Option A. Keep as a rental, probably rent for $2700-$2800/month, so a negative flow of $400-$500/month
Option B. Sell it now, net gain about $40-$60K after taxes, commissions, listing price, etc
Forecasting that unit at -$400 because rent - PITI - HOA is $400 shows you have a lot to learn about rental expenses. There is vacancy, cap expense, maintenance, typically you allocate for property management even if self managing because 1) You may change your mind in the future 2) it takes time and effort and you should be compensated for it. My estimate the initial cash would be closer to -$1k/month. On the positive, that area has outstanding historical appreciation. I suspect in 5 years there is a good chance that this will no longer project negative cash flow
Does your condo HOA allow short term rentals (STRs)? That could be an option.
If it is not able to be used for an STR, my recommendation would be to keep it.
Historically it has outstanding property and rent appreciation. This historically has produced an outstanding return as evidenced by your equity accumulated with only 5% down.
prop 13: you are paying a reduced prop tax rate.
Property near the beach is precious especially in Southern CA there is virtually zero available for further development.
Real estate sales commission is typically 5 to 6% but total cost to sell is typically 8 to 10%.
Hi Minka, few questions that will either make some of the above options, not options at all, and maybe some alternative options to think about.
1. Is this your personal residence currently? if So 1031 is not an option.
2. Is there a reason you are needing to rent or sell (i.e moving away, found a better place etc)
3. have you looked at refinance options? not sure what your rate is currently, but maybe there are alternatives such as ARM's you could consider to make renting it make more sense until you have it rented long enough to qualify for a 1031.
4. If you do end up staying for a total of 2 years in it as your personal residence and then sell it, you can keep all your profit tax free (its up to 250 for an individual 500 couple but you already stated your profit margin)
5. If you have to sell it and have no other idea what to do and you have capital gains to deal with you can look at opportunity zones as options to invest those gains, make tax free money on the investment, and pay those original gains 10 years from now.
1) your principal pay down, is probably $400-500/month.
2) rent growth - PB is very desirable and rents will likely continue to go up over time
3) appreciation - coastal CA will always be in demand which will fuel appreciation
You bought it with 5% down so have very little skin in the game. $1000/month loss like @Dan Heuschele calculated is tough to swallow but I’d guess you’re breaking even if you include principal pay down and appreciation.
Rent growth is why long term prime CA real estate is a great long term bet. It makes so-so investments (like this one) great investments in 10 years.
If you are in a market that is increasing quickly (or was) which it sounds like, hold on to it for a year or two until the market starts to stabilize or you find something else.
Option C - Stay in the house and get a roommate to share some of the payment until you have lived there for 2 years. Then sell and take the $40K tax free using the sec 121 primary residence exclusion.
for bonus points, Air BNB it for weekends at the beach. Have friend you can stay with for those occasional weekends (HOA willing of course). But keep it as your residence per option C.
Option B, then 1031 it into something that cash flows.
Option C, figure out if a roommate situation can work where you'll rent the rooms separately to two individuals to squeeze out some profit or even break even.
Option D, if it's close to a hospital monthly rental to traveling nurses. If it's close to an airport contracts for flight attendants and pilots. If close to a college, tap into the college roommate market.
@Minka Sha I’d recommend looking at the return you’re getting on the equity you have in the property. If that’s acceptable to you given rate of return you can get elsewhere than go for it. Likely if you could sell at a gain, or keep for a monthly loss, it makes sense to sell
@Minka Sha if you can try to make it work by keeping it, you’ll be happy you did down the road since You only out 5% down. Are you upgrading? Or moving elsewhere?
Maybe you can keep it furnished and rent it out for a higher monthly amount that way.
Im in a very very similar boat in SoCal. But mine is not in beach area (more in the hillside in an upcoming neighborhood in Los Angeles county)... and its a house not a condo. I originally planned on flipping mine... but now contemplating keeping it. I bought house and rehab “all cash” but want to cash out my capital investment (which is about 75% ltv)... but will be negative about $300+ per month since even the highest rent in the area is not enough to cover the mortgage
A walk to the beach location North Pacific Beach is about as good as it gets. Do you know who regrets selling their property in Malibu ? Everyone who has ..
Other people have made some great suggestions on ways to increase rent. There will likely be downward pressure on rents also. But lets assume your loss will be fixed at $500 a month for the next 3 years. That will be an $6K loss per year ( RE tax write offs aside ). You recently gained $50K appreciation in one very good economic year.
Great locations can be hard to acquire. Keep it for now because swapping investments in the middle of a storm may be tricky. Upper income people will always want to live somewhere special and NPB is special.
Which option would you pick, and WHY?? Also, if you can think of Option C, you are a rock-star! :)
So, condo is 2 BR, 2 BA in North Pacific Beach area in San Diego, CA. Great location, walkable to the beach. I bought with only 5% down, and my monthly payment (principal, insurance, taxes) $2700/month + HOA is an additional $400
Option A. Keep as a rental, probably rent for $2700-$2800/month, so a negative flow of $400-$500/month
Option B. Sell it now, net gain about $40-$60K after taxes, commissions, listing price, etc
To properly and adequately answer this question, one would need to know your strategy and goals.
Strategy A is based on cash flow to support living expenses.
Strategy B is long term wealth building - appreciation (market and forced) combined with principle pay down, depreciation, etc.
If you strategy is A, then you should sell as this will not turn out positive for several years down the road (unless you utilize some sort of house hack play, vacation rental to increase income, or any combo of increasing income and reducing operating expenses - which by the way you skipped a lot of those in your analysis so your negative monthly cash flow is actually greater than you explained.)
If your strategy is B, then by all means keep it and enjoy the likely future appreciation, amortization and depreciation deductions to offset your actual loss each month until the unit goes cash flow positive. The 2-3 years you experience negative will likely be outweighed by the gain in value.
Keep it. You only put 5% down. So negative cash flow is expected. Second, 50K net may not even be that much and its not enough to change your life in any meaningful way. Third, you have only owned it for a year. Thats not the way to play RE. Its a long term game (unless you planned a flip). Be patient. Rents will go up and negative cash flow will diminish. Value will go up. And as an A class property (and a condo) your actual expenses will be pretty close to PITI + HOA. And you will have better quality tenants and predictable income eventually when you need it.
I was hoping I would be first but others were quicker:
Option C - utilize the condo as your primary residence for 2 out of the 5 years to avoid tax on the gain.
Option "D" - improve cash flow by putting more equity into the property...assuming this is an option. This would improve the cash flow problem allowing you to take advantage of the appreciation until you find a more suitable alternative.
Option "E" - get rid of the HOA fee so that you break even - totally kidding.
I am not an advocate for negative cash flow, but seeing as how you have it, use that loss to offset taxable income elsewhere. Factor in the principal pay down when analyzing your losses..likely small, but it is part of your return.
Please do not even consider option A as you are purchasing a liability. Assets put money in your pocket, not take money out! Have you considered what would happen if the market slows and you cannot sell it for the price you think (2008)? What if your income drops and can’t afford to pay the additional $500? Not to mention all the other risks you are taking to lose money each month such as liability, assessments, repairs, etc.
Sell the property, live in it and rent it out as a house hack, turn it into an STR if it can be profitable.
I would never sit on a negative cash flow properties hoping that it continues to appreciate. You can take your $40-$60,000 in profits and put it into another investment that has a positive cash flow or a passive investment like buying a note which will produce a positive cash flow of $400/mo instead of negative cash flow of $400/mo. As others have said the 1031 exchange is an option.
That sounds like something you would want to sell. If you can take a profit and put it towards a better property that can give you at least break even or positive cash flow you should do it.
I'd vote for option A. Pacific Beach is a superb area and long term quality real estate. If you lose 6K a year, the asset probably will appreciate more than that amount. In time, the cash flow shortfall may shrink with rent increases.
A wise post on this thread mentioned you may not be including all the real expenses of owning a rental condo. Still, I think you can overcome this.
I think it depends partially on what the rest of your portfolio looks like and what your goals are. If this is your only investment property and you don't really mind the negative cash flow because of the appreciation and you have a lot of healthy reserves... Then maybe it's not an issue to keep it. Or if you have a lot of cash flowing properties that make up the difference for this one. But if you are somewhere in the middle and trying to scale, then maybe keeping it at the current numbers won't work. For me personally, having a negative cash flow like that would really hurt my DTI and I don't think it would be worth it.
However I agree with option C that you find a way to increase rents- either with it 100% an Airbnb, or better yet still live there, airbnb out both rooms and sleep on the couch ;) not the most glamorous but hey I'd do that to live steps from the beach!