Investor · Wheat Ridge, CO · Member since 2013 · 75 posts · 41 votes
I've been underwriting deals this week where cash on cash exceeds 12%, but the IRR on a 5 year old is around 10%. This would be an absolute triple net lease outpatient surgical center. For those who have invested (or thinking about investing in syndications), especially NNN triple net lease properties, what are your thoughts? I know it will be depend on lease length, tenant type, asset age, and location, but I'm curious how LP passive investors are navigating syndication are navigating investing in this environment.
@Chris Seveney - Right now we'd be modeling an exit at year 5. Refinancing might work, but we first model a sale so we aren't specifically dependent on the debt markets.
@Matthew Drouin - Yes, modeling cap rate decompression. Usually starting at 10 basis points per year, sometimes more if we're buying below market cap and it's a heavier value-add. This is a sale lease back and the length would be 10 years.
is there any value add in this deal or is just a straight up flip after 5 years since you got it at a good price to begin with?
if your return on equity is 10% thats pretty good in my book. I assume the reason that its lower than 12% is that the bank is asking you to put a huge chunk down.
I would invest in risk-free online savings, CDs, US Treasuries, and money market mutual funds at 5% over getting 10% in asset classes that have a risk component. The spread to risk-free is not sufficient (particularly given the magnitude of unprecedented government actions in recent years).
I too have gotten into 5% CDs and treasuries as a way to "barbell" my higher risk with apartments and other CRE. It's just too good of a return to ignore. In fact, if I were a few years from retirement, I would be very interested in a 10 year treasury note. Right now I need to aim for a higher average return than 5%, but 4-5% going into retirement is a great thing. It used to be that bonds were an important part of a typical portfolio--until bonds started returning near zero (which was pretty instrumental in pushing stock prices up as more dollars crowded into the stock market).
As to the OP, I am also wondering if the IRR can be lower than the COC--or if I am just uneducated as to how that could technically happen. I'm thinking if one were to simply drop out of a 5 year investment in year 4 without seeing a disposition (but having initial investment returned), perhaps the COC could be a little higher than the IRR because the IRR would be signaling that five years is a long time to get a return of capital...
You also can’t say this….”Refinancing might work, but we first model a sale so we aren't specifically dependent on the debt markets.”
The higher interest rates in the debt market will lower your sale price. The debt market could absolutely make selling a worse decision than refinancing. If you can’t afford to refinance and make the deal work then your buyer can’t afford to buy at that price.
@Chris Seveney - Right now we'd be modeling an exit at year 5. Refinancing might work, but we first model a sale so we aren't specifically dependent on the debt markets.
@Matthew Drouin - Yes, modeling cap rate decompression. Usually starting at 10 basis points per year, sometimes more if we're buying below market cap and it's a heavier value-add. This is a sale lease back and the length would be 10 years.
still doesn't make sense to me. cap rates alone won't cause this. are you modeling declining market rents too?
You also can’t say this….”Refinancing might work, but we first model a sale so we aren't specifically dependent on the debt markets.”
The higher interest rates in the debt market will lower your sale price. The debt market could absolutely make selling a worse decision than refinancing. If you can’t afford to refinance and make the deal work then your buyer can’t afford to buy at that price.
The reason why we look to selling on our first pass is that there are fewer variables to predict or even manipulate. When model a sale, you simply model the exit cap. When you refinance, you also have to make assumptions on the interest rate, the LTV, AND the cap rate. As a sponsor, I could make a deal look sweeter if I fail to properly estimate any of those variables in the refinance estimate. Curious to to hear other thoughts out there.
I would invest in risk-free online savings, CDs, US Treasuries, and money market mutual funds at 5% over getting 10% in asset classes that have a risk component. The spread to risk-free is not sufficient (particularly given the magnitude of unprecedented government actions in recent years).
Thanks for your input. What do you mean by asset classes that have a risk component? Does that mean you have different investment criteria for different asset classes?
is there any value add in this deal or is just a straight up flip after 5 years since you got it at a good price to begin with?
if your return on equity is 10% thats pretty good in my book. I assume the reason that its lower than 12% is that the bank is asking you to put a huge chunk down.
This would viewed as a core asset. The value add component would be annual rent bumps, but overall there isn't a vacancy to fill or lease to negotiate that would dramatically increase NOI during the hold period. We usually look to 70% LTV and 1.25 DSCR, but some banks can allow higher leverage at a higher debt service.
is there any value add in this deal or is just a straight up flip after 5 years since you got it at a good price to begin with?
if your return on equity is 10% thats pretty good in my book. I assume the reason that its lower than 12% is that the bank is asking you to put a huge chunk down.
This would viewed as a core asset. The value add component would be annual rent bumps, but overall there isn't a vacancy to fill or lease to negotiate that would dramatically increase NOI during the hold period. We usually look to 70% LTV and 1.25 DSCR, but some banks can allow higher leverage at a higher debt service.
For single tenant NNN the thing that you need to underwrite is the tenant main business operation, if they collapse you lose money with this deal. Ask their audited financial statement. But if you are LP I guess the GP co. already doing that. How much skin of the game the GP has in this deal ?
Real estate investors should be cautious, as the spread to risk-free is not sufficient compared to other asset classes that come with higher risks. While real estate has traditionally been viewed as a safe investment, in today's uncertain times it is important to maintain a diversified portfolio and weigh your options carefully before investing. Investors should consider allocating their funds into safer investments like online savings accounts, CDs, US Treasuries, and money market mutual funds, which offer a far greater return than the 5% spread to risk-free. By doing this, investors can ensure that their investments are secure and will provide them with a steady stream of income for years to come.
I would invest in risk-free online savings, CDs, US Treasuries, and money market mutual funds at 5% over getting 10% in asset classes that have a risk component. The spread to risk-free is not sufficient (particularly given the magnitude of unprecedented government actions in recent years).
Thanks for your input. What do you mean by asset classes that have a risk component? Does that mean you have different investment criteria for different asset classes?
Absolutely...everyone has different investment criteria depending on risk and that's why asset classes trade at different values/cap rates. Government bonds and bank CDs have a dramatically different risk (and expected return) profile than real estate (or the stock market, crypto, commodities, etc.).
I would invest in risk-free online savings, CDs, US Treasuries, and money market mutual funds at 5% over getting 10% in asset classes that have a risk component. The spread to risk-free is not sufficient (particularly given the magnitude of unprecedented government actions in recent years).
Thanks for your input. What do you mean by asset classes that have a risk component? Does that mean you have different investment criteria for different asset classes?
Absolutely...everyone has different investment criteria depending on risk and that's why asset classes trade at different values/cap rates. Government bonds and bank CDs have a dramatically different risk (and expected return) profile than real estate (or the stock market, crypto, commodities, etc.).
The money being re-invested into Money Market flows in 2023 is like 5 times than average of 2010-2020, no doubt almost everyone is moving into fixed-income city.
I would invest in risk-free online savings, CDs, US Treasuries, and money market mutual funds at 5% over getting 10% in asset classes that have a risk component. The spread to risk-free is not sufficient (particularly given the magnitude of unprecedented government actions in recent years).
Thanks for your input. What do you mean by asset classes that have a risk component? Does that mean you have different investment criteria for different asset classes?
Absolutely...everyone has different investment criteria depending on risk and that's why asset classes trade at different values/cap rates. Government bonds and bank CDs have a dramatically different risk (and expected return) profile than real estate (or the stock market, crypto, commodities, etc.).
The money being re-invested into Money Market flows in 2023 is like 5 times than average of 2010-2020, no doubt almost everyone is moving into fixed-income city.
Yep, and it was materially accelerated with the bank failures as business and consumers performed hygiene on their excess liquidity to ensure better returns and FDIC coverage. I actually moved money OUT of a money market mutual fund on the Monday after the SVB failure into a Wealthfront FDIC ensured cash account earning 4.8% (4.3% standard rate plus 0.5% referral bonus). At the time, there was uncertainty about the safety of money market mutual funds in the event of a bank failure but that has since been clarified.
I would invest in risk-free online savings, CDs, US Treasuries, and money market mutual funds at 5% over getting 10% in asset classes that have a risk component. The spread to risk-free is not sufficient (particularly given the magnitude of unprecedented government actions in recent years).
Thanks for your input. What do you mean by asset classes that have a risk component? Does that mean you have different investment criteria for different asset classes?
Absolutely...everyone has different investment criteria depending on risk and that's why asset classes trade at different values/cap rates. Government bonds and bank CDs have a dramatically different risk (and expected return) profile than real estate (or the stock market, crypto, commodities, etc.).
I should have clarified, I meant commercial real estate asset classes. We aim as healthcare real estate syndicators mirror at lease what multifamily is modeling around 7% CoC and 13-15% IRR.
It appears that either your exit year involves lease turnover or a significant outlier expense, which is distorting your IRR. A deal that generates such positive cash flows cannot have an unusually low IRR without a compelling explanation, even with a standard cap rate expansion assumption.
Those issues in MF over the last few years are what led me into a different niche for Commercial RE. I invest in RV Resort Campgrounds. These properties deliver double digit cash on cash, averaging between 12-16% COC AND also get high IRR 20%+ on a 5 year hold. The immediate and high cash flows are what attracted me to this niche and I love it! I am always happy to share more information with those who are interested to learn more.