legal timeline for updating investors

legal timeline for updating investors

Wholesaler · Texas, USA · Member since 2022 · 139 posts · 40 votes

Is there a legal timeline to update current investors about a significant change in the investment?

What are the legal requirements for updating the investment information/pitch deck for new investors?

I am no longer working with this person, but am curious what the legal obligations are and if they were followed. It is certainly immoral to raise funds without updating the information on a deal, but is it illegal?

0Reply
72 views

Most Popular Reply

Don KonipolBusiness Member
Investor · The Woodlands TX / Avon, CT · Member since 2009 · 6k+ posts · 10k+ votes
2y
Quote from @Morgan Gutierrez:

Is there a legal timeline to update current investors about a significant change in the investment?

What are the legal requirements for updating the investment information/pitch deck for new investors?

I am no longer working with this person, but am curious what the legal obligations are and if they were followed. It is certainly immoral to raise funds without updating the information on a deal, but is it illegal?

Besides certain reporting requirements being spelled out in the Operating Agreement, a lot will depend on the type of offering that was made when investors were given the opportunity to invest.  Assuming that the offering was a securities offering, as opposed to a joint venture, we’d need to know first if the offering was a registered offering or was claiming an exemption from registration.  In the much more common exemption from registration, was it an intrastate exemption, a Reg D filing, or did the offering rely on the general exemption for private placements?  
Your question does bring up a very good point.  Few investors realize the differences in the types of the offering.  More sophisticated and experienced investors, and those employing knowledge attorneys will understand that while not an absolute, a REG D offering offers some amount of comfort in that the sponsor has placed his offering on a more “sophisticated” level than an intrastate or general exemption offering.  Many larger investors won’t consider any non registered offering unless the sponsor has file and follow the rules for the “safe harbor” Reg D offering. 
Private Mortgage Financing Partners, LLC
See this reply in the discussion

10 Replies

Jump to latestLatest
  • Henry ClarkPro Member
    Developer · Member since 2020 · 4k+ posts · 4k+ votes
    2y

    You have to be specific about what the deal is and its structure.  If you're talking a Syndication or a fund, there is a Syndication section you could post and probably get a better response.

    Anything that is Required will be in the documents.

  • Chris SeveneyBusiness Member
    Moderator
    Investor · VA · Member since 2015 · 21k+ posts · 19k+ votes
    2y

    @Morgan Gutierrez

    It depends. As others mentioned ton definitely need a lot more data

    End of day what does the agreement state?

    If it says they don’t have to provide anything then that’s the agreement

    Typically agreements require at a minimum annual updates

    The good ones do monthly or quarterly depending on offering type

    7e investments53 Reviews
  • Don KonipolBusiness Member
    Investor · The Woodlands TX / Avon, CT · Member since 2009 · 6k+ posts · 10k+ votes
    2y
    Quote from @Morgan Gutierrez:

    Is there a legal timeline to update current investors about a significant change in the investment?

    What are the legal requirements for updating the investment information/pitch deck for new investors?

    I am no longer working with this person, but am curious what the legal obligations are and if they were followed. It is certainly immoral to raise funds without updating the information on a deal, but is it illegal?

    Besides certain reporting requirements being spelled out in the Operating Agreement, a lot will depend on the type of offering that was made when investors were given the opportunity to invest.  Assuming that the offering was a securities offering, as opposed to a joint venture, we’d need to know first if the offering was a registered offering or was claiming an exemption from registration.  In the much more common exemption from registration, was it an intrastate exemption, a Reg D filing, or did the offering rely on the general exemption for private placements?  
    Your question does bring up a very good point.  Few investors realize the differences in the types of the offering.  More sophisticated and experienced investors, and those employing knowledge attorneys will understand that while not an absolute, a REG D offering offers some amount of comfort in that the sponsor has placed his offering on a more “sophisticated” level than an intrastate or general exemption offering.  Many larger investors won’t consider any non registered offering unless the sponsor has file and follow the rules for the “safe harbor” Reg D offering. 
    Private Mortgage Financing Partners, LLC
  • Henry ClarkPro Member
    Developer · Member since 2020 · 4k+ posts · 4k+ votes
    2y
    Quote fro:
    Quote from :

    Is there a legal timeline to update current investors about a significant change in the investment?

    What are the legal requirements for updating the investment information/pitch deck for new investors?

    I am no longer working with this person, but am curious what the legal obligations are and if they were followed. It is certainly immoral to raise funds without updating the information on a deal, but is it illegal?

    Besides certain reporting requirements being spelled out in the Operating Agreement, a lot will depend on the type of offering that was made when investors were given the opportunity to invest.  Assuming that the offering was a securities offering, as opposed to a joint venture, we’d need to know first if the offering was a registered offering or was claiming an exemption from registration.  In the much more common exemption from registration, was it an intrastate exemption, a Reg D filing, or did the offering rely on the general exemption for private placements?  
    Your question does bring up a very good point.  Few investors realize the differences in the types of the offering.  More sophisticated and experienced investors, and those employing knowledge attorneys will understand that while not an absolute, a REG D offering offers some amount of comfort in that the sponsor has placed his offering on a more “sophisticated” level than an intrastate or general exemption offering.  Many larger investors won’t consider any non registered offering unless the sponsor has file and follow the rules for the “safe harbor” Reg D offering. 

    @Don

    Could you repost under the Syndication tab?    Based in the level and types of questions I see on Syndication investments, I hadn’t thought but a lot of these investors don’t recognize the differences in investment structures as it relates to requirements.   Thanks. 

  • Gino BarbaroPro Member
    Rental Property Investor · St Augustine, FL · Member since 2014 · 2k+ posts · 1k+ votes
    2y

    @Morgan Gutierrez

    I would reach out to a syndication attorney. We use @Kim Lisa Taylor. If it was my deal, and I found out about something, whether legal or not, I would think that my investors have a right to know, and it would be my duty.

    I can see your values did not align with this individual and good on you for breaking apart.

    Gino

  • Wholesaler · Texas, USA · Member since 2022 · 139 posts · 40 votes
    2y
    Quote from @Chris Seveney:

    @Morgan Gutierrez

    It depends. As others mentioned ton definitely need a lot more data

    End of day what does the agreement state?

    If it says they don’t have to provide anything then that’s the agreement

    Typically agreements require at a minimum annual updates

    The good ones do monthly or quarterly depending on offering type


     So an update was provided - finally- but it still excluded crucial information the investors should have been updated about (in my opinion) considering there was a significant change made in the project that they are unaware of.

  • Wholesaler · Texas, USA · Member since 2022 · 139 posts · 40 votes
    2y
    Quote from @Don Konipol:
    Quote from @Morgan Gutierrez:

    Is there a legal timeline to update current investors about a significant change in the investment?

    What are the legal requirements for updating the investment information/pitch deck for new investors?

    I am no longer working with this person, but am curious what the legal obligations are and if they were followed. It is certainly immoral to raise funds without updating the information on a deal, but is it illegal?

    Besides certain reporting requirements being spelled out in the Operating Agreement, a lot will depend on the type of offering that was made when investors were given the opportunity to invest.  Assuming that the offering was a securities offering, as opposed to a joint venture, we’d need to know first if the offering was a registered offering or was claiming an exemption from registration.  In the much more common exemption from registration, was it an intrastate exemption, a Reg D filing, or did the offering rely on the general exemption for private placements?  
    Your question does bring up a very good point.  Few investors realize the differences in the types of the offering.  More sophisticated and experienced investors, and those employing knowledge attorneys will understand that while not an absolute, a REG D offering offers some amount of comfort in that the sponsor has placed his offering on a more “sophisticated” level than an intrastate or general exemption offering.  Many larger investors won’t consider any non registered offering unless the sponsor has file and follow the rules for the “safe harbor” Reg D offering. 

     It was Reg D at one point and then they closed that and moved to Reg C so advertising could be done. Same project though. 

  • Wholesaler · Texas, USA · Member since 2022 · 139 posts · 40 votes
    2y
    Quote from @Gino Barbaro:

    @Morgan Gutierrez

    I would reach out to a syndication attorney. We use @Kim Lisa Taylor. If it was my deal, and I found out about something, whether legal or not, I would think that my investors have a right to know, and it would be my duty.

    I can see your values did not align with this individual and good on you for breaking apart.

    Gino


     Thank you! I will reach out and see their suggestions. 

    I agree the investors have a right to know. I want to inform them and repeatedly tried while in my previous position, but wasn't provided the data to do so. 

    My integrity is all that I have. The value of honest business is irreplacable. 

  • Kim Lisa TaylorPro Member
    Attorney · Saint Augustine, FL · Member since 2016 · 247 posts · 234 votes
    2y

    If this is a securities offering (with passive investors contributing funds), then the "issuer" of the securities has an obligation to inform prospective investors of all material facts necessary to make informed consent prior to making their investment decision. An omission of a material fact known to the issuer that wasn't disclosed to investors could be considered fraud or misrepresentation, which is illegal in a securities offering.

    After the raise, if the issuer has sold passive interests in a company such as a limited liability company, the LLC Act of the state where the entity is formed may have additional laws regarding fiduciary obligations, fraud, misrepresentation, good faith and fair dealing, that may also be applicable if management knowingly conceals material facts from the members. As others have stated, a well-drafted LLC operating agreement should have language that would prevent management from withholding material facts and/or removal provisions for a manager who doesn't comply. Bottom line, the specific facts pertaining to the transaction would have to be examined to know when or whether an illegal act has occurred, and what remedies are available to investors who were harmed as a result.

    It's always best practice to keep investors informed of all relevant information related to their investment (good or bad), both before they invest and during the period of ownership of the investment.

  • Wholesaler · Texas, USA · Member since 2022 · 139 posts · 40 votes
    2y
    Quote from @Kim Lisa Taylor:

    If this is a securities offering (with passive investors contributing funds), then the "issuer" of the securities has an obligation to inform prospective investors of all material facts necessary to make informed consent prior to making their investment decision. An omission of a material fact known to the issuer that wasn't disclosed to investors could be considered fraud or misrepresentation, which is illegal in a securities offering.

    After the raise, if the issuer has sold passive interests in a company such as a limited liability company, the LLC Act of the state where the entity is formed may have additional laws regarding fiduciary obligations, fraud, misrepresentation, good faith and fair dealing, that may also be applicable if management knowingly conceals material facts from the members. As others have stated, a well-drafted LLC operating agreement should have language that would prevent management from withholding material facts and/or removal provisions for a manager who doesn't comply. Bottom line, the specific facts pertaining to the transaction would have to be examined to know when or whether an illegal act has occurred, and what remedies are available to investors who were harmed as a result.

    It's always best practice to keep investors informed of all relevant information related to their investment (good or bad), both before they invest and during the period of ownership of the investment.


     Thank you so much! I sent you a message as well. 

Join the conversationCreate a free account to reply, vote on answers and follow this thread.