Is there a legal timeline to update current investors about a significant change in the investment?
What are the legal requirements for updating the investment information/pitch deck for new investors?
I am no longer working with this person, but am curious what the legal obligations are and if they were followed. It is certainly immoral to raise funds without updating the information on a deal, but is it illegal?
Is there a legal timeline to update current investors about a significant change in the investment?
What are the legal requirements for updating the investment information/pitch deck for new investors?
I am no longer working with this person, but am curious what the legal obligations are and if they were followed. It is certainly immoral to raise funds without updating the information on a deal, but is it illegal?
You have to be specific about what the deal is and its structure. If you're talking a Syndication or a fund, there is a Syndication section you could post and probably get a better response.
Anything that is Required will be in the documents.
@Morgan Gutierrez
It depends. As others mentioned ton definitely need a lot more data
End of day what does the agreement state?
If it says they don’t have to provide anything then that’s the agreement
Typically agreements require at a minimum annual updates
The good ones do monthly or quarterly depending on offering type
Is there a legal timeline to update current investors about a significant change in the investment?
What are the legal requirements for updating the investment information/pitch deck for new investors?
I am no longer working with this person, but am curious what the legal obligations are and if they were followed. It is certainly immoral to raise funds without updating the information on a deal, but is it illegal?
Is there a legal timeline to update current investors about a significant change in the investment?
What are the legal requirements for updating the investment information/pitch deck for new investors?
I am no longer working with this person, but am curious what the legal obligations are and if they were followed. It is certainly immoral to raise funds without updating the information on a deal, but is it illegal?
@Don
Could you repost under the Syndication tab? Based in the level and types of questions I see on Syndication investments, I hadn’t thought but a lot of these investors don’t recognize the differences in investment structures as it relates to requirements. Thanks.
I would reach out to a syndication attorney. We use @Kim Lisa Taylor. If it was my deal, and I found out about something, whether legal or not, I would think that my investors have a right to know, and it would be my duty.
I can see your values did not align with this individual and good on you for breaking apart.
Gino
@Morgan Gutierrez
It depends. As others mentioned ton definitely need a lot more data
End of day what does the agreement state?
If it says they don’t have to provide anything then that’s the agreement
Typically agreements require at a minimum annual updates
The good ones do monthly or quarterly depending on offering type
So an update was provided - finally- but it still excluded crucial information the investors should have been updated about (in my opinion) considering there was a significant change made in the project that they are unaware of.
Is there a legal timeline to update current investors about a significant change in the investment?
What are the legal requirements for updating the investment information/pitch deck for new investors?
I am no longer working with this person, but am curious what the legal obligations are and if they were followed. It is certainly immoral to raise funds without updating the information on a deal, but is it illegal?
It was Reg D at one point and then they closed that and moved to Reg C so advertising could be done. Same project though.
I would reach out to a syndication attorney. We use @Kim Lisa Taylor. If it was my deal, and I found out about something, whether legal or not, I would think that my investors have a right to know, and it would be my duty.
I can see your values did not align with this individual and good on you for breaking apart.
Gino
Thank you! I will reach out and see their suggestions.
I agree the investors have a right to know. I want to inform them and repeatedly tried while in my previous position, but wasn't provided the data to do so.
My integrity is all that I have. The value of honest business is irreplacable.
If this is a securities offering (with passive investors contributing funds), then the "issuer" of the securities has an obligation to inform prospective investors of all material facts necessary to make informed consent prior to making their investment decision. An omission of a material fact known to the issuer that wasn't disclosed to investors could be considered fraud or misrepresentation, which is illegal in a securities offering.
After the raise, if the issuer has sold passive interests in a company such as a limited liability company, the LLC Act of the state where the entity is formed may have additional laws regarding fiduciary obligations, fraud, misrepresentation, good faith and fair dealing, that may also be applicable if management knowingly conceals material facts from the members. As others have stated, a well-drafted LLC operating agreement should have language that would prevent management from withholding material facts and/or removal provisions for a manager who doesn't comply. Bottom line, the specific facts pertaining to the transaction would have to be examined to know when or whether an illegal act has occurred, and what remedies are available to investors who were harmed as a result.
It's always best practice to keep investors informed of all relevant information related to their investment (good or bad), both before they invest and during the period of ownership of the investment.
If this is a securities offering (with passive investors contributing funds), then the "issuer" of the securities has an obligation to inform prospective investors of all material facts necessary to make informed consent prior to making their investment decision. An omission of a material fact known to the issuer that wasn't disclosed to investors could be considered fraud or misrepresentation, which is illegal in a securities offering.
After the raise, if the issuer has sold passive interests in a company such as a limited liability company, the LLC Act of the state where the entity is formed may have additional laws regarding fiduciary obligations, fraud, misrepresentation, good faith and fair dealing, that may also be applicable if management knowingly conceals material facts from the members. As others have stated, a well-drafted LLC operating agreement should have language that would prevent management from withholding material facts and/or removal provisions for a manager who doesn't comply. Bottom line, the specific facts pertaining to the transaction would have to be examined to know when or whether an illegal act has occurred, and what remedies are available to investors who were harmed as a result.
It's always best practice to keep investors informed of all relevant information related to their investment (good or bad), both before they invest and during the period of ownership of the investment.
Thank you so much! I sent you a message as well.