Your commercial building might already be non-compliant (and you might not know it)

Your commercial building might already be non-compliant (and you might not know it)

Property Manager · Member since 2026 · 2 posts · 2 votes

If you own commercial property in any of these 10 cities/states, your building may be subject to carbon emissions limits with real financial penalties:

NYC (Local Law 97), $268/metric ton over the limit, active since 2024. Boston (BERDO), daily fines for non-compliance. Washington DC (BEPS), performance standards for buildings over 10,000 sq ft. Plus Washington State, Denver, Oregon, Philadelphia, Montgomery

County MD, Chicago, and LA.

These are called Building Performance Standards (BPS). They set emissions caps based on your building type and size. Go over the cap, you pay penalties. The limits get stricter over time.

What catches most investors off guard:

1. The thresholds are lower than you think. In most jurisdictions, buildings over 20,000-25,000 sq ft are covered. That's not just skyscrapers. That's your average office building or mid-size multifamily.

2. The compliance periods have already started. NYC's first period began in 2024. If you bought a building last year without checking this, you may already be accumulating penalty exposure.

3. Due diligence should include this. A building that's 200 tons over its NYC limit is looking at $53,600/year in penalties, and that's the easy period. Limits tighten significantly in 2030.

4. It affects valuation. A non-compliant building needs capital improvements to get compliant. That's a negotiation point on acquisition and a liability on the balance sheet.

If anyone has questions about a specific jurisdiction, happy to dig into the details.

1Reply
151 views

Most Popular Reply

Member since 2018 · 1k+ posts · 1k+ votes
7mo
Quote from @Aaron Zimmerman:

Good to know! What are the rules in Chicago?

Wrong question in Chicago. In Chicago it’s “Who do you pay off?”
See this reply in the discussion

5 Replies

Jump to latestLatest
  • Aaron ZimmermanBusiness Member
    Accountant · Chicago, IL · Member since 2018 · 2k+ posts · 1k+ votes
    7mo

    Good to know! What are the rules in Chicago?

    • Member since 2018 · 1k+ posts · 1k+ votes
      7mo
      Quote from @Aaron Zimmerman:

      Good to know! What are the rules in Chicago?

      Wrong question in Chicago. In Chicago it’s “Who do you pay off?”
    • Property Manager · Member since 2026 · 2 posts · 2 votes
      7mo
      Quote from @Aaron Zimmerman:

      Good to know! What are the rules in Chicago?

      Great question, Aaron. In Chicago, the main rule right now is energy benchmarking for larger buildings under the Chicago Energy Benchmarking Ordinance.

      Quick version:
      - Applies to many larger commercial/multifamily buildings (typically 50,000+ sq ft, with phased thresholds)
      - You have to track and report annual energy use (usually via ENERGY STAR Portfolio Manager)
      - Non-reporting can trigger enforcement/fines
      - It's not a direct emissions fine like NYC LL97 yet, but benchmarking is often the base layer for stricter BPS-style policy later


    • Aaron ZimmermanBusiness Member
      Accountant · Chicago, IL · Member since 2018 · 2k+ posts · 1k+ votes
      7mo

      @Leon Freier thank you for sharing!

  • Property Manager · Calabasas, CA · Member since 2026 · 141 posts · 67 votes
    7mo

    Good post. Adding the SoCal perspective since LA is on that list and the mechanics are worth understanding before it gets stricter.

    LA's Building Performance Standards under the Green New Deal plan are currently in benchmarking/reporting mode for commercial buildings over 20,000 sq ft, but the trajectory is toward hard compliance requirements similar to NYC LL97. The city has been doing voluntary benchmarking through ENERGY STAR Portfolio Manager for years, but the enforcement teeth are coming. The 2028 and 2035 targets in LA's Climate Action Plan are real, and the city is already requiring disclosure on transactions for qualifying buildings.

    What I tell owners in my portfolio who are near that 20k sqft threshold: don't assume you're in the clear just because enforcement hasn't kicked in. The compliance costs compound fast once the limits start tightening. HVAC upgrades, building envelope improvements, lighting retrofits — these are capital-intensive and the best time to plan for them is before they're mandatory, not after.

    The due diligence point in the OP is the most important one. I've seen buyers not ask about this at all on acquisitions in the last two years. As these regulations mature, energy compliance exposure is going to show up the same way deferred maintenance does — as a line item in the negotiation. Better to know about it up front.

Join the conversationCreate a free account to reply, vote on answers and follow this thread.