Equity Multiples and What They Mean for Passive Investors

Equity Multiples and What They Mean for Passive Investors

Investor · Indianapolis, IN · Member since 2018 · 1k+ posts · 756 votes

Any time a potential investor is reviewing real estate syndication investment opportunities, they’ll likely come across the term “equity multiple”. Even if they’ve purchased a primary home or a residential rental property before, it’s unlikely they’ve heard of equity multiples.


The initial amount invested into a deal is an investor’s capital. That capital equals the amount of equity an investor has in the passive investment. Thus, the term Equity Multiple simply means the amount your capital (or equity) will be multiplied by the end of the deal.

How about we explore an example deal with a 2x equity multiple?

The investment (capital, also referred to as equity) is $100,000 and this deal has a projected annual rate of return of 8% with a 5 year hold period. This means the investor may receive about $8,000 per year for 5 years.

In other words, over a 5 year period, the investor will have received a total of $40,000 in cash flow distributions. Then, when the asset is sold, investors receive their initial $100,000 back, plus another, say, $60,000 in profit from the sale.

When the $40,000 in cash flow distributions and the $60,000 from the sale are added up, that’s $100,000 in total returns. The investor began with $100,000 and, not only got that back, but also earned an additional $100,000 cash.

In this example, the investor has doubled their money, which is what it means to have an equity multiple of 2x.

5Reply
45 views

Most Popular Reply

Syndication Expert and Investor · Indianapolis, IN · Member since 2016 · 591 posts · 808 votes
5y

I just went full cycle on an LP investment that was an 18 month hold, 2.14X! It definitely can happen with wedge deals. 

See this reply in the discussion

8 Replies

Jump to latestLatest
  • Investor · Batavia, IL · Member since 2014 · 99 posts · 81 votes
    5y

    Well put, Justin. I think this points to how a strong operator or syndicator can supercharge an investor's portfolio. Some operators will even shorten that hold time based on performance and bring in that 2X in a 3yrs. You don't have to be an all active or all passive investor. a blended approach can also work. 2X in 3-5yrs is tough to beat.

    Regards,
    Joe

  • Investor · Indianapolis, IN · Member since 2018 · 1k+ posts · 756 votes
    5y
    Originally posted by @Joe Archbold:

    Well put, Justin. I think this points to how a strong operator or syndicator can supercharge an investor's portfolio. Some operators will even shorten that hold time based on performance and bring in that 2X in a 3yrs. You don't have to be an all active or all passive investor. a blended approach can also work. 2X in 3-5yrs is tough to beat.

    Regards,
    Joe

    Yes, I agree. Has to be a screaming deal for a 3 year hold but it's still possible. 

  • Developer · Ottawa, Ontario · Member since 2019 · 105 posts · 58 votes
    5y

    Equity Multiple and IRR give great insight into the return & duration of an investment. The longer hold projects will have diminishing returns on the IRR but will eventually lead to an infinite return scenario where you maintain equity in the project and have all your money back.

    Well written @Justin Goodin

  • Investor · Durham, NC · Member since 2020 · 1k+ posts · 691 votes
    5y

    Great explanation. 

    Hope all is well! 

  • Syndication Expert and Investor · Indianapolis, IN · Member since 2016 · 591 posts · 808 votes
    5y

    I just went full cycle on an LP investment that was an 18 month hold, 2.14X! It definitely can happen with wedge deals. 

  • Paul MoorePro Member
    Commercial Real Estate Fund Manager · Lynchburg, VA · Member since 2015 · 1k+ posts · 1k+ votes
    5y

    Hey @Justin Goodin. Great explanation - thank you.  I’d also point out that the multiple is almost meaningless without a timeframe attached. For example, which is a better deal… A 2.0x multiple or a 4.0x multiple?  

    You can't know from that question. If the 2.0x multiple took five years, that's a total annual return of 20%. If the 4.0x multiple took 100 years, that's a total annual return of 3%. The deal with the smaller multiple is actually almost 7 times better (judging by ROI).

    The IRR (internal rate of return) is helpful because it accounts for the return and the timing. But it's hard for many investors to grasp and it includes a built-in reinvestment assumption (saying ongoing cash flow is reinvested at the same return along the way). Thanks again!

    • Investor · Indianapolis, IN · Member since 2018 · 1k+ posts · 756 votes
      5y
      Originally posted by @Paul Moore:

      Hey @Justin Goodin. Great explanation - thank you.  I’d also point out that the multiple is almost meaningless without a timeframe attached. For example, which is a better deal… A 2.0x multiple or a 4.0x multiple?  

      You can't know from that question. If the 2.0x multiple took five years, that's a total annual return of 20%. If the 4.0x multiple took 100 years, that's a total annual return of 3%. The deal with the smaller multiple is actually almost 7 times better (judging by ROI).

      The IRR (internal rate of return) is helpful because it accounts for the return and the timing. But it's hard for many investors to grasp and it includes a built-in reinvestment assumption (saying ongoing cash flow is reinvested at the same return along the way). Thanks again!

      Well said 👍 Couldn’t agree more. 

  • New to Real Estate · Indianapolis, IN · Member since 2019 · 4 posts · 2 votes
    5y

    @Spencer Gray - Just curious (I don't mean to hijack this thread so feel free to respond to only me directly), what is a "wedge deal"?

Join the conversationCreate a free account to reply, vote on answers and follow this thread.