Investor · Oklahoma/Texas · Member since 2020 · 14 posts · 7 votes
Hello everyone, Im relatively new to investing. Right now, I own some rentals in a rural area, and they're performing well. I am considering whether to keep investing in similar rural areas with populations below 15,000 or to transition to purchasing properties in larger cities.
Hello everyone, Im relatively new to investing. Right now, I own some rentals in a rural area, and they're performing well. I am considering whether to keep investing in similar rural areas with populations below 15,000 or to transition to purchasing properties in larger cities.
Can you clarify when you say performing well? What's the cash flow looking like? How's the equity on the rentals? I say if it's not broken then don't fix it. keep doing what is working for you.
Investor · Shelton, WA · Member since 2017 · 6k+ posts · 6k+ votes
2y
I bought a 12 unit building a few years ago in a town/city of 16,000. It is a better than average property and is netting 70k year and growing. Small city tenants are a breath of fresh air. They are grateful, they accept responsibility and there are far fewer free loaders!
Real Estate Broker · Charlotte, NC · Member since 2016 · 569 posts · 351 votes
2y
Ultimately, the decision should align with your investment goals, risk tolerance, and the amount of time you can dedicate to managing your properties. Diversification can also be a key to a robust investment strategy, so considering a mix of both rural and urban properties could be beneficial. Happy investing!
Hello everyone, Im relatively new to investing. Right now, I own some rentals in a rural area, and they're performing well. I am considering whether to keep investing in similar rural areas with populations below 15,000 or to transition to purchasing properties in larger cities.
Can you clarify when you say performing well? What's the cash flow looking like? How's the equity on the rentals? I say if it's not broken then don't fix it. keep doing what is working for you.
The properties are cash flowing with a low entry cost to purchasing the property. Thats one of the Cons is theres hardly any appreciation growth. One issue i will run into is funding since alot of dscr loans do not fund in rural areas.
I bought a 12 unit building a few years ago in a town/city of 16,000. It is a better than average property and is netting 70k year and growing. Small city tenants are a breath of fresh air. They are grateful, they accept responsibility and there are far fewer free loaders!
Yes, the cashflow is great in these smaller towns, but im looking for long term since lot of these small towns do not grow appreciation like the larger cities.
Ultimately, the decision should align with your investment goals, risk tolerance, and the amount of time you can dedicate to managing your properties. Diversification can also be a key to a robust investment strategy, so considering a mix of both rural and urban properties could be beneficial. Happy investing!
I do believe it would be best to invest in both the urban properties for long term since the properties will appreciate over time then the ones in the rural as they are just cash cows.
Hello everyone, Im relatively new to investing. Right now, I own some rentals in a rural area, and they're performing well. I am considering whether to keep investing in similar rural areas with populations below 15,000 or to transition to purchasing properties in larger cities.
Can you clarify when you say performing well? What's the cash flow looking like? How's the equity on the rentals? I say if it's not broken then don't fix it. keep doing what is working for you.
The properties are cash flowing with a low entry cost to purchasing the property. Thats one of the Cons is theres hardly any appreciation growth. One issue i will run into is funding since alot of dscr loans do not fund in rural areas.
Generally the biggest con or concern on rural (from dscr lender perspective) is the availability of the land to build competitive supply cheaply that can challenge the value of the subject property. One of the benefits of larger markets is that there is less raw land available in cities to add supply and pressure values
Ultimately, the decision should align with your investment goals, risk tolerance, and the amount of time you can dedicate to managing your properties. Diversification can also be a key to a robust investment strategy, so considering a mix of both rural and urban properties could be beneficial. Happy investing!
I agree with Kai. Also, take into account that lenders will typically lower the LTV in rural areas.