Investor · Santa Rosa Beach, FL · Member since 2013 · 50 posts · 7 votes
Hey all
I just got off a call with a mortgage Broker. They told me it is pretty common practice to purchase a house as your primary residence with 3% or 5% down, wait the required year (I guess specifically for FHA, USDA) then move out and get renters in. No permission from the lender needed, no punitive interest rate hike, just a change in insurance policy and lost homestead. It also means avoiding a huge 20%-down investment loan up front, higher interest rate, inflated insurance and huge difficulty refinancing to get cash out at 70% LTV down the line.
I know it is a slow way to build a portfolio but is this correct?
The reason I asked is because I went the investment route (to take advantage of the increased income/buying power I would get from the cash flow generated for the next loan) and while I have better income, I now have a lot of capital tied up I can't release easily or cheaply. Nor can I sell without incurring capital gains tax or qualify for an equity line of credit as I don't live there. I suspect I may have taken the wrong route...
Rental Property Investor · Austin, TX · Member since 2016 · 1k+ posts · 1k+ votes
9y
Many of us started just this way - converting our primary residence to a rental property. As long as you have owner-occupied for the required initial period (typically 1 year as you mentioned) you are good to go.
And don't rule out being able to pull a LOC from it. You may be facing a more conservative LTV in what you can take but that aside you should be able to draw on any surplus equity.
Investor · Santa Rosa Beach, FL · Member since 2013 · 50 posts · 7 votes
9y
thanks Ryan. I don't know how I missed this. I think I was focused too much on building an investment portfolio and misunderstood the 85% refinance option to include investment property too. Learning curve.