The Short- Term Rental Loophole Explained

The Short- Term Rental Loophole Explained

Julio GonzalezPro Member
Specialist · West Palm Beach, FL · Member since 2008 · 4k+ posts · 1k+ votes

Short-term rentals have become an increasingly popular investment strategy for real estate investors to increase wealth and passive income. STRs have very substantial tax advantages compared to other strategies as long as proper tax planning is done.

Let’s start by getting an understanding of how rental property loss recognition has evolved over time. Prior to the 1986 Act, real estate investors were able to offset their rental property losses against their active income including w-2 earnings and profits from businesses. Rentals were a very attractive tax shelter. Under the 1986 Act, the Passive Activity Loss Rules were introduced. This defined rental income as passive income and no longer allowed rental property losses to offset active income. Instead, they could offset passive income or be carried forward. Eventually, lawmakers realized the negative impact this was having on the real estate sector and created what is known as Real Estate Professional Status (REPS). For individuals that qualify for this, they can use their rental property losses to offset their active income. However, this is a difficult qualification to meet, especially if you have a full-time job outside of real estate.

Don't worry if you aren't able to qualify for REPS status, because there is another strategy that is referred to as a "loophole", which is the STR strategy.

Per Section 1.469-1T(e)(3)(ii)(A): there are six exceptions where your rental property income is not automatically considered to be “rental activity” and thus may unlock the door for being able to offset these losses against your active income.

  1. The average customer use is seven days or less.
  2. The average customer use is 30 days or less and significant personal services were provided (for example, daily housekeeping).
  3. Extraordinary personal services are provided, regardless of the duration of customer use.
  4. The rental is incidental to a non-rental activity.
  5. The property is available during defined business hours for non-exclusive use by various customers.
  6. The property is used in an activity conducted by an S Corporation, partnership or joint venture in which the taxpayer holds an interest.

If your property qualifies by meeting one of the exceptions above, the next step is to demonstrate material participation in the rental activity. There are seven tests, however the most relevant tests for STR investors include:

  • Perform substantially all the work related to the activity.
  • Participate over 500 hours during the tax year.
  • Participate over 100 hours during the tax year and no one else participated more.

If your property meets one of the exceptions above AND you meet one of the above tests, you can qualify to treat your rental activity as non-passive. By doing so, this unlocks the door for having a cost segregation study performed on your property. A cost segregation study is a strategic tax planning tool that separates the assets that have a shorter useful life and can be depreciated over 5, 7 and 15 years from the residential rental property or nonresidential real property that are depreciated over 27.5 and 39 years, respectively. By accelerating your depreciation schedules, you reduce your taxable income which in turn increases your operating cash flow.

So why is this called a “loophole”?

When lawmakers wrote these provisions, they were originally intended to be used by hotels and motels rather than VRBO and AirBnB hosts. They did not anticipate these being able to be utilized for STR owners.

Have you utilized this strategy as an STR investor?

6Reply
56 views

Most Popular Reply

Michael BaumPro Member
Olympia, WA · Member since 2016 · 8k+ posts · 7k+ votes
1y

TLDR: @Julio Gonzalez. I tuned out when you said loophole. It isn't a loophole. It is just the tax law. It is working as intended and is not a way around things.

Loophole-
A way of avoiding or escaping a cost or legal burden that would otherwise apply by means of an omission or ambiguity in the wording of acontract or law.

I understand calling it a loophole as it is a simple thing to say. Seeing as STRs started long before VRBO (1995) and AirBNB (2008) or HomeAway (2004, now part of VRBO) this was considered when it was created.

The "Augusta Rule" was a driving force. This refers to IRS Code Section 280A which allows up to 14 days of rental income without paying at taxes. This was written into law in 1976. Augusta, GA is the home of the Masters and a lot of folk vacate their residences in order to make some cashola.

I don't mean to bust your chops on this as the info was great, but it isn't a loophole and the IRS doesn't consider it a loophole. If it did, you can bet they would have closed it after VRBO started.

See this reply in the discussion

11 Replies

Jump to latestLatest
  • Member since 2024 · 1k+ posts · 351 votes
    1y

    Julio Awesome information.. some of the points were not known to me. Thanks so much for posting it

  • Michael BaumPro Member
    Olympia, WA · Member since 2016 · 8k+ posts · 7k+ votes
    1y

    TLDR: @Julio Gonzalez. I tuned out when you said loophole. It isn't a loophole. It is just the tax law. It is working as intended and is not a way around things.

    Loophole-
    A way of avoiding or escaping a cost or legal burden that would otherwise apply by means of an omission or ambiguity in the wording of acontract or law.

    I understand calling it a loophole as it is a simple thing to say. Seeing as STRs started long before VRBO (1995) and AirBNB (2008) or HomeAway (2004, now part of VRBO) this was considered when it was created.

    The "Augusta Rule" was a driving force. This refers to IRS Code Section 280A which allows up to 14 days of rental income without paying at taxes. This was written into law in 1976. Augusta, GA is the home of the Masters and a lot of folk vacate their residences in order to make some cashola.

    I don't mean to bust your chops on this as the info was great, but it isn't a loophole and the IRS doesn't consider it a loophole. If it did, you can bet they would have closed it after VRBO started.

  • Real Estate Consultant · Ann Arbor, MI · Member since 2022 · 461 posts · 250 votes
    1y

    Thank you Julio. 

    This is great information on how to use short-term rentals to offset active income like W-2 and business income at tax time and how you qualify for doing that by documenting your material participation in managing and setting up the property. Being able to use the depreciation or accelerating the depreciation as much as possible also helps especially before the end of this tax year.

    Thank you for this detailed description of how to qualify and I have helped investors use this strategy in Michigan in college towns and along the coasts so I know there is interest.

    To your success!

  • Julio GonzalezPro Member
    OP
    Specialist · West Palm Beach, FL · Member since 2008 · 4k+ posts · 1k+ votes
    1y
    Quote from @John Mason:

    Julio Awesome information.. some of the points were not known to me. Thanks so much for posting it


     Thanks John! I'm glad you found this useful.

  • Julio GonzalezPro Member
    OP
    Specialist · West Palm Beach, FL · Member since 2008 · 4k+ posts · 1k+ votes
    1y
    Quote from @Jeff Roth:

    Thank you Julio. 

    This is great information on how to use short-term rentals to offset active income like W-2 and business income at tax time and how you qualify for doing that by documenting your material participation in managing and setting up the property. Being able to use the depreciation or accelerating the depreciation as much as possible also helps especially before the end of this tax year.

    Thank you for this detailed description of how to qualify and I have helped investors use this strategy in Michigan in college towns and along the coasts so I know there is interest.

    To your success!


     Thanks Jeff. Love that you are helping investors utilize this strategy. There can be some great tax benefits with this strategy.

  • Sean GrahamBusiness Member
    Investor , CPA · Detroit, MI · Member since 2016 · 582 posts · 248 votes
    1y
    Quote from @Jeff Roth:

    Thank you Julio. 

    This is great information on how to use short-term rentals to offset active income like W-2 and business income at tax time and how you qualify for doing that by documenting your material participation in managing and setting up the property. Being able to use the depreciation or accelerating the depreciation as much as possible also helps especially before the end of this tax year.

    Thank you for this detailed description of how to qualify and I have helped investors use this strategy in Michigan in college towns and along the coasts so I know there is interest.

    To your success!

    Great to see a fellow Michigander who gets it! 
    Maven Cost Segregation Tax Advisors555 Reviews
  • Sarah KensingerPro Member
    Real Estate Consultant · OH · Member since 2023 · 2k+ posts · 1k+ votes
    1y

    We have many STR owners come on here asking questions about the tax loophole and how to utilize it. Thanks for taking the time to share, I'm sure others will find it very helpful!

  • Julio GonzalezPro Member
    OP
    Specialist · West Palm Beach, FL · Member since 2008 · 4k+ posts · 1k+ votes
    1y

    @Sarah Kensinger So glad you found it helpful!

  • Rental Property Investor · south carolina and michigan · Member since 2023 · 348 posts · 226 votes
    1y
    Quote from @Michael Baum:

    TLDR: @Julio Gonzalez. I tuned out when you said loophole. It isn't a loophole. It is just the tax law. It is working as intended and is not a way around things.

    Loophole-
    A way of avoiding or escaping a cost or legal burden that would otherwise apply by means of an omission or ambiguity in the wording of acontract or law.

    I understand calling it a loophole as it is a simple thing to say. Seeing as STRs started long before VRBO (1995) and AirBNB (2008) or HomeAway (2004, now part of VRBO) this was considered when it was created.

    The "Augusta Rule" was a driving force. This refers to IRS Code Section 280A which allows up to 14 days of rental income without paying at taxes. This was written into law in 1976. Augusta, GA is the home of the Masters and a lot of folk vacate their residences in order to make some cashola.

    I don't mean to bust your chops on this as the info was great, but it isn't a loophole and the IRS doesn't consider it a loophole. If it did, you can bet they would have closed it after VRBO started.


     The irony is the whole tax system is a loophole, don't know why its so triggering? If you file your taxes and you have 5 kids and you don't take that deduction, you missed out on the loophole- the IRS designed it this way- the ENTIRE system is a loophole and those that know how to navigate it reap its benefits and of course some of us miss them and find them later. Tax loopholes are provisions in the tax code that allow taxpayers to lower their tax liability. The IRS designed it this way so that the "average joe" misses out on deductions. Its all how you look at it. As with everything "always and never" is proven wrong because there is someone out there right now making sure of it. 

  • Michael BaumPro Member
    Olympia, WA · Member since 2016 · 8k+ posts · 7k+ votes
    1y

    Sorry @Nathan M kiefer, tax laws aren't loopholes. There are loopholes in tax laws but the entire system isn't a loophole.

    Again, here is the definition -
    Loophole- A way of avoiding or escaping a cost or legal burden that would otherwise apply by means of an omission or ambiguity in the wording of a contract or law.

    Child deductions aren't a loophole. They are part of the law. Now if it didn't say the age of the child and you were deducting when they are 29 years old, that would be a loophole in the law. The law itself isn't a loophole.

    Everything is spelled out but it is a slog to work through all the info. Anyone can read up and there are tons of resources to help with tax law.

    I am a big advocate of getting a good CPA. They are well worth the cost in the long run.

    I wouldn't say that I am triggered by the loophole statement. I am just out to keep people from thinking that they are sneaking around a tax provision when it is perfectly legal and working as designed.

    Plus none of us want this part of the tax law eliminated because some eager beaver IRS person keeps hearing of this "STR loophole" and decides to take steps to either change or get rid of it.

  • Rental Property Investor · south carolina and michigan · Member since 2023 · 348 posts · 226 votes
    1y
    Quote from @Michael Baum:

    Sorry @Nathan M kiefer, tax laws aren't loopholes. There are loopholes in tax laws but the entire system isn't a loophole.

    Again, here is the definition -
    Loophole- A way of avoiding or escaping a cost or legal burden that would otherwise apply by means of an omission or ambiguity in the wording of a contract or law.

    Child deductions aren't a loophole. They are part of the law. Now if it didn't say the age of the child and you were deducting when they are 29 years old, that would be a loophole in the law. The law itself isn't a loophole.

    Everything is spelled out but it is a slog to work through all the info. Anyone can read up and there are tons of resources to help with tax law.

    I am a big advocate of getting a good CPA. They are well worth the cost in the long run.

    I wouldn't say that I am triggered by the loophole statement. I am just out to keep people from thinking that they are sneaking around a tax provision when it is perfectly legal and working as designed.

    Plus none of us want this part of the tax law eliminated because some eager beaver IRS person keeps hearing of this "STR loophole" and decides to take steps to either change or get rid of it.


     agree to disagree-a loophole in tax is both, its not just a gap in the law.

    A tax loophole is a tax law provision or a shortcoming of legislation that allows individuals and companies to lower tax liability. Loopholes are legal and allow income or assets to be moved with the purpose of avoiding taxes.

    I just want to make sure that people don't get the connotation that using a loophole is illegal, it is not. 

Join the conversationCreate a free account to reply, vote on answers and follow this thread.