Lender · USA · Member since 2022 · 1k+ posts · 1k+ votes
2y
Hi Carlos -
With a HELOC you'll have lower closing costs being a plus in addition to flexibility as you can draw funds as needed and only pay interest on what you use. Though, keep in mind that HELOC rates can fluctuate with the market, potentially exposing you to higher interest rates down the line.
With a cash-out refinance, you'll typically have a fixed rate, providing stability/predictability in your monthly payments. While the closing costs may be higher than a HELOC, the long-term interest savings might outweigh this initial expense depedning on the property value, LTV, credit, etc.
Really depends on your strategy/perspective (short/long-term play, where rates are going, current fianncial position, etc).
Cincinnati, OH · Member since 2020 · 4k+ posts · 3k+ votes
2y
@Carlos Oliva, I am not sure I am tracking your comment. Are you saying, you acquired the property in cash and funded the rehab with cash? So now you have a renovated property and are wondering if you should refi or take out HELOC?
My personal opinion is: once the renovation is done, property is rented and generally stabilized, I take out a fixed rate mortgage. This locks in your monthly expenses, versus HELOC that is variable, and matches well to the long term hold of the rental.
I use HELOCs for shorter term capital needs, i.e. flips, or even possibly the acquisition and renovation of a rental, but always with the belief that I will have it paid off in under a year, typically 6 months.
Rental Property Investor · Philadelphia, PA · Member since 2021 · 774 posts · 501 votes
2y
Carlos - I think this depends on your perspective of where rates are going to go. If you think rates will be consistent for the next couple of years and you'll have consistent deal flow to use the funds I would tend towards doing a cash-out refi on the existing property that you own free and clear. However, if you think rates will decline in the next 2-3 years and you're deal flow will be intermittent (i.e. 1-2 deals a year with some months without activity) I would lean more towards the HELOC as you only pay interest on the amount you access/withdraw. In either scenario you want to make sure you account for the "cost" of the money in your deal analysis so you account for your HELOC or mortgage payments.
Pros: Fixed interest rate - providing stability in your payments Lump sum payout - one-time lump sum, which can be beneficial if you have a specific investment or expense in mind. Lower interest rates - compared to HELOCs because they're first mortgages
Cons: Closing costs - higher which can eat into your equity Resets mortgage term - If you've already paid down a significant portion of principal. Amortization starts over.
HELOC:
Pros: Flexible borrowing - borrow as needed giving you flexibility Lower initial costs Variable interest rates - can be a con if rates rise, it can also be beneficial if rates decrease
Cons: Variable interest rates - rate can fluctuate More risk of foreclosure - you're adding a second loan
Lender · USA · Member since 2022 · 1k+ posts · 1k+ votes
2y
Hi Carlos -
With a HELOC you'll have lower closing costs being a plus in addition to flexibility as you can draw funds as needed and only pay interest on what you use. Though, keep in mind that HELOC rates can fluctuate with the market, potentially exposing you to higher interest rates down the line.
With a cash-out refinance, you'll typically have a fixed rate, providing stability/predictability in your monthly payments. While the closing costs may be higher than a HELOC, the long-term interest savings might outweigh this initial expense depedning on the property value, LTV, credit, etc.
Really depends on your strategy/perspective (short/long-term play, where rates are going, current fianncial position, etc).