Court throws out pocket listing lawsuit against NAR and MLS

Most Popular Reply

Russell BrazilBusiness Member
Moderator
Real Estate Agent · Washington, D.C. · Member since 2012 · 17k+ posts · 30k+ votes
5y

Its hard to tell how serious I should take this article when it is referring to what I think is supposed to be "lawsuit" as "swimsuit."

See this reply in the discussion

6 Replies

Jump to latestLatest
  • Russell BrazilBusiness Member
    Moderator
    Real Estate Agent · Washington, D.C. · Member since 2012 · 17k+ posts · 30k+ votes
    5y

    Its hard to tell how serious I should take this article when it is referring to what I think is supposed to be "lawsuit" as "swimsuit."

  • Real Estate Agent · San Francisco · Member since 2020 · 5 posts · 0 votes
    5y

    @Russell Brazil I'd post the Inman link but most people don't have access. Here is the original source: https://www.inman.com/2021/02/...

  • Rental Property Investor · East Wenatchee, WA · Member since 2014 · 10k+ posts · 16k+ votes
    5y
    Originally posted by @Michael C Williams:

    Big development in the fight against the "cartel". Would love to hear everyone's opinion on this ruling.


    http://builditconcrete.com/cou...

    I thought this was the swimsuit against basically forcing the sellers that list (supposedly negotiable) to compensate any 'cooperating' buyers' representation/agent/brokerage. 

    Cooperating LOL   Yeah, cooperating against you as the seller. 

    We all love paying for the privilege of having someone negotiate against us, but I don't think this swimsuit holds water😎

  • Austin, TX · Member since 2019 · 5k+ posts · 5k+ votes
    5y

    [from media article] "... discovering that the plaintiff’s arguments are so flawed that the case can’t be saved. ..."

    Law firm spinning it's wheels in the mud for fees maybe? (Lawyer needs a new Mercedes and business was slow maybe?)

    Lawyer incompetence maybe?

    No real grounds for case maybe?

    Who knows???

    From that media statement (if it's even true) , maybe another law firm should take a look at it.....

    Just my 2 cents.

  • Real Estate Agent · San Francisco · Member since 2018 · 42 posts · 13 votes
    5y

    @Steve Vaughan There are a few lawsuits filed right now against NAR and various MLS's around the country. The one you may be thinking of is the Chicago DoJ vs NAR one that was settled. But it won't be the last I'm sure.

     https://chicagoagentmagazine.c...

    @Steve Vaughan

  • Real Estate Consultant · Greenville, SC · Member since 2015 · 45 posts · 35 votes
    2y

    This case has been reopened.

    Clear Cooperation policy — which had been dismissed in 2021 — will be able to proceed.

    December 21, 2023
    Robert Davis 
    Real Estate News

    California District Judge Vince Chhabria agreed to reopen a lawsuit against the National Association of Realtors that seeks to prohibit agents from selling so-called "pocket listings," or properties that are not listed for sale on the MLS.

    Background: Private listing service Top Agent Network sued NAR in May 2020, challenging the organization's Clear Cooperation policy, which states that an agent or broker must submit their listing to the MLS within one day of marketing the property to the public. The lawsuit alleges that NAR conspired with the San Francisco Association of Realtors to force agents to list their properties on the MLS, thereby increasing the dues and membership fees that NAR collects. It was filed in the Northern District of California.

    The suit was initially dismissed in 2021, but the case was sent to a lower court for review in August 2023 after TAN's lawyers argued that the plaintiff's claims were strikingly similar to those in a case filed by another private listing company, ThePLS.com.

    New developments: The lower court review has now concluded. On Dec. 18, the district judge filed an order to reopen the case, vacating the previous order granting a motion to dismiss.

    What's at stake: TAN CEO David Faudman has previously argued that NAR's Clear Cooperation policy effectively prevents private listing services like his from gaining a foothold in local markets. In August 2021, he described the policy to Reuters as "just another anticompetitive attempt by the NAR to use its monopoly power to crush market alternatives."

    A spokesperson for NAR told Real Estate News in September that the Clear Cooperation policy "ensures brokers and agents serve the best interest of their consumers and promote equal opportunity for all."

    Some MLSs, including REcolorado, have also defended NAR's Clear Cooperation policy. REColorado described it on their website as "pro-competitive" and "pro-consumer."

    The reopened lawsuit is the latest legal arrow aimed at one of NAR's policies. NAR is also fighting multiple lawsuits over commission practices and policies.

    Real Estate News has reached out to NAR for comment about the lawsuit being reopened but did not immediately receive a reply.

Join the conversationCreate a free account to reply, vote on answers and follow this thread.