the trend that company move to Texas

the trend that company move to Texas

Member since 2019 · 7k+ posts · 4k+ votes

so based on these recent huge tech layoffs in CA, there's structural job changes that due to Fed Interest Rate, tech company can not longer operating in sustainable fashion in CA, so they have to move operation. Either to Texas, to India to Arizona or to Florida. So even company is moving out. This would obviously trigger more out-migration. One biggest S&P company is saying to their employee, either you move to Texas or we give you severance package !

I think the trend is pretty clear for next decade. There is more growth in TX,AZ,OH,WI,FL/India most likely. This is the trend that's very apparent. Texas is good in particular because cost of doing business is "moderate" with ample size of headcount available in the market and practically has no housing issue. What do you see in Texas ?

6Reply
425 views

Most Popular Reply

Alecia LovelessPro Member
Member since 2019 · 3k+ posts · 2k+ votes
2y

@Carlos Ptriawan Many areas in Texas have seen unreasonable property tax increases over the past few years. My sister owns 17 SFH that she bought in Denton TX more than a decade ago and refinanced to low interest rates during the pandemic. Most of them have less than $130,000 left on their mortgage but have appreciated to around $350,000. Their property taxes have gone up by approximately 60% each year for the past 3 years and 40% for several years before that. She barely breaks even now on these properties that were once her retirement plan and if she has any unexpected expenses forget it, those all come out of her pocket.

All of the tax dollars are going to widen roads to support more people moving to the area and to build more schools to accommodate the influx of kids. There are no benefits to the property owners that aren’t using these things.

She wanted a new investment in Texas and showed me a 6 unit apartment building that was $1.4M and after expenses LOST $3875/month. I told her to forget ever buying a property that lost money unless maybe it was waterfront and to let me find something. We bought a 5 unit property for $340K that cash flows$2000/month. What a difference!

See this reply in the discussion

117 Replies

Jump to latestLatest
  • Member since 2019 · 7k+ posts · 4k+ votes
    2y
    Quote from @Carlos Ptriawan:
    Quote from @Bruce Lynn:
    Quote from @V.G Jason:

    Texas is taking the lion share of tech, Florida took the lion share of financials.

    Amazon currently has about 95,000 staff in Texas.  Not sure how that is distributed.  Florida about 59,000, so there is some catching up to do.  Of course you could have all the $120,000/year coders while we have the $20,000/year warehouse workers.  While Bezos parks the yacht in South Florida I imagine, he also has a huge ranch in Texas where he is from and parks the rockets there.

    Everyone a few years ago was excited about HDQ2, but I guess they thought Brooklyn was hipper because everyone talks faster and no one shows up in boots and Stetsons.  Not sure where those 25,000 jobs went?   Maybe distributed around to various offices already in place.

    We've seen massive move in GS, Schwab, Fidelity, TD Ameritrade, Liberty Mutual, State Farm, WF, and BoA, also Fisher Investments looks like they're moving here.  Lots of PE and family offices, but no idea how that compares to South Florida.  We probably got all the call takers and tellers, you probably got all the analysts.


     This is solid research and convincing !!


     What really happened is TX becoming new center attracting mid level employee for service industry , it is kinda choice of in-shore choice where company needs to expand with budget in mind. They can’t keep continue off shoring the job to other country …. Seems only TX and FL is ready to reap the benefit.

  • Member since 2019 · 7k+ posts · 4k+ votes
    2y

    best market for middle level company/business service expansion: Texas
    best market for high growth tech/research company: California
    best market for financial sector: New York/Florida/Chicago-land.
    best market for appreciation for investor  : California/Hawaii/Colorado/Florida
    best market for real estate cash flow/mild appreciation for investor : Wisconsin/Ohio/Indiana/Iowa/Alabama/Midwest 
    best job growth for owner occupant: Texas/Florida
    best weather: Hawaii/Mexico LOL :)

  • Broker / Investor · Tewksbury, MA · Member since 2008 · 1k+ posts · 351 votes
    2y

    California unsustainable for business. Go figure with their current political leadership.

  • Member since 2020 · 351 posts · 329 votes
    2y

    I think the demand for software engineers is pretty much infinite. The demand at Bay Area prices is not. We’ll probably see some of those 300k/yr engineers move to 150k/yr jobs but they will be fine. I would have done software going back. They are the highest margin business out there which is what supports wages which are out of this world compared to other Stem types.

  • Member since 2019 · 7k+ posts · 4k+ votes
    2y
    Quote from @Peter W.:

    I think the demand for software engineers is pretty much infinite. The demand at Bay Area prices is not. We’ll probably see some of those 300k/yr engineers move to 150k/yr jobs but they will be fine. I would have done software going back. They are the highest margin business out there which is what supports wages which are out of this world compared to other Stem types.


     Correct , it is going to commoditize in near future due to wage pressure and AI.


    hence Texas 

  • Member since 2019 · 7k+ posts · 4k+ votes
    2y
    Quote from @Rich Hupper:

    California unsustainable for business. Go figure with their current political leadership.


     That’s exactly what happen here

  • Investor · El Dorado Hills, CA · Member since 2012 · 1k+ posts · 1k+ votes
    2y
    Quote from @Peter W.:

    I think the demand for software engineers is pretty much infinite. The demand at Bay Area prices is not. We’ll probably see some of those 300k/yr engineers move to 150k/yr jobs but they will be fine. I would have done software going back. They are the highest margin business out there which is what supports wages which are out of this world compared to other Stem types.


     That is much of what you are seeing according to my tech friends.. Either old technology getting gutted and replaced (Amazon Alexa just adopting Chatgpt4) or companies laying off and rehiring at a lower rate.  People making $210k seeing their job reposted at $140k with no shortage of applicants.


    Those that did relocate to Austin have been deeply disappointed by the tech talent and high prices.  They paid cash for a $1M house and are still paying nearly $3k a month in property tax and insurance.  Several have returned.  

  • Member since 2019 · 7k+ posts · 4k+ votes
    2y
    Quote from @Joe Bertolino:
    Quote from @Peter W.:

    I think the demand for software engineers is pretty much infinite. The demand at Bay Area prices is not. We’ll probably see some of those 300k/yr engineers move to 150k/yr jobs but they will be fine. I would have done software going back. They are the highest margin business out there which is what supports wages which are out of this world compared to other Stem types.


     That is much of what you are seeing according to my tech friends.. Either old technology getting gutted and replaced (Amazon Alexa just adopting Chatgpt4) or companies laying off and rehiring at a lower rate.  People making $210k seeing their job reposted at $140k with no shortage of applicants.


    HAHA so true, in short the commoditizing of software and tech has started, means our buying power would be reduced by 25%, inflation rise with decline salary LOL.

    AI already change the landscape of tech engineering and tech engineering + Fed Inflation made TX the new CA. The process happened just so fast.
  • Member since 2024 · 12 posts · 7 votes
    2y

    @Carlos Ptriawan Thanks for sharing and if I might address this then, Just so you’d know companies people and small businesses tends to follow trends and that’s significantly how they keep up with demands…. Firsthand Texas has emerge as a prime destination over the years for companies looking to relocate, thanks to its attractive tax police’s, affordable living and working costs, also we should not forget the growing tech pool. So it’s safe to say there’s a cow and now everyone else wants to milk it. The idea of turning Texas to CA or NJ and NY I don’t see that happening because Texas on its own has every bit of those in it waiting to be tapped into. The state’s diverse economy, driven by diverse, high-end paying industries is gaining ground, and also it offers a fertile ground for businesses, communities, individuals and companies to thrive and grow.

  • Real Estate Broker · Austin, TX · Member since 2012 · 1k+ posts · 1k+ votes
    2y
    Quote from @Robert Walter:

    @Carlos Ptriawan Thanks for sharing and if I might address this then, Just so you’d know companies people and small businesses tends to follow trends and that’s significantly how they keep up with demands…. Firsthand Texas has emerge as a prime destination over the years for companies looking to relocate, thanks to its attractive tax police’s, affordable living and working costs, also we should not forget the growing tech pool. So it’s safe to say there’s a cow and now everyone else wants to milk it. The idea of turning Texas to CA or NJ and NY I don’t see that happening because Texas on its own has every bit of those in it waiting to be tapped into. The state’s diverse economy, driven by diverse, high-end paying industries is gaining ground, and also it offers a fertile ground for businesses, communities, individuals and companies to thrive and grow.


     Texas economy is super diverse and its very welcoming for businesses with many tax benefits and ease of doing business. There are multiple industries that drive the state's economy such as Tech, Oil and Gas, Aerospace, Medical and Biomedical, Agriculture, Military, Manufacturing, etc. The days of labeling Texas as a one industry economy went out during the 1970-1980's painful economic oil industry collapse. The diversification has allowed Texans to not only survive but thrive. We need folks to come here to fill the jobs from this economic job creating juggernaut. But to be very real, we are a victim of our own success and the immigrant crisis on the southern border is an example. 


  • Real Estate Broker · Minneapolis, MN · Member since 2011 · 5k+ posts · 6k+ votes
    2y
    Quote from @Robert Walter:

    ....The idea of turning Texas to CA or NJ and NY I don’t see that happening.......

    Let me add a counter-point to ponder. 
    AND, please all know I PREFACE this with: I LOVE TX, the ethos's of TX, so much of TX INCLUDING the people of TX I have ran into there and the culture, really REALLY like/love so much about TX. 

    Texas and Texan's have a CA/NJ/NY SERIOUS issue at hand, and coming to bear, that it's a bit of a wild-card as to how it will go. And with that TX "could" become a whole lot more CA/NJ/NY. 
    In a word: POPULATION. 

    TX has grown at a rate COMPLETELY off the chart's. 
    That kind of growth brings serious issues with it. CA/NY issues. The infrastructure to support such massive populations AND such massive populations density, is no minor nor easy chore. 

    How does a land, founded on individuality, act in a collective? Because fact is, that kind of MASSIVE population and population density, that's what made CA/NY the way they are today. 

    How TX consolidates this growth, how TX stabilizes, IF it stabilizes this new population basis, is the big question. CA went through this, and became "CA". NY/NJ, well that's what made it what it is today.     

    Even FL which so many are holding as a "Gold-Star" example of conservative large populous region, is far FAR more "socialist" in it's operations than a TN, and fact is it HAS TO be because, population and population density. 

    Roads cost $, waste water treatment cost's $, drinking water, parks, sidewalks, street lights/signs, on and on the list is VERY long of the services NEEDED to support population and, at BIG population, those expenses get BIG. 

    People ran to TX from an impression of what it was. What Tx WILL-BE, we will have to see how it tackles these issues going forward. Does it become more CA/NY which is SUPER easy to do because it has so much more CA/NY influence/voices in it now who, when asked how to deal with these issues, will regurgitate what they know, CA/NY "solutions". 

    Will TX stay TX, demand CA/NY thought's die at the state line and forge a NEW solution path forward? A TX path forward?  IDk....... 
  • Member since 2020 · 351 posts · 329 votes
    2y
    Quote from @James Hamling:
    Quote from @Robert Walter:

    ....The idea of turning Texas to CA or NJ and NY I don’t see that happening.......

    Let me add a counter-point to ponder. 
    AND, please all know I PREFACE this with: I LOVE TX, the ethos's of TX, so much of TX INCLUDING the people of TX I have ran into there and the culture, really REALLY like/love so much about TX. 

    Texas and Texan's have a CA/NJ/NY SERIOUS issue at hand, and coming to bear, that it's a bit of a wild-card as to how it will go. And with that TX "could" become a whole lot more CA/NJ/NY. 
    In a word: POPULATION. 

    TX has grown at a rate COMPLETELY off the chart's. 
    That kind of growth brings serious issues with it. CA/NY issues. The infrastructure to support such massive populations AND such massive populations density, is no minor nor easy chore. 

    How does a land, founded on individuality, act in a collective? Because fact is, that kind of MASSIVE population and population density, that's what made CA/NY the way they are today. 

    How TX consolidates this growth, how TX stabilizes, IF it stabilizes this new population basis, is the big question. CA went through this, and became "CA". NY/NJ, well that's what made it what it is today.     

    Even FL which so many are holding as a "Gold-Star" example of conservative large populous region, is far FAR more "socialist" in it's operations than a TN, and fact is it HAS TO be because, population and population density. 

    Roads cost $, waste water treatment cost's $, drinking water, parks, sidewalks, street lights/signs, on and on the list is VERY long of the services NEEDED to support population and, at BIG population, those expenses get BIG. 

    People ran to TX from an impression of what it was. What Tx WILL-BE, we will have to see how it tackles these issues going forward. Does it become more CA/NY which is SUPER easy to do because it has so much more CA/NY influence/voices in it now who, when asked how to deal with these issues, will regurgitate what they know, CA/NY "solutions". 

    Will TX stay TX, demand CA/NY thought's die at the state line and forge a NEW solution path forward? A TX path forward?  IDk....... 
    I’ve heard it said Texas is just California but 20 years behind. They are about to run into the same budget issues as California as their pension system is similarly underfunded.  While they have more space than CA the infrastructure to support the growth probably isnt there. Many of the southern states are severely underfunded compared to their northern cousins because they rely on low interest rates and population growth to pass the bill into the future rather than taxes. In general they tend to not budget cap ex for infrastructure repair or for the natural disasters coming their way. Houston in particular has extreme flood risk. When my wife and I talked about moving there, our friend who did flood modeling for the army corp of enginners strongly suggested not moving there—the flooding from Harvey should not be considered a freak occurrence but rather something that will occur regularly (every 25 years or so).

    I am not making a prediction just some additional food for thought. I don’t have a great system view of any these states, but some niche knowledge (for instance the three pillars of the Florida economy are: agriculture, construction and population growth). And with Florida it’s only by luck that DeSantis won in 2016, that state could have very easily turned blue and become a solidly blue state in the same manner it is red now.
  • Member since 2022 · 75 posts · 73 votes
    2y

    I'd look for untapped markets in Texas that are prime for growth. Amarillo for example? 

  • V.G JasonPro Member
    Investor · Member since 2022 · 3k+ posts · 3k+ votes
    2y
    Quote from @James Hamling:
    Quote from @Robert Walter:

    ....The idea of turning Texas to CA or NJ and NY I don’t see that happening.......

    Let me add a counter-point to ponder. 
    AND, please all know I PREFACE this with: I LOVE TX, the ethos's of TX, so much of TX INCLUDING the people of TX I have ran into there and the culture, really REALLY like/love so much about TX. 

    Texas and Texan's have a CA/NJ/NY SERIOUS issue at hand, and coming to bear, that it's a bit of a wild-card as to how it will go. And with that TX "could" become a whole lot more CA/NJ/NY. 
    In a word: POPULATION. 

    TX has grown at a rate COMPLETELY off the chart's. 
    That kind of growth brings serious issues with it. CA/NY issues. The infrastructure to support such massive populations AND such massive populations density, is no minor nor easy chore. 

    How does a land, founded on individuality, act in a collective? Because fact is, that kind of MASSIVE population and population density, that's what made CA/NY the way they are today. 

    How TX consolidates this growth, how TX stabilizes, IF it stabilizes this new population basis, is the big question. CA went through this, and became "CA". NY/NJ, well that's what made it what it is today.     

    Even FL which so many are holding as a "Gold-Star" example of conservative large populous region, is far FAR more "socialist" in it's operations than a TN, and fact is it HAS TO be because, population and population density. 

    Roads cost $, waste water treatment cost's $, drinking water, parks, sidewalks, street lights/signs, on and on the list is VERY long of the services NEEDED to support population and, at BIG population, those expenses get BIG. 

    People ran to TX from an impression of what it was. What Tx WILL-BE, we will have to see how it tackles these issues going forward. Does it become more CA/NY which is SUPER easy to do because it has so much more CA/NY influence/voices in it now who, when asked how to deal with these issues, will regurgitate what they know, CA/NY "solutions". 

    Will TX stay TX, demand CA/NY thought's die at the state line and forge a NEW solution path forward? A TX path forward?  IDk....... 

     Texas will be the strongest of the strong. Austin, San Antonio, Dallas, Texas, Houston and more!

  • Polo VazquezPro Member
    Real Estate Agent · McAllen, TX · Member since 2017 · 382 posts · 281 votes
    2y
    Quote from @Tracy Ross:

    I'd look for untapped markets in Texas that are prime for growth. Amarillo for example? 


     I agree! all of Texas is growing. Might as well look for cities where major growth hasn't occurred yet.

  • Member since 2024 · 12 posts · 7 votes
    2y
    Quote from @Aaron Gordy:
    Quote from @Robert Walter:

    @Carlos Ptriawan Thanks for sharing and if I might address this then, Just so you’d know companies people and small businesses tends to follow trends and that’s significantly how they keep up with demands…. Firsthand Texas has emerge as a prime destination over the years for companies looking to relocate, thanks to its attractive tax police’s, affordable living and working costs, also we should not forget the growing tech pool. So it’s safe to say there’s a cow and now everyone else wants to milk it. The idea of turning Texas to CA or NJ and NY I don’t see that happening because Texas on its own has every bit of those in it waiting to be tapped into. The state’s diverse economy, driven by diverse, high-end paying industries is gaining ground, and also it offers a fertile ground for businesses, communities, individuals and companies to thrive and grow.


     Texas economy is super diverse and its very welcoming for businesses with many tax benefits and ease of doing business. There are multiple industries that drive the state's economy such as Tech, Oil and Gas, Aerospace, Medical and Biomedical, Agriculture, Military, Manufacturing, etc. The days of labeling Texas as a one industry economy went out during the 1970-1980's painful economic oil industry collapse. The diversification has allowed Texans to not only survive but thrive. We need folks to come here to fill the jobs from this economic job creating juggernaut. But to be very real, we are a victim of our own success and the immigrant crisis on the southern border is an example. 


    I couldn’t agree more, and at the pace things are moving right now there’s a lot coming up from every corner every sectors too….

    Right on point!!!
  • Member since 2024 · 12 posts · 7 votes
    2y
    Quote from @V.G Jason:
    Quote from @James Hamling:
    Quote from @Robert Walter:

    ....The idea of turning Texas to CA or NJ and NY I don’t see that happening.......

    Let me add a counter-point to ponder. 
    AND, please all know I PREFACE this with: I LOVE TX, the ethos's of TX, so much of TX INCLUDING the people of TX I have ran into there and the culture, really REALLY like/love so much about TX. 

    Texas and Texan's have a CA/NJ/NY SERIOUS issue at hand, and coming to bear, that it's a bit of a wild-card as to how it will go. And with that TX "could" become a whole lot more CA/NJ/NY. 
    In a word: POPULATION. 

    TX has grown at a rate COMPLETELY off the chart's. 
    That kind of growth brings serious issues with it. CA/NY issues. The infrastructure to support such massive populations AND such massive populations density, is no minor nor easy chore. 

    How does a land, founded on individuality, act in a collective? Because fact is, that kind of MASSIVE population and population density, that's what made CA/NY the way they are today. 

    How TX consolidates this growth, how TX stabilizes, IF it stabilizes this new population basis, is the big question. CA went through this, and became "CA". NY/NJ, well that's what made it what it is today.     

    Even FL which so many are holding as a "Gold-Star" example of conservative large populous region, is far FAR more "socialist" in it's operations than a TN, and fact is it HAS TO be because, population and population density. 

    Roads cost $, waste water treatment cost's $, drinking water, parks, sidewalks, street lights/signs, on and on the list is VERY long of the services NEEDED to support population and, at BIG population, those expenses get BIG. 

    People ran to TX from an impression of what it was. What Tx WILL-BE, we will have to see how it tackles these issues going forward. Does it become more CA/NY which is SUPER easy to do because it has so much more CA/NY influence/voices in it now who, when asked how to deal with these issues, will regurgitate what they know, CA/NY "solutions". 

    Will TX stay TX, demand CA/NY thought's die at the state line and forge a NEW solution path forward? A TX path forward?  IDk....... 

     Texas will be the strongest of the strong. Austin, San Antonio, Dallas, Texas, Houston and more!


     Word buddy!!!

Join the conversationCreate a free account to reply, vote on answers and follow this thread.