Exit Strategies For Wholesaling. What Is a Double Closing?

Exit Strategies For Wholesaling. What Is a Double Closing?

Goshen, KY · Member since 2009 · 835 posts · 683 votes

What Is A Double Closing?

A double closing or simultaneous closing as it is sometimes called is when you (the buyer) actually take title to the property just before you sell it. This means that your name or the name of your company will go on the chain of title whether you sell the property the same day (which is typical for a double closing) or 30-60 days or more down the road. The main advantage to doing this type of closing is that you do not need to bring any of your own funds to the closing.

How Does A Double Closing Work?

The first part of the transaction which is typically called the A to B transaction is between you and your seller. The second transaction where you sell the property to your end buyer is called the B to C transaction. As a wholesaler, I am almost always funding the A to B transaction (my original purchase) with the funds from the B to C transaction. Simply put, my end buyer is bringing all of the money to the closing for both transactions.

There are two settlement statements created for the closing. One settlement statement or HUD-1 is between you and the seller which reflects the amount that you paid for the property. The second settlement statement is the transaction between you and your end buyer and reflects the amount you sold the property for.

What If I Am Not Working With A Cash Buyer?

Now this whole process probably seems very strange to folks that unfamiliar with double closings. However, I can assure you that they are quite common. This process works because the majority of the time I am selling my properties to other investors that are cash buyers. On the occasions when I am not working with a cash buyer, they will be using some type of financing such as hard money, a private lender or an investor friendly bank. If my buyer happens to be a rehabber, then it is quite common to get a “construction†type of loan from one of the local banks which will cover not only the purchase of the property but some if not all of the repairs. In all of these instances, the lender is familiar with simultaneous closings and you will find that they don’t have a problem with doing them.


How Does This All Work?

The key point to remember is that the certified funds are already in the hands of the attorney at the time of the closing for the B to C transaction, so there is a certainty that the first transaction (the A to B transaction) will close. As soon as the sale to the end buyer is completed, the A to B transaction takes place. The funds that I just “made†on sale of my property are actually used for my original purchase (the A to B transaction). I just love this process!

What Are the Negatives of A Double Closing?

In my part of the country, there just really aren’t any. We use closing attorneys rather than title companies for all of our closings. It only costs me about $300.00 - $350.00 on average for each closing. That comes to about $600.00 - $700.00 for both closings which I think is pretty cheap. Folks in my area are pretty much evenly split on whether or not they buy title insurance on the property. In most cases, I only own the property for about 5 – 10 minutes so I rarely buy title insurance when I am wholesaling properties.

Be sure to familiarize yourself with how things are done in your area. I have heard that some title companies won’t do double closings.

Can You Use A Traditional Lender?

If you are wholesaling a house and your buyer wants to use a traditional bank, you will most likely run into a seasoning issue. Seasoning is a term to describe how long a person has owned the house. The majority of banks will not fund the deal unless the title has been held by one person for at least 90 days. Some banks require you to own the property even longer. These rules were put into effect to protect homeowners from that small percentage of unscrupulous investors who were out to take advantage of folks.

Why Not Just Assign the Contract?

How you close your deals is a personal decision. I personally don’t like doing assignments unless my assignment fee is small. In my opinion the probability of the deal blowing up increases when you assign the contract. Your seller and your buyer see exactly how much you are making just for being a “transaction coordinatorâ€. And in most cases, they are not going to be happy with what they see. The larger your assignment fee, the higher the probability this will happen.

I always tell my seller from the very beginning, that I am not sure what I will be doing with the property. I let them know that at times I pass on properties to other investors, and they are always clear on the fact that my intention is to make money from this transaction. However, knowing this “intellectually†does not really alleviate the problem when they see just how much you made right there on the HUD-1.

So What’s the Answer?

For me, I almost always do double closings. I have only assigned the contract a few times in my real estate career. The advantages of doing simultaneous closings far out weigh the fact that I have to pay a little more in closing costs. Pick what works best for you, and you have made the right decision.

8Reply
328 views

Most Popular Reply

Real Estate Investor · Tampa, FL · Member since 2009 · 64 posts · 62 votes
16y


Yes, Johnny, the process that Sharon is decribing is actually a simultaneous close. Your end buyer's money is used to fund the A-B transaction, so that you don't have to bring any money to the closing table. The one disadvantage to this strategy is that you won't find too many title companies these days that will still do this (as Bill noted). There are a couple where I live that will do them. And Sharon has found a closing attorney in her area that will still do them. But in many other areas, a simo close may not be an option at all. So when working directly with homeowners, you will assign your contract, unless you choose to double close.

With a double closing, you will have to bring money to the closing table to fund the A-B transaction (whether it be transactional funding or your own money). When working with a bank (be it an REO or short sale), unless you can find a title company to do a simo close, you will have to double close, since banks will not allow assignments.





See this reply in the discussion

43 Replies

Jump to latestLatest
  • Goshen, KY · Member since 2009 · 835 posts · 683 votes
    16y

    EJ-

    That's interesting to know since it is the buyer here.

  • Real Estate Investor · Portage, MI · Member since 2010 · 470 posts · 315 votes
    16y
    Originally posted by Sharon Vornholt:
    EJ-

    That's interesting to know since it is the buyer here.

    That explains my earlier confusion!

  • Real Estate Investor · Los Angeles, CA · Member since 2010 · 67 posts · 3 votes
    16y

    Now, if you were to do a back to back close, funded by your own money (or transactional funding), are you taking a risk that the b to c will not close?

  • Goshen, KY · Member since 2009 · 835 posts · 683 votes
    16y

    @Misia-

    No. The B to C paperwork is actually signed just before the A to B. It all happens in just a few minutes.

  • Member since 2009 · 22 posts · 1 vote
    16y

    So if your end-buyer funds both transactions, how does the mechanics of that work? You agree with end buyer on the total price...he brings that money to closing, hands it to you, waits while you go off and do the A-B transaction, then you come back and do the second closing with him? I'm confused as to how the whole thing would work, and how the end-buyer wouldn't find out your assignment fee?

  • Goshen, KY · Member since 2009 · 835 posts · 683 votes
    16y

    Eugene. We use closing attorneys here rather than title companies so there are no problems doing these types of closings.

    I simply go into the conference room (I get there a little early) and wait for the folks for the B ato C closing. They bring certified funds from the bank so you are sure the deal will close. We do that closing. Everyone shakes hands and they leave. I stay behind to discuss another matter with the attorney.

    After they are gone the attorney brings the A to B folks into the conference. Remember that all the title works has been done, so he is sure this part of the transaction will close. We simply sign the documents and they get their money. It is all quite seamless.

    No one except the attorney and me know exactly what the procedure was and what the numbers were. There were two different closings.

    Everyone leaves happy.

  • Real Estate Investor · Los Angeles, CA · Member since 2010 · 67 posts · 3 votes
    16y

    Sorry, a follow up to my question :)

    Sharon, in your case where you are allowed to fund A-B with B-C, the B-C is signed first, but it wouldn't be that way with A-B (transactional funding) then B-C, or would it?

  • Goshen, KY · Member since 2009 · 835 posts · 683 votes
    16y

    That's correct. Anytime you are bringing money to the closing for the A to B closing it closes first.

  • Member since 2010 · 1 post · 0 votes
    16y

    Dear Sharon,

    When funding a double close do you use your personal name on the contract or do you use a company name? Also, if asset protection is a concern is it necessary to use different companies (for each wholesale deal) or use a trust even if you will only take ownership for a less than an hour?

  • Goshen, KY · Member since 2009 · 835 posts · 683 votes
    16y

    I always buy in a land trust with the address as the name of the trust..

    Ex. 1123 Main St. Land Trust.

  • Involved In Real Estate · Portland, OR · Member since 2008 · 117 posts · 44 votes
    16y
    Originally posted by Misia Snyder:
    Sorry, a follow up to my question :)

    Sharon, in your case where you are allowed to fund A-B with B-C, the B-C is signed first, but it wouldn't be that way with A-B (transactional funding) then B-C, or would it?

    Misia, as I understand it (having never done it) if you are using transactional funding, the transactional lender will require the b-c contract before they release funds to do the a-b.

    Someone else should correct me if I am mistaken.

  • Will BarnardPro Member
    Moderator
    Developer · Santa Clarita, CA · Member since 2008 · 15k+ posts · 10k+ votes
    16y

    Correct Jeff, in transactional funding scenarios, where the funder will fund the A-B side, they require the B-C side contarcted and in place, usually with the same escrow company with specific escrow instructions not to release their funds until the B-C is reaady to close.

  • Will BarnardPro Member
    Moderator
    Developer · Santa Clarita, CA · Member since 2008 · 15k+ posts · 10k+ votes
    16y

    This terminology "double close", "simultaneous close", "wet close", "dry close", etc. is hardly cast in concrete. Different people use the terms with different meanings. I don't think there's much of a case one way or another as to which is right or wrong.

    I agree that many people interchange the words/phrases, but the meanings for each do have specific definitions/facts to them and are set in stone.
    A double close is different than a simu close in that the double close has 2 escrows (although often with teh same escrow company and the A-B transaction is funded with buyers funds (B) and not end buyers funds C as in a simu close.
    Wet funds are funds of yoru own or your lenders whereas dry funds are from your end buyer in the simu close scenario. Definately confirm or explain when using these terms to identify exactly what you are referring to as many people mix up these terms often and are usually unaware of teh differences.
  • Real Estate Investor · Pittsburgh, PA · Member since 2011 · 40 posts · 1 vote
    15y

    Just so I'm clear....when I am doing a wholesale double/simultaneous close transaction between a private seller(A) and an all cash end buyer(C)....I can definitly use C's funds to fund A-B's transaction.....It's when doing short sales that is where having my own funds at closing is the issue????

  • Real Estate Investor · Pittsburgh, PA · Member since 2011 · 40 posts · 1 vote
    15y

    Just so I'm clear....when I am doing a wholesale double/simultaneous close transaction between a private seller(A) and an all cash end buyer(C)....I can definitly use C's funds to fund A-B's transaction.....It's when doing short sales that is where having my own funds at closing is the issue????

  • Goshen, KY · Member since 2009 · 835 posts · 683 votes
    15y

    That's correct Michael. However, you should be able to use transactional funding for short sales.

  • Goshen, KY · Member since 2009 · 835 posts · 683 votes
    15y

    That's correct Michael. However, you should be able to use transactional funding for short sales.

  • Goshen, KY · Member since 2009 · 835 posts · 683 votes
    15y

    That's correct Michael. However, you should be able to use transactional funding for short sales.

Join the conversationCreate a free account to reply, vote on answers and follow this thread.