Hello everyone, I’m a beginner investor looking to get started with short-term rentals, but I’ve been following the news and it seems like many cities are tightening regulations, issuing stricter permits, and enforcing occupancy rules. I’m trying to understand whether STRs are still a good strategy in 2026 given these changes. Specifically: • 1. Are you seeing new regulations significantly impact profitability in your markets? • 2. How are experienced STR investors adapting to regulatory changes? • 3. Are there any locations you’d consider safer or more stable for STR investments right now? 1. Are you seeing new regulations significantly impact profitability in your markets? 2. How are experienced STR investors adapting to regulatory changes? 3. Are there any locations you’d consider safer or more stable for STR investments right now? Any insights, personal experiences, or advice would be greatly appreciated. I want to make sure I start on the right foot without running into unexpected legal or financial issues. Thanks in advance!

Just have to look at areas where things are stable. I don't feel that enforcing occupancy rules is a problem. People who own STRs that violate the rules give us all a bad name.

The regulatory question is really a data question — and right now most operators are flying blind on it. We built an open API that pulls official government STR permit records from 30 US jurisdictions (Seattle, Nashville, Austin, Houston, Denver, Chicago, San Diego, Philadelphia, and more) into one normalized schema. Every record carries the permit status, expiration date, coordinates, and a link back to the government source. The data refreshes daily. What it shows you: permit density by neighborhood (tells you where STRs are already operating legally), status distribution (how many active vs expired vs revoked — a high revocation rate is a red flag for enforcement), and which cities actually publish their registry versus which ones you're guessing about. The cities that are "safer" for STR investment tend to be the ones that publish clean, machine-readable permit data — it means they've built a system, not just passed a rule. Nashville, Denver, Sacramento, Scottsdale, and Austin all publish daily-updated registries. Cities with no public registry are the ones where you're most likely to get surprised. Free API: civicdataforge.pages.dev/data/str-permit-data

Yes, in fact, I like regulations. Two of my properties in the county have extreme STR regulations, but because of it, it keeps supply lower than demand, so we constantly get booked. Don't be discouraged. There are so many markets that still have no regulations and still rent very well, especially the suburbs of big cities.

Honestly I'd flip the way you're looking at this. "Is it worth it with all the regulation" treats regulation like it's only a cost....but in many markets it's actually working in your favor more than against you. So for example....every time a city tightens permitting or caps the # of licenses they'll hand out to hosts...a bunch of people just bail. The folks who wanted to slap a listing up over a weekend and coast don't want to deal with permit applications, inspections, insurance, tax registration, all of it. So they leave, or they never even start or do it wrong and pay penalities, lose their license to host in their town, etc.. That's less competition for you. And the people who stick around and actually do the paperwork tend to be the same people who do everything else right too. Good photos, fast responses, clean places, screening guests properly. So regulation kind of raises the floor on who's even in the game...which usually means better rates and occupancy for the operators who are still standing. The regulations are in a way protecting you from a flood of new competitors six months from now....so my advice would be to reframe it a bit in your mind and try and look at it as a positive in some regard. Yes it can be a hassle, but it also removes competition.Hope that helps.Mike

Every business has to deal with regulations. As short term rentals morphed into a multi-billion dollar business, it was only a matter of time before regulation caught up. Some of it is very necessary, some of it is a cash grab.

You’ve heard the term location, location, location. When it comes to STR’s you are looking for locations that are embracing them. Regulation is coming down hard on more urban areas, bigger cities. My STR’s are in Beach areas where regulation is more positive. For one of my properties they just started a license program. Had to register and install emergency lighting and additional carbon monoxide detectors. They’re mostly trying to make sure investors are providing enough parking. In this respect, it will weed out the bad operators. Some things good come with regulation it’s not always bad. Again let’s look for areas that are embracing it whereas the economy flourishes with these types of properties.

One good thing about FL is the state took away the local municipalities ability to enforce new (prior to 2011) laws on lease duration. For example Clearwater Beach is largely 30 night minimum and has been since the 80's, so it continued to be so. Largo right down the road had no pre 2011 law so it cannot make one now. This helps keep you from being a city council meeting away from being out of business.

I agree with Brian. There are good areas and there are areas with uncertainty. Stick with areas where STRs have been embraced or areas where it is unlikely to have unfavorable regulations crop up.

I'm an operator in Coachella CA and Madera CA. Both areas have surrounding counties with increasingly growing restrictions - but I find this to be a blessing rather than a curse. I believe other PMs have said this before but entering sooner rather than later is important - because it's true that STRs are getting increasingly regulated. But all that hurts is the ability to enter - NOT the ability to perform (depending on the type of regulation). Performance (again as other people have stated) will improve as demand will always increase and supply will begin to plateau with regulation. TLDR; Regulation is your friend if you're able to enter. Regulation simply hurts your ability to enter in the first place. If you'd like to chat more and share notes feel free to shoot a DM and we can set something up as fellow investors! Also if you were interested in those two markets - I've been eyeing some properties that might be interesting if you have the capital to improve.

Are Short-Term Rentals Still Worth It in 2026 with All the New Regulations?

Short-Term & Vacation Rental Discussions

9moFollow

Are Short-Term Rentals Still Worth It in 2026 with All the New Regulations?

Levonte Wilson

New to Real Estate · Member since 2025 · 75 posts · 42 votes

Hello everyone,

I’m a beginner investor looking to get started with short-term rentals, but I’ve been following the news and it seems like many cities are tightening regulations, issuing stricter permits, and enforcing occupancy rules. I’m trying to understand whether STRs are still a good strategy in 2026 given these changes.

Specifically:

1. Are you seeing new regulations significantly impact profitability in your markets?
2. How are experienced STR investors adapting to regulatory changes?
3. Are there any locations you'd consider safer or more stable for STR investments right now?

Any insights, personal experiences, or advice would be greatly appreciated. I want to make sure I start on the right foot without running into unexpected legal or financial issues.

Thanks in advance!

2 Reply

1,229 views

Most Popular Reply

Bruce WoodruffPro Member

Contractor/Investor/Consultant · San Diego / Phoenix · Member since 2021 · 12k+ posts · 15k+ votes

9mo

It's just like any other business. Some vacation rentals will make a killing, some will struggle to pay the bills. It's up to you to choose the location and set up your business so it runs profitably.

Back when STR started, it was much easier for newbies to make an easy profit.... Now you actually have to be a good businessman..... 😉

5 Reply

See this reply in the discussion

25 Replies

Jump to latestLatest

Sort by

G. Brian DavisPro Member
Investor · Hatboro, PA · Member since 2016 · 2k+ posts · 854 votes
9mo
Profitability is still strong where rules are clear and stable. Most experienced hosts are adapting by focusing on fully permitted, regulation-friendly areas, shifting toward mid-term rentals, or buying in STR-by-right zones where cities explicitly allow them.

The "safer" markets today are places with long-standing, well-defined STR ordinances—often smaller vacation towns or jurisdictions that rely on tourism. Big metro areas tend to be more volatile.

0 Reply
- John UnderwoodPro Member
  Investor · Greer, SC · Member since 2014 · 13k+ posts · 17k+ votes
  9mo
  Quote from @G. Brian Davis:
  
  Profitability is still strong where rules are clear and stable. Most experienced hosts are adapting by focusing on fully permitted, regulation-friendly areas, shifting toward mid-term rentals, or buying in STR-by-right zones where cities explicitly allow them.
  
  The "safer" markets today are places with long-standing, well-defined STR ordinances—often smaller vacation towns or jurisdictions that rely on tourism. Big metro areas tend to be more volatile.
  
  I agree with Brian.
  There are good areas and there are areas with uncertainty.
  Stick with areas where STRs have been embraced or areas where it is unlikely to have unfavorable regulations crop up.
  1 Reply
- Levonte Wilson
  OP
  New to Real Estate · Member since 2025 · 75 posts · 42 votes
  9mo
  Quote from @G. Brian Davis:
  
  Profitability is still strong where rules are clear and stable. Most experienced hosts are adapting by focusing on fully permitted, regulation-friendly areas, shifting toward mid-term rentals, or buying in STR-by-right zones where cities explicitly allow them.
  
  The "safer" markets today are places with long-standing, well-defined STR ordinances—often smaller vacation towns or jurisdictions that rely on tourism. Big metro areas tend to be more volatile.
  
  That makes a lot of sense. I've been noticing the same trend—focusing on areas where the rules are clear seems like the smarter play these days. Smaller towns and STR-friendly zones definitely seem more predictable than the big cities.
  0 Reply
Michael BaumPro Member
Olympia, WA · Member since 2016 · 8k+ posts · 7k+ votes
9mo
Just have to look at areas where things are stable. I don't feel that enforcing occupancy rules is a problem. People who own STRs that violate the rules give us all a bad name.
2 Reply
- Levonte Wilson
  OP
  New to Real Estate · Member since 2025 · 75 posts · 42 votes
  9mo
  Quote from @Michael Baum:
  
  Just have to look at areas where things are stable. I don't feel that enforcing occupancy rules is a problem. People who own STRs that violate the rules give us all a bad name.
  Exactly, stability is key. And I totally agree—following the rules keeps the market healthy for everyone. Those who cut corners definitely make it harder for the rest of us.
  0 Reply
Bruce WoodruffPro Member
Contractor/Investor/Consultant · San Diego / Phoenix · Member since 2021 · 12k+ posts · 15k+ votes
9mo
It's just like any other business. Some vacation rentals will make a killing, some will struggle to pay the bills. It's up to you to choose the location and set up your business so it runs profitably.
Back when STR started, it was much easier for newbies to make an easy profit.... Now you actually have to be a good businessman..... 😉
5 Reply
- Levonte Wilson
  OP
  New to Real Estate · Member since 2025 · 75 posts · 42 votes
  9mo
  Quote from @Bruce Woodruff:
  
  It's just like any other business. Some vacation rentals will make a killing, some will struggle to pay the bills. It's up to you to choose the location and set up your business so it runs profitably.
  Back when STR started, it was much easier for newbies to make an easy profit.... Now you actually have to be a good businessman..... 😉
  
  Totally agree. It really comes down to picking the right location and running it like a real business. Seems like the days of easy profits are gone, so you really have to be smart about it.
  0 Reply
Mike GrudzienPro Member
Lender · Eugene, OR · Member since 2019 · 2k+ posts · 1k+ votes
9mo
It all depends on the market, the presiding regulations in the municipality and the owner's business acumen.
0 Reply
- Jon Martin
  Member since 2022 · 1k+ posts · 1k+ votes
  9mo
  Quote from @Mike Grudzien:
  
  It all depends on the market, the presiding regulations in the municipality and the owner's business acumen.
  
  Agreed, there are no monolithic regulations that apply to the entire country, and I can't think of any states with state-wide restrictive regulations.
  
  If the rules are strict in the city, you could always go outside city limits. Maybe not the right play in a huge city, but in a college town. If it's an area with county wide regulations, I would be very hesitant unless there was a clear path to compliance.
  
  As for your questions: 1) Yes, if the fees/taxes are high or there are other onerous rules that limit revenue and/or occupancy; 2) You either play the game in your chosen location or go elsewhere; 3) Anywhere with less regulations is "safer" from a regulation standpoint, but attracts more investors that dilute the market. Barriers to entry can be very profitable if you make it through the gauntlet.
  0 Reply
Jules Aton
MD/DC · Member since 2024 · 1k+ posts · 1k+ votes
9mo
I’m in beach areas that rely on tourism so although the competition can be higher the regs generally aren’t an issue or likely to change.
0 Reply
Kenneth GarrettPro Member
Investor · Florida Panhandle/Illinois · Member since 2016 · 4k+ posts · 3k+ votes
9mo
You've heard the term location, location, location. When it comes to STR's you are looking for locations that are embracing them. Regulation is coming down hard on more urban areas, bigger cities.
My STR's are in Beach areas where regulation is more positive. For one of my properties they just started a license program. Had to register and install emergency lighting and additional carbon monoxide detectors. They're mostly trying to make sure investors are providing enough parking. In this respect, it will weed out the bad operators. Some things good come with regulation it's not always bad. Again let's look for areas that are embracing it whereas the economy flourishes with these types of properties.
1 Reply
Account Closed
Interior Decorator · Member since 2025 · 82 posts · 42 votes
9mo
Yes owners I work with that invest in ALL SEASON properties are doing very well. And they also invested in design and photography as well.
0 Reply
Andrew SteffensBusiness Member
Tampa, FL · Member since 2022 · 3k+ posts · 3k+ votes
9mo
One good thing about FL is the state took away the local municipalities ability to enforce new (prior to 2011) laws on lease duration. For example Clearwater Beach is largely 30 night minimum and has been since the 80's, so it continued to be so. Largo right down the road had no pre 2011 law so it cannot make one now. This helps keep you from being a city council meeting away from being out of business.
[email protected]813-563-0877
Vacation Rentals of Florida53 Reviews
Website View Page
1 Reply
Amanpreet Kaur
New to Real Estate · Member since 2026 · 3 posts · 0 votes
3mo
Worth it — but the risk moved. In 2026 the people getting hurt aren't the ones with thin margins, they're the ones who missed a rule change. New Orleans pulled 1,000+ listings almost overnight last August; Austin starts forcing platforms to delist unlicensed STRs July 1.

Two habits that help:
1. Before you buy, confirm the specific address/zone actually allows an STR — not just "the city allows it." Plenty of "legal city" deals die on the parcel's zoning.
2. Treat compliance as a monitored input, not a yearly check — put each city's official .gov license + tax pages on a watch so a change hits your inbox, not a delisting notice.
Full disclosure: I built a free tool (bondpermit.com) that pulls the permit/license/zoning picture from .gov sources for ~29 metros and can watch a city for changes. Happy to run an address for anyone here — not legal advice, just a faster start.
0 Reply
Collin HaysBusiness Member
Property Manager · Gatlinburg, TN · Member since 2020 · 3k+ posts · 4k+ votes
3mo
Every business has to deal with regulations. As short term rentals morphed into a multi-billion dollar business, it was only a matter of time before regulation caught up. Some of it is very necessary, some of it is a cash grab.
[email protected]806-672-7102
SMOKY MOUNTAIN FALLS INC.51 Review
Website View Page
1 Reply
Bruce WoodruffPro Member
Contractor/Investor/Consultant · San Diego / Phoenix · Member since 2021 · 12k+ posts · 15k+ votes
3mo
Yeah, what @Collin Hays said. STRs started out with zero regulations compared to most 'real' businesses......
0 Reply
Mike Shemp
Rental Property Investor · Stewartsville, NJ · Member since 2016 · 418 posts · 280 votes
3mo
Honestly I'd flip the way you're looking at this. "Is it worth it with all the regulation" treats regulation like it's only a cost....but in many markets it's actually working in your favor more than against you.

So for example....every time a city tightens permitting or caps the # of licenses they'll hand out to hosts...a bunch of people just bail. The folks who wanted to slap a listing up over a weekend and coast don't want to deal with permit applications, inspections, insurance, tax registration, all of it. So they leave, or they never even start or do it wrong and pay penalities, lose their license to host in their town, etc.. That's less competition for you.

And the people who stick around and actually do the paperwork tend to be the same people who do everything else right too. Good photos, fast responses, clean places, screening guests properly. So regulation kind of raises the floor on who's even in the game...which usually means better rates and occupancy for the operators who are still standing. The regulations are in a way protecting you from a flood of new competitors six months from now....so my advice would be to reframe it a bit in your mind and try and look at it as a positive in some regard. Yes it can be a hassle, but it also removes competition.

Hope that helps.
Mike

1 Reply
Angela Venger
Member since 2026 · 47 posts · 21 votes
3mo
Yes, in fact, I like regulations. Two of my properties in the county have extreme STR regulations, but because of it, it keeps supply lower than demand, so we constantly get booked.

Don't be discouraged. There are so many markets that still have no regulations and still rent very well, especially the suburbs of big cities.

1 Reply
Bryan Williams
Member since 2026 · 23 posts · 6 votes
2mo
The regulatory question is really a data question — and right now most operators are flying blind on it.
We built an open API that pulls official government STR permit records from 30 US jurisdictions (Seattle, Nashville, Austin, Houston, Denver, Chicago, San Diego, Philadelphia, and more) into one normalized schema. Every record carries the permit status, expiration date, coordinates, and a link back to the government source. The data refreshes daily.
What it shows you: permit density by neighborhood (tells you where STRs are already operating legally), status distribution (how many active vs expired vs revoked — a high revocation rate is a red flag for enforcement), and which cities actually publish their registry versus which ones you're guessing about.
The cities that are "safer" for STR investment tend to be the ones that publish clean, machine-readable permit data — it means they've built a system, not just passed a rule. Nashville, Denver, Sacramento, Scottsdale, and Austin all publish daily-updated registries. Cities with no public registry are the ones where you're most likely to get surprised.
Free API: civicdataforge.pages.dev/data/str-permit-data
1 Reply
Adam TafelBusiness Member
Real Estate Agent · St. Paul, MN · Member since 2017 · 580 posts · 396 votes
2mo
11 year superhost here:

No new regulations in my market of the Twin Cities, specifically St Paul MN (duplex/triplex/fourplex and SF). Most cities have already gone through the city council back and forth over STRs and regulations have settled, I wouldn’t worry about much changing post 2026 unless your market has a strong tourism lobby. If you are concerned you could always look over the city council meeting minutes to see if anyone is still bringing up regulatory ideas.

Something cool about the Minneapolis market: each individual can only own 1 STR. No, you cannot use separate LLCs. This was super annoying for long term hosts with multiple properties when the city council passed this (with no grandfather clause), but now it creates artificial scarcity which I believe will support long-term stability to local occupancy. I've been hosting (mostly 30+ day stays) for quite a while and have rarely struggled with vacancy.

Invest in an area you understand, in most markets professional management will eat up ALL your cashflow above the income an LTR might produce/ come up with systems to self-manage (it’s easier than you’d think), invest in a quality product (class A only IMO), don’t skimp on furnishings or renovations.
Upside Property Sales 4.9108 Reviews
Website View Page
0 Reply
Scott ScovilleBusiness Member
Real Estate Agent · Sacramento, CA · Member since 2019 · 497 posts · 272 votes
2mo
Quote from @Levonte Wilson:
Hello everyone,

I’m a beginner investor looking to get started with short-term rentals, but I’ve been following the news and it seems like many cities are tightening regulations, issuing stricter permits, and enforcing occupancy rules. I’m trying to understand whether STRs are still a good strategy in 2026 given these changes.

Specifically:

1. Are you seeing new regulations significantly impact profitability in your markets?

2. How are experienced STR investors adapting to regulatory changes?

3. Are there any locations you'd consider safer or more stable for STR investments right now?

Any insights, personal experiences, or advice would be greatly appreciated. I want to make sure I start on the right foot without running into unexpected legal or financial issues.

Thanks in advance!
It really depends on location and local regulations. We're actively buying STR's in a handful of cities (i.e. West Sacramento, Rancho Cordova) in the Sacramento area. Happy to connect if anyone is interested in these markets.
[email protected]415-933-2202
Scoville Realty & Investments LLC
Website View Page
0 Reply
Daniel Battaglia
Member since 2026 · 1 post · 0 votes
1mo
Angle nobody has raised yet, from an adjacent seat: I run a parking marketplace, so I see what happens to properties after STR regulation bites. The thing to remember is that the dwelling is the regulated asset, and the rest of the property usually is not. When a city caps permits or tightens occupancy, the guest side of the business shrinks, but a driveway or garage near a stadium, airport, hospital or transit line keeps earning with no permit, no guests inside the house, and basically no wear. It is small money next to a booked STR, call it a utility bill or two a month in most markets, more during event season, but it survives every council vote. For your question 3, that suggests a useful screening test when you compare locations: ask what the property still earns if the STR permit disappears tomorrow. A property whose land keeps producing without guests is a fundamentally safer buy than one where all the income dies with a single regulation change. Beginners underwrite the upside. The regulation era rewards underwriting the downside.
0 Reply
Matthew Tregoning
Property Manager · Melbourne, FL · Member since 2019 · 245 posts · 121 votes
1mo
Still worth it. Just way less forgiving. I operate in multiple states and the deals that hold up have legal certainty, more than one demand driver and a normal rental exit. Airbnb revenue by itself is not an investment thesis.
0 Reply
Daniel Jung
Member since 2026 · 5 posts · 2 votes
8h
I'm an operator in Toronto, which is about as regulated as it gets, and the answer is yes — but only if you underwrite the regulation like any other cost.
Compliance isn't a footnote here. Registration fees, collecting and remitting the municipal accommodation tax, and a hard cap on the number of nights you can sell per year all come straight off your revenue. If your numbers only work assuming 365 nights at peak rates, you don't have a deal.
The properties that survive in markets like this are the ones run like actual businesses: dynamic pricing instead of set-and-forget rates, real systems for turnovers, and reviews treated as inventory because ranking drives occupancy.
Regulation mostly kills the passive-income fantasy. If you're willing to operate it properly, the reduced competition is a feature, not a bug.
0 Reply
Akash Kakumani
Member since 2020 · 11 posts · 2 votes
3h
I'm an operator in Coachella CA and Madera CA. Both areas have surrounding counties with increasingly growing restrictions - but I find this to be a blessing rather than a curse. I believe other PMs have said this before but entering sooner rather than later is important - because it's true that STRs are getting increasingly regulated. But all that hurts is the ability to enter - NOT the ability to perform (depending on the type of regulation). Performance (again as other people have stated) will improve as demand will always increase and supply will begin to plateau with regulation.
TLDR; Regulation is your friend if you're able to enter. Regulation simply hurts your ability to enter in the first place.
If you'd like to chat more and share notes feel free to shoot a DM and we can set something up as fellow investors! Also if you were interested in those two markets - I've been eyeing some properties that might be interesting if you have the capital to improve.
0 Reply

Join the conversationCreate a free account to reply, vote on answers and follow this thread.