I'm getting conflicting advice from lenders whether i can have two second home mortgages in the same city.
If both are used for primary use and rental use, is it possible?
Fannie Mae doesn't have a blanket mileage limitation so it may be lender underwriting specific requirement?
I'm looking to put down 10% on a second home, but i already have a second home in the same market that i rent out sometimes (put down a lot more for that downpayment).
Want to make sure i'm doing everything above board.
The rules are very vague on this topic but generally, it shouldn't be allowed since as some have said, its intended to be a loan program for one "2nd Use" home, so you you playing with fire a little bit. Heres a good analysis of the issues with Second Home Loans for rental properties or STRs
Because these Second Home Loans are intended for, at most, dual-use as a second home and vacation rental rather than a mostly-rental property, there are lots of restrictions on usage of these properties as short term rentals when using this type of financing. These include:
Restrictions on Days Rented Per Year: Short term rentals financed by second home loans must be “primarily” for owner-use, generally interpreted as no more than 180 days (or half the year) rented out. This restriction obviously takes the wind out of the sails of any serious STR investors, finding profitability on a STR with a hard ceiling of 50% occupancy is all but impossible except for the rarest of properties in very seasonal markets, or with minimizing mortgage costs with extremely low leverage (which would also defeat the primary purpose most investors would use these loans for, the 90% leverage). Additionally, jamming all the rental activity into a few short seasonal months would also defeat the purpose of a dual-use property, as owners seeking any sort of return would need to refrain from enjoying the property themselves during the attractive months.
Restriction on Property Management: STRs with second home loan mortgages that are rented out can be rented out via STR platforms such as airbnb or VRBO however, a third-party manager can’t be used, the individual owner must manage the property themselves, including responding to and communicating with guests and either performing necessary services like cleaning, maintenance and landscaping, or overseeing those vendors. Scaling becomes all but impossible self-managing past a few properties, and this is another feature of second home loans that is problematic for serious short term rental investors looking to scale.
Restriction on Unit Counts: Second Home Loans are only eligible for SFRs (single family residences), meaning these loans can’t be used for duplexes, triplexes or fourplexes or mixed in with the "house hacking" strategy that mixes some units as owner-occupied with others used as pure rentals to maximize earnings. Another shortcut to STR scaling is to capitalize on the outsized returns of multi-unit properties, this is another door closed on investors using second home loans for STRs.
No Vesting in LLC Allowed: The ability to own the properties in individual LLCs and borrow through the entity is not allowed under second home loans, which must be made to an individual. This shuts out STR investors going this route from the numerous important benefits of LLCs for STRs. Primarily, it disallows the liability protection benefits that appeal to property owners operating STRs with lots of guests, turnovers and potential problems arising from having so many people come and go from a property. It also prevents the popular capital raising strategies for STR investors, many of whom like to split ownership to raise money for down payments, or simply to partner up with people with complementary skill sets and aptitudes. Finally, second home loans will go directly on the individual borrower’s credit reports, instead of being held off, which can damage credit rating and capacity.
Geographic Restrictions: While this rule is somewhat vague, geographic restrictions on second home loans cut in two directions; meaning the property has to be both far away enough from the borrower’s personal residence (i.e. in a legitimately different market) but also close enough, “a reasonable distance,” to be managed and utilized as a second home. To illustrate, a borrower living in Austin, Texas might have trouble qualifying for a second home loan in Cape Cod, Massachusetts since it’s so far away, but also not qualify for a home on Lake Austin in nearby Lago Vista (~25 miles away) since it’s the same market, even if one property is a lake house and one is an urban townhome.
I'm getting conflicting advice from lenders whether i can have two second home mortgages in the same city.
If both are used for primary use and rental use, is it possible?
Fannie Mae doesn't have a blanket mileage limitation so it may be lender underwriting specific requirement?
I'm looking to put down 10% on a second home, but i already have a second home in the same market that i rent out sometimes (put down a lot more for that downpayment).
Want to make sure i'm doing everything above board.
You can actually buy a second house or several without using Fannie Mae. There are sufficient numbers of people willing to sell and allow you to keep their financing.
If your insistence is to use Fannie Mae, For second homes/investment properties, Fannie Mae generally allows up to 10 financed properties through DU. Your properties can be in the same city. You may actually be running into a Debt to Income issue instead of a FM limitation.
You're right that Fannie doesn't have a mileage rule, but the home has to be a reasonable distance from your primary, available for your own use, and not under a rental arrangement that controls occupancy. Two second homes in the same city with one already rented part-time reads like investment to a lot of underwriters, so the conflicting answers are mostly lender overlays. I'd ask each lender point blank if they'll do it as a second home in writing before you lock, and if not, plan on investment terms (15% down on a single unit) so nothing gets reclassified later.
The rules are very vague on this topic but generally, it shouldn't be allowed since as some have said, its intended to be a loan program for one "2nd Use" home, so you you playing with fire a little bit. Heres a good analysis of the issues with Second Home Loans for rental properties or STRs
Because these Second Home Loans are intended for, at most, dual-use as a second home and vacation rental rather than a mostly-rental property, there are lots of restrictions on usage of these properties as short term rentals when using this type of financing. These include:
Restrictions on Days Rented Per Year: Short term rentals financed by second home loans must be “primarily” for owner-use, generally interpreted as no more than 180 days (or half the year) rented out. This restriction obviously takes the wind out of the sails of any serious STR investors, finding profitability on a STR with a hard ceiling of 50% occupancy is all but impossible except for the rarest of properties in very seasonal markets, or with minimizing mortgage costs with extremely low leverage (which would also defeat the primary purpose most investors would use these loans for, the 90% leverage). Additionally, jamming all the rental activity into a few short seasonal months would also defeat the purpose of a dual-use property, as owners seeking any sort of return would need to refrain from enjoying the property themselves during the attractive months.
Restriction on Property Management: STRs with second home loan mortgages that are rented out can be rented out via STR platforms such as airbnb or VRBO however, a third-party manager can’t be used, the individual owner must manage the property themselves, including responding to and communicating with guests and either performing necessary services like cleaning, maintenance and landscaping, or overseeing those vendors. Scaling becomes all but impossible self-managing past a few properties, and this is another feature of second home loans that is problematic for serious short term rental investors looking to scale.
Restriction on Unit Counts: Second Home Loans are only eligible for SFRs (single family residences), meaning these loans can’t be used for duplexes, triplexes or fourplexes or mixed in with the "house hacking" strategy that mixes some units as owner-occupied with others used as pure rentals to maximize earnings. Another shortcut to STR scaling is to capitalize on the outsized returns of multi-unit properties, this is another door closed on investors using second home loans for STRs.
No Vesting in LLC Allowed: The ability to own the properties in individual LLCs and borrow through the entity is not allowed under second home loans, which must be made to an individual. This shuts out STR investors going this route from the numerous important benefits of LLCs for STRs. Primarily, it disallows the liability protection benefits that appeal to property owners operating STRs with lots of guests, turnovers and potential problems arising from having so many people come and go from a property. It also prevents the popular capital raising strategies for STR investors, many of whom like to split ownership to raise money for down payments, or simply to partner up with people with complementary skill sets and aptitudes. Finally, second home loans will go directly on the individual borrower’s credit reports, instead of being held off, which can damage credit rating and capacity.
Geographic Restrictions: While this rule is somewhat vague, geographic restrictions on second home loans cut in two directions; meaning the property has to be both far away enough from the borrower’s personal residence (i.e. in a legitimately different market) but also close enough, “a reasonable distance,” to be managed and utilized as a second home. To illustrate, a borrower living in Austin, Texas might have trouble qualifying for a second home loan in Cape Cod, Massachusetts since it’s so far away, but also not qualify for a home on Lake Austin in nearby Lago Vista (~25 miles away) since it’s the same market, even if one property is a lake house and one is an urban townhome.
You're getting conflicting advice because the advice is genuinely conflicted — Fannie's second-home rules are written around occupancy intent, and two second homes in the same city is where every lender's fraud overlay kicks in. There's no blanket Fannie mileage rule, but each lender's underwriting overlay is its own rulebook, which is why lender #2 says yes and lender #3 says no. You're not crazy; the guidelines are just vague and the overlays are strict.
The practical problem: a second-home loan assumes YOU occupy it part of the year and it's not primarily income-producing. The moment you're renting it out "sometimes," you're arguing both sides of that definition — and with 10% down, the lender has maximum incentive to scrutinize it.
If the honest plan includes rental income, stop fighting the occupancy rules and finance it as what it is: a DSCR loan qualifies on the property's rental income alone — no tax returns, no W-2s — down to 620 FICO, no ratio required, up to 85% LTV. No occupancy test, no second-home definition to thread. You'd need 15% down instead of 10%, but you'd never be looking over your shoulder on the occupancy question.
Happy to run both structures side by side so you can see the real cost difference. — Dan
DSCR isn't meant for any owner use, even as a vacation home. Your loan documents are most likely going to have an affidavit that you have to sign stating that neither you nor your family members will use or occupy the home during the loan term. The response (appears to be written by AI) is giving wrong information here.
Why would anyone need to 2nd homes in the same city?
Reeks of fraudulent intent...
Just skip all the headache and buy with a 15% down DSCR loan.
This is the grey area in the industry but this scenario screams investment property use. Especially if the underwriter sees you reporting rental income and rental property expenses on your taxes.