Real Estate Consultant · Chicago, IL · Member since 2026 · 2 posts · 1 vote
I've been doing property due diligence for STR investors and here are the questions that sometimes get overlooked:
What jurisdiction actually governs the property?
What is the zoning classification, and does it allow the proposed use?
Are STRs permitted, restricted, capped, or prohibited?
Is a license or permit required, and is one currently obtainable?
Does an existing STR permit transfer with the property?
Are there deed restrictions, restrictive covenants, or HOA rules that create another layer of restrictions?
Are there septic, wastewater, parking, occupancy, or access requirements that could affect feasibility?
I’m curious how other investors approach this.
At what point in your acquisition process do you investigate these questions? Before underwriting, after identifying a promising deal, or only once you’re preparing an offer?
I'd want those questions answered before getting attached to the furnishing plan. I'd also have a local cleaner walk the actual house early. A place can look straightforward in photos and turn out to have a long driveway, awkward laundry setup or access problems that make every turnover harder. Those are useful things to learn before you're committed.
Since I work mostly the same areas (Hillsborough, Pinellas, Manatee, Sarasota counties FL) I know all of these already my memory. This is why its important to work with an STR knowledgeable agent in your given market to lean on their expertise. Always double check their work before closing the property but working with a good agent who specializes in STR can save you a lot of time and potentially money cutting the learning curve.
I'd screen the market-level rules before spending time on individual listings, then repeat the check for the exact parcel before making an offer. The key is saving the answer with its source and date—an email from the relevant office, the current ordinance section, and the HOA documents—rather than relying on a listing description or a verbal summary. That makes later underwriting assumptions traceable when rules or staff interpretations change.
Market first, then property. Out here the rules can flip at a county line, and the city, county, HOA and sometimes the septic or water district all get a say. So I screen towns before I ever open a listing. Once I like a specific house, I check it all again for that address, in writing from whoever issues the license, and ask if the license transfers on a sale. And I read the HOA docs myself. Listings are wrong about STRs being allowed more often than you'd think.
In South Florida I'd split it the way Elijah did, with one addition: check the building or HOA documents at the same stage as the city rules, not at the end. In condo-heavy areas the association's minimum stay is often the real limit, and it can be stricter than the city's.
Two other checks that matter more here than in many markets:
- Whether a license or registration follows the property or the owner. Florida's state lodging license can't be transferred to a new owner, and some cities' rental permits can't be either. A new owner may have to apply again, sometimes with a new inspection, before taking bookings.
- Flood zone and wind-mitigation status, because insurance can change whether a deal works at all, and it's quoted per property.
I'd also ask the seller for future bookings and whether they transfer. Guests booked months ahead may not be yours to keep.
Disclosure: I run a vacation-rental management company in South Florida.
For an operating STR, I'd reconcile future reservations with the seller's deposits and owner statements before closing. Who holds the guest's money, who owes any refund, and who gets paid for a stay crossing closing day? I'd want that handover agreed before treating those bookings as income I'll receive.