@Michelle Tolentino Seller financing can open up some interesting possibilities when the buyer and seller are willing to negotiate. Some options worth exploring include seller carryback financing, interest-only payments with a balloon payment, lease options, and wraparound financing where the existing loan structure allows it.
I think the key is understanding the seller’s motivation. Some sellers value a steady income stream, while others want a faster exit or a specific down payment. The terms can often be structured around those priorities.
@Michelle Tolentino Seller financing can open up some interesting possibilities when the buyer and seller are willing to negotiate. Some options worth exploring include seller carryback financing, interest-only payments with a balloon payment, lease options, and wraparound financing where the existing loan structure allows it.
I think the key is understanding the seller’s motivation. Some sellers value a steady income stream, while others want a faster exit or a specific down payment. The terms can often be structured around those priorities.
0 or very low interest rate, substitution of collateral, subordination of mortgage note, right of first refusal if note holder sells note at discount, split note into 1st and 2nd and sell 1st, package a number of seller financed notes and syndicate package, etc,
i've bought on seller finance. do you have more specific questions? in general i recommend seller finance only if you're well capitalized, and i don't recommend sub-to unless you're a highly experienced HNWI in a situation where it makes sense for all parties
Thanks, Nicholas! Quick context: this would be a brand-new seller carry, not sub-to. I'm trying to keep my cash-in low, but I don't want a balloon.
I'm thinking small down payment, interest-only for the first 2 years, then converting to amortizing until it's paid off. Have you seen sellers go for that? What would make a low down payment feel safe to a seller?
Or is there another loan structure I'm not aware of that would work better in my situation?
Amongst both parties in a transaction, of your experience, the more complex you make a transaction, the less likely it would be to occur. You want something that all parties can understand. Sometimes getting too creative convolutes things, makes it more difficult, and also can have significant tax ramifications down the road.
For example, 0% financing for a seller is a very bad idea because they still pay taxes on interest even though they're not collecting interest.
Michelle, thanks for the context — that helps a lot. For a brand-new seller carry, your structure (small down, interest-only then amortizing) is actually pretty common and can work well, especially if you need to preserve cash for the property itself in those first two years.
A couple of things to think through: make sure the interest rate is fair to the seller (they're taking risk, and as Chris noted, 0% creates tax headaches for them), and get very clear on what happens at the conversion — what's the amortizing rate, over how many years, and is there a balloon? I'd also want a proper loan doc package (note, mortgage/deed of trust) recorded, not just a handshake.
The "better" structure really depends on your exit — are you planning to refinance, sell, or hold long-term? That changes everything.
If there's any chance you'll want to refi out of the seller note later, talk to a lender before you sign anything. Pay the seller in a way that leaves a paper trail (bank transfer, not cash) because they'll usually want to see the payment history, and how long they need to see it varies a lot by program. Setting it up clean on day one makes the exit so much easier.
None. Seller financing for family members, fine. They’re blood. Joe blow off the street — come back when you have the wherewithal. Strangers and I am down on my luck? That’s why God invented bankruptcy.
And don’t get me started about subject to financing. If you think concealing facts is necessary to your transaction, then your business is wrong.