This seems to indicate that the lenders’ process is not typically set up for this situation.I have long held the view that the property owner should receive some small compensation when their loan is sold.  

This is because there is established case law indicating a benefit must be received to be held personally liable for a loan guarantee (can the lender go after the borrower personally in the event of a default).

Some (not most) sources indicate just before the GFC was less affordable.- rents are the lowest per the affordability since records were kept.  

It also has a bunch of really unique benefits/tools for your rental portfolio (Lease Indication Tool, Expense Tracking, Maintenance Requests, Rent Collection, Tenant Communication, etc.) in one central place.

The risk of this not working out is not low.During Covid, I indicated I would not evict anyone who could not pay rent due to real COVID impacts.  

It also has a bunch of really unique benefits/tools for your rental portfolio (Lease Indication Tool, Expense Tracking, Maintenance Requests, Rent Collection, Tenant Communication, etc.) in one central place.

The eviction rate and tenant turnover rate on the properties they manage is a good indicator of how well they screen tenants.Do they provide you with tenant information so you can approve or deny each tenant?

Late to the party but I find it is usually due to an angry applicant who got disqualified due to being low credit score, or some of the other red flags that indicate a low performing tenant. 

Also the low rent indicates there may be quite a bit of delayed maintenance.  

Most institutions won't pay more than 1.5% (and some 1%).  3+% is a solid indicator that sponsor is more focused on quantity over quality.