For instance your insurance may be more but the actual cost per unit is less.

If yes, get it done.Some instances where a cost segregation will help1) rental losses would not be considered passive - Real Estate Professional Status or STR being considered active2) You sold another property that generated passive gain that you want to minimize3) Your income is below $150,000 and you can utilize some of your rental losses.

The work around tends to be instances where the investor is self-managing the construction or is collecting fees built into the development deals, but this requires fairly large total cost projects.I see you pinned Philadelphia, what neighborhood are you focused on?

I do not have any experience with this company but in most instances, owners run into lots of limitations with the software/program and wind up hiring a PMC.

Those are the crooks that get the lighter sentences the crooks that have no money and have  poor defense tend to get very long sentences or max sentences.I have a feeling that's the instance here. 

Incidentally in some instances it is possible to "partner" with your plan to buy the real estate but it adds complication and financing cannot be used.

For instance, the typical water usage in a unit is about 30-40% from toilets alone (and around about 25% for low flow toilets).

The other things to consider is you do not need to follow the herd mentality and in this instance - prices skyrocketed during covid which makes sense.

You have McDonald's, for instance, that was a restaurant company, that ultimately became more of a real estate company. 

So for instance, let's say Investor A is where your lender/broker is sending the paper, and Investor A has an overlay that includes PG'd DSCR loans in this definition, then your lender/broker may decline to close the 11th loan, even though other lenders would close it because they send their paper to a different investor.