It's always the quality that matters, not the quantity. 

These properties will appeal to certain renters but it's going to be a tiny minority and you'll have plenty of competition for that limited demand.

Because our resource based system defines quality and experience of life, by ones quantity of resources. 

Otherwise I would likely hear about tiny 2k discounts and the standard answer of focus on incentives which is not addressing the question asked 

Clearly the setbacks and zoning for structures will have to be approved but what about tiny houses, driveways, fencing options or anything that would fall on the property line...

Stupidity like this might be why your company has such a tiny sliver of the Cleveland market share.

I’m a Realtor living and working in a tiny town with super expensive real estate with less than 10k homes total.

I purchased a property several years ago at auction however, I happened to know that the property was in great shape (and I did pay a tiny premium to win the bid).

Buyers are a lot more educated than sellers just by the quantity of listings they look at for months - they get typically VERY good understaning value in their particular taregt segement.

And financially that is pretty wasteful, most consumers will just rent a 3 bedroom apartment for half your price and then buy a house as quickly as possible.The rental market looks like a bell shape with standard deviation and you are on the far right end; so the issue is that you have a tiny market of very, very few people who are looking to spend that much on rent.