How are you making any money with Rentals?
OK... I know. Pretty general question. But truly... how are you doing it to your satisfaction. Now here is the reason for the question, and of course I would like to hear input. I am brand new to this forum, so I suppose I would like to get a feel for how everyone 'thinks' or processes their real estate investment.
OK.. I purchased a home for 40K that will rent for $650. After all expenses, debt service, vacancy and maintenence, the cash flow will only be $145/mo.
So I will be receiving $650/mo but only keeping $145/mo until the first small crisis that will cost 2K (roof/ furnace/ toilet, etc...) AT which time will not make any of this worth my time. NOTE: I will be doing all of the property management, etc... sleepless nights, etc...
So..... why do you do it? Honest question. And honestly, I appreciate all responses.
@Anthony Newbold How much do you have into the property? If you put down 20%, then your cash on cash return is like 20% with that $145 a month. If you put down 25% your cash on cash is 17%. Ive got to say those are phenomenal returns. Yeah $145 a month may not be a large amount of money, but you did not invest a lot of money.
(I was not factoring in closing costs just to make the math easy)
What is investing? It is deploying capital to get a return on that capital. If I am deploying my capital to get a 20% cash on cash return, I would do that every day.
**DISCLAIMER, I AM A NEWBIE**
with that disclaimer out of the way, I would venture to say that what is frustrating you is that you are investing your money AND your time for a low return. I think one of the things I have learned is to calculate the ROIs with property management and repairs in mind. If you have a property manager involved, you do not have to invest (or waste, depending on how you want to look at it) your time with the day to day of managing the property. I would gladly take that $100-150 in passive income if I knew that all I had to do was supervise my property manager and make sure he is on point. Its different when you are investing 15-20 hours managing the property, collecting rent, finding tenants, signing leases etc. I consider myself to be worth more than $150/15 hours. What I am getting at is for your next deal, calculate the expenses with property management and major repairs in mind and if the ROI is still pretty good then go for it!
Best of luck!
That is a scary thought however. A roof should last 25 years. and an old furnace or ac actually only costs 800 to replace installed. Remember, you pay wholesale for repairs not full price.
Also, if you are truly making 146 dollars cash flow your expenses should already include CAPEX (Capital Expenditure Reserve). So, your deal above isn't a deal.
Good luck:)
As others have mentioned, in a cash flow focused / low appreciation area, this isn't a very good rate of return. With that said, you can still build a business with those types of returns. Rentals are a long term game - you need the vision to see 10 years or 20 years down the road, where you not only enjoy the cash flow you're getting, but have increased holdings and decreased principals. Real Estate is also one of the few businesses where you can (in large part) control your income by expanding your portfolio - at a pace that you deem acceptable.
-Christopher
This is probably obvious, but try to always buy the worst property on the best street; that way you have built-in equity right from the start so don't need to worry too much about the cash flow. More importantly, I think it's vital to learn as much about repairs and maintenance as possible. If you don't like doing any of the work, you will pay for that and pay a high price. Even if you don't do the work yourself, it's important to at least be knowledgeable about whatever can ail a property or you will get ripped off on a regular basis. Best of luck!
This is probably obvious, but try to always buy the worst property on the best street; that way you have built-in equity right from the start so don't need to worry too much about the cash flow. More importantly, I think it's vital to learn as much about repairs and maintenance as possible. If you don't like doing any of the work, you will pay for that and pay a high price. Even if you don't do the work yourself, it's important to at least be knowledgeable about whatever can ail a property or you will get ripped off on a regular basis. Aside from that, it's vital to learn which improvements will get you higher rent and better tenants. It's not always the best tactic to buy the most expensive products; for example, I never buy pricey paint as in all my years as an investor/landlord I have never cleaned a wall in preparation for a new tenant and find if I stick to one color for all my properties it doesn't take that long to just put on a fresh coat of paint. Same with mini-blinds and verticals; tenants always seem to break these so buy the cheaper brand and be prepared to just change them out. I'm sure you get the picture... Best of luck!
That puts me all in at $45k. I rent the house for $600 (what a coincidence), which is rented to a great tenant with a good income, and wherein I will raise the rent slowly beginning next year to market (~650-700). I paid cash for the house, but probably this winter I will cash out refinance at 75% of appraised value:
75% of 60k, let's say = $45k. I get all of my actual cash spent back through the increased equity in the house. Payment = $228. Insurance ($500) and taxes ($480) = $82.
JD.... perhaps this is why I am confused. Perhaps a little more enlightening please. Looking above it looks like your deal is awfully similar to mine and you pointed out that I chose poorly. (of which I don't completely disagree.).. anyhow you are all in for 45K and rent for $600 is good, and my $40K that rents for $650 is poor.
Here is my breakdown: Payment= $231 (very close to yours), Insurance= $900 (you've done better so please advise), and taxes= $1280 (horrible, but non-negotiable).. Oh also, I calculated 10% vacancy and 10% maintainence.
Now, like yourself, I paid CASH. I just used a LOC to acquire with cash, of which I will mortgage my purchase that will pay off the LOC in FULL.. and simply do it again and again. I just simply am not happy with only $145 and have seen lots of $40K pieces of junk ... this one doesn't need much at all (actually purchased for 35K last week, but have budgeted 5K to bring up to standard.
You have been so helpful, so please continue to advise as well as all of these great folks on this forum.
That puts me all in at $45k. I rent the house for $600 (what a coincidence), which is rented to a great tenant with a good income, and wherein I will raise the rent slowly beginning next year to market (~650-700). I paid cash for the house, but probably this winter I will cash out refinance at 75% of appraised value:
75% of 60k, let's say = $45k. I get all of my actual cash spent back through the increased equity in the house. Payment = $228. Insurance ($500) and taxes ($480) = $82.
JD.... perhaps this is why I am confused. Perhaps a little more enlightening please. Looking above it looks like your deal is awfully similar to mine and you pointed out that I chose poorly. (of which I don't completely disagree.).. anyhow you are all in for 45K and rent for $600 is good, and my $40K that rents for $650 is poor.
Here is my breakdown: Payment= $231 (very close to yours), Insurance= $900 (you've done better so please advise), and taxes= $1280 (horrible, but non-negotiable).. Oh also, I calculated 10% vacancy and 10% maintainence.
Now, like yourself, I paid CASH. I just used a LOC to acquire with cash, of which I will mortgage my purchase that will pay off the LOC in FULL.. and simply do it again and again. I just simply am not happy with only $145 and have seen lots of $40K pieces of junk ... this one doesn't need much at all (actually purchased for 35K last week, but have budgeted 5K to bring up to standard.
You have been so helpful, so please continue to advise as well as all of these great folks on this forum.
Well, they're not really similar, only in the purchase price and amount of rent they demand:
Mine: Bought for my cash; yours: bought with a loan.
Mine: Insurance & taxes $80/mo; yours: I&T $181/mo
Because I used my own money, and you used someone else's money, when I cash out refi this property I will be ahead of you about $150/mo on this house, and $500 ahead of you on my next house (rent minus insurance/taxes/other expenses). For the same amount of money outlay, I will be pulling in $650 more than you, because I started with money that came from myself, not from a loan/LOC, that would just be sitting or going into mutual funds or stocks. You have to settle for low return rates because you don't have your own money - you paid cash, but it was someone else's cash that you have to pay back. I believe that when you are working off low spreads, on small houses such as these, you really should own one or two outright to provide you with strong cash flow to help buoy the others until you reach a critical mass.
I can't really advise you on the insurance. I use Allstate, but maybe I get a better rate because I've been with them forever, or maybe because I've had few claims over the years. You also have very high taxes for such low-value houses; in your area, buying cheap houses might not work as well because of things like that. You have to customize the strategy for where you live; if your area can support higher rents, and you have certain fixed costs like taxes and insurance that only move incrementally, you might need to buy more expensive houses.
@Anthony Newbold once you get the hang of being a classic landlord, you might want to consider a more times intensive but up to 8x more profitable approach and operate your SFH in a non traditional manner - more niche.
There are atleast five different ways to operate a SFH rental: traditional, rooming house, dorm, short-term, and corporate housing. Each way has its own pros and cons, each has its own profit margin.
Just keep yourself open. You don't have to stay in the classic role.
I've tried all five models and uncovered opportunities I wouldn't have found if I stayed in the classic landlording groove. Now that I've found what working in my focus neighborhood, I'm expanding to met the demand.
There are world of possibilities waiting for you to explore them.
And, honestly, passive landlording kills your cash cow.
Well, they're not really similar, only in the purchase price and amount of rent they demand:
Mine: Bought for my cash; yours: bought with a loan.
JD,, OK, so here's where I may not understand our similarities, but let me explain my position.
Yes, you are correct: You bought yours with hard CASH. I bought mine with an LOC.
You withdraw hard CASH out of your bank account. (Your CASH was your collateral)
I withdrew hard CASH out of the banks bank account. (My Home was my collateral)
We both are going to mortgage our investment properties at full value, and have a mortgage payment for said property. (Therefore we are in the same position.)
You will take that money to buy your next investment.
I will take that money to payoff the LOC so that I can get another LOC to buy my next investment.
Now granted: Your deal looks better than mine. But yet they are so similar. I simply cannot control the taxes (that I hate), and yes, my insurance is more (something I can work on....)...
Most of all I appreciate the discussion. I am learning with every post that I read.
Thank you Al,
An interesting perspective that I had not considered. Very interesting, I will have to explore more.
I agree with J Scott... you can absolutely find higher ROI properties, you just have to do some digging to find them. When I look at any property ( flip or rental ) I always work the numbers backwards. First decide what the profit number needs to be ( mine is 25%) I either get all my money back in 4 years or sooner or I don't do the deal. That is almost unheard of in most markets but in mine I can find these all the time. My last house I have purchased and repaired for about $10K and have it rented for $620/m. That's about $7500/yr or an ROI of 75%. Same thing with my flips...
Sale Price - 30% profit - repairs = max purchase price
Example house that I can sale for 100K
$30K profit - $15K in repairs = $65K
If I can purchase it for anything less than 65 its a good deal, won't touch it over that number. Do the same thing with your rental numbers... purchase, plus repairs, plus holding costs and vacancies = a number. If you can get that much $ or more in a set time frame you do the deal, if not keep looking. I hope this helps. Feel free to connect with me if you still have questions.
Well, they're not really similar, only in the purchase price and amount of rent they demand:
Mine: Bought for my cash; yours: bought with a loan.
JD,, OK, so here's where I may not understand our similarities, but let me explain my position.
Yes, you are correct: You bought yours with hard CASH. I bought mine with an LOC.
You withdraw hard CASH out of your bank account. (Your CASH was your collateral)
I withdrew hard CASH out of the banks bank account. (My Home was my collateral)
We both are going to mortgage our investment properties at full value, and have a mortgage payment for said property. (Therefore we are in the same position.)
You will take that money to buy your next investment.
I will take that money to payoff the LOC so that I can get another LOC to buy my next investment.
Now granted: Your deal looks better than mine. But yet they are so similar. I simply cannot control the taxes (that I hate), and yes, my insurance is more (something I can work on....)...
Most of all I appreciate the discussion. I am learning with every post that I read.
Thank you Ozzy,, Great information, And just knowing what people near me are doing it makes me feel very good.
As far as 'connecting'... I'm brand new, so I don't know what that button does.