Investor · Chino Hills, CA · Member since 2009 · 95 posts · 12 votes
So I am wondering what I should do with $40,000 that I have. Should I invest it in mutual funds or should I invested in buy-and-hold single-family residence? I am looking to invest for the next 15 to 20 years and have a retirement income that I can live off of. Should I do it through real estate or mutual funds? And what city and states are the best place to invest in real estate if you think real estate is the way I should go, if you think mutual funds what do you think is best. I'm on the fence please advise which way I should jump. Thank you
Investor · Chino Hills, CA · Member since 2009 · 95 posts · 12 votes
10y
Hi @Russell Brazil
Thanks for the info California is to expensive and want to put all my money info one place right know and wanted to know should it be relestate or Mutural funds
Investor · Orange County, CA · Member since 2015 · 2k+ posts · 3k+ votes
10y
If you are debating between out of state rentals and mutual funds, buy the mutual funds (total stock market index w/ ultra low fees). I'd buy my primary residence locally, rent rooms, and eventually turn it into a rental before I'd do either of those, though. If you already own your primary, consider turning it into a rental (if it will cash flow) and buying the next to move into & fix ... repeat as necessary.
Investor · Columbus , OH · Member since 2013 · 24 posts · 14 votes
10y
Rob, What you should invest in is a personal preference. If you go to your financial adviser he will most defiantly tell you mutual funds because they can make money off of it. Advisors will almost never tell you real estate because there is no way for them to benefit. I would say buy a rental and use to cash to reinvest and buy more rentals so by the time you retire you will have a nice money making machine assembled. Real estate is multi dimensional asset class that makes you moneys in many different ways while you hold the property. It is also great for tax purposes. You have to understand though, its not completely passive. You will have many more head aches with real estate, but its all part of the experience. You need to ask your self if your ok with a more high maintenance investment. Even if you have a property manager, you will still have to manage your manager. In my opinion, its worth it.
As far as a market is concerned, the more boring the better. Cali and New York City are good examples of terrible places for buy and hold. Why would you buy a house for $1 Mil that rents for $3500 when you can deploy that same 1 mil and buy 10 houses for $100k each that rent for $1k per home. You can find a lot of good markets in the midwest. Indiana, Tennessee, Ohio, etc. The second biggest determining factor would be a great property manager. The property manager you pick will be everything when investing at a distance. They will make or break your investment.
Investor · Topeka, KS · Member since 2015 · 1k+ posts · 1k+ votes
10y
I would restate @Brian Mathews statement and say real estate has the potential of better returns. There are people, this very moment, that are losing money from real estate month after month. And not only does real estate have more hassle, the potential for greater returns also means greater risk. If you put 40k into some no load index funds you can only lose 40k. You invest in real estate and you have an infinate potential for loss.
on the flip side, 40k in mutual funds/index funds will take much longer than 15-20 years to produce any reasonable income.
I agree with both of @Russell Brazil 's points. Whether it be stocks or real estate you have the best chance of success when investing in what you know. Local markets are what you know. I think out of state as a first attempt at RE investing is pretty risky.
Investor · New York City, NY · Member since 2015 · 15 posts · 13 votes
10y
Real estate has the potential to significantly outperform or underperform a mutual fund, the real question is how much effort are you prepared to put into it? If you're looking to just make one decision now, and never think about it again for 20 years, real estate is probably not what you're looking for.
I love real estate. (Obviously) but if you choose to go the mutual fund route, investigate Vanguard Index Funds. Warren Buffett recommends them, too.
Couldn't agree more. Vanguard no load low fee index funds are the way to go. I invest in real estate but for diversification I also have money going into several Vanguard index funds.
Specialist · Memphis, TN · Member since 2008 · 41 posts · 34 votes
10y
Hi Jake
Lots of opinions here, all valid. If I could, I would state that you are wanting your 40k to create for you what most people are looking for - financial freedom. The question you really are asking is - 'how can I become financially free using this 40k I have worked for so hard?'
That requires a more complex answer.
I can't give you an answer, but I can tell you about assets. The key to wealth, in my experience, is in acquiring assets. That doesn't mean that you cannot acquire mutual funds, as many REI people would have you believe. Mutual funds are assets, as much as real estate. Intangible though they may be, barring something catastrophic they certainly hold value and can increase your personal net worth substantially.
I would encourage you to consider the following question - 'how can i get people to pay my bills for me?' When people pay your bills, whether through rent or a business you own, you can reinvest your hard earned money into - you guessed it - acquiring more assets. Monopoly taught us a valuable lesson we took for granted in terms of green and red houses and hotels, but the real key to the 'real' game is to change your perspective from being an earning employee to an entrepreneurial acquirer of assets - through your lifetime, and ideally, onto your heirs lifetime(s).
Focus on asset accumulation, whatever the vehicle or vehicle(s), and you will see a vast horizon beyond your current 40k mental construct. It isn't a question of real estate vs. mutual funds, it is a question of 'how do I get more?'
Real Estate Broker · Raleigh, NC · Member since 2014 · 2k+ posts · 1k+ votes
10y
I would do both. I would take the 40k and put 20k down on two 100k rental properties. Then, I would take a small (or large) portion of my income (from work or other investments) and put it into Vanguard mutual funds. At a certain point, I would probably divert more money into buying more rental properties, but starting with two is probably a good place to see if it will be a good fit for you.
I have five rental properties, but I still fully fund our Roth IRAs, my SEP IRA and my husband's 403b each year that I have been able to.
Investor · Orange County, CA · Member since 2015 · 2k+ posts · 3k+ votes
10y
Really Jake? What experience is this based off of? How many rental properties have you purchased and held in Cali or New York? You aught not be bad mouthing markets in which you have no experience ... I don't bad mouth Indiana, Tennessee, or Ohio. Trying to do it from thousands of miles away only compounds problems ... great cash flow for his contractors, realtors, and property managers, but not so much for him. Focusing on cash flow only is very narrow minded and short sited in my opinion ... it is only a small part of the total investment return if you are in a desirable RE market. I've got the consistent long-term returns to back that statement up, and no, it isn't speculation or luck, it is a lot of hard work to buy it right, fix it right, rent it right, and eventually sell it right. Good returns can be made in any market in the USA if you are local, aren't afraid of hard work, open minded enough to see the opportunities, flexible and brave enough to seize them.
Investor and Property Manager · Mount Pleasant, SC · Member since 2016 · 24 posts · 21 votes
10y
Rob,
Good question and I think it boils down to personal preference. I like what @Dawn Brenengensaid the most thus far, which is do both. Regarding investing in the market, please don't just buy standard mutual funds, either do index, or what I would recommend even more is read Tony Robbins book: "Money, Master the Game" and listen to the section specifically on asset allocation by Ray Dalio. For instance, the market is down like 7% this year +/- yet his portfolio is still even and has not lost money this year....very cool stuff.
Regarding real estate, my suggestion is do not over-leverage when you buy. Be very conservative in projections on rentals and always plan on at least 10% vacancy. You can do well with rentals, far better than mutual funds, but, either have enough money to hire great managers, or do it yourself and expect to work hard. I own properties that focus on cash flow, so I try to buy properties that cost anywhere from $10,000 to $35,000 per unit. Such as mobile home parks, or low income rentals. Where you live this can be tough, so you may need a different strategy as
@David Faulkner suggested, which may be more active, fix and flip, or other strategy that works in your market. Or, if you are interested in a market like mine, you can buy rental properties on the low end for around $50,000 that can rent for around $800 +/-. But, you still have ongoing repairs, management fees, etc. to consider. As a rule of thumb, a 50% expense ratio is conservative and a good estimate. That being said, you should be able to get a 10% + return all day long, even paying all cash.
Good luck. If you want help finding, analyzing and managing rental properties, please let me know.
Thanks for the info California is to expensive and want to put all my money info one place right know and wanted to know should it be relestate or Mutural funds
Ive said this often on these forums, and it was intended in what I originally wrote...I think people should buy within 90 minutes of where they are. I believe it is a huge misnomer that someone's market is too expensive. You mention you are in California and it is expensive. A quick look and I found a property in your own market at $65k in Chino Hills. In the general LA area I am finding plenty of stuff in a quick perusal under $50k.
Now I am not advocating for you to buy this properties...I am just pointing out that price is not the reason anyone should look outside their own market. I live in the DC area, also one of the most expensive housing markets in the country, and we too have plenty of housing stock that is incredibly cheap. I hear all the time that people do not want to invest here because it is too expensive...and Im like really? I know of a $50k property that rents for $1200....that is too expensive for you? We can often not see what is right in front of us.
One thing that I didn't see mentioned is becoming a private lender for real estate investors.
IMHO - this is the fastest way to grow you limited seed funds.
You can easily charge 1-5 points PLUS 12-15% APR for short term loans that are secured by real estate.
I personally use a handful of private lenders to fund my wholesale business [I don't do assignments, I close on each property before reselling].
I never pay more than 65% LTV and give the lender a Promissory Note along with a Mortgage. In addition, they are listed as "additional insured" on the insurance policy that each property gets. This makes it very secure [more than wall street] for them.
All of my lenders enjoy strong double digit annual returns and only spend a few hours a year [making wire transfers] to realize this profit.
Yes, I am biased when it comes to RE or Wall Street - but ponder this and you'll see why: We all know bankers are some of the most penny pinching individuals on the planet, right? Go to your favorite bank and ask them for a loan like this: "Mr. Banker, I want to get a loan to buy 1000 shares of Vanguard MF - will you help me? Of course the answer will be NO. Then ask them partner with you on some REI and magically the answer is YES.
So...if the cheapest, penny pinching people on the planet won't help you invest in Wall Street - why would you want to be??
Investor · Saint Paul, MN · Member since 2015 · 663 posts · 512 votes
10y
Here's something to think about with real estate say you put $40,000 of your own money into $100,000 property you have the potential to lose 100,000 on the property if something should go very wrong whereas with index funds are mutual funds if you put 40,000 in the most you can lose is 40,000 but in index funds are mutual funds if you keep it in there for a long period of time they will grow due to compound interest and due to the fact that the SMP has returned 11% overage history
Real estate has better returns, but is more hassle.
He's right. How involved do you want to be with your investment? If you want to just write a check and forget about it... go with Mutual funds. If you enjoy the challenge of trying to improve your investment, being hands on, and possibly making a better return.... go with real estate.
Investor · Long Beach, CA · Member since 2015 · 201 posts · 29 votes
10y
Both is probably best... I was a financial planner for 17 years in Canada, and now doing real estate in USA... diversifications is diversifying and mitigate the risks...
tax strategies are awesome in Real Estate, especially in USA. You're welcome to watch my video won website, talking about analyzing 6 deals under 2 minutes, tax strategies, creative financing and invest Out-of-State...
Knowledge in all strategies you want to use is KEY!!!! Learn always.... :-)