Out of curiosity, when investors says "I have X doors", are they including those they are in partnership with?
I have heard many say things like "I have purchased 15 properties this month", but I am never sure if he means they he did, or "they" did.
If the sole owner of said properties, that would be quite impressive.
When someone buys into a syndication of an apartment building with 100 doors for $1,000 they willl say they own 100 doors. It's like buying stock.
Don't worry about people who need an ego boost who are making false claims. I define "false" as information intentionally intended to deceive, kind of like the goverment and unemployment. ;-)
based the syndication model I have more doors than i can count LOL.. means nothing.
Out of curiosity, when investors says "I have X doors", are they including those they are in partnership with?
I have heard many say things like "I have purchased 15 properties this month", but I am never sure if he means they he did, or "they" did.
If the sole owner of said properties, that would be quite impressive.
When someone buys into a syndication of an apartment building with 100 doors for $1,000 they willl say they own 100 doors. It's like buying stock.
Don't worry about people who need an ego boost who are making false claims. I define "false" as information intentionally intended to deceive, kind of like the goverment and unemployment. ;-)
Out of curiosity, when investors says "I have X doors", are they including those they are in partnership with?
I have heard many say things like "I have purchased 15 properties this month", but I am never sure if he means they he did, or "they" did.
If the sole owner of said properties, that would be quite impressive.
When someone buys into a syndication of an apartment building with 100 doors for $1,000 they willl say they own 100 doors. It's like buying stock.
Don't worry about people who need an ego boost who are making false claims. I define "false" as information intentionally intended to deceive, kind of like the goverment and unemployment. ;-)
based the syndication model I have more doors than i can count LOL.. means nothing.
Out of curiosity, when investors says "I have X doors", are they including those they are in partnership with?
I have heard many say things like "I have purchased 15 properties this month", but I am never sure if he means they he did, or "they" did.
If the sole owner of said properties, that would be quite impressive.
When someone buys into a syndication of an apartment building with 100 doors for $1,000 they willl say they own 100 doors. It's like buying stock.
Don't worry about people who need an ego boost who are making false claims. I define "false" as information intentionally intended to deceive, kind of like the goverment and unemployment. ;-)
yea , i saw it all the times lol this is very funny
also i dont understand some folks are so bragging that they own X door as GP but never mentioned the profit after all the costs :-)
Out of curiosity, when investors says "I have X doors", are they including those they are in partnership with?
I have heard many say things like "I have purchased 15 properties this month", but I am never sure if he means they he did, or "they" did.
If the sole owner of said properties, that would be quite impressive.
When someone buys into a syndication of an apartment building with 100 doors for $1,000 they willl say they own 100 doors. It's like buying stock.
Don't worry about people who need an ego boost who are making false claims. I define "false" as information intentionally intended to deceive, kind of like the goverment and unemployment. ;-)
based the syndication model I have more doors than i can count LOL.. means nothing.
Hi Jay, this is related to other post (I don't remember which one) but related to this post.
So this guy is only having one house, but :
Today Jan 18, 2023
Date Listed (Active) MLSListings #ML81916549
$2,098,000 Price
May 1972, Sold for $28,000 May 1, 1972
Date
Sold (Public Records) Public Records
Price $28,000
So in half century, the return on investment is 75 times LOL. Compare to someone that invest in S&P500 in 1972, the return is only 5 times the original investment.
Just look at all the BP interview videos "We went from 0 to 1000 units in a year." Almost everyone in BP interviews counts doors purchased with partners as "theirs".
If you're going to tell me about the number of doors you have, you better also tell me your personal profit/door. Otherwise, I'm inclined to believe you made some bad purchases....
@James Sloan who cares? Are you basing your goals / decisions off of what other people are saying? If one person says they have 20 doors and another says 1,000 will you change your business plan accordingly?
The real answer is: most people will include all doors they are associated with whether they own 100% or 5%. It's about bragging rights, attention and promotion. Would you rather listen to someone with 20 doors or 1,000? Probably 1,000.
@James Sloan Most people include partnerships or limited equity type situations when they're referring to the amount of doors they have
Doors is a fairly meaningless metric in my opinion. What's more impressive is the financials on those doors. Are all those doors cash flowing? Do they have low vacancy? What kind of properties are they? How good are the operations? Quality > Quantity is the key here
I know guys with lots of doors who bought subpar stuff and they generally pay for it one way or the other (bad tenants, losing money on liquidations etc) because, more often than not, emotion (As Jon Kelly said, fame of a 1000 doors > 20 doors) gets in the way
Being well capitalized (partners, LOCs etc) is great but what's even better is when you buy a deal with solid financials and fairly low, well-measured risk going into it
@James Sloan who cares? Are you basing your goals / decisions off of what other people are saying? If one person says they have 20 doors and another says 1,000 will you change your business plan accordingly?
The real answer is: most people will include all doors they are associated with whether they own 100% or 5%. It's about bragging rights, attention and promotion. Would you rather listen to someone with 20 doors or 1,000? Probably 1,000.
keep in mind unless they are paying cash they are in partnership with their lender LOL and or investors. to me the metric is I own X amount of doors free and clear with NO partners.
Out of curiosity, when investors says "I have X doors", are they including those they are in partnership with?
I have heard many say things like "I have purchased 15 properties this month", but I am never sure if he means they he did, or "they" did.
If the sole owner of said properties, that would be quite impressive.
Why not just ask the person (if it's something you really want to know).
Sometimes very large deals will have a few partners, and not everyone has the same percentage ownership.
People will just say what they say--"My family owns several apartments" "I'm a landlord" "We own cash flowing rental properties" "I own X doors", etc..
As others have stated, the # of doors you own is a meaningless metric.
You could own 100 doors in a D class neighborhood that 'cash flow' $10,000 per month but are riddled with turnover, vacancies, crime, delinquent tenants, evictions, repairs, maintenance, and lawsuit risk. Or you could own 30 doors in a B class neighborhood that 'cash flow' $10,000 per month with stable tenants, little to no headache, and minimal deferred maintenance.
Plus no matter what way you slice it, scaling to 100+ doors is very capital intensive. As much as we hear gurus preach ways to buy real estate with little or no money down, it doesn't work that way much in real life. This is why people bring on equity partners then advertise that they "own" a bunch of doors when in reality they "owe" a bunch of people money.
Unless you have a lot of capital on your own, most people with a lot of doors (say 100+) almost certainly have private money or equity partners. Which makes sense because by cooperating with other people you have way more leverage to accomplish more through increased knowledge, capital, systems, and network.
To @Scott E.'s point, leverage is great and all but most gurus would never ask you to pay the loans down while true wealth is built by paying down debts on the collateralized assets + appreciation over time
Owning your assets free and clear is what will get you out of the rat race to a bajillion doors. That is the exact reason why I pay ~$100/mo from personal cash flows to pay down the principal faster
One of my banker buddies made this remark the other day, a ship with lots of gold will eventually either sink or be robbed
I think the # of doors matter when you're underwriting the deal because you have to figure out if I make x improvements how will that impact my bottom line on each unit. A $300 increase in improvements/rent for each door x 100 doors is an extra $30K in your pocket each month.
Out of curiosity, when investors says "I have X doors", are they including those they are in partnership with?
I have heard many say things like "I have purchased 15 properties this month", but I am never sure if he means they he did, or "they" did.
If the sole owner of said properties, that would be quite impressive.
When someone buys into a syndication of an apartment building with 100 doors for $1,000 they willl say they own 100 doors. It's like buying stock.
Don't worry about people who need an ego boost who are making false claims. I define "false" as information intentionally intended to deceive, kind of like the goverment and unemployment. ;-)
based the syndication model I have more doors than i can count LOL.. means nothing.
Hi Jay, this is related to other post (I don't remember which one) but related to this post.
So this guy is only having one house, but :
Today Jan 18, 2023
Date Listed (Active) MLSListings #ML81916549
$2,098,000 Price
May 1972, Sold for $28,000 May 1, 1972
Date
Sold (Public Records) Public Records
Price $28,000
So in half century, the return on investment is 75 times LOL. Compare to someone that invest in S&P500 in 1972, the return is only 5 times the original investment.
In practice they likely did far better than the 75X return. They likely financed the property at purchase. If they owner occupied it at 90% LTV, the return would be 750x. If they refinanced is and extracted out their initial investment the return would increase further.
BTW the house my parents purchased in 1969 for $19.5K is worth ~$1m. Not quite as impressive as the property you referenced, but it does show what sort of return can be achieved via appreciation.
Out of curiosity, when investors says "I have X doors", are they including those they are in partnership with?
I have heard many say things like "I have purchased 15 properties this month", but I am never sure if he means they he did, or "they" did.
If the sole owner of said properties, that would be quite impressive.
When someone buys into a syndication of an apartment building with 100 doors for $1,000 they willl say they own 100 doors. It's like buying stock.
Don't worry about people who need an ego boost who are making false claims. I define "false" as information intentionally intended to deceive, kind of like the goverment and unemployment. ;-)
based the syndication model I have more doors than i can count LOL.. means nothing.
Hi Jay, this is related to other post (I don't remember which one) but related to this post.
So this guy is only having one house, but :
Today Jan 18, 2023
Date Listed (Active) MLSListings #ML81916549
$2,098,000 Price
May 1972, Sold for $28,000 May 1, 1972
Date
Sold (Public Records) Public Records
Price $28,000
So in half century, the return on investment is 75 times LOL. Compare to someone that invest in S&P500 in 1972, the return is only 5 times the original investment.
In practice they likely did far better than the 75X return. They likely financed the property at purchase. If they owner occupied it at 90% LTV, the return would be 750x. If they refinanced is and extracted out their initial investment the return would increase further.
BTW the house my parents purchased in 1969 for $19.5K is worth ~$1m. Not quite as impressive as the property you referenced, but it does show what sort of return can be achieved via appreciation.
yeah, that particular zip code appreciation is amazing......btw 20k to 1m is normal nowadays I guess..
Unless you have a lot of capital on your own, most people with a lot of doors (say 100+) almost certainly have private money or equity partners. Which makes sense because by cooperating with other people you have way more leverage to accomplish more through increased knowledge, capital, systems, and network.
This is actually similar to Realtor bragging about their number too, something like this, oh my realtor had 20 million transactions last year hahaha but then when you examine the time, that team has 100 members and only sells 20 houses with each priced as 100k.
why can't folks just become humble hahaha we know some realtors only had 3 transactions under your name for given year and you don't even met your cap so your comms is still 50%
sometimes, it's the contractor and handyman that made the most money and they never bragged their number.