It's Feeling a Lot Like 2007

It's Feeling a Lot Like 2007

Real Estate Agent · Sebastopol, CA · Member since 2017 · 56 posts · 161 votes

Hi All, 

Wanted to start a discussion on peoples outlook on the real estate market and the economy in general. I know it is a controversial topic but I have not seen many discussions on BiggerPocket on this topic and I believe they are important conversations to have. 

Here are my general thoughts on the topic. 

Economies always go through cycles and we are coming up on the longest bull market era in history. If history is any indication of the future their have always been corrections or crashes every 8-10 years. 

Data

1. Interest rates are rising and the yield curve is flattening a tell tale sign of future growth expectations are declining

2. Corporations are turning to stock buybacks because they cannot find internal or M&A returns that can get a high enough return. Once buybacks are done will corporations begin to "restructure" or contract leading to layoffs and the downward spiral of layoff, people not buying as many goods and services leading to more layoffs. 

3. Inflation is another worry when prices begin to increase at a higher rate after almost a century of 2% inflation people are going to be inclined to buy less leading to the ugly spiral as well. 

4. In the stock market is extremely over prices with PE ratios being the highest they have ever been.

5. Housing prices especially in California have increase much more rapidly then wage increases and I do not see this as a sustainable recipe.

There are many other factors and coming from an analytical background i know there are ways to spin the numbers to make it look any way you want. 

I cannot time the market and nor do I think anyone can but I am writing this post to get others perspectives about where we are and what they think of the future outlook of the economy. With the ways things are, my guess is there will be at least a big correction in 2019 or 2020 but I could be way off as well. 

I would like to get peoples opinions on both sides. I am not someone stuck in my ways and truly believe that debating with someone that has complete opposite views is the best way to learn in life. 

75Reply
1,472 views

Most Popular Reply

Jay HinrichsBusiness Member
Real Estate Consultant · Summerlin, NV · Member since 2014 · 45k+ posts · 66k+ votes
8y
Originally posted by @Account Closed:

The economy needs a good cleansing of bad fed zirp policy.  It has so distorted the economy.   EZ money means asset prices go up.....what has happened ,   asset prices have gone up.

Out of staters buying in the HOOD is always a bad sign.  So whats the play here.   Capital gains play?

 out of state buying in the HOOD has been going on for about 25 years that I know of.. with no stop in sight.   

there was a thread last week titled

" thank you bigger pockets  0 to 15 doors in one year"

Well that got at least 200 responses of which 197 of them were way to go congrats I cant wait to do what you did ..

well what did that investor do.. he ripped a bunch of equity out of his prime CA residence and paid cash for D class in the mid west 

little plex's that have 400 dollar renters in them..  to me I am like OK.... you leverage the family home buy the toughest rentals on the planet and 97% of the people on this site want to do the same thing and cant wait to do the same thing.. so that's your mind set.. 

I hope it works for that guy.. but folks just don't know what they don't know.. and there is this irrational exuberance to get doors at any cost because its the way to financial freedom   ( what ever that means).. for most it means I guess being self employed.

See this reply in the discussion

278 Replies

Jump to latestLatest
  • Real Estate Broker · Southern California · Member since 2018 · 10 posts · 3 votes
    8y

    Speculation drives cyclical industry cycles.  Because of the cyclical nature of industries there is no avoiding recessions at the bottom of a cycle after a dip in perceived values.  I agree that the real estate recession won't be as deep as it was in 2008 because of the current state of loan requirements but it is bound it happen.  When it does people who have over extended their cash flow will need to make adjustments to their portfolios and people will lose houses.  There is no getting around this.

    Here in the Southern California I am seeing a continued uppward trend of the value of houses sold, but a reduction to 2016 levels of the number of closings.  That means that while the number of transactions are starting to flatten out that the values are starting to exponentially increase, this is a red flag.  I would be careful right now about over extending cash flow.

  • Olathe, KS · Member since 2018 · 148 posts · 207 votes
    8y
    Originally posted by @John Kunick:

    @Kraig Kujawa, totally agree about resting easy via cash flow.

    Here are other key things perhaps many on this thread will consider about how different we are now vs. 2007:

    1.  The real estate bubble in 2007/2008 was primarily based on government-induced loans that were then backed by government via taxpayer.  In short, due to government intervention in the market place and the consequent greed, money was too easy to get.  There were people getting loans that had no business getting loans and the house of cards fell.  This is not currently the issue.  While loans are easier now than they were five years ago, they are nothing like it was in the early-to-mid 2000's.  No comparison.

    2.  Those people that were getting loans that shouldn't have, are now renting and that has propped up the rental demand and thus the cash flow for investing.

    3.  Savings rate - In mid-to-late 2000's, the savings rate was 1-2%.  It is now almost 7%

    4. Not all markets are like California - Like many have commented on this thread, CA seems to be out of bounds. Perhaps there are other markets like that. But, there are still many markets where real estate has acted normally the last ten years. Even in Tulsa, where I own a significant portfolio of SFH, the prices still have room to run up. Sure, they are not as attractive as they were after the crash, but there are still bargains to be had - and rents have increased as prices have gone up.

    5.  Equity - In early 2000's there was very little equity in most rental properties (and real estate in general).  That is not the case now perhaps due to loan requirements.  This will curb panic selling should a recession hit.

    So, all in all, I see a lot of differences between now and 2007.  That is not to say that a recession or correction might not take place (they are usually psychologically driven), but I do believe the fundamentals are significantly different now

    For #5, the equity thing, there are a large number of FHA home buyers who have very little equity. A couple websites mention 25% to 40% of the home purchases are FHA, that would seem to imply that there are a large amount of homes with low equity. I'm not saying that it's like 2007 or anything, but people are buying a large amount of houses with very little down.

  • Investor · Broken Arrow, OK · Member since 2016 · 210 posts · 314 votes
    8y

    @Nicole Heasley Beitenman, RE: student loan crisis.

    Per my post above, I was one of those shaking my head at the stupidity of those taking loans out for real estate in early-to-mid 2000's.  While I understand their motivation, the key is they were like sheep being led to financial slaughter due to government intervention.  Therefore, I was setting a lot of money aside to buy up cheap homes once the house of cards fell.  I am thankful for the opportunity that was presented.

    I know there will be some that will find my comments troubling as they may think I was looking to profit off of someone else's misfortune.  Unfortunately, I was telling lots of people back in early 2000's not to invest nor to take the easy money to buy a personal residence unless they could put a large downpayment.  To be honest, I think many of them deserve what they got as there were lots of people telling them not to do it.

    However, on the student loan crisis - which I see a lot of similarities in terms of government intervention driving up college costs due to easy money - I don't see any ways to either prevent a collapse or how an investor can find opportunities by picking up the pieces.

    Anyone see any good ways to avoid the collapse?  Any ways to pick up the pieces?

  • Real Estate Agent · Sebastopol, CA · Member since 2017 · 56 posts · 161 votes
    8y

    @Omar Khan

    I am young and naive. I have so much to learn from people like yourself and others in the industry. I have begun to network in the area but I will dig in more. I know a lot of people in the industry that are always willing to help which is awesome. I have not yet been to a meet up but I have heard from many people that they are salesy. 

  • Investor · Youngstown, OH · Member since 2017 · 2k+ posts · 2k+ votes
    8y

    @John Kunick I think the opportunity will be in the form of the availability of tenants and homes. Those with heavy student loan debt will have more difficulty buying. Therefore, they will become potential tenants. This is already happening. The bulk of the burden is currently being carried by millennials, and even those that can afford to buy a home are more and more frequently choosing not to. And the more difficulty you have selling a home, the lower you price said home. Bad news for flippers, but good news for those looking to pursue the BRRR method or buy and hold turnkeys.

  • Investor · Broken Arrow, OK · Member since 2016 · 210 posts · 314 votes
    8y
    Originally posted by @Aaron Taylor:
    Originally posted by @John Kunick:

    @Kraig Kujawa, totally agree about resting easy via cash flow.

    Here are other key things perhaps many on this thread will consider about how different we are now vs. 2007:

    1.  The real estate bubble in 2007/2008 was primarily based on government-induced loans that were then backed by government via taxpayer.  In short, due to government intervention in the market place and the consequent greed, money was too easy to get.  There were people getting loans that had no business getting loans and the house of cards fell.  This is not currently the issue.  While loans are easier now than they were five years ago, they are nothing like it was in the early-to-mid 2000's.  No comparison.

    2.  Those people that were getting loans that shouldn't have, are now renting and that has propped up the rental demand and thus the cash flow for investing.

    3.  Savings rate - In mid-to-late 2000's, the savings rate was 1-2%.  It is now almost 7%

    4. Not all markets are like California - Like many have commented on this thread, CA seems to be out of bounds. Perhaps there are other markets like that. But, there are still many markets where real estate has acted normally the last ten years. Even in Tulsa, where I own a significant portfolio of SFH, the prices still have room to run up. Sure, they are not as attractive as they were after the crash, but there are still bargains to be had - and rents have increased as prices have gone up.

    5.  Equity - In early 2000's there was very little equity in most rental properties (and real estate in general).  That is not the case now perhaps due to loan requirements.  This will curb panic selling should a recession hit.

    So, all in all, I see a lot of differences between now and 2007.  That is not to say that a recession or correction might not take place (they are usually psychologically driven), but I do believe the fundamentals are significantly different now

    For #5, the equity thing, there are a large number of FHA home buyers who have very little equity. A couple websites mention 25% to 40% of the home purchases are FHA, that would seem to imply that there are a large amount of homes with low equity. I'm not saying that it's like 2007 or anything, but people are buying a large amount of houses with very little down.

    Aaron, yes there are FHA loans without significant equity. But, as you mentioned, they are not the majority of loans. Compare that to 2000's, when people were getting not only zero down loans, but actually 110% loans. It was like a feeding frenzy with both government and mortgage lenders (as well as credit rating agencies) putting lots of fuel on the fire. Have you seen the movie "Big Short"?

  • Investor · Broken Arrow, OK · Member since 2016 · 210 posts · 314 votes
    8y
    Originally posted by @Nicole Heasley Beitenman:

    @John Kunick I think the opportunity will be in the form of the availability of tenants and homes. Those with heavy student loan debt will have more difficulty buying. Therefore, they will become potential tenants. This is already happening. The bulk of the burden is currently being carried by millennials, and even those that can afford to buy a home are more and more frequently choosing not to. And the more difficulty you have selling a home, the lower you price said home. Bad news for flippers, but good news for those looking to pursue the BRRR method or buy and hold turnkeys.

     Good points, which support the buy and hold strategy (that's all i do).  But, do you see any chance of avoiding the specific student loan collapse?  If it does collapse, do you see any specific "non-real estate" opportunities for investors?

  • Real Estate Agent · Sebastopol, CA · Member since 2017 · 56 posts · 161 votes
    8y

    @Stephen Kunen

    I will take a look at the article and I also think there is some truth to your point. I am just going to start searching and putting in offers that make sense to what will work for me to be cash flow. I probably will not get a lot but I may come across someone that needs to sell fast. I also might try to start looking for off market deals!

  • Real Estate Agent · Sebastopol, CA · Member since 2017 · 56 posts · 161 votes
    8y

    @Account Closed

    Would you take the time to talk to me on the phone? I would like to hear more about your experience!

  • Real Estate Broker · Southern California · Member since 2018 · 10 posts · 3 votes
    8y
    Originally posted by @Frank Wong:

    Great posts everyone.  Markets go in cycles, but past performance is not indicative of future returns.  They do give us warning signs on when to tighten up and be conservative.  We have been on a tremendous bull cycle which we could be on the tail end of things.  A correction is surely in the cards given the scope of everything mentioned. 

    I try to keep it simple. Not every home in the area can be a million dollars.  Million dollars in West Oakland, please good luck with that.  Incomes don't justify these prices.  I see the crises starting with tech, drops in stock prices in tech companies that are making money and not making money.  Job layoffs in tech will have a ripple effect.  How bad the ripple effect we don't know.  We also have a major currency crisis that is going on.  The big thing we have that no news outlet is talking about is QT.  When you pull 30billion out of the markets each month you are draining liquidity.  Its that simple less money in the system equals a contracting market add that with rising rates.  Well, that's bad news bears. 

    Does this mean a crash does this mean stop investing?  No, not really.  Just know your risk.  Don't be over leverage.  I am conservative and hate debt.  When you have no debt or very little it gives you one thing to survive any downturn.  HOLDING POWER.   I think Jay mentioned a guy cashing out his house to buy Hood homes in Memphis.  That's crazy to me.   I think a lot of people have only seen one cycle which is up.  They don't remember the last real estate crash or dot come bubble of the early 2000s.  Risk Management is key. 

    If you are not overleveraged and have cash.  You can survive the downturn whenever it happens and you can also buy some deals.  I look to buy when the markets are going up and down.  Like Warren Buffet says "The market transfers money from the impatient to the patient"

    I agree with you that there is a good chance that the bubble will take place in Tech.  Just look at all of the inflated values centered around the industry in the Bay Area.  A large part of the problem has been easy money and over inflation in the equity markets.  As the markets heat up we tend to see exponential growth in value due to the historical trend nature of financial forecasting and companies feeling that they have to meet industry bench marks in performance in order to not under perform the market.  It is one big self fulfilling prophecy and at the end of the day there needs to be a correction because the trend simply can not be sustained.  If you increase volume forecasts and cant reach the volume goals then the only way to meet goals is through increasing prices, which leads to price inflation, which leads to...

    Personally, while many people will disagree with me, I believe the monetary tightening and increased interest rates is over due.  Yes it can potentially contribute to the beginning of a financial recession, but it can also mitigate the effect when managed properly.

  • Investor · Youngstown, OH · Member since 2017 · 2k+ posts · 2k+ votes
    8y

    @John Kunick There's no avoiding it. Not uless the government bails out borrowers, which is unlikely to happen as they're moving in the complete opposite direction by trying to hinder student debt relief rather than accelerate it. What do you mean by "non-real estate" opportunities? Do you mean stock market opportunities?

  • Investor · Broken Arrow, OK · Member since 2016 · 210 posts · 314 votes
    8y
    Originally posted by @Nicole Heasley Beitenman:

    @John Kunick There's no avoiding it. Not uless the government bails out borrowers, which is unlikely to happen as they're moving in the complete opposite direction by trying to hinder student debt relief rather than accelerate it. What do you mean by "non-real estate" opportunities? Do you mean stock market opportunities?

     No, what I mean is there any way for investors to profit from helping bail out students or from picking up the pieces?  For example, investors could easily make money by buying up distressed housing after the stupidity of early 2000's.....  I don't see any opportunities, but just wondering if others might?

  • Rental Property Investor · Chicago, IL · Member since 2014 · 22 posts · 21 votes
    8y
    @Jay Hinrichs Sorry I’m relatively new to responding on these things but I’m truly fascinated by something you just said that I’ve noticed around my area - What happens usually when you start seeing fewer home owners and more renters in an area? Does that mean the neighborhood is becoming more trendy or does it mean it’s about to go to hell? Does it matter whether the neighborhood is mainly sfh or mfh?
  • Jay HinrichsBusiness Member
    Real Estate Consultant · Summerlin, NV · Member since 2014 · 45k+ posts · 66k+ votes
    8y
    Originally posted by @Jeffrey Isenberg:

    There are definitely some valid points that have been addressed and of particular interest those on CA real estate.   As a buy and hold investor in the SoCal Market, it is important to consider that without over-leveraging that what happens in the short-term will have little effect on an overall investment plan.  Get Rich Slow, it's a long term play.

    The three recession/recovery cycles prior to 2007 in the South Bay area of Los Angeles played out as follows:

    1967-1981

    4 year downturn of $1.00/sq. ft. or 5.6%

    11 year recovery of $69.00 sq. ft. or 406%

    1981-1991

    1 year downturn of $1.00/sq. ft. or 1.2%

    8 year recovery of $55.60 sq. ft. or 65%

    1991-2007

    4 year downturn of $26.40/sq. ft. or 18.8%

    12 year recovery of $216.00 sq. ft. or 189%

    No need to wait for the big drop as there is really no way to tell when it will arrive and real estate does not always move in line with the stock market.  Invest conservatively for the long term in appreciating markets and you will prosper.

    nice post.... and I high light APPRECIATING markets  and LONG TERM  … if its the rental game I like that and pay down your debt.. you retire when your rentals are paid for .. you get a huge increase in income and off into the sunset you go.. without having to own so many units that is a J O B unless you want it to be.. some people are very pleased to live the life of a landlord.. I see many hubby and wife teams in the mid west do this..  Wife is the leasing agent and hubby is the handy man .. they pay cash for low value assets they know they are not really going to go up much.. but they have no debt and they collect a few a year end of a 20 year run they own 30 to 40 free and clear making a nice living especially if they are in a small rural mid western town..  

  • Jay HinrichsBusiness Member
    Real Estate Consultant · Summerlin, NV · Member since 2014 · 45k+ posts · 66k+ votes
    8y
    Originally posted by @Aaron Taylor:
    Originally posted by @John Kunick:

    @Kraig Kujawa, totally agree about resting easy via cash flow.

    Here are other key things perhaps many on this thread will consider about how different we are now vs. 2007:

    1.  The real estate bubble in 2007/2008 was primarily based on government-induced loans that were then backed by government via taxpayer.  In short, due to government intervention in the market place and the consequent greed, money was too easy to get.  There were people getting loans that had no business getting loans and the house of cards fell.  This is not currently the issue.  While loans are easier now than they were five years ago, they are nothing like it was in the early-to-mid 2000's.  No comparison.

    2.  Those people that were getting loans that shouldn't have, are now renting and that has propped up the rental demand and thus the cash flow for investing.

    3.  Savings rate - In mid-to-late 2000's, the savings rate was 1-2%.  It is now almost 7%

    4. Not all markets are like California - Like many have commented on this thread, CA seems to be out of bounds. Perhaps there are other markets like that. But, there are still many markets where real estate has acted normally the last ten years. Even in Tulsa, where I own a significant portfolio of SFH, the prices still have room to run up. Sure, they are not as attractive as they were after the crash, but there are still bargains to be had - and rents have increased as prices have gone up.

    5.  Equity - In early 2000's there was very little equity in most rental properties (and real estate in general).  That is not the case now perhaps due to loan requirements.  This will curb panic selling should a recession hit.

    So, all in all, I see a lot of differences between now and 2007.  That is not to say that a recession or correction might not take place (they are usually psychologically driven), but I do believe the fundamentals are significantly different now

    For #5, the equity thing, there are a large number of FHA home buyers who have very little equity. A couple websites mention 25% to 40% of the home purchases are FHA, that would seem to imply that there are a large amount of homes with low equity. I'm not saying that it's like 2007 or anything, but people are buying a large amount of houses with very little down.

    but as long as they are still employed  married not sick don't have to bail kids out of jail.. they should still make their payments.. keep in mind 5 to 6% of all mortgages are in default all the time.. in every market no matter how good.. it just got acute there.. with strategic foreclosures and that could happen.. people could choose to walk..  

  • Rental Property Investor · Chicago, IL · Member since 2014 · 22 posts · 21 votes
    8y
    @Sam Shueh Damn Sam, you wanna go to a party later? :) jk. You are making me rethink things in a big way. The Big Short was obviously a dramatic interpretation. The lending practices of yore are by no means at work today.
  • Rental Property Investor · Las Vegas, NV · Member since 2018 · 133 posts · 171 votes
    8y

    There used to be a saying "Don't fight the Fed".  Guess this time it's different, lol.

  • Colorado Springs, CO · Member since 2016 · 39 posts · 6 votes
    8y
    John Kunick profit from potential student loan victims? Interesting question. Investors can “own” distressed students, just like distressed properties, LOL
  • Real Estate Broker · Commerce City, CO · Member since 2018 · 107 posts · 55 votes
    8y
    @Jay Hinrichs So Jay are you saying that you rather see someone not get into real estate at all, or for a longer period of time if it means they would have to use a heloc on their primary residence to do so? That's the point I'm at currently. I have about $25k in savings that I plan to use as reserve funds on any rental property I purchase, but was planning on using some of the $100k in equity from my primary residence to get started. Now I'm not looking to just buy property to buy it, and anything I'm looking at I'm making sure it cash flows at 100 percent financed. But I feel like if I didn't use this strategy it would be a lot longer of a road before I could purchase my first property.
  • Rental Property Investor · Hagerstown, MD · Member since 2018 · 26 posts · 3 votes
    8y

    @Tristan Colborg - I'm right there with you!

    @Jay Hinrichs

    well this thread is just a tad terrifying. Okay, needing a little reassurance -- in the process of getting a HELOC on our home, taking about 60% of our equity (on our first home that we "slow" flipped) out on a line to have ready to make moves when the right deal comes along.

    Our plan is to be patient and incredibly particular about the next property, hoping to find an owner-financed opportunity, and had planned to BRRRR. But maybe just rehab, rent, and hold? We are working uber-local, and sticking with what (and who) we know.

  • Patti RobertsonBusiness Member
    Property Manager · Virginia Beach, VA · Member since 2016 · 2k+ posts · 2k+ votes
    8y
    @Dylan Mathias I agree 100%! Banks are making stupid decision on the loans that qualify for automated underwriting. I’m looking forward to this next downturn. We won’t buy as many as we did last time, but they will be in much better condition, b/c as an investor community we have already rehabbed the majority of properties in our markets.
  • Real Estate Agent · Goleta, CA · Member since 2017 · 73 posts · 92 votes
    8y

    Hi Everyone,

    Im reading this thread and learning a lot. I have 2 SFR rentals myself and have not gone much further than that because I have not felt comfortable with the market lately. Ive just been watching, reading and researching. I am in SoCal so that in of itself is another reason I am patient. In reading all these comments I feel a bit better knowing I AM being patient. My question to all the seasoned investors is this,

    Can you tell me what common Real Estate indicators I should be following, to know, "ok, we are officially in a downturn, correction, crash". I'll probably know a "crash" but for more subtle corrections what indexes, graphs, news, media should I be looking at and reading (ie) CPI, Wallstreet Journal, MLS inventory, Or maybe I shouldn't look at media at all? I don't know, what I do know is that I use my intuition a lot in Real Estate and so far Ive been ok. Could it be that this is all I need to use?

    Any advice is greatly appreciated, thank you for starting this conversation, just because its come up multiple times before doesn't mean we all can't stand to learn a little more and contemplate on it again. It can only improve awareness.

    ~Ally

  • Roshan K.Pro Member
    Oklahoma City, OK · Member since 2017 · 258 posts · 215 votes
    8y
    Originally posted by @Account Closed:

    Am i the only one who actually wants a crash. i was out of the country on the last one so i really missed a lot of oppurtunities.

    Then i can become pro D class.   You know that D er in 2018 that cost $18,000 now selling for $8,0000 thats what financial freedom looks like..............................hahahaha.

     A crash may hurt 5 people for every 1 person that can capitalize on it. I never wish for a crash (and don't think anyone should) because it causes trouble for people. You don't want anyone you know to be homeless.

    With that said, I have no problems capitalizing when there is a crash or softening. I just never wish for one.

  • Destin, FL · Member since 2018 · 20 posts · 8 votes
    8y
    @Aaron Taylor Federal Housing Administration (FHA) loans were created to promote homeownership. These loans have lower down payment requirements and more liberal underwriting standards than most conventional mortgages. Because of their stated purpose, FHA loans are, for the most part, restricted to buyers who intend to occupy the houses they are purchasing. An FHA loan typically cannot be used to finance a second home, a rental home, a vacation home or investment property. However, there are a few exceptions to the general rule. People are not going out and buying investment properties with a FHA loan in mass. While there Is little equity it is also there primary residence and without this option most people could never afford the down payment. Read more: Can FHA loans be used for investment property? | Investopedia https://www.investopedia.com/ask/answers/112515/can-fha-loans-be-used-investment-property.asp#ixzz5OgHoTez8 Follow us: Investopedia on Facebook
  • Olathe, KS · Member since 2018 · 148 posts · 207 votes
    8y
    Originally posted by @Justin McFarland:
    @Aaron Taylor Federal Housing Administration (FHA) loans were created to promote homeownership. These loans have lower down payment requirements and more liberal underwriting standards than most conventional mortgages. Because of their stated purpose, FHA loans are, for the most part, restricted to buyers who intend to occupy the houses they are purchasing. An FHA loan typically cannot be used to finance a second home, a rental home, a vacation home or investment property. However, there are a few exceptions to the general rule.

    People are not going out and buying investment properties with a FHA loan in mass. While there Is little equity it is also there primary residence and without this option most people could never afford the down payment.

    Read more: Can FHA loans be used for investment property? | Investopedia https://www.investopedia.com/ask/answers/112515/can-fha-loans-be-used-investment-property.asp#ixzz5OgHoTez8 Follow us: Investopedia on Facebook

     Oh I totally understand that, the one post just mentioned that we aren't overleveraged and I was just pointing out that 25% to 40% of the loans made today are at a high leverage point.    Not that it means anything other than maybe people are being stretched a little thin possibly, and if housing dropped you could have a large number of homes under water mortgage wise. 

Join the conversationCreate a free account to reply, vote on answers and follow this thread.