Skip to content

Let's keep in touch

Subscribe to our newsletter for timely insights and actionable tips on your real estate journey.

By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions
Followed Discussions Followed Categories Followed People Followed Locations
Commercial Real Estate Investing
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 7 years ago on . Most recent reply

Account Closed
  • Los Angeles, CA
56
Votes |
73
Posts

No Certificate of Occupancy

Account Closed
  • Los Angeles, CA
Posted

Currently trying to close a deal on a fitness center that's still being developed here in California. 

Seller can guarantee the Certificate of Occupancy upon close of the escrow but when I requested that we include the Certificate of Occupancy as part of the materials provided in the Buyer's Contingencies to be reviewed prior to closing escrow (along with the lease, environmental reports, etc.), the agent said the seller will not accept this.

I'm confused as to why the seller wouldn't agree to this. If the seller can "guarantee" the Certificate of Occupancy, why wouldn't they be okay to include it with the other materials they're providing as part of the Buyer's Contingency? Why are they eager to close before providing a Certificate of Occupancy?

**This is a large developer and the tenant is a national fitness chain.

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

28,241
Posts
41,504
Votes
Nathan Gesner
  • Real Estate Broker
  • Cody, WY
41,504
Votes |
28,241
Posts
Nathan Gesner
  • Real Estate Broker
  • Cody, WY
ModeratorReplied

That sounds shady. Just because it's a "large developer" and "national fitness chain" doesn't mean they are doing everything above board.

  • Nathan Gesner
business profile image
The DIY Landlord Book
4.7 stars
245 Reviews

Loading replies...