How Much Does Market Selection Matter in Multifamily Investing?

Question

One thing I keep hearing from experienced investors is that buying the “right deal” is important, but buying in the right market might matter even more long term.

Curious what others think:

When evaluating a multifamily opportunity, how much weight are you putting on:
• population growth
• job growth
• landlord friendliness
• taxes/insurance
• local rent demand
• affordability
• long-term appreciation potential

versus just focusing on the numbers of the deal itself?

Would be interested hearing how different investors balance market quality vs deal quality in today’s environment.

J Castro · Answer

From a lender’s perspective, market selection matters just as much as the deal itself — sometimes more.

A strong operator can improve operations, reduce expenses, and execute a business plan, but they can’t change the market fundamentals around the property.

When we evaluate multifamily deals, we’re looking at both:

• the quality of the asset/business planAND• the long-term strength of the market

The deals that tend to perform best over time are usually in markets with:
• steady population growth
• diversified job growth
• strong rental demand
• landlord-friendly environments
• reasonable taxes and insurance costs
• affordability relative to local incomes

In today’s environment especially, taxes and insurance have become huge underwriting factors. A property with strong cash flow on paper can quickly become a problem if expenses keep rising faster than rents.

That said, market quality alone doesn’t save a bad deal. We’ve seen investors overpay in “hot” markets assuming appreciation will bail them out later. The numbers still have to work day one.

Personally, I’d rather finance:• a solid deal in a good marketthan• a great-looking deal in a declining or unstable market

The best multifamily investors seem to balance both — disciplined acquisitions in markets with long-term economic durability.

Michael Swan · Answer

100% agree!! The team is more important than the market. I have 10 apartment complexes in NE Ohio, primarily Lake County, Ohio and nobody ever said it was a sexy area that all the gurus talk about. Although it has been very sexy for me!!!!! I love talking shop!! Feel free to reach out to me!! If you change the way you look at things the things you look at change right before your eyes!!!

Swanny (Michael Swan) OG BP Podcast 238 Guest

Brad Sicoli · Answer

First, I think that the team matters more than the market. A great manager can make a bad deal good and a bad manager can make a good deal bad.

Those other factors that you mention are just noise and I think markets are generally efficient. In other words, the price and market rents are reflected in the price already. Not that you should ignore them, I just think the team is more important than the economic conditions. I also think the fundamentals or as you call it "focusing on the numbers" is more important than those economic factors that you list.

Also, I think you're missing a very important economic factor on your list: supply. I put more weight into new units coming on than I do population growth. If population growth is 0%, nominal wages increase at 3%, and there is 0 new supply added or lost, then I would expect rents to increase by 3%. In other words, population and job growth alone is only half the picture, that's the demand of rentals. Austin had high population and job growth but now it's crashing because it was overbuilt. I believe the supply factors are more important than the demand factors.

Stacy Raskin · Answer

From what I hear from investors, they usually want some kind of cash flow, a market that has rental demand and tenants that have job opportunities and will be able to pay their rent. Also, local housing laws as far as how tenant or landlord friendly the laws are can make a big difference in their investment.

Greg Scott · Answer

Based on the criteria you listed, Austin TX was one of the very best market to invest in 5 years ago. Ask people how that went.

Nick Sansivero · Answer

@Dalton Mongold the old saying “Location, Location, Location” exists for a reason. Obviously you should buy the right deal but only in a market you’d be comfortable holding through a cycle. Personally I always start by analyzing and comparing cities/counties/ZIPs as a whole (with Tenantry.ai) to make sure they’re likely to appreciate before ever running numbers on individual deals. Even if I found a property that looks like a cash cow I wouldn’t touch it if I didn’t think the area was ripe for appreciation

Vijay Friedman · Answer

@Dalton MongoldI’d weigh both, but market quality becomes more important the longer the hold period is. A strong deal in a weak market can work short-term, but for multifamily, rent demand, job growth, taxes/insurance, and landlord-friendliness can affect the refinance or DSCR exit later.

For me, the deal numbers should still work on day one, but the market helps determine whether the exit strategy is actually realistic.

G. Brian Davis · Answer

Depends on the goals of the deal, buy we spend a lot of time looking at both the market and the operator plus the projected returns. We pay close attention to population and job growth, landlord friendliness, affordability, and whether rent demand is truly sustainable.

Kyle Snodgrass · Answer

Deal quality is important but I tend to error on the side of vetting the market more than the deal. "A rising tide lifts all boats" is certainly true in real estate so I'd prefer to be in a growing market.

All of the items you listed are important but I tend to focus in on job growth and inflowing investor dollars. For example, we're looking at a deal in a market where Tesla & SpaceX are expanding their footprint - that's going to lift the market for the next several years as they finish construction and then ramp up hiring. So even if we can't execute our value-add strategy, the market should provide a level of "fallback" growth that can support us.

That's why you'll hear people say "invest in your backyard" because you're closer to the local news and drivers of the market. But the principals are the same: economic growth fuels population growth fuels rent growth (assuming constant supply).

Morgan Weiss · Answer

"Market over deal" holds up, but the word doing the work is market — and it's almost never the metro, it's the submarket. The spread between tracts inside one metro is bigger than anything you'll win haggling price.

Easy way to see it: pull the latest ACS for every tract in one county and compute gross rent-to-price (annual median gross rent ÷ median home value) — a rough proxy for the income-to-cost a submarket structurally supports. In Harris County (Houston), across ~960 tracts the middle half runs about 5.1% to 9.1%, and the 10th-to-90th percentile spans ~3.4% to ~10.9%. That's a ~4-point band on the structural number, inside one metro and one MSA-level job market. Phoenix and Chicago show the same shape — a 2-3 point spread across their tracts.

Set that next to a cap-rate haggle, which on a good day moves your entry yield a few tenths of a point. Submarket choice moves the gross-yield band your eventual cap rate sits inside by several points — close to an order of magnitude more leverage than the negotiation. You can win the best deal of your life in the wrong tract and still lose to someone who paid retail in the right one.

Demand splits just as hard. Population 2020-2024 in those same Houston tracts: the median tract was basically flat, but the top decile grew ~23% while the bottom decile lost ~15%, and roughly half the county's tracts shed people over four years. Same metro, opposite trajectories two miles apart.

Caveat: median home value skews single-family, so treat rent-to-price as a submarket screen, not a substitute for underwriting the building's actual NOI. But as a first filter it's brutal and free — for the specific tracts you're weighing, pull rent-to-value and 4-year population change off data.census.gov (B25064 gross rent, B25077 home value, B01003 population) and let that pick the submarket before you ever argue price.

How Much Does Market Selection Matter in Multifamily Investing?

How Much Does Market Selection Matter in Multifamily Investing?

Most Popular Reply

11 Replies