Here is a list of 17 metros in the US that have population larger than 900k and median house price is below 400k:

Which metro you recommend and which metro you don't recommend?
I know California is not so investor friendly due to high taxes and non landlord friendly regulation.
Florida has high insurance costs in some areas?!
What do you think?
@Justin Brin great lead in for discussion, thanks for putting that together. Generally speaking, we have the same approach - avoid areas that are heavy in renter friendly regulation (i.e. CA). Then TX is tough right now because of property taxes. And then, Florida is difficult with insurance right now until that stabilizes.
Then, when we look at Atlanta and Charlotte we see a good amount of supply because of the footprint of large institutiional buyers (i.e. invitation homes).
That leaves the midwest (OH, IN, MO), TN, and the one off markets like Tucson and Albuquerque. Personally, we have had success in small multi-family across OK, TN, MO, KY, IN, OH.
@Justin Brin great lead in for discussion, thanks for putting that together. Generally speaking, we have the same approach - avoid areas that are heavy in renter friendly regulation (i.e. CA). Then TX is tough right now because of property taxes. And then, Florida is difficult with insurance right now until that stabilizes.
Then, when we look at Atlanta and Charlotte we see a good amount of supply because of the footprint of large institutiional buyers (i.e. invitation homes).
That leaves the midwest (OH, IN, MO), TN, and the one off markets like Tucson and Albuquerque. Personally, we have had success in small multi-family across OK, TN, MO, KY, IN, OH.
@Justin Brin great lead in for discussion, thanks for putting that together. Generally speaking, we have the same approach - avoid areas that are heavy in renter friendly regulation (i.e. CA). Then TX is tough right now because of property taxes. And then, Florida is difficult with insurance right now until that stabilizes.
Then, when we look at Atlanta and Charlotte we see a good amount of supply because of the footprint of large institutiional buyers (i.e. invitation homes).
That leaves the midwest (OH, IN, MO), TN, and the one off markets like Tucson and Albuquerque. Personally, we have had success in small multi-family across OK, TN, MO, KY, IN, OH.
Great question! I've invested in Indianapolis metro area - SFH#1 is in a nice suburb with great schools and SFH#2 is in a Class C moving up to B area It's got a diverse job market. FedEx and Eli Lilly are two of the larger employers. I feel that the property tax rates are a little high 2.77% and 2.78% but I'm still cash flow positive despite the large property tax increase on SFH#1 (owned for 10 years).
I considered FL (not Tampa or Jacksonville but the Panhandle, Fort Walton Beach and West Panama City Beach) but the insurance costs are high. I considered Cincinnati but since I know Indy well (used to live there), I decided to focus just on one city in the Midwest
I also looked at Bakersfield. I've heard from others that the tenant base might be a little challenging so that's a no for me. Coastal CA with the Bay Area, LA or San Diego will hold its value and it doesn't take too many properties to build long term wealth. I would have to buy a lot of properties in Indy to outperform my CA properties. My suburban Indy home has doubled in value (+$140,000) in 10 years, which is good for the Midwest - I'm pretty sure any coastal CA property would surpass that appreciation rate. I know current prices and interest rates make it difficult.
I have a California investor friends who bought in Kansas City, MO, Oklahoma, and Dallas.
Thanks @Becca F. for your reply!
How you manage your properties in Indy? Do you do it yourself or you have a local manager?
As of now, I've only invested in single-family homes in the Los Angeles,
CA area. Given the recent surge in property prices in LA, I'm
considering expanding to the outer suburbs of Los Angeles. Additionally,
I'm exploring long-distance investments to identify locations with
stronger cashflow potential and a lower entry point.
Good, my market still not showing up. That means my strategy of being a contrarian and going in first is working. I'm raising rents often and seeing appreciation in a Blue Ocean. Soon the investors will show up - and I'll begin to sell ;)
Columbus, OH has to be at the top of the list of cities to be investing in right now. Huge tech grow, low taxes, and landlord friendly.
Plans to were announced last month to invest $2B into the cities airport in anticipation of the population/business
I don't personally invest in the following but I've heard great things about Indianapolis and Cincinnati. I know some people crushing it with STRs in indy and a friend who is looking for multifamily in Cinci
Personally, I like the Florida market because I'm familiar with it
Good, my market still not showing up. That means my strategy of being a contrarian and going in first is working. I'm raising rents often and seeing appreciation in a Blue Ocean. Soon the investors will show up - and I'll begin to sell ;)
I don't personally invest in the following but I've heard great things about Indianapolis and Cincinnati. I know some people crushing it with STRs in indy and a friend who is looking for multifamily in Cinci
Personally, I like the Florida market because I'm familiar with it
Here is a list of 17 metros in the US that have population larger than 900k and median house price is below 400k:

Which metro you recommend and which metro you don't recommend?
I know California is not so investor friendly due to high taxes and non landlord friendly regulation.
Florida has high insurance costs in some areas?!
What do you think?
@Justin Brin great lead in for discussion, thanks for putting that together. Generally speaking, we have the same approach - avoid areas that are heavy in renter friendly regulation (i.e. CA). Then TX is tough right now because of property taxes. And then, Florida is difficult with insurance right now until that stabilizes.
Then, when we look at Atlanta and Charlotte we see a good amount of supply because of the footprint of large institutiional buyers (i.e. invitation homes).
That leaves the midwest (OH, IN, MO), TN, and the one off markets like Tucson and Albuquerque. Personally, we have had success in small multi-family across OK, TN, MO, KY, IN, OH.
I see your criteria, but I would strongly consider looking at Nevada. It’s closest to your location. Nevada has the third lowest property taxes in the nation, no state income tax and very landlord friendly laws. No offense to Ohio but they are usually in the top 10 most expensive states for property taxes, along with Texas. Reno is considerably less expensive as an entry point compared to CA.
I'm helping a lot of CA investors discover Reno and I'm curious on why Nevada wouldn't even be a consideration? We have severe land constraints, and Tesla is about to expand Giga Nevada to include the Tesla Semi factory which will lead to more rent and home appreciation. Our low unemployment is driving up housing prices from a lull we have been in for 18 months and we continue to have population migration from NorCal and the most expensive area in the nation, the Bay Area. Our market dynamics are optimal for real estate investing either SFR or Multifamily.
@Justin Brin great lead in for discussion, thanks for putting that together. Generally speaking, we have the same approach - avoid areas that are heavy in renter friendly regulation (i.e. CA). Then TX is tough right now because of property taxes. And then, Florida is difficult with insurance right now until that stabilizes.
Then, when we look at Atlanta and Charlotte we see a good amount of supply because of the footprint of large institutiional buyers (i.e. invitation homes).
That leaves the midwest (OH, IN, MO), TN, and the one off markets like Tucson and Albuquerque. Personally, we have had success in small multi-family across OK, TN, MO, KY, IN, OH.
@Justin Brin - well yes TX property taxes are always high but the run up of sales over the last few years have given taxing entities the opportunity to re-assess even more.
Regarding Charlotte and Atlanta we find there to be just a little too much supply because of how much investor activity they drew over the last few years.
Of the OK, TN, MO, KY, IN, OH our favorites would be OH and TN.
Justin, really curious why Detroit didn't make this list.
The Metro area is 4.36 million people.
I'm not sure what the median home price is in all of Metro Detroit but it's south of $400k.
I see your criteria, but I would strongly consider looking at Nevada. It’s closest to your location. Nevada has the third lowest property taxes in the nation, no state income tax and very landlord friendly laws. No offense to Ohio but they are usually in the top 10 most expensive states for property taxes, along with Texas. Reno is considerably less expensive as an entry point compared to CA.
I'm helping a lot of CA investors discover Reno and I'm curious on why Nevada wouldn't even be a consideration? We have severe land constraints, and Tesla is about to expand Giga Nevada to include the Tesla Semi factory which will lead to more rent and home appreciation. Our low unemployment is driving up housing prices from a lull we have been in for 18 months and we continue to have population migration from NorCal and the most expensive area in the nation, the Bay Area. Our market dynamics are optimal for real estate investing either SFR or Multifamily.
Nevada barrier to entry is higher than this list. Believe that's the emphasis of this. You're trying to find growing areas in below median list--these are how to invest. California investors come significantly more equipped than average investors. What % of houses in Reno are available for a conventional investment loan at $360k or less?
I see your criteria, but I would strongly consider looking at Nevada. It’s closest to your location. Nevada has the third lowest property taxes in the nation, no state income tax and very landlord friendly laws. No offense to Ohio but they are usually in the top 10 most expensive states for property taxes, along with Texas. Reno is considerably less expensive as an entry point compared to CA.
I'm helping a lot of CA investors discover Reno and I'm curious on why Nevada wouldn't even be a consideration? We have severe land constraints, and Tesla is about to expand Giga Nevada to include the Tesla Semi factory which will lead to more rent and home appreciation. Our low unemployment is driving up housing prices from a lull we have been in for 18 months and we continue to have population migration from NorCal and the most expensive area in the nation, the Bay Area. Our market dynamics are optimal for real estate investing either SFR or Multifamily.
Nevada barrier to entry is higher than this list. Believe that's the emphasis of this. You're trying to find growing areas in below median list--these are how to invest. California investors come significantly more equipped than average investors. What % of houses in Reno are available for a conventional investment loan at $360k or less?
You are suggesting not to focus on main metro areas but secondary areas?
Justin, really curious why Detroit didn't make this list.
The Metro area is 4.36 million people.
I'm not sure what the median home price is in all of Metro Detroit but it's south of $400k.
Yes Detroit is also on option. How is the current economy in Detroit?
Justin, really curious why Detroit didn't make this list.
The Metro area is 4.36 million people.
I'm not sure what the median home price is in all of Metro Detroit but it's south of $400k.
Yes Detroit is also on option. How is the current economy in Detroit?
You are suggesting not to focus on main metro areas but secondary areas?
Correct. Don't invest in Austin but along the I35 corridor going North. Similarly along the I45 corridor from Houston. Hwy 75 North of Dallas is another good area.
You are suggesting not to focus on main metro areas but secondary areas?
Correct. Don't invest in Austin but along the I35 corridor going North. Similarly along the I45 corridor from Houston. Hwy 75 North of Dallas is another good area.
Where did you pull that data? Milwaukee metro has 1.6M people and median is 225k.
Here is a list of 17 metros in the US that have population larger than 900k and median house price is below 400k:

Which metro you recommend and which metro you don't recommend?
I know California is not so investor friendly due to high taxes and non landlord friendly regulation.
Florida has high insurance costs in some areas?!
What do you think?
There is a reason investor from around the world have been buying for the last 10 years and still are buying in the Cleveland markets. If you got in , 7 8 years ago, you doubled tripled or more on top of the 20% net caps. I just locked up 7 more last week, all are under 90k, all have rents from 1100- 1400, all have values from 115k- 125k . MF, try finding one, there is simply no inventory.
All the best
Thanks @Becca F. for your reply!
How you manage your properties in Indy? Do you do it yourself or you have a local manager?
As of now, I've only invested in single-family homes in the Los Angeles,
CA area. Given the recent surge in property prices in LA, I'm
considering expanding to the outer suburbs of Los Angeles. Additionally,
I'm exploring long-distance investments to identify locations with
stronger cashflow potential and a lower entry point.
I have a property manager for Indy. I interviewed 3 PM companies. Typical monthly management fee is 10% of the rent. SFH#2 is on the East side of Indy (Christian Park). I bought it from a flipper who over priced it, purchase price $130,000. I've made at least 6 offer since this summer, attempting to flip or BRRRR. I decided that trying to renovate from 2000 miles away isn't for me and definitely don't have the risk tolerance to flip - the margins are thin and the ARV isn't high enough to do Hard Money Loan with high interest rates, not worth the stress for me.
Was looking at residential multi-units in Indy but feedback from PM company is that 2 to 4 units have higher turnover and in less demand than SFHs. Good tenants will pay to not have neighbors right next to them. I'll either buy another SFH turn key, not buy for a while and save up money for a year or two to look in Northern California (Sacramento) or Nevada. I'm also looking at syndications.
Can you build ADUs if you buy SFH in LA area so you'd get a higher rent? I don't know much about LA but I've heard Inland Empire is more affordable.
You should also take a look at Little Rock, Arkansas. Little Rock has experienced steady population growth over the years, which can create increased demand for housing. A growing population often leads to higher demand for real estate, making it an appealing market for property investors seeking potential rental income or property appreciation.