While listening to Barbara Corcoran she emphasized the need to have other income while building your real estate holdings. I wonder how many actually live off rental income alone without having put in years of building equity and having other main sources of income. I know in my area starting out cash flow is low and while holding RE over the long-term is lucrative pulling money out to live would be a constant drain on equity.
I imagine if you buy low cost properties and get lots of doors and frugally manage them you could earn a living. If you are a good RE agent or builder/developer or have a great source of income and can delay gratification then you are golden. As she says after 20 years or so she can easily pull cash out for personal use. Living off rentals is the plan just wonder if it is realistic.
Living off rentals will take a long, long time for the average REI. 15-20 years, probably. You'll need 7-10 quality doors.
Going the full scale--- lower barrier to entry, lots of doors, etc. You got to remember the more houses, the more capex, the more tenants. Bad areas then you're talking bad tenants. So on paper, sure, you'll get there maybe in 8-10 years but reality will hit. You'll get higher turnover, more damage to the properties, higher vacancies.
The average BP folk on a W2 making $80k/year. Needs to save up to buy 1 rental property in a favorable location every 3-4 years. By year 12-15, re-fi 1 and sell 1. Take that cash do capex, and pay down the debts. Have 2-3 rentals that make you probably $7500/mo. To really get into the part where you're having 8-10 fully paid off rentals in year 12-15, you'll need to make a $400-500k/year at least for a 4-5 year stretch.
This whole jump in and get rich on REI passed us in 08-22. It's going to be the even longer game now.
@Jay Hinrichs would you pls expand on this a bit
Folks purchasing their first rental will often borrow 75% and have not a lot of cash in the bank.
If you could do 10 of those (75 ltv properties and not a lot of cash left over) isn't that a ‘safer' portfolio than just 1? Why then is it risky to have a 70% LTV portfolio (4M equity) with 500k in liquidity?
Its basically wholesaling to yourself. The trick is to find properties far under market value and refinance your capital back out so you can keep going. That guy mentions he is not into partnerships and he owns almost everything himself.
10 years ago I did buy houses on the cheap. There was some period of time where the tenants were a little rough.
I got better at screening tenants and that improved a lot but still had a fee issues.
Now due to gentrification these neighborhoods are being replaced with DINK Mellineials. The house are being fixed up nice and selling for 350k.
It is incredible what some of these cheap houses are worth.
This happened by accident as I didn't know the future value of these houses but wow!
@John Underwood my experience exactly. An accident by way of DINKs and soccer moms buying in low cost areas and putting in a couple hundred grand all new high tech wanting to be close to the center of town. The closer the better for bike riders and green thinking bus riders.
@John Underwood my experience exactly. An accident by way of DINKs and soccer moms buying in low cost areas and putting in a couple hundred grand all new high tech wanting to be close to the center of town. The closer the better for bike riders and green thinking bus riders.
@John Underwood my experience exactly. An accident by way of DINKs and soccer moms buying in low cost areas and putting in a couple hundred grand all new high tech wanting to be close to the center of town. The closer the better for bike riders and green thinking bus riders.
@Becca F. you have a good head on your shoulders and I trust you will figure it out. I know about 100 year old properties and they can be solid buildings with old growth timber. I know costs of repairs can be painful but as you have seen your wealth has been created from quality areas. California is experiencing huge reductions in capital gains taxes as tech companies move out but I have heard they are starting to clean up their act so there is that hope.
You have family that has worked hard and struck gold in the Bay area. It is a blessing to have had family to blaze the trail for you. I feel the same way about RE as I have watched those that would not own rentals get buried in inflation as they age out. The rich are getting richer faster and the others are caught in the middle. You are working hard and helping take care of family which is the way it should be. Keep it up.
Also $15,000 per month is cheap. Home Instead charges $30 an hour which adds up quickly using 24 hour care.
I do know older people who don't need the money who go back to work because of boredom which is better than having to supplement SS because of not being able to make ends meet. I don't think that is a concern for you.
Thanks for your positive words Jeff! Everyone has a different opinion. Sell all Indy properties and 1031 them to an appreciating location, sell the 2 cheaper ones and don't buy anymore RE (if I can get out my 20% down payments I would be happy), hold onto to them since RE is a long term hold. I'm so confused now.
One of my fears is that I will wind up homeless living in the Bay Area while I own 3 properties here (including my primary residence) with lots of equity (the multi-unit is co-owned with family) - I was half joking and half serious when I said to my friend that I'll be on the side of the street with a cardboard sign with my cat. I have a good W2 job but I don't want to work until I'm 65 or 70 years old (or worse 80). I also know medical costs have wiped some people out.
@John Underwood my experience exactly. An accident by way of DINKs and soccer moms buying in low cost areas and putting in a couple hundred grand all new high tech wanting to be close to the center of town. The closer the better for bike riders and green thinking bus riders.
This is what I was hoping with these Class C properties in Indianapolis. They are close to downtown Indy where a new hospital will be built. Some neighborhoods (not the ones I bought in) have old $70,000 homes next to renovated ones worth $250,000 to $450,000
So far I'm losing $300 to $500 a month on house #2. I'm communicating with my property manager and maintenance coordinator. Also if I was the tenant, would I want to renew a release on a house where things keep breaking or malfunctioning?
How long ago did you buy these properties in SC?
@John Underwood my experience exactly. An accident by way of DINKs and soccer moms buying in low cost areas and putting in a couple hundred grand all new high tech wanting to be close to the center of town. The closer the better for bike riders and green thinking bus riders.
@John Underwood my experience exactly. An accident by way of DINKs and soccer moms buying in low cost areas and putting in a couple hundred grand all new high tech wanting to be close to the center of town. The closer the better for bike riders and green thinking bus riders.
@John Underwood my experience exactly. An accident by way of DINKs and soccer moms buying in low cost areas and putting in a couple hundred grand all new high tech wanting to be close to the center of town. The closer the better for bike riders and green thinking bus riders.
This is what I was hoping with these Class C properties in Indianapolis. They are close to downtown Indy where a new hospital will be built. Some neighborhoods (not the ones I bought in) have old $70,000 homes next to renovated ones worth $250,000 to $450,000
So far I'm losing $300 to $500 a month on house #2. I'm communicating with my property manager and maintenance coordinator. Also if I was the tenant, would I want to renew a release on a house where things keep breaking or malfunctioning?
How long ago did you buy these properties in SC?
Around 8 years ago.
As @John Underwood indicates Greenville SC is a great market.
I am a multifamily investor and syndicator in Greenville SC.
Happy to connect with any and all interested in investing in Greenville SC.
@John Underwood my experience exactly. An accident by way of DINKs and soccer moms buying in low cost areas and putting in a couple hundred grand all new high tech wanting to be close to the center of town. The closer the better for bike riders and green thinking bus riders.
@John Underwood my experience exactly. An accident by way of DINKs and soccer moms buying in low cost areas and putting in a couple hundred grand all new high tech wanting to be close to the center of town. The closer the better for bike riders and green thinking bus riders.
That is Awesome!
@John Underwood Greenville SC sounds awesome.
@Becca F. as you notice from this thread people are making it happen many different ways. Personally I like being sure I won't go broke but there are no guarantees. There are those that can live off their rentals alone but also could retire without their rentals because they are financially solid w/o RE.
@Becca F. So far I'm losing $300 to $500 a month on house #2. I'm communicating with my property manager and maintenance coordinator. Also if I was the tenant, would I want to renew a release on a house where things keep breaking or malfunctioning?
There is no way of knowing why this is happening but the whole problem may be a lack of experience. Spending an extra 6k a year would not be much of a surprise for those that have seen things go wrong but know how things work out in the long run. If the property is improving I would be ok but for those on a tight budget maybe a problem.
You should read (the small and mighty real estate investor by Chad Carson) or listen to his podcast on BP, he doesn’t own many units but paid them down quickly…maybe 5 years and lives modestly off his rent income.
@Nick Benedick like the concept live below your means and cover your living expenses with RE. Are you planning to live off rentals?
You should read (the small and mighty real estate investor by Chad Carson) or listen to his podcast on BP, he doesn’t own many units but paid them down quickly…maybe 5 years and lives modestly off his rent income.
It's no different than what others, like me, have said. Buy a few quality one's-- sell 1, cash out refi 1(that'll you sell soon) and paid down the debts. Have a few rentals, capex reserves, and have cash flow.
Now to live off that, that really depends on your age, reserves, dependents, etc. I don't think the average couple with two kids can live off 5 rentals for the duration of their lives if they're 37 years old. 47 years old-50 years old with 7-8 rentals and two other streams of income later(401k, pension, IRAs, annuities, equities, etc.) and the kids already in college then maybe.
People need to remember every 12-15 years, costs will slowly accrue to 40-50% more than today. So your goal post today needs to actually be adjusted. If you're 40 and thinking I'll live to 80 and all I need is $7,500 in monthly income net and you have reserves. Make sure your reserves are actually 2.5-3x of what it'll cost today, and the $7500 likely needs to be able to grow into $20,000 net or find another avenue to create that.
@Nick Benedick like the concept live below your means and cover your living expenses with RE. Are you planning to live off rentals?
Absolutly, but it will take time and a lot of work, I think the biggest misconception is people need x to live on monthly, but when you reach x, you want more…eat out more, nicer car, more vacations etc so that x becomes more and we keep chasing a bigger and more expensive life. Stick to a goal and make it happen
Age is not a factor, I see 25 year olds doing it, I see 60 year olds doing it.. find your monthly comfort number and go after it.
You should read (the small and mighty real estate investor by Chad Carson) or listen to his podcast on BP, he doesn’t own many units but paid them down quickly…maybe 5 years and lives modestly off his rent income.
It's no different than what others, like me, have said. Buy a few quality one's-- sell 1, cash out refi 1(that'll you sell soon) and paid down the debts. Have a few rentals, capex reserves, and have cash flow.
Now to live off that, that really depends on your age, reserves, dependents, etc. I don't think the average couple with two kids can live off 5 rentals for the duration of their lives if they're 37 years old. 47 years old-50 years old with 7-8 rentals and two other streams of income later(401k, pension, IRAs, annuities, equities, etc.) and the kids already in college then maybe.
People need to remember every 12-15 years, costs will slowly accrue to 40-50% more than today. So your goal post today needs to actually be adjusted. If you're 40 and thinking I'll live to 80 and all I need is $7,500 in monthly income net and you have reserves. Make sure your reserves are actually 2.5-3x of what it'll cost today, and the $7500 likely needs to be able to grow into $20,000 net or find another avenue to create that.
Absolutly, but it will take time and a lot of work, I think the biggest misconception is people need x to live on monthly, but when you reach x, you want more…eat out more, nicer car, more vacations etc so that x becomes more and we keep chasing a bigger and more expensive life. Stick to a goal and make it happen
So true @Nick Benedick
@Jay Hinrichs my parents as were many in that age group were self employed their entire lives and retired early but it was no cake walk. Their advice get a job with benefits.
@Jay Hinrichs my parents as were many in that age group were self employed their entire lives and retired early but it was no cake walk. Their advice get a job with benefits.