What do you REALLY pay for Property Management?

What do you REALLY pay for Property Management?

Rental Property Investor · Leander, TX · Member since 2018 · 183 posts · 264 votes

I'm somewhat new to Real Estate investing, so I analyze lots of deals as a way to learn. I want my analyses to be as accurate as I can get them.

I've been concerned about the accuracy of my estimate for Property Management expense. At first I was using 10% because in many metros, that's what PM's take from the monthly rent roll, but then I realized that was only part of the story.

  • Each time a tenant moves out, a PM charges 1 month's rent to place a new tenant. If tenants stay on average for 2 years, that's an extra 1/24 (one month out of 24) of rental income going to the PM. 1/24 = 4.2%.
  • Most PMs charge a renewal fee if a tenant re-ups. Again using the average 2 year stay, that means the PM is collecting that fee every other year (think of it as: in even years, the tenant re-ups; in odd years, new tenant). Let's say that's another $100 on a $800/month unit. That's 1/8 of a month's rent, every 24 months - another 0.5%.
  • Each time a tenant re-ups, I'll want an inspection of the property. Call that $75 - again, every other year. Add 0.4%.

So we're looking at

  • Base fee: 10%
  • Tenant placement: 4.2%
  • Renewal fee: 0.5%
  • Inspection fee: 0.4%
  • Total: 10+4.2+0.5+0.4 = 15.1%

Of course, this will vary across markets and between PM's. In some areas PMs charge less than 10%, or less than a full month's rent for a tenant placement. And if your tenants stay longer than 2 years, then your placement fees will hit less often.

But the point stands: the base rate is only a part of the net cost of PM service.

I'd love to hear from other BP'ers: what do YOU use for PM cost in your analyses (or what are you actually paying). Anyone?

11Reply
85 views

Most Popular Reply

Doug McVinuaPro Member
Property Manager · Queen Creek, AZ · Member since 2016 · 608 posts · 426 votes
7y

@Joel Fine Not all Property Managers charge fee structures like you're experiencing. Good, caring PM's exist that want owners to be successful while still making an honest dollar.

I was with an attorney for a very large flat fee ($75.00 per month) PM firm one day and he was proud to convey that the average gross per door was $250 per month and the average tenant duration was 8 months. $75.00 per month is clearly total BS marketing and if I had an 8 month tenant duration I would be pissed as an owner.

I take great pride in the service we provide with only 2 fee's to owners, a lease up fee and a % per month. The lease up fee is needed as it's actually a lot of time to market, show, screen, lease and do the move-in etc. I don't consider the leasing fee a profit center given the value of my time, prepping the property, showings, lease, move-in and then the first month or two is generally higher service volume with a new tenant.

I believe in most situations we are far better off keeping the tenant happy enough to want to stay put and avoid the turnover. Unless a tenant is bad it's much better for the owner to renew and the owner is who I owe my fiduciary. Yes, I have a right to an income but my obligation and fiduciary is with the owner. The needs of the owner come before mine so in good faith I never turn a property over unless it needs it. I have one right now that I just don't like the tenant and agreed to do a lease up for free because it helps me, the owner was indifferent. It's an easy lease up and won't cause vacancy and I get rid of a difficult tenant that is a time sucker.

PM industry gurus for years have been promoting the fee's as additional income. I like income don't get me wrong but I'm happy taking my % per month with good owners that own decent properties and let us do our job.

Another fee to be careful of is the PM charging the tenant a monthly fee. In AZ I believe that fee drives away many good tenants. Many good tenants are smart and realize the owner should be paying the PM fee so they avoid those properties so now the ones charging the tenants are left with a less than desirable pool of tenants. The owner thinking they are saving money is likely losing money as they get a lower quality tenant and all the issues that go with them.

Sorry for rant, it's early on a Saturday and I need more coffee!!! lol

See this reply in the discussion

27 Replies

Jump to latestLatest
  • Rental Property Investor · Boise/Portland · Member since 2017 · 709 posts · 742 votes
    7y
    Originally posted by @Joel Fine:

    I'm somewhat new to Real Estate investing, so I analyze lots of deals as a way to learn. I want my analyses to be as accurate as I can get them.

    I've been concerned about the accuracy of my estimate for Property Management expense. At first I was using 10% because in many metros, that's what PM's take from the monthly rent roll, but then I realized that was only part of the story.

    • Each time a tenant moves out, a PM charges 1 month's rent to place a new tenant. If tenants stay on average for 2 years, that's an extra 1/24 (one month out of 24) of rental income going to the PM. 1/24 = 4.2%.
    • Most PMs charge a renewal fee if a tenant re-ups. Again using the average 2 year stay, that means the PM is collecting that fee every other year (think of it as: in even years, the tenant re-ups; in odd years, new tenant). Let's say that's another $100 on a $800/month unit. That's 1/8 of a month's rent, every 24 months - another 0.5%.
    • Each time a tenant re-ups, I'll want an inspection of the property. Call that $75 - again, every other year. Add 0.4%.

    So we're looking at

    • Base fee: 10%
    • Tenant placement: 4.2%
    • Renewal fee: 0.5%
    • Inspection fee: 0.4%
    • Total: 10+4.2+0.5+0.4 = 15.1%

    Of course, this will vary across markets and between PM's. In some areas PMs charge less than 10%, or less than a full month's rent for a tenant placement. And if your tenants stay longer than 2 years, then your placement fees will hit less often.

    But the point stands: the base rate is only a part of the net cost of PM service.

    I'd love to hear from other BP'ers: what do YOU use for PM cost in your analyses (or what are you actually paying). Anyone?

     Joel, I've been very fortunate to have a great PM whom I've used for 10+ years.  They charge me a flat 6% of the gross collected rent with no additional fees such as what you've listed in your post; with the exception that I reimburse them for advertising when there's a vacancy.

  • Specialist · Paradise Valley, AZ · Member since 2018 · 3k+ posts · 2k+ votes
    7y
    Originally posted by @Joel Fine:

    I'm somewhat new to Real Estate investing, so I analyze lots of deals as a way to learn. I want my analyses to be as accurate as I can get them.

    I've been concerned about the accuracy of my estimate for Property Management expense. At first I was using 10% because in many metros, that's what PM's take from the monthly rent roll, but then I realized that was only part of the story.

    • Each time a tenant moves out, a PM charges 1 month's rent to place a new tenant. If tenants stay on average for 2 years, that's an extra 1/24 (one month out of 24) of rental income going to the PM. 1/24 = 4.2%.
    • Most PMs charge a renewal fee if a tenant re-ups. Again using the average 2 year stay, that means the PM is collecting that fee every other year (think of it as: in even years, the tenant re-ups; in odd years, new tenant). Let's say that's another $100 on a $800/month unit. That's 1/8 of a month's rent, every 24 months - another 0.5%.
    • Each time a tenant re-ups, I'll want an inspection of the property. Call that $75 - again, every other year. Add 0.4%.

    So we're looking at

    • Base fee: 10%
    • Tenant placement: 4.2%
    • Renewal fee: 0.5%
    • Inspection fee: 0.4%
    • Total: 10+4.2+0.5+0.4 = 15.1%

    Of course, this will vary across markets and between PM's. In some areas PMs charge less than 10%, or less than a full month's rent for a tenant placement. And if your tenants stay longer than 2 years, then your placement fees will hit less often.

    But the point stands: the base rate is only a part of the net cost of PM service.

    I'd love to hear from other BP'ers: what do YOU use for PM cost in your analyses (or what are you actually paying). Anyone?

     I agree, those are discouraging numbers. In Arizona we do things a bit differently than California or Texas. Keep in mind that a Property Manager makes *MORE money to fill a vacancy* than to keep tenants happy. (What do you think their incentive is . . .?) Bummer, eh? That's why in AZ we don't do what people in CA & TX do. Because we've figured this out! Let me show you how to get rid of the Property Manager altogether and make mucho more:

    https://www.biggerpockets.com/forums/600/topics/58...

  • Nathan GesnerBusiness Member
    Moderator
    Real Estate Broker · Cody, WY · Member since 2010 · 28k+ posts · 41k+ votes
    7y

    This is a good analysis. I wish more people read the fine print and calculated the true costs like you've done. I've seen PM companies charge as low as 4% management fee but it jumps to over 10% when you consider all the add-on fees they collect.

    The DIY Landlord Book4.7248 Reviews
  • Doug McVinuaPro Member
    Property Manager · Queen Creek, AZ · Member since 2016 · 608 posts · 426 votes
    7y

    @Joel Fine Not all Property Managers charge fee structures like you're experiencing. Good, caring PM's exist that want owners to be successful while still making an honest dollar.

    I was with an attorney for a very large flat fee ($75.00 per month) PM firm one day and he was proud to convey that the average gross per door was $250 per month and the average tenant duration was 8 months. $75.00 per month is clearly total BS marketing and if I had an 8 month tenant duration I would be pissed as an owner.

    I take great pride in the service we provide with only 2 fee's to owners, a lease up fee and a % per month. The lease up fee is needed as it's actually a lot of time to market, show, screen, lease and do the move-in etc. I don't consider the leasing fee a profit center given the value of my time, prepping the property, showings, lease, move-in and then the first month or two is generally higher service volume with a new tenant.

    I believe in most situations we are far better off keeping the tenant happy enough to want to stay put and avoid the turnover. Unless a tenant is bad it's much better for the owner to renew and the owner is who I owe my fiduciary. Yes, I have a right to an income but my obligation and fiduciary is with the owner. The needs of the owner come before mine so in good faith I never turn a property over unless it needs it. I have one right now that I just don't like the tenant and agreed to do a lease up for free because it helps me, the owner was indifferent. It's an easy lease up and won't cause vacancy and I get rid of a difficult tenant that is a time sucker.

    PM industry gurus for years have been promoting the fee's as additional income. I like income don't get me wrong but I'm happy taking my % per month with good owners that own decent properties and let us do our job.

    Another fee to be careful of is the PM charging the tenant a monthly fee. In AZ I believe that fee drives away many good tenants. Many good tenants are smart and realize the owner should be paying the PM fee so they avoid those properties so now the ones charging the tenants are left with a less than desirable pool of tenants. The owner thinking they are saving money is likely losing money as they get a lower quality tenant and all the issues that go with them.

    Sorry for rant, it's early on a Saturday and I need more coffee!!! lol

  • Rental Property Investor · Dayton, OH · Member since 2016 · 210 posts · 160 votes
    7y

    I guess I am blessed as well. My property management charges me a flat 10% of rent er month. I do not pay extra for the resign of a lease. I do not pay extra for the yearly walk through. I pay a full months rent to find a new tenant if needed. 

  • Specialist · Honolulu, HI · Member since 2014 · 1k+ posts · 1k+ votes
    7y
    Originally posted by @Joel Fine:

    I'm somewhat new to Real Estate investing, so I analyze lots of deals as a way to learn. I want my analyses to be as accurate as I can get them.

    I've been concerned about the accuracy of my estimate for Property Management expense. At first I was using 10% because in many metros, that's what PM's take from the monthly rent roll, but then I realized that was only part of the story.

    • Each time a tenant moves out, a PM charges 1 month's rent to place a new tenant. If tenants stay on average for 2 years, that's an extra 1/24 (one month out of 24) of rental income going to the PM. 1/24 = 4.2%.
    • Most PMs charge a renewal fee if a tenant re-ups. Again using the average 2 year stay, that means the PM is collecting that fee every other year (think of it as: in even years, the tenant re-ups; in odd years, new tenant). Let's say that's another $100 on a $800/month unit. That's 1/8 of a month's rent, every 24 months - another 0.5%.
    • Each time a tenant re-ups, I'll want an inspection of the property. Call that $75 - again, every other year. Add 0.4%.

    So we're looking at

    • Base fee: 10%
    • Tenant placement: 4.2%
    • Renewal fee: 0.5%
    • Inspection fee: 0.4%
    • Total: 10+4.2+0.5+0.4 = 15.1%

    Of course, this will vary across markets and between PM's. In some areas PMs charge less than 10%, or less than a full month's rent for a tenant placement. And if your tenants stay longer than 2 years, then your placement fees will hit less often.

    But the point stands: the base rate is only a part of the net cost of PM service.

    I'd love to hear from other BP'ers: what do YOU use for PM cost in your analyses (or what are you actually paying). Anyone?

     Don't forget the utilities and "yard cleanup" (2X per month!) your PM will charge you during turnover/vacancy. Ask me how I know :P

  • MD/DC market · Member since 2018 · 16 posts · 4 votes
    7y

    @Joel Fine its funny you ran those numbers because i was doing the exact same this week as i was breaking down a market i saw as profitable until i incorporated the cost of a management fee. The charges i ran into were exactly the same as yours, as they where what i found 2-3 in the area to pose, and i didn't feel the property cash flowed enough with the integrated cost of a PM.

     Then i wondered if i even wanted to go with one for my first couple of properties until i scale up to where i might really need it and might have more negotiation with a portfolio of 5-7 properties. The other consideration i had was my market is mostly Condos, Row homes, Townhomes ect. not freestanding single family homes with yards. Aside from finding a tenant the upkeep on a 2br 1200 sq/ft condo isn't much. 

    i don't know. 

    If i could find a PM in my area with the terms some people have stated of 5-7% flat rate i would think more about it. the PM i have found just kill the cash flow on what could otherwise be a solid property.

    -Josh  

  • Sherman Oaks, CA · Member since 2013 · 3k+ posts · 2k+ votes
    7y

    14% is national PM average cost after up and extras.

  • Rental Property Investor · Leander, TX · Member since 2018 · 183 posts · 264 votes
    7y
    Originally posted by @Courtney Jones:

    I guess I am blessed as well. My property management charges me a flat 10% of rent er month. I do not pay extra for the resign of a lease. I do not pay extra for the yearly walk through. I pay a full months rent to find a new tenant if needed. 

    Thanks for the reply, and the info about your PM fees.

    So when you analyze a deal, what number do you use for PM? I would think 10% is too low since that doesn't take into account the 1-month rent you pay to find a new tenant. A month of rent is 8.3% of your income for the year, so even if it only happens once every few years, it's not a trivial amount.

  • Rental Property Investor · Leander, TX · Member since 2018 · 183 posts · 264 votes
    7y
    Originally posted by @Matthew McNeil:
    Originally posted by @Joel Fine:

    I'm somewhat new to Real Estate investing, so I analyze lots of deals as a way to learn. I want my analyses to be as accurate as I can get them.

    I've been concerned about the accuracy of my estimate for Property Management expense. At first I was using 10% because in many metros, that's what PM's take from the monthly rent roll, but then I realized that was only part of the story.

    • Each time a tenant moves out, a PM charges 1 month's rent to place a new tenant. If tenants stay on average for 2 years, that's an extra 1/24 (one month out of 24) of rental income going to the PM. 1/24 = 4.2%.
    • Most PMs charge a renewal fee if a tenant re-ups. Again using the average 2 year stay, that means the PM is collecting that fee every other year (think of it as: in even years, the tenant re-ups; in odd years, new tenant). Let's say that's another $100 on a $800/month unit. That's 1/8 of a month's rent, every 24 months - another 0.5%.
    • Each time a tenant re-ups, I'll want an inspection of the property. Call that $75 - again, every other year. Add 0.4%.

    So we're looking at

    • Base fee: 10%
    • Tenant placement: 4.2%
    • Renewal fee: 0.5%
    • Inspection fee: 0.4%
    • Total: 10+4.2+0.5+0.4 = 15.1%

    Of course, this will vary across markets and between PM's. In some areas PMs charge less than 10%, or less than a full month's rent for a tenant placement. And if your tenants stay longer than 2 years, then your placement fees will hit less often.

    But the point stands: the base rate is only a part of the net cost of PM service.

    I'd love to hear from other BP'ers: what do YOU use for PM cost in your analyses (or what are you actually paying). Anyone?

     Joel, I've been very fortunate to have a great PM whom I've used for 10+ years.  They charge me a flat 6% of the gross collected rent with no additional fees such as what you've listed in your post; with the exception that I reimburse them for advertising when there's a vacancy.

    That sounds great! Quite a bit less than I'm seeing for PM fees.

    So how do you account for the advertising expense when you analyze a deal?

  • Rental Property Investor · Leander, TX · Member since 2018 · 183 posts · 264 votes
    7y
    Originally posted by @Account Closed:
    Originally posted by @Joel Fine:

    I'm somewhat new to Real Estate investing, so I analyze lots of deals as a way to learn. I want my analyses to be as accurate as I can get them.

    I've been concerned about the accuracy of my estimate for Property Management expense. At first I was using 10% because in many metros, that's what PM's take from the monthly rent roll, but then I realized that was only part of the story.

    • Each time a tenant moves out, a PM charges 1 month's rent to place a new tenant. If tenants stay on average for 2 years, that's an extra 1/24 (one month out of 24) of rental income going to the PM. 1/24 = 4.2%.
    • Most PMs charge a renewal fee if a tenant re-ups. Again using the average 2 year stay, that means the PM is collecting that fee every other year (think of it as: in even years, the tenant re-ups; in odd years, new tenant). Let's say that's another $100 on a $800/month unit. That's 1/8 of a month's rent, every 24 months - another 0.5%.
    • Each time a tenant re-ups, I'll want an inspection of the property. Call that $75 - again, every other year. Add 0.4%.

    So we're looking at

    • Base fee: 10%
    • Tenant placement: 4.2%
    • Renewal fee: 0.5%
    • Inspection fee: 0.4%
    • Total: 10+4.2+0.5+0.4 = 15.1%

    Of course, this will vary across markets and between PM's. In some areas PMs charge less than 10%, or less than a full month's rent for a tenant placement. And if your tenants stay longer than 2 years, then your placement fees will hit less often.

    But the point stands: the base rate is only a part of the net cost of PM service.

    I'd love to hear from other BP'ers: what do YOU use for PM cost in your analyses (or what are you actually paying). Anyone?

     I agree, those are discouraging numbers. In Arizona we do things a bit differently than California or Texas. Keep in mind that a Property Manager makes *MORE money to fill a vacancy* than to keep tenants happy. (What do you think their incentive is . . .?) Bummer, eh? That's why in AZ we don't do what people in CA & TX do. Because we've figured this out! Let me show you how to get rid of the Property Manager altogether and make mucho more:

    https://www.biggerpockets.com/forums/600/topics/58...

    I've seen this post before. I have GOT to figure out how to make this happen - it looks like an incredible profit machine. Very impressive how you have it worked out!

  • Rental Property Investor · Leander, TX · Member since 2018 · 183 posts · 264 votes
    7y
    Originally posted by @Doug McVinua:

    @Joel Fine Not all Property Managers charge fee structures like you're experiencing. Good, caring PM's exist that want owners to be successful while still making an honest dollar.

    I was with an attorney for a very large flat fee ($75.00 per month) PM firm one day and he was proud to convey that the average gross per door was $250 per month and the average tenant duration was 8 months. $75.00 per month is clearly total BS marketing and if I had an 8 month tenant duration I would be pissed as an owner.

    I take great pride in the service we provide with only 2 fee's to owners, a lease up fee and a % per month. The lease up fee is needed as it's actually a lot of time to market, show, screen, lease and do the move-in etc. I don't consider the leasing fee a profit center given the value of my time, prepping the property, showings, lease, move-in and then the first month or two is generally higher service volume with a new tenant.

    I believe in most situations we are far better off keeping the tenant happy enough to want to stay put and avoid the turnover. Unless a tenant is bad it's much better for the owner to renew and the owner is who I owe my fiduciary. Yes, I have a right to an income but my obligation and fiduciary is with the owner. The needs of the owner come before mine so in good faith I never turn a property over unless it needs it. I have one right now that I just don't like the tenant and agreed to do a lease up for free because it helps me, the owner was indifferent. It's an easy lease up and won't cause vacancy and I get rid of a difficult tenant that is a time sucker.

    PM industry gurus for years have been promoting the fee's as additional income. I like income don't get me wrong but I'm happy taking my % per month with good owners that own decent properties and let us do our job.

    Another fee to be careful of is the PM charging the tenant a monthly fee. In AZ I believe that fee drives away many good tenants. Many good tenants are smart and realize the owner should be paying the PM fee so they avoid those properties so now the ones charging the tenants are left with a less than desirable pool of tenants. The owner thinking they are saving money is likely losing money as they get a lower quality tenant and all the issues that go with them.

    Sorry for rant, it's early on a Saturday and I need more coffee!!! lol

    Thanks for sharing your thoughts ! Hope you got that coffee that you needed... :)

    Don't get me wrong, I'm not complaining about the fees (at least, not in this post). I do understand that PM's need to make a profit for the valuable service they perform. I just want to get accurate numbers so my profitability calculations will be as close to reality as possible. And of course if I'm comparing fees from different PM's I would want to include ALL fees, not just the monthly rake from the rent roll.

    I've never heard of a PM charging the tenant a monthly fee. I'll have to keep an eye out for that one. That sounds a little underhanded to me.

  • Rental Property Investor · Leander, TX · Member since 2018 · 183 posts · 264 votes
    7y
    Originally posted by @Andrey Y.:
    Originally posted by @Joel Fine:

    I'm somewhat new to Real Estate investing, so I analyze lots of deals as a way to learn. I want my analyses to be as accurate as I can get them.

    I've been concerned about the accuracy of my estimate for Property Management expense. At first I was using 10% because in many metros, that's what PM's take from the monthly rent roll, but then I realized that was only part of the story.

    • Each time a tenant moves out, a PM charges 1 month's rent to place a new tenant. If tenants stay on average for 2 years, that's an extra 1/24 (one month out of 24) of rental income going to the PM. 1/24 = 4.2%.
    • Most PMs charge a renewal fee if a tenant re-ups. Again using the average 2 year stay, that means the PM is collecting that fee every other year (think of it as: in even years, the tenant re-ups; in odd years, new tenant). Let's say that's another $100 on a $800/month unit. That's 1/8 of a month's rent, every 24 months - another 0.5%.
    • Each time a tenant re-ups, I'll want an inspection of the property. Call that $75 - again, every other year. Add 0.4%.

    So we're looking at

    • Base fee: 10%
    • Tenant placement: 4.2%
    • Renewal fee: 0.5%
    • Inspection fee: 0.4%
    • Total: 10+4.2+0.5+0.4 = 15.1%

    Of course, this will vary across markets and between PM's. In some areas PMs charge less than 10%, or less than a full month's rent for a tenant placement. And if your tenants stay longer than 2 years, then your placement fees will hit less often.

    But the point stands: the base rate is only a part of the net cost of PM service.

    I'd love to hear from other BP'ers: what do YOU use for PM cost in your analyses (or what are you actually paying). Anyone?

     Don't forget the utilities and "yard cleanup" (2X per month!) your PM will charge you during turnover/vacancy. Ask me how I know :P

    Ugh, good point. I was thinking those expenses are in the vacancy figures but that just accounts for lost rent - utilities and property upkeep is on top of that. So I guess I'll have to come up with an estimate for those line items as well...

  • Rental Property Investor · Leander, TX · Member since 2018 · 183 posts · 264 votes
    7y
    Originally posted by @Josh Thames:

    @Joel Fine its funny you ran those numbers because i was doing the exact same this week as i was breaking down a market i saw as profitable until i incorporated the cost of a management fee. The charges i ran into were exactly the same as yours, as they where what i found 2-3 in the area to pose, and i didn't feel the property cash flowed enough with the integrated cost of a PM.

     Then i wondered if i even wanted to go with one for my first couple of properties until i scale up to where i might really need it and might have more negotiation with a portfolio of 5-7 properties. The other consideration i had was my market is mostly Condos, Row homes, Townhomes ect. not freestanding single family homes with yards. Aside from finding a tenant the upkeep on a 2br 1200 sq/ft condo isn't much. 

    i don't know. 

    If i could find a PM in my area with the terms some people have stated of 5-7% flat rate i would think more about it. the PM i have found just kill the cash flow on what could otherwise be a solid property.

    -Josh  

    I've found deals that still pencil out with higher PM fees. But, it certainly makes each deal less profitable when I use 15% instead of 10% for PM fees. And some deals go from "worth doing" to "never mind."

  • Rental Property Investor · Boise/Portland · Member since 2017 · 709 posts · 742 votes
    7y
    Originally posted by @Joel Fine:
    Originally posted by @Matthew McNeil:

     Joel, I've been very fortunate to have a great PM whom I've used for 10+ years.  They charge me a flat 6% of the gross collected rent with no additional fees such as what you've listed in your post; with the exception that I reimburse them for advertising when there's a vacancy.

    That sounds great! Quite a bit less than I'm seeing for PM fees.

    So how do you account for the advertising expense when you analyze a deal?

    Joel, I don't include a projected advertizing line-item budget in my analysis.  Its not really necessary because my PM does an excellent job advertising for free through their web-based portal.  I think I've paid $200 total for advertising about 4 years ago when I owned an older house that needed some work and its was a bit difficult getting a tenant in there.  My PM convinced me to sell the house which I did two years ago and 1031 exchanged it for a newer house.  Aside from that rare occasion, the longest I've gone without a tenant is about 3 weeks.  Also worth noting for clarity; these aren't MFs.  I focus on SFHs.

  • MD/DC market · Member since 2018 · 16 posts · 4 votes
    7y

     Agreed, And when I ran it over a 3 year projection and figured worse case scenario that I turned over a Tennant each year it made the deal a lot less attractive. 

  • Real Estate Broker · 3412 S. Harlem Avenue Riverside, IL 60546 · Member since 2015 · 6k+ posts · 5k+ votes
    7y

    @Joel Fine this is one of the main reasons that I am more inclined to invest in apartment buildings instead of single family homes, town homes, condos or small multi. I have a 20 unit that is professionally managed, and they charge us 5% of the monthly gross, 1/2 months lease up fees and a lease renewal of $100. I feel that this structure is fair, and we have been able to be very profitable. I recently acquired a 19 unit deal in Berwyn, in my own back yard. I am currently self managing while we stabilize the building, but when I interviewed PM companies I got numbers of anywhere from 5% of the gross with no lease up fees all the way up to 7.5% of the gross with no lease up fees. I had several that would structure it as a certain amount of dollars per door plus 1 months lease up fees. 

    I did have one person tell me management would be around 10-12%, and I almost died laughing. He was dead serious, but was the only person I talked to that was anywhere near that amount. 

  • Rental Property Investor · Phoenix/Lima, Arizona/OH · Member since 2012 · 4k+ posts · 4k+ votes
    7y

    I pay Pay Roll of anywhere between $1,200 - $1,500 depending on size. plus about 3% of GCI.

  • Ellis HammondPro Member
    Investor · Leawood, KS · Member since 2017 · 178 posts · 108 votes
    7y
    @Joel Fine Great question, I also was factoring in these #s the other day. My management company charges flat 6% (5+units) with a $150 re-up fee for new qualified tentsnts and a service fee of $45 per hour. The more units I have with this company I can also negotiate that down and the goal is to keep tenants happy and stay as long as possible. I’m not paying them 6% just to collect rents.
  • Newbury Park, CA · Member since 2015 · 157 posts · 121 votes
    7y

    I pay 8% with no added fees with my PM in Michigan. 

  • Rental Property Investor · Lexington, KY · Member since 2018 · 40 posts · 26 votes
    7y
    @Joel Fine I am in the same boat. The industry is overdue for disruption.... There is too much incentive to have turnover, since it’s obviously where some of these folks are making their money. I have zero problem with someone else profiting on me, but only if their incentives align with my goals too - otherwise how can these industries see eye to eye? Maybe you can negotiate a rate that has proper incentives. Offer them a extra for renewal, but take away payment for placing new tenants (except for the material cost of promotion, such as advertising in a newspaper).
  • Rental Property Investor · Leander, TX · Member since 2018 · 183 posts · 264 votes
    7y
    Originally posted by @John Warren:

    @Joel Fine this is one of the main reasons that I am more inclined to invest in apartment buildings instead of single family homes, town homes, condos or small multi. I have a 20 unit that is professionally managed, and they charge us 5% of the monthly gross, 1/2 months lease up fees and a lease renewal of $100. I feel that this structure is fair, and we have been able to be very profitable. I recently acquired a 19 unit deal in Berwyn, in my own back yard. I am currently self managing while we stabilize the building, but when I interviewed PM companies I got numbers of anywhere from 5% of the gross with no lease up fees all the way up to 7.5% of the gross with no lease up fees. I had several that would structure it as a certain amount of dollars per door plus 1 months lease up fees. 

    I did have one person tell me management would be around 10-12%, and I almost died laughing. He was dead serious, but was the only person I talked to that was anywhere near that amount. 

    For now I'm buying small multi-family, but I have been thinking about moving up to apartment buildings. I alternate between "I should start small, and besides I need to use my 10 residential loans" and "go big! apartments have better return anyway!" I'm really torn.

  • Investor · Atlanta, GA · Member since 2013 · 97 posts · 32 votes
    7y
    I'm currently paying $75 a door for property management for sfh that I own in chicago and 10% for my properties in Atlanta Georgia
  • Investor · Tel Aviv, Israel · Member since 2016 · 26 posts · 12 votes
    7y

    @Joel Fine

    I own rentals  in the better Memphis suburbs ( Collierville, Bartlet, Arlington, Cordova ) . For me, tenant replacement is not a taken-for-granted expense item. It is by far THE highest expense  on a rental ( I always say that replacing a tenant costs like replacing an HVAC... ) . 

    Therefore , I take all measures to avoid it :

    - Encourage the PM to get me a long-term lease and willing to do price reduction for that .

    - Make sure PM takes good care of the tenants. 

    - Prefer families w/ kids in desired school districts ( how often will they want to move ? ) 

    - Aim for lease expiry in the spring ( vacancies will be shorter, monthly rent will be higher ) 

    - Don't nickel and dime with minor rent raise when you have good tenants 

    I have been blessed thus far ( touch wood ) to have 85% renewal ratio which is HUGE on your bottom line but this comes with planning and work. Don't take it to be a PM derivative -much of it is up to you ! 

    As for PM costs - I use 2 different PM's , pay 7%-8% collected rent, 50% lease up fee $0-$100 renewal . 

    I don't negotiate on my fees, it doesn't mean much . I demand great service from them, and that's the biggest impact on your bottom line. My view is : 

    Great PM - pay him even 10% . 

    Bad PM - don't even hire for free. 

  • Member since 2018 · 64 posts · 45 votes
    7y
    @Joel Fine In my neck of the woods, its 20% plus all the extra cost.......
Join the conversationCreate a free account to reply, vote on answers and follow this thread.