Newark, CA · Member since 2017 · 22 posts · 7 votes
Formed a 3-way LLC partnership in 2018 but no business was conducted. How much should it cost to file and does each partner need to file separately? I received a quote for $600 and this seems outrageous. Also, does anyone have any bay area CPA referrals?
Is the CPA you received the quote from located in the bay area (i.e. the number one COL area in the US right now)? If so a base fee of $600 for a partnership federal and state return sounds very reasonable.
As @Brandon Hall mentioned, if the partnership had neither items of income nor items of loss during the tax year, a federal return is generally not required.
However, you will generally not be able to avoid a CA Form 568 obligation if the LLC is registered in California, even if it had no activity. Because of this the firm/practice/CPA you received the quote from will usually need to prepare the federal return anyway to get the CA return filed.
Highly encourage taxpayers obtaining a CPA/EA for the first time to obtain proposals from multiple CPA/EAs and ascertain the value they'll receive for each fee. You might find this CPA is very reasonable compared to others in your area and/or a good value...
If no business was conducted, you may not have a filing liability. Otherwise the quote seems reasonable. We’d probably charge $800. CA stinks for entities.
Is the CPA you received the quote from located in the bay area (i.e. the number one COL area in the US right now)? If so a base fee of $600 for a partnership federal and state return sounds very reasonable.
As @Brandon Hall mentioned, if the partnership had neither items of income nor items of loss during the tax year, a federal return is generally not required.
However, you will generally not be able to avoid a CA Form 568 obligation if the LLC is registered in California, even if it had no activity. Because of this the firm/practice/CPA you received the quote from will usually need to prepare the federal return anyway to get the CA return filed.
Highly encourage taxpayers obtaining a CPA/EA for the first time to obtain proposals from multiple CPA/EAs and ascertain the value they'll receive for each fee. You might find this CPA is very reasonable compared to others in your area and/or a good value...
@Brandon HallEven if a federal partnership return is not required (due to a lack of income), I always recommend to my clients that they file the return anyway (even if it reflects zero income). That way, they start the statute of limitations running for that tax year. If you file a return, the statute starts running. If you don't file a return, the statute does NOT run and that year remains an open tax year for audit purposes.
Plus, the IRS computer system might be expecting a tax return to be filed for that tax year and you could get computer generated notices of non-filing that you then have to respond to. In my experience, it's much better to simply file the return in the first place.
Interesting. Generally if there is/are state return(s) that need to be filed because the bar is higher than the federal bar (like CA), I suggest filing the federal as the client is paying for it anyway to prepare the state return(s).
Not sure I'd suggest filing the federal if it had no items of income and expense and no required state returns. We're in the business of saving our clients money after all. It would cost the client more for me to file a return than deal with the IRS if there's an issue.
If a junior IRS auditor wanted to audit that tax year and get the partnership on 'failure to file', I'd laugh and just send a response letter. Easy peasy.
I am in basically the same situation with a 3 way LLC in which a house was purchased but still under renovation so no income was gained. This being said this thread has me somewhat confused because some suggest it needs done while other suggest it doesn't. I am somewhat under the impression this then puts the decision on the LLC which to me seems a little backwards. Is there no "Right" answer?
A partnership that has no income, deductions, or credits for federal income tax purposes for a taxable year is not required to file a partnership return for that year.
This is general information and does not constitute tax advice. Always consult your tax CPA/EA before making a filing decision.
That price sounds entirely reasonable to me. You have to understand that a CPA’s time IS his/her money. CPAs aren’t out selling merchandise or some kind of goods that they receive a mark-up on to make money. Even though your return may not have complicated items of income or expenses, it takes time to set up a return, gather information, document the supporting info, converse back and forth with the client, postage, printing ink, software, etc. not to mention the liability the CPA is absorbing by signing the return as a paid preparer. All of that adds up quickly and $600, especially for the Bay Area in CA, sounds entirely reasonable to me. If your entity starts making money I wouldn’t be surprised to see that cost go up. Most entity returns in CA run probably closer to $1,000 as a general estimate. There’s always the option to self-prepare if you find the cost too high, and you may soon have a newfound appreciation for that $600 haha. I know CPAs in San Diego if you want to get a second quote.
*this post does not create an attorney-client or CPA-client relationship. Readers are advised to seek professional advice.
Partnership returns normally cost more to prepare than individual returns and there are reasons for this.
There are less tax practitioners that specialize in partnership taxation than you will find that specialize in individual taxation.
The following is at the minimum required to prepare a blank partnership return 1) Name, SSN/EIN, address, active/passive information for each partner 2) Reading and understanding of partnership agreement 3) Gathering EIN and address of partnership 4) determine how tax law changes(I.E. 199A deduction) has an impact on the return. 5) Time to prepare and review the return
Regarding whether the partners have to file separately. There is one partnership return. However, the partnership return will distribute a "K-1" to each member his share of income/losses from the partnership.
You should consult with a couple accountants here on pricing. I agree that a federal return is not required if there is no activity. However, you may be required to file the state return.
@Scott Carrillo. I had this same situation with my cpa. He charged me nothing since we didn’t really do any business last year. Normally he’d probably charge a couple hundred bucks. I spend about 600 for my personal tax returns
Hey just thought I would thank everyone for their responses. Just to add I live in California but the LLC partnership was formed in Wyoming through Anderson Advisors.
I asked Anderson Advisors and here is what they said:
"That is a great question that you are asking about your LLC. Your LLC was formed in Wyoming. You are right about it not being in California. Even though it is a Partnership, you still need to file something on record with the IRS. If there hasn't been any activity, you still need to report that so that you do not receive any penalties. I know that the Partnerships are for renovations, you still need to put on your taxes any work that you have done and the expenses. Here at Anderson Business Advisors, we charge $500 as a base fee for the taxes."
I have heard of people that live in California form LLC's in California complain about an $800 fee the state charges, since my LLC was formed in Wyoming I would be avoiding this fee correct?
I am still confused a bit, do I need to file anything for the LLC?
I am looking to save money but not do something that may bite me in the long run.
California paints with a pretty broad brush regarding nexus and the $800 LLC tax obligation.
If the LLC has a member-manager located in CA, generally speaking the LLC is "doing business" in CA regardless of where it is organized, and won't be able to avoid a CA 568 obligation or the $800 LLC tax.
"If there hasn't been any activity, you still need to report that so that you do not receive any penalties."
This isn't correct. They either aren't familiar with partnership tax law or there are more nefarious reasons...like trying to pull the wool over your eyes because they're financially incentivized to do that.
That would be a non-starter for me.
Pros on this board are telling you that you probably don't have a federal obligation, but more than likely have a CA obligation for 2018.
California is a sort of beastly state when it comes to taxes and filings. Even if you create a non-CA LLC, if you are managing the business from California, you will be deemed to be "doing business" in California and therefore subject to CA taxes. California charges a minimum tax of $800 a year per LLC, and more if you have gross receipts in excess of $250k. So, if you create an LLC in another state, you will need to register it as a foreign LLC in California. Just because you created a WY LLC does not allow you to escape CA taxes and filing fees.
*This post does not create an attorney-client or CPA-client relationship. The information contained in this post is not to be relied upon. Readers are advised to seek professional advice.
I asked Anderson Advisors if I would need to pay the $800 California LLC tax and here is there response:
"In the State of California, there are franchise taxes that have to be paid every year. These fees have to be paid if you do business within the state. You don't have to worry about that because you don't have any entities there. Are you thinking about forming an entity in California?"
They make it seem as though I don't have to pay it unless I formed the entity in California, this seems contradictory to what I have heard here. Who is right?
Scott, this is the second time you've asked Anderson Advisers what your compliance exposure is, and the second time they've been wrong. They're now "oh for two".
It's slightly surprising to me that you still think they might be correct when their information contradicts what pros on this sub-forum are telling you.
"Doing business in California", as defined by California, does not mean merely having a business entity organized or incorporated there. Again, California paints with a very broad brush here. An LLC with a member-manager located in California is doing business in California.
Pull up the 2018 California Form 568 instructions for confirmation. Page 4 of the pdf.
Doing Business – A taxpayer is doing business if it actively engages in any transaction for the purpose of financial or pecuniary gain or profit in California or if any of the following conditions are satisfied:
The taxpayer is organized or commercially domiciled in California.
The sales as defined in R&TC Section 25120(e) or (f), of the taxpayer in California, including sales by the taxpayer’s agents and independent contractors, exceed the lesser of $583,867 or 25% of the taxpayer’s total sales.
The real property and tangible personal property of the taxpayer in California exceed the lesser of $58,387 or 25% of the taxpayer’s total real property and tangible personal property.
The amount paid in California by the taxpayer for compensation, as defined in R&TC Section 25120(c), exceeds the lesser of $58,387 or 25% of the total compensation paid by the taxpayer.
In determining the amount of the taxpayer’s sales, property, and payroll for doing business purposes, include the taxpayer’s pro rata share of amounts from partnerships and S corporations. These amounts are reported on the member’s Schedule K-1 on Table 2, Part C.
Partnerships and LLCs are considered doing business in California if they have a general partner or member doing business on their behalf in California. Likewise, general partners and members are considered doing business in California if the partnership or LLC, respectively, is doing business in this state. For more information, see R&TC Section 23101 or go to ftb.ca.gov and search for doing business.
It's not that I think they are right, I'm just posting what they said. It's good to know there are people like you around these forums to point people like me in the right direction. Thanks for all your advice and guidance with my questions.
@Scott Carrillo How has your experience been with Anderson so far? Based on your responses from them, I am not impressed with thema nd thinking of looking elsewhere...