Get ready to pay more for you mortgage

Get ready to pay more for you mortgage

Michael BaumPro Member
Olympia, WA · Member since 2016 · 8k+ posts · 7k+ votes

So here is something that is coming on May 1st. I just heard about it.

Essentially if you have a good credit score (680 or above) you will pay more in mortgage fees to help those with poor credit buy a house.

https://www.foxnews.com/us/bid...

Expect to pay $40 more a month on a 400k mortgage.

This has me very angry. I don't want to pay for others who didn't do things correctly and tanked their credit.

This is communism at work. Good golly....

15
Topic locked
116 views

Most Popular Reply

Lender · Nashville TN - Licensed in AL AR DC FL GA LA MD TN, TX and VA · Member since 2021 · 583 posts · 338 votes
3y

A product of the administration's drive to expand homeownership to underserved communities. Seems pretty heavy-handed to me with this notion that you need to penalize one group to raise up another. I worked at Fannie Mae for a few years (during which happened to be under the previous administration) and the efforts to expand homeownership seemed much more tactful and balanced. Hopefully will revert back to a more targeted and nuanced approach with future administrations.

8
Topic locked
See this reply in the discussion

33 Replies

Jump to latestLatest
  • Rental Property Investor · Indianapolis, IN · Member since 2020 · 562 posts · 554 votes
    3y

    @Michael Baum we have to stop penalizing people who do the right thing and rewarding people who don’t. I am all for helping the less fortunate find a path to home ownership, but this is ridiculous.

    1
    Topic locked
  • Investor · Central Virginia · Member since 2020 · 394 posts · 253 votes
    3y

    Many of you are focused on the article source, but if the @Afoma Okwudiafor comments are true with the before and after from the Fannie Mae website this turns into a simple supply and demand market. If the government is incentivizing demand growth what is the result? Higher prices. Why?  Because with increased demand and the same supply, upward pressure is put on equilibrium, or price.

    I am certain there are others on here who are seeing two markets, one above the median and one below. Below the median, it is on fire. Why? Because we cannot provide enough housing below the median in most markets. If this is happening, is it wise to increase demand on an already thin supply?

    Isn't the solution to increase from the supply side? Increase the supply of homes on the market? Maybe reduce red-tape and lower taxes for small investors, say those with 1-6 units to rehab existing properties to get them on the market. By getting more supply, it will keep prices lower and there are several homes in each town that need some rehab. 

    2
    Topic locked
  • Rental Property Investor · Indianapolis, IN · Member since 2020 · 562 posts · 554 votes
    3y

    @Michael Baum and the more I think about it, this isn’t about helping someone buy a house. This is about compensating the bank for the higher risk.

    1
    Topic locked
  • Real Estate Broker · Minneapolis, MN · Member since 2011 · 5k+ posts · 6k+ votes
    3y

    @Michael Baum Do you think anyone is going to WAKE UP now? 

    Redistribution of wealth is HERE, most are just sleeping through it chugging the kool-aid shovel feed to them. 

    It's CONSISTENT in the messaging from ACTIONS; how-dare-you-work! How-dare-you-invest-in-self! The ONLY acceptable action is drink DRINK from that Federal boob, and if you don't your gonna get beat down until you MUST! 

    Those who feed from it like good little sheeple, will reap YOUR rewards. 

    Welcome to the NEW America, the "inclusive" "tolerant" America. Do as your told OR ELSE! You can do anything you want, as long as it's what your told to do!

    2
    Topic locked
  • Michael BaumPro Member
    OP
    Olympia, WA · Member since 2016 · 8k+ posts · 7k+ votes
    3y

    No @James Hamling, I don't think people will really go against it. We are more about feelings and emotion and not facts like math. I am hoping there will be some kind of lawsuit against it but who knows.

    I am going to start looking for portfolio loans that bypass the feds if I can. 

    0
    Topic locked
  • Investor · Fort Washington, MD · Member since 2014 · 1k+ posts · 1k+ votes
    3y

    This is a group where politics has no place. I seen this circulating for the past few days through right wing sources only. Some of those sources have a brazen history of fabrication, feckless interpretation  or erratic conspiracy theories. In many instances the originators are confident they will be believed and it will be circulated for free no matter what it is. For me to give this further thought I would need to hear it from other sources. 

    1
    Topic locked
  • Michael BaumPro Member
    OP
    Olympia, WA · Member since 2016 · 8k+ posts · 7k+ votes
    3y

    Hey @Mark Cruse, this isn't some kind of conspiracy theory. It is a new set of regs. Do you just not believe it?

    https://singlefamily.fanniemae...

    There it is. It is the flyer that has gone out to all lenders. Right on the FNMA website.

    Right or left, these are the facts. Just because right wing sources are the first to report on it doesn't mean it isn't correct.

    You can keep you head in the sand if you want but I look at many sources of info to make my determinations.

    I am sorry I posted this. Mods if you could close this thread, it would be a good thing.

    2
    Topic locked