It's 2018... someone tell my why these are still thing

It's 2018... someone tell my why these are still thing

Investor · Boston, MA · Member since 2014 · 232 posts · 165 votes

Can someone please explain to me how, in 2018, we haven't come up with a better process for:

1. The real estate title system

Between title searches and title insurance - the real estate title system is a $15 BILLION complete scam. How can we still not say who actually owns a property? When I buy or sell a car, there's a title transfer document and a bill of sale. End of story - no lawyers or title companies involved. I'm not saying buying real estate should be as simple as buying toothpaste, and I get the idea of title clouds, but there HAS to be a better system than the one we have in place. Is anyone getting close to improving this? For all of the hype around blockchain helping to fix this system, I haven't actually seen a functional project launched yet. Are places like Ubitquity making an impact?

2. Notaries

How are we still saying that "yea this document is super legit because this person who paid a $60 fee has a fancy stamp?" Shockingly, this is not the most secure system, and there are still cases of rampant fraud (like this one from a few years ago,  or this one). The notary system is so antiqued it's preposterous. I'll double down and say that the concept of a physical signature is just as ridiculous. 

3. The rest of my rant can be bucketed into just general technology enhancements, especially in the commercial lending industry. In my previous life, I was a consultant with a big accounting firm, and our projects were mostly around bringing these lenders from the stone age to at least 2010 with their tech. And that's not even the consumer facing stuff, it was the back end, loan accounting and reporting systems that were so mickey mouse it was terrifying. Bigger banks have the pockets to justify new system implementations, but many smaller banks and credit unions are running on decades old technology. My latest commercial loan was through a bank that can't even link an auto pay to my loan! Boston Sewer and Water doesn't accept auto pay either - when I asked, they said they are "working on implementing later this spring." I physically write checks every month. In 2018. 

So, that was a lot of whining without offering much in terms of solutions... sorry about that. 

Consumers are expecting more and more in terms of technology offerings from their lenders, brokers, property managers, the courts and other partners, and the real estate industry is letting us all down. These inefficiencies are costing us time, money, and creating massive barriers to entry for new investors and home owners. I fully realize there are some progressive companies out there, and CRE tech is starting to gain steam, but we are still 100 years behind other industries and it's up to us to drive institutional change and improvement.

Do you have anything to add to this list or anything I'm missing in my assessment? 

22Reply
368 views

Most Popular Reply

Tom GimerBusiness Member
DMV · Member since 2017 · 3k+ posts · 3k+ votes
8y

@James E. This movement needs a #hashtag.  Something whiny but cute.

Once we have that let's put the federal government in charge of the whole system so it is efficient and fund it with Bitcoin so it is stable..

Gimer Law517 Reviews
See this reply in the discussion

104 Replies

Jump to latestLatest
  • Member since 2018 · 1 post · 0 votes
    8y

    Interesting, post. As a software developer who has done a lot of work with agents and brokers, I see a lot of systems that can be improved. I'd love to connect with others who would be interested in working on products that fix some of these concerns. The title / notary issues could easily be solved by implementing a blockchain ledger that includes property details. It might take a decade to get the industry on board, but I'm sure there are already companies pioneering this technology as we speak. 

  • Mike CumbieBusiness Member
    REALTOR® · Brockport, NY · Member since 2015 · 3k+ posts · 4k+ votes
    8y

    @Russell Fair

    "It might take a decade to get the industry on board,"

    It's not the industry it is all of the individual village/town/county/state boards. Change on that scale will end up weaving in and out of local regulation/law for much longer than most of us will be alive. Currently we see titles that changed hands 8 times that still have a legal description of "The tree where John Kilt the bear south to the rock that looks like a skillet". Because nobody wants to open that can of worms on a single property. Now you are talking about getting it all pushed into a new technology.

    To give you an idea our whole county still uses pagers for first-responders..... Pagers....... Reason being, let the lawsuit come through because Mary the RSI technician had Sprint and didn't get the text so the 4 year old didn't make it.  Imagine telling every company that does title insurance (and their lawyers) that we are just going to go ahead and import all of this into a blockchain tracked method and you are Ok with continuing to insure it right? Everyone would claim their policy was no longer valid. So I think a decade is being very generous. 

    I think a better investment would be a technology on the consumer side, there are much more apt to change.

  • West Hills, CA · Member since 2016 · 6 posts · 0 votes
    8y

    I 10000000% agree with you on notary being a completely antiquated and useless system to be using when we have biometrics and technology to be used to verify identity in seconds. Terrible system that needs to go away ASAP. 

Join the conversationCreate a free account to reply, vote on answers and follow this thread.