Airbnb Has Picked a Side—and It’s Not With Hosts

Airbnb Has Picked a Side—and It’s Not With Hosts

Member since 2026 · 1 post · 0 votes

Airbnb’s current review-removal process is deeply unfair to hosts.

In the past, a host could speak with someone at Airbnb and explain why a review violated the company’s policies. Now, in my experience, hosts are directed to submit a written request. If that request is denied, they receive only one appeal before the matter is permanently closed.

Even worse, Airbnb provides no meaningful explanation for its decision. There is no indication of which arguments were considered, which policy provisions were applied, or whether the evidence was carefully reviewed. Hosts receive a rejection without any real opportunity to discuss the case with a human being.

The process effectively requires ordinary hosts to argue their cases like lawyers—interpreting policy language, organizing evidence, and preparing what amounts to a legal brief. Most of us are not attorneys or large hotel corporations with legal departments. We are simply people trying to rent our homes responsibly. We should not need legal training to receive a fair hearing from a company we pay to facilitate those rentals.

I could recount every detail of my own case, but I don’t want this to sound like a complaint about one unhappy guest. The larger problem is the process itself.

After more than 300 reviews, I received my first two-star review. Airbnb does not seem to appreciate how damaging a review like that can be. Hosts operate in a system where anything below five stars can significantly affect a listing’s rating, visibility, and income.

Airbnb should also recognize that one dramatically negative review among hundreds of five-star reviews is, by definition, an outlier. That does not mean it should automatically be removed—but it should receive careful, individualized review by an actual person.

Hosts open their properties—and often their homes—to Airbnb guests. We pay Airbnb substantial fees and depend on the platform for our livelihoods. The very least Airbnb owes us is a transparent review process, a clear explanation when a removal request is denied, and the opportunity to speak with a human being when a single review may materially damage years of responsible hosting.

Airbnb has created a system in which guests are allowed to judge hosts publicly, while hosts cannot meaningfully question Airbnb’s judgment in return. That is neither balanced nor fair.

This may not seem like a problem that affects you today, but eventually it will—and when it does, you may discover that there is no meaningful way to make your case.

Please like and share this post so that it reaches other hosts—and, ultimately, the decision-makers at Airbnb. If enough of us speak up together, perhaps Airbnb will finally listen.

0Reply
263 views

Most Popular Reply

Rental Property Investor · Phoenix, AZ and Rehoboth Beach DE · Member since 2019 · 1k+ posts · 1k+ votes
2mo

Peter, Airbnb now uses AI exclusively to handle their review removal process, so no human is reading it.  From what I hear from other hosts who were successful, you need to use AI to write your argument (now your appeal), so it's your AI reasoning with Airbnb's AI.  You'll need to tell your AI that you want Airbnb to remove that review because the guest broke Airbnb's own rules, and then quote all of the appropriate rules to your AI.  Here's Airbnb's page on review rules: https://www.airbnb.com/help/article/2673#section-heading-0 

See this reply in the discussion

6 Replies

Jump to latestLatest
  • MD/DC · Member since 2024 · 1k+ posts · 1k+ votes
    2mo

    Not surprised. It is a shame AirBNB and VRBO are essentially the only game in town and act like it. 

  • Rental Property Investor · Phoenix, AZ and Rehoboth Beach DE · Member since 2019 · 1k+ posts · 1k+ votes
    2mo

    Peter, Airbnb now uses AI exclusively to handle their review removal process, so no human is reading it.  From what I hear from other hosts who were successful, you need to use AI to write your argument (now your appeal), so it's your AI reasoning with Airbnb's AI.  You'll need to tell your AI that you want Airbnb to remove that review because the guest broke Airbnb's own rules, and then quote all of the appropriate rules to your AI.  Here's Airbnb's page on review rules: https://www.airbnb.com/help/article/2673#section-heading-0 

  • Joseph CacciapagliaBusiness Member
    Lender · San Antonio, TX · Member since 2020 · 1k+ posts · 1k+ votes
    2mo

    Airbnb seems to be following eBay's playbook. I've dabbled in reselling over the years, and saw tons of posts like this in their forums. eBay chose buyers over sellers, and changed basically all of their policies with that lens. Airbnb seems to be doing the same. It makes sense for them as a business, because guests are where the revenue comes from. It's much easier for a guest to switch to a hotel or another platform than it is to shut down your STR business. That's why even though Airbnb is currently the highest traffic platform, it's important to cross book and also self book.

    Joseph Cacciapaglia powered by Morty
  • Andrew SteffensBusiness Member
    Tampa, FL · Member since 2022 · 3k+ posts · 3k+ votes
    2mo

    This is all par for the course, and yes it is getting worse and worse.  Though I will say I have had some success in getting reviews removed under the new system - but it has always been unfair to hosts in favor of the guests.

  • Realtor · Columbus, OH · Member since 2017 · 313 posts · 245 votes
    2mo

    I think this thread hits the nail on the head. Anyone running short-term rentals on Airbnb right now is feeling these exact growing pains. The platform is definitely maturing, but a lot of the recent shifts feel like a classic case of operational risk being pushed straight onto the hosts.

    The AirCover sounds great in marketing, but in practice, the evidence bar is sky-high—unedited video proof, zero coverage for consumables, and tight 14-day claim windows. Pair that with hosts now eating the liability for guest credit card chargebacks after check-out, and the financial risk profile is way higher than it was a couple of years ago.

    When a dispute actually happens, getting a human customer support rep who understands nuance feels like winning the lottery. You're usually stuck in automated ticket loops.

  • Dan H.Pro Member
    Investor · Poway, CA · Member since 2015 · 7k+ posts · 8k+ votes
    2mo

    Airbnb picked the guest side years ago,

    I miss the days prior to virtually all bookings being via the OTAs.  Our first STRS were all direct booking when we first started renting them as STRs and our occupancy was high.

    Direct bookings take work but as long as most bookings come via the OTAs, the OTAs currently have the power.

    What do you think would happen if just 25% of bookings were direct bookings?   Do you think the OTAs would recognize that the hosts are letting guests stay in their very valuable assets?   Do you think they may realize without hosts, they do not have units to rent to guests?

    Mark Simpson. “The book direct playbook”.   

    Good luck

Join the conversationCreate a free account to reply, vote on answers and follow this thread.