Bedrooms and bathrooms. Specifically, the conversions that add a bedroom and a bath where the space already exists. We do 2/1 to 3/1 and 3/1 to 4/2 or 3/2 conversions all over Memphis — converting a carport or garage into a master bed and bath typically adds about 400 to 650 square feet. That spend moves two numbers at once: the rent and the ARV. A 3BR that rents at $1,395 becomes a 4BR that rents toward $1,950, and the appraisal follows the bed and bath count. Kitchens and finishes matter, but they're cosmetic — the market pays for beds, baths, and square footage. If a dollar doesn't add one of those three, I think hard before spending it.
Bedrooms and bathrooms. Specifically, the conversions that add a bedroom and a bath where the space already exists. We do 2/1 to 3/1 and 3/1 to 4/2 or 3/2 conversions all over Memphis — converting a carport or garage into a master bed and bath typically adds about 400 to 650 square feet. That spend moves two numbers at once: the rent and the ARV. A 3BR that rents at $1,395 becomes a 4BR that rents toward $1,950, and the appraisal follows the bed and bath count. Kitchens and finishes matter, but they're cosmetic — the market pays for beds, baths, and square footage. If a dollar doesn't add one of those three, I think hard before spending it.
Great point! Adding a bedroom and bathroom can make a big difference when the existing space and local market support it. The key is making sure the renovation costs align with the potential increase in value and rental income. Do you usually check rental comps first before deciding which conversions make the most sense?
For me, it is the kitchen and primary bathroom — but with a caveat: spend for clean, durable, and broadly appealing, not for luxury. Those are the rooms buyers and renters notice first, and a tired kitchen or bathroom can make an otherwise solid home feel dated. I would prioritize good lighting, sound flooring, updated fixtures, and a layout that works, before spending on high-end finishes that only a narrow group of buyers will value. I also put safety and function first: if something is broken, leaking, or outdated behind the walls, that has to come before cosmetic upgrades. In short, spend where people live every day, keep the finish level in line with the home and its price point, and save the splurge for the one feature that truly helps the home show well.
Absolutely! A clean, functional kitchen and bathroom can go a long way without needing luxury finishes. I also agree that addressing safety and underlying issues first is important before investing in cosmetic upgrades. How do you usually decide which improvements are worth the extra spend on a specific property?
Hi Siahna, good question to start the weekend with!
For us it's anything that keeps water out: roof, gutters, grading, plumbing. Buyers rarely notice it, but it protects every other dollar you put into the house, and it's often the first thing an inspector flags.
For what buyers do notice, it's the kitchen, priced line by line rather than as one "kitchen budget", because that's where scope quietly grows. What do you see your borrowers overspend on most?
That’s a great point! Water-related issues can quickly turn into expensive problems if they’re overlooked, and a detailed kitchen budget can help keep costs from creeping up. It really comes down to balancing essential repairs with upgrades that support the property’s value. Do you build a contingency into your rehab budget for unexpected issues?
@Siahna Im thank you! Rather than guessing a buffer, we price everything from the house plans and photos. Once we have the plan, we already know where pipes, wiring and weak spots are likely to be.
Surprises still happen. On our jobs in Switzerland we covered two of them at our own cost:
A pipe burst during the work and flooded the first-floor ceiling of a private house, so we repainted the whole floor.
The pipes were old and the owner didn't want to replace them. Our worker didn't remove a fitting correctly, it broke, and we replaced all of it.
We collect every case like this into our model, so it knows in advance what can happen. For example, when you open the ceiling of a wooden house built before 1990, the likely extra work is already in the budget. Or we split the job into blocks and price the next block only after the ceiling is open.
Every house is a new case, and it's important to warn early, both the owner and the lender or insurer. After floods it works a bit differently, and we've learned to assess the condition of the house for that too.
@Siahna Im I'm with Vladimirs on anything that keeps water out. On older houses the money that mattered most for us was the stuff nobody sees, plumbing, electrical, roof. My first house we basically redid all of it just to live there. Buyers won't pay extra for new wiring, but they'll walk when the inspector finds old wiring. After that I'd probably put it into the kitchen and baths and keep everything else simple. Every property is different, but that's roughly how I'd do it.
Well said! The improvements buyers don’t see can be just as important as the ones they notice during a showing. Taking care of major systems first helps protect the rest of the renovation budget. When evaluating an older property, do you usually set aside a separate budget for hidden repairs before planning the cosmetic upgrades?
@Matthew Morrow thank you, Matthew! I'd add one thing: it's all about priorities :) Every case is different, but we start by assessing the condition of the house, and today we can do it fully remotely. That first remote budget is usually 70 to 85% accurate. Then every job gets its own detailed calculation, block by block, and we can still be wrong. An old house may have been home to an electrician who redid all the wiring himself, and you can't tell that from the outlets.
That's why we split the work into blocks and price each one properly. You can always save on one thing and spend more on another, like the kitchen :) It also matters what the goal is and how the house was bought. Maybe it's your first home and you're paying rent in the meantime, with 5 kids and 3 dogs! There are many factors, and we adjust to every owner. It has to be a system that runs like a clock: when the light turns green, you just cross :)
I really enjoy talking with you! What else would you like to hear about our launch in Switzerland? Or share your own stories: builders, lost receipts, handshake deals :)
@Vladimirs Veiss pricing it block by block makes sense, and the electrician who rewired his own house is a good example of why you never really know until the walls are open. Good luck with the launch.
@Matthew Morrow thank you, Matthew, that means a lot coming from you!
You mentioned that on your first house you redid almost everything just to live there. I'm curious: what was the one thing behind the walls that surprised you most? And looking back, what went really well, and what's the one lesson from all your flips you'd pass on to anyone starting a rehab today?
If you have a minute, I just started a thread on whether the 10-15% rehab buffer is a myth, and I'd really value your take there.
@Vladimirs Veiss honestly it wasn't one thing, it was how much of it there was. We went in planning to fix a few things and ended up doing plumbing, electrical, pretty much everything, just so we could live there. What went well is it showed me what a house can be worth once you fix what everyone else avoided. The one lesson I'd pass on is that the price you pay is the most important number of the whole project. Overpay and no rehab budget saves you. After that, I'd assume the last owner didn't take care of the big stuff and have the reserves to handle it.
@Matthew Morrow thank you so much for sharing this, your experience really means a lot to us. Your lesson is the key one: the price you pay is the most important number, and on that first house you couldn't know upfront how much was waiting behind the walls. I hope that soon new owners won't have to learn it the hard way, and will be able to plan before they buy: whether to take this house at all, and what will happen once they do. Looking back, if you'd known the real renovation cost before that first purchase, would you still have bought it? And what number would have made you walk away? Have a great day!
@Vladimirs Veiss probably yes, but mostly because we were living in it. That house showed me what real estate could do, and it's the reason I kept going. If it had been a pure investment I'd have looked at it differently. There's no single number I'd walk at. It comes back to the price. If what I'm paying plus a realistic rehab, with reserves for the stuff behind the walls, doesn't leave room, I pass, no matter how good the house looks.
@Matthew Morrow thank you, Matthew. Living in it first is the best teacher. I really like your rule: it comes back to the price, and if price plus a realistic rehab with reserves doesn't leave room, you pass. Pricing the stuff behind the walls before closing is the tricky part. In your market, is the inspection or attorney review window usually long enough to get a real rehab number, or do you price it off a walkthrough? Have a great day!
For me, it's kitchens, but with an important caveat: I don't mean installing the most expensive cabinets or high-end appliances.
A dated kitchen is one of the first things buyers notice when they walk through a house. A clean, bright, functional kitchen can make the entire property feel updated, even if the rest of the renovation is fairly standard.
The best returns I've seen usually come from:
Painted or refaced cabinets when possible
New hardware
Durable countertops
Updated lighting
Modern backsplash
Stainless appliances (when appropriate for the neighborhood)
You don't necessarily need a luxury kitchen. You need a kitchen that feels fresh and move-in ready.
Honorable mention goes to flooring. Consistent flooring throughout a home can completely change a buyer's perception of the property. It's one of those upgrades that photographs well, shows well, and impacts every room.
On the flip side, I've seen investors overspend on things buyers barely notice. The goal isn't always to build the nicest house on the block. It's to spend money where buyers emotionally connect with the home.
If I had to pick just one area to allocate a little extra budget, it'd be the kitchen every time. That's where I've seen the most impact on buyer interest and overall marketability.
@Vladimirs Veiss me again. It depends on the deal. Around here the inspection period is negotiated in the agreement of sale, and on an older property I'd rather ask for enough time up front to get a contractor through, not just the inspector. A walkthrough gets you close, but the stuff behind the walls is where the surprises live. If I can't get real eyes on the big items, I'd rather carry more reserves than guess. PA doesn't really have the attorney review period NJ does, so the inspection contingency ends up doing most of that work.
@Matthew Morrow thank you, Matthew, the PA perspective is really helpful! "The stuff behind the walls is where the surprises live" is the truest line in this thread, and it's exactly why a contractor on the walkthrough beats an inspector alone. My rule on old houses is simple: the house usually tells on itself if you know where to look. A panel with breakers from three different decades, three kinds of pipe under one sink, fresh paint on just one spot of a ceiling. Each of those says a previous owner patched something, and patched work is where the budget leaks. On our jobs every one of those signs becomes its own priced line item before work starts, so the reserve is sized by evidence, not a flat percent. Which of those signs has burned you the most on a 100-year-old house in PA? Have a great weekend!