Investor · 02906 · Member since 2020 · 10 posts · 4 votes
Hi BP community. My name is Jordan and I'm a new OOS investor (and as a new real estate investor in general). After reading as many books as I can and doing the best possible research I could do, I found myself with a couple of potential markets to invest in BUT ONE BIG QUESTION:
As an OOS investor, would you rather invest in an area you are familiar with, in which you have a network in place and people you can trust OR would you go for a market you are not familiar with, but have stronger ROI and CoC numbers? Both are profitable, btw.
Post your answer and if you don't mind your "why". Thanks!
@Jordan M. I’m considering/struggling with the same situation. As a Boston investor, cap rates are low, cash flow scarce and very capital intensive. I like the basic concept of using equity built in a high cost market and then deploying it in a lower cost/higher cash flow market.
The compromise I’m coming to is focusing on out of state markets I have visited or lived in (there have been many in my case). But to everyone else’s point, building a good team and/or connecting with old contacts in those places are key. BP is a gold mine for assembling a team.
First one all day. There is too much trust being tossed out in option #2 that can't be returned in alleged CoC and ROI. You can't learn a neighborhood or city from afar so it's best to start with areas you know if you can't invest locally or at the very least, areas where you know and trust someone already to be your eyes.
Follow-up though, why are you deciding to go OOS from Providence?
Hi @Jonathan Greene. Thanks for your input. In reference to your question: I'm working with other private investors and the target home price doesn't match with the existing inventory in the northeast.
@Jordan M. If both are profitable, I’d suggest going with the one that is MORE profitable. Study the sub markets that you’re interested in religiously. Once you find one market you want to focus on build a good team of knowledgeable trustworthy people based there. Most importantly, find a qualified agent that knows their market well, works with investors regularly, and knows how to run the numbers. Oh, and actually knows what a cap rate is.
The goal would be to invest locally where you personally know the market and can make contacts easier. If that is not possible due to the prices of where you live, then I would turn to out of state investing. It can be a great move if you have the right team in place. @Jordan M.
For me the answer relies in a couple of "if"s. What are the numbers, exactly, on the option where you have a network, as compared to the other option? For the market you aren't familiar with, do you have any access to good teams there? What's the appreciation potential there as compared to the other one?
Need more info. What are the numbers on both, generally, and what are the two markets like? Solid, growth potential, strong rental market, etc.?
I only invest out of state because I used to live in Seattle and now Hawaii. San Francisco, Hawaii, Los Angeles, Seattle, Boston are examples of primary markets which are NOT ideal for cashflow investing.
Sophisticated investors look at the Rent-to-Value Ratio and look for at least 1% or more to be able to cashflow after expenses.
Great question @Jordan M. I would say invest where the numbers make the most sense. The most important thing is to build your “core 4” in that new market. Use BiggerPockets to connect with realtors, property managers, contractors, lenders, and other investors. If you can connect with professionals who have experience working with OOS investors you will be successful!
Which are the two markets you’re deciding between?
@Jordan M. I’m considering/struggling with the same situation. As a Boston investor, cap rates are low, cash flow scarce and very capital intensive. I like the basic concept of using equity built in a high cost market and then deploying it in a lower cost/higher cash flow market.
The compromise I’m coming to is focusing on out of state markets I have visited or lived in (there have been many in my case). But to everyone else’s point, building a good team and/or connecting with old contacts in those places are key. BP is a gold mine for assembling a team.
Such an interesting question. I am currently looking for places OOS to invest in. I live in MA and feel I can get better ROI elsewhere. The hard part is finding the right team to trust. I have met with a few people here that have been very helpful
@Jordan M. Why not build a team of people you can trust in OOS markets? If you ever want to venture OOS, that is where you'll have to start. But if you're finding equally good deals locally, then that's a no brainer.
This is an easy one for me. Invest in the market you know and have people you trust. I learned this lesson the hard way, even when I believed I had built trust in the OOS partner. Finding trusted partners is difficult out of state, not to say it can't be done, with a large vetting process and short leash.
@Jordan M. I think you can build a trustworthy team and learn any market. So if you pick a market with great returns you’ll be able to learn it and build relationships there. So my answer is that either of these will work but don’t discount 2. I think people spend way too much time thinking about what they will do, planning what they will do, and a year goes by and you haven’t actually done anything. So if 1 or 2 gets you going, that’s the better choice.
I would strongly encourage you to invest in an area that you know about over pro-forma CoC and ROI numbers. If you don't know the area, don't have a quality team in place, it is very likely that your proforma CoC and ROI numbers won't come close to actuals. I invest out of state and invested in a market that I knew well enough (visited multiple times, have a friend that lives just outside the metro, and did some research/watching before jumping in).