@Jon Q. I 100% agree that that statement holds true as a generalization.
Historically based on the comparison of Houston, Austin, and BCS, the data says the big cities have a more volatile price index. That history includes 2 Gulf wars, 3 recessions, and 6 Presidents. Volatility does not equal risk in investing, but for me if feel safer in a less volatile market.
Is it possible that a city with one very strong economic driver could be less risky than one with multiple drivers? I'd say yes.
If you could acquire a SFR in Austin vs Lubbock that is the same price, same rental rate, and same condition and all else being equal except location, which would you buy?
We all know the answer, people have already spoken with their $$$... which is why Austin has and is still growing so quickly, the jobs and diverse economy.
Austin prices are not that volatile, vs Dallas, Houston, and San Antonio... Austin’s price chart looks like one for the record books, one that all investors want to see... up and to the right.