Fort Worth, TX · Member since 2020 · 1k+ posts · 2k+ votes
Welcome to our Question of the Week! We have a lot of people who are entering the world of real estate investment who could use your wisdom. When evaluating a property, what are your automatic no or exclusion list items and why? Was there an experience that caused you to exclude them? How did you handle that experience?
Let's help each other learn to analyze a deal quickly and effectively. Share your thoughts!
Required repairs that will put us upside down on the investment. It’s amazing to me that some sellers have a difficult time acknowledging the scope of work is extensive and the sale price should permit us to be below market value after the overhaul renovation. Then again, there’s always a buyer 🤦🏻♂️
especially tear downs.. the seller wants the value of his lot like it was ready to go day one. never a thought to the cost of demo lead and asbesto's remediation dump fees etc etc.. so lot value is usually 50k less with a tear down on it. I am in the process of buying one probably that has a bunch of stuff on it oil tankes etc.. and the seller is going to remove everything I told him I would pay him 150k more for it if he does all the remediaiton and delivers mean a clean ready to subdivide parcel.. worth it to me.
There is no item that is an automatic "no", there is only items that have an associated price-tag to them for making corrections, or to mitigate risk factors, or simply for mental damage of dealing with it.
There is a number that anything works, the only automatic "no" is if a seller is not willing to meet that #.
Properties with an HOA. Theoretically an HOA seems like a good idea, but realistically most are corrupt and dysfunctional organizations that charge too much and as an owner I have no control over the fees.
For a STR pools can be a plus because you can generally get quite a bit more $$ per night and be more desirable to the guest, thus offsetting some of the possible added costs of the pool.
I agree with @JD Martin that Real State is an investment and there should be no hard passes. Run the numbers and if it makes dollars and sense then pull the trigger.
D class neighborhoods. Often hard to get banks to lend on them, more tenant problems, property damage, higher turnover, difficult to get contractors and trades to provide service, property management agencies often won't take on D class neighborhoods. There are always exceptions, of course, but this is common. I struggle with this because I see the tremendous need for affordable housing but when I run the numbers it never pencils.
My only hard pass is if the adjacent properties are real eyesores. I just can't control other property owners and landlords; I figure I can handle the rest if the price is right.
I am not really sure what to say except it's all about the numbers and of course I do not want to be in an D area . As long as I am about 20% net cap, I am good
My only hard pass is if the adjacent properties are real eyesores. I just can't control other property owners and landlords; I figure I can handle the rest if the price is right.
For a STR pools can be a plus because you can generally get quite a bit more $$ per night and be more desirable to the guest, thus offsetting some of the possible added costs of the pool.
That was my thought, I just wanted to be sure of the accuracy that a pool is a plus for a STR, so thanks for confirming. I wouldn't pay to add a pool to a home, but if I can buy a pool home in a good airbnb location, that might be of interest, especially since appraisers don't give pools much value.
My only hard pass is if the adjacent properties are real eyesores. I just can't control other property owners and landlords; I figure I can handle the rest if the price is right.
That's a great point!
I’d say for me this rule has some exceptions. For my own personal residence, this is absolutely the case, but for investing, the exceptions to this rule would be in cases where the area is a transitional neighborhood opportunity, as those ugly properties will soon get snapped up and repaired by investors or the next home owners. I currently have a nice property in such a neighborhood and its amazing watching all the low priced houses getting repaired and renovated, not to mention neighborhood values going up. Assuming the buy price has priced in the disrepair of the neighborhood, that might be a deal I would be interested in. I suppose the downside scenario would be a significant recession slowing the transition, and then waiting years for the neighborhood transition to get underway again.
There are places I won't invest (Syria, Somalia...). Rule-of-law is my #1 business and political value.
If there are people associated on the ownership-sell side of a deal, I may stomach a deal with them and then avoid relying on them, certainly their representation of me, in the future (and document them for an internal 'black list' for my colleagues).
I looked at one last week that I nicknamed "Alice in Wonderland house" because the foundation bowed 5.5" to the middle, rose 3 in the center front to back, and the drop ceiling in the kitchen made it seem like a fun house. I offered lot value and he passed, it's now contingent at almost double that. ARV is about $50k more with at least $30k in foundation, and the roof is totally shot. There's a fool born ever minute, but it won't be me.
I looked at one last week that I nicknamed "Alice in Wonderland house" because the foundation bowed 5.5" to the middle, rose 3 in the center front to back, and the drop ceiling in the kitchen made it seem like a fun house. I offered lot value and he passed, it's now contingent at almost double that. ARV is about $50k more with at least $30k in foundation, and the roof is totally shot. There's a fool born ever minute, but it won't be me.
Yeah, let somebody else learn their lessons on places like this.....!
I recently looked at street view for a MLS property and it had 4 cops outside the house!!! hard No! right now i'm looking and 2-4 units and to have my partner on board our unit has to have a private washer and dryer and I garage to park her car. Anything that doesn't have those two things or affordable potential to have those things is an automatic no.
When the cost to make it liveable is higher than the value of the property. Here in Naples, there are locations, Naples Manor, Bayshore old sections, Normandy Dr area, that the prices are at stupid levels. They are asking $450,000 FOR A 1900 SQFT DUPLEX, 2/1 OR 2/2 and the rent currently is $900 monthly. I spend $50,000 to make it liveable, it is still in a terrible location and I have to accept subsidized rent to even rent it. When the turn hits later this year, the thing will be worth $325,000 and I own it at $500,000. Rent maybe goes to $1200 or even $1500. You do the math, terrible return if I need to dump it. Your loan is based on $450,000...Brian doesn't make profit.
Also location is always key. If you see them dealing drugs across the street, you will not get quality tenants. Burned out cars, pitbulls running loose, no grass, just dirt in the yard....run don't walk.
It all starts from the backend in my opinion! Any deal can really be taken on if the numbers work well and it's situated in a growing area. But, if you don't have the right team members calling the shots and making the right decisions any deal could go south extremely fast.
Other things I would look out for otherwise are foundation issues, septic issues and how good the neighborhood is where the house is situated.