Once of my favorite entrepreneurs would have to be the one and only Grant Cardone. So naturally I listen to his podcast and follow a lot of his material. One number that he continuously brings up is $100,000 and once you have that kind of money in the bank, its time to start to invest. Which in some aspect I do agree. A 10%on $5000 is just $500 where the same on $100,000 is $10,000, which is much more interesting.
This ideal comes up quite a bit with other motivators and entrepreneurs, to get first things first and make the money before you invest it.
This website clearly breaks that mold so the question is, what do you think is the best route? To make all the money and then figure it out or to make some small amounts and work with that? What experiences can you provide with both ends?
I would have never started investing, if I had followed that rule. huh!
Don't get me wrong, his books are very motivating, but maybe Grant should be more upfront about the source of his "investing" and say.. "Dont start investing until you have the financial backing of other rich members of the church of Scientology" ... He let that one slide in one of his YouTube videos awhile back.
To me, you should have your personal finances in order before you start investing. If you can't create a budget, have credit card debt, can't or won't live within your means, and don't have enough saved for a decent sized rainy day fund then you shouldn't be investing.
100k is an arbitrary number. For some that may make sense. To me it didn't. I started investing when I had an extra 5k. I started with stocks and did a lot of reading and research before jumping in. Even if you're prepared, you're going to get an education and you're likely going to pay for it. Literally pay for it. I lost some of that initial investment but I learned a lot, refined my strategy and forged ahead. Had I waited until I had 100k I don't know when I would have started but I do know I likely would have still paid for my education. Except it would have been 20% of 100k instead of 20% of 5k.
I definitely would, and did, start well before that $100k mark. I actually made my first real investment using some of my summer internship savings from college, $2000, and put it into purchasing stocks. I did this because I wanted to learn as I went, and I definitely did as I lost big initially and gained well after.
I did the same thing in real estate when I put in $20k of my savings from my first job, and I jumped in so I could learn. I just make sure now that I am well planned financially, and that even in the case of a setback my business will still be able to maintain itself.
Not investing until you reach $X is lost income/appreciation, compounding gains, and more importantly time wasted away not investing and learning.
@Daniel Cuevas I watch a lot of his videos and he's literally the MAN!
To your question, I think it depends on your income and market to be honest. And more importantly, how creative you can get on your financial solutions. Where I live, it can get pretty expensive depending on the market your focused in.
I started with less than 30K purchasing a 450K MultiFamily with 120K worth of Renovations (Totaling 588K Loan). Plus, don't forget an additional 10K I used out of my 401K "penalty free". This is a huge source for money you can use to get started. A lot of us who have 401Ks because of our jobs and contribute every month, won't see that money till 59 1/2. Chances are, that 10K will be worth way less when I'm 60 and I won't need it as much as I need it now. (Disclaimer, you have to pay the taxes on that 10K the following year.)
Also, opened up a few credits cards that have 18 months or 15 months 0% interest on Purchases so I could survive/live comfortably during my reno process and pay my mortgage using my active income. Then, when the units get rented and I live rent free, I can pay them back and it's like free money to borrow with no interest.
So you CAN and SHOULD get started as soon as your comfortable with getting started. You set your own parameters and thresholds tailored to your own lifestyle. And learn how to get creative!!!
As Grant would say, "Whatever It Takes!"
@Daniel Cuevas I used a private lender and a refi to pay them back. Worked out well, but I learned after the fact that condos aren't the best rentals due to HOA discrepancies / assessments. Luckily, my HOA is managed correctly. It could have easily been a nightmare from the HOA point of view. I would recommend sticking to SF or MF buildings for this reason.
@Simon Wold That makes sense. Its difficult to find a single family in the area within the price range that I'm looking for but I'm sure its possible. This is why I am considering a condo. When you refinanced, was it for 100% assessed value or was it based off of other factors, not too knowledgeable of refi's.
@William Kwong I agree, every situation is very different and its built off of the premise of discipline more then anything. Invest in yourself and your ability to make the money, then invest.
That is a great technique, the company I work for does offer a 401k but I decided not to take advantage because it wouldn't be my money anymore. I'm working on getting started right away/
@Keeya WangJones I would be interested in helping you find that San Diego buy and hold deal you are looking for. Please PM me if you are interested.
@Daniel Cuevas here is how it worked:
Keep in mind that the 30k cost I was referring to included all of the loan / holding / rehab costs associated with the purchase. The numbers aren't exact because I don't have them in front of me, but they are close.
If you use this method correctly, you can acquire a REI with little or no money down. Just using what is coined as the 70% rule / BRRR Strategy.
Hope this helps!
@Daniel Cuevas here is how it worked:
Keep in mind that the 30k cost I was referring to included all of the loan / holding / rehab costs associated with the purchase. The numbers aren't exact because I don't have them in front of me, but they are close.
If you use this method correctly, you can acquire a REI with little or no money down. Just using what is coined as the 70% rule / BRRR Strategy.
Hope this helps!
It absolutely does, thank you very much.
under that rule a lot of people would be still working their 9-5's
They are.
@Keeya WangJones I don't own anything in Encinitas (or anywhere in California for that matter) as my focus is cap-rate/cash-flow rather than looking for appreciation. Frankly, if I had the DNA/mindset/fortitude/etc. to buy for appreciation I'd be better off buying here and holding for the next 20 years. But that's really not what lets me sleep at night. I buy multifamily properties in Arkansas. They cash-flow better and don't get the large swings in appreciation/depreciation that California does. Anyway, long answer to a short question!
I'm starting out with 10k in cash and more available in credit/loans. It's all about mindset right? Isn't that Grant's thing? haha.
I'm just going to 10X my 10k to 100k in the next 12-24 months! (See what I did there)
Seriously though, it all depends on your personal situation; I live in Cleveland where we all know property is dirt cheap and the cost of living is rock bottom. I'm currently staying with my parents and have been living extremely frugally for almost a whole year and have been able to save that 10k living on a salary of 29k (thats before tax!).
How bad do you want it? That's the question I would ask yourself. I was truly intimidated jumping on this site and into the world of investment. Some of the people in real estate are just monster successes in everything they do in life it seems! But seeing what can be accomplished by anyone, given enough drive and motivation, that is truly inspiring! I've found motivation and determination within myself I didn't know was there.
Summary:
Make the sacrifices necessary to accomplish the goals you have set for yourself. If real estate investment is the ultimate goal then a lack of 6-figure capital to start with certainly won't stop you! GET OUT THERE AND DO IT!!!
Sorta. You're Schedule E would be in the green, but your checking account could be in the red :(
Don't wait. Invest as soon as you can. Reinvest your gains and continue to compound. Use other resources to your advantage, networking, financing, skills, biggerpockets.com and do what you can. The real estate market is not static and timing holds much value too.
It's not a matter of who is right or wrong. BP followers are primarily new investors that are learning the game and networking. Cardone has over 25 years of experience in sales and multi-family investing. He is telling you to think bigger. $100K is a down payment on a $400K deal.
I am off work today due to a "snow day" so had a little time to actually listen to the podcast was referring to and found about what i expected. Cardone over simplifies economic concepts to the point that his explanations are partially if not completely incorrect. However, the conclusions he reaches are by and large correct showing that he understands the concepts but does not have faith that his listeners have the capacity or desire to understand more detailed explanation.
Examples:
1. His grandmas bank account earned in the high teens in 1976 and earns almost nothing now which means traditional savings accounts are less valuable. - In reality the inflation rate in 1976 was 16.5 and is currently near 0. The real income from these accounts is almost exactly the same and savings accounts have been and will likely always be based on inflation + around 50 basis points.
2. The minimum wage adjusted for inflation is $2 less today than it was in 1960 so that means the dollar is losing value. - The minimum wage adjusted for inflation has nothing to do with the real value of a dollar. It is absolutely true that real income earned by the lower class has remained stagnant or slightly decreased for decades while the real income of the wealthy has increased significantly. However, this has no relationship to the value of money.
Cardone's ultimate take away that you should not just sit on your money but should instead invest it in something (namely real estate) is totally correct but not for the oversimplified reasons he stated. Investments unlike cash increase with inflation. Real estate investments allow investors to take advantage of leverage which increases the amount you can invest and therefore increases the potential profit.
Don't invest until you have $100,000 is another example of an oversimplification. People should have enough cash reserves to take care of themselves and their family if they loose their job and should have reserves built into an investment to withstand negative cash flow for a period of time. People should also not invest all of their savings in one investment that could serve to be life ruining if it fails.
It is hard to imagine someone having sufficient savings, cash reserves and the money for the down-payment on an investment property without having $100,000. The conclusion that you should not invest until you have savings, cash reserves and the money for a down payment is correct for most people. This conclusion does not take into account the complexities of the individual. A 25 year old with no family to support and a steady income can probably invest his first $10,000 in a SFH. He has less responsibility, more time to make up for a failure and cash flow to get through a tough part of the investment. A union member with fixed pension payments does not have to worry as much about savings and can probably invest with a much lower amount in the bank.
Finance and economics is complex and takes time and brainpower to understand. If finance and economics could be explained and understood in simple terms there would not be an industry of professionals paid handsomely for dedicating their lives to understanding it. Anyone claiming to be able to explain these complex ideas using a few easy to understand principles is selling snake oil and its important people take in this type of information with skepticism.
Cardone may not be as sophisticated as you are Mike, but I'll bet he is making more. He has credibility because he has achieved what most of us wish to achieve.
I think 90% of ppl would never invest if this was the case. saving up that much, while dealing w/ all that life throws at you, would require a lot of things going your way. other variables of kids, bills, etc. the people that would benefit the most from investing are those that probably don't have the income from a job that will allow you to save 100k in the bank in any decent amount of time.
Oh man, if I had waited until I had $100k to invest I'd still be renting and driving my 2003 Toyota Matrix. No offense to Toyota Matrixes, it was a good car. It was that initial leap of faith in buying my first investment that built my business, when I had maybe $20k in the bank from working a second job for a year.
Need to be more specific. For REI, I don't know.
Investing in general though, is a mindset and a habit you need to build. It's absurd to wait till you have X dollars, then think you are going to flip some switch and become an investor. You are likely to make greedy, horrible mistakes in the beginning, driving by fear of missing out and a desire to want it NOW. It will take a while to develop a temperament where you realize you are in a marathon, not a sprint. You are also going to have to develop your inner compass so you don't go for half *** gurus, financial planners, syndicators, ect. All of them will be happy to tell you what to do with that 100,000. Your best interests might be different.
Start with your first dollar. Every dollar you get is a little soldier you need to put to work making you more dollars.
Grant also said REITs are awful and he is currently doing a REIT..
This is not a one size fits all answer just like Dave Ramsey who many active investors would say his advice is horrible but he caters to the 99% population who are not real estate investors.
I can see his point and agree with it for some and disagree for others. For me I took about $35k and turned it into seven figures but also have put a TON of sweat equity into learning my niche.