California Rent Control

California Rent Control

Residential Real Estate Broker · College Station, TX · Member since 2013 · 1k+ posts · 969 votes

California Draws Battle Lines in Rent Control Conflict

Kathy Fettke | 28 May 2018

The battle lines have been drawn in the war over California rent control. Tenant advocates announced recently they have enough signatures for a ballot initiative to repeal the Costa-Hawkins Act, which could open the floodgates for extreme rent control in California and put some landlords right out of business.

Why Rent Control Doesn’t Work

While the idea of rent control may sound like a nice one (help keep real estate affordable for families who otherwise would be forced to move), the concept is, by nature, easy to exploit. Tenants may hold onto low-rent apartments for years despite employment gains and higher salaries, crippling landlords’ ability to collect market rents for decades. This not only hurts the landlords, it also eliminates affordable housing for people who truly need it and creates a stagnant rental market.

Rent control also creates a losing situation for landlords in terms of operating income. If a landlord cannot generate enough money to maintain properties, they will be forced to forego repairs and let buildings deteriorate. In California, that can lead to tenants being able to legally refuse to pay rent while being protected from eviction if a trigger maintenance issue arises. Landlords often tend to opt out of the rental game, sell their properties, and put their money elsewhere. If they sell to owner-occupants, which is likely, that removes those rentals from the market entirely and, again, reduces available housing for the renters who desperately need it.

We are on the Cusp of Massive Rent Control

If this ballot measure wins voter approval, investors with property in California are on the cusp of what could be a massive shift toward rent control. Cities that currently have rent control ordinances include Berkeley, Beverly Hills, East Palo Alto, Hayward, Los Angeles, Los Gatos, Mountain View, Oakland, Palm Springs, Richmond, San Francisco, San Jose, Santa Monica, and West Hollywood. Notably, Thousand Oaks has rent control but is phasing it out.

Because a repeal of Costa-Hawkins will substantially broaden the legal alternatives for cities to implement rent control, California landlords currently operating under the protection of the act may need to rethink their investment plans if the measure is approved in November.

Investor Insight:If this ballot passes and you own California rental real estate, you may need to reevaluate your investment strategy.

3Reply
92 views

Most Popular Reply

Realtor · Oakland, CA and a Real Estate Investor with Multi-Family Units and a Self Storage Facility · Member since 2016 · 2k+ posts · 2k+ votes
7y

Hmmm............so long term tenants here in the Bay Area want Rent Control.....AirBNB listings have dropped dramatically because The City of SF got greedy....in Richmond you literally have to pay for your tenant to move out if you no longer make your rental property a rental property.....

1. Y'all may not like this,...but that's why both my rentals here in the Bay Area are to Section 8 tenants that I personally screened.....Don't have to worry about some "entitled thinking person" saying, I'm not going to pay you rent this month.....Those checks come from the housing authority like clockwork the 1st of the month.....EVEN DURING THE GOVERNMENT SHUTDOWN. 

2. In Oakland, when a tenant's rent is subsidized by the government (As in Section 8!), you are not held to the same restrictions of rent control.

3. I also invest out of state in Cleveland......very general rule of thumb is if it's a republican state, it is more landlord friendly. I have a small portfolio (2 duplexes and 2 SFR's in Cleveland) out of state and all are at least the two percent rule. You will not find anything in the entire state of California meeting the 2% rule.

4. As previous posters have said.....VOTE in November and make sure we don't let this nonsense of a measure pass. 

See this reply in the discussion

16 Replies

Jump to latestLatest
  • Jana CainPro Member
    Enrolled Agent · Richmond, CA · Member since 2016 · 225 posts · 148 votes
    8y

    Rent control is definitely a hot button topic these days. I attended a local meetup last week where the discussion was focused exclusively on rent control and evictions in SF (led by an eviction attorney). Exceptionally informative for me, and basically confirmed that I have zero interest in being a landlord in SF. I'm generally a homer when it comes to anything Bay Area related, but I'm not sure appreciation could sway me to bear the headache of dealing with the outrageous policies in place in this regard. It will be very interesting to see how the voting goes.

  • Rental Property Investor · San Francisco, CA · Member since 2013 · 1k+ posts · 1k+ votes
    8y

    Although I’m worried about this, I don’t think it will pass in November for several reasons:

    1- all interests aligned with real estate, such as apartment associations,  developers, realtors, etc. will put ALOT of money behind defeating this. They will have a lot more advertising power than tenant groups IMO. 

    2- this will be very bad even for regular homeowners (non landlords), both SFH and condo, as it will restrict their property rights if they ever want to rent their home out in the future. And there are more homeowners than renters in CA, and they are more active voters. Personally I think this segment of the population will decide the bill's outcome, as they are the majority. And all those advertising dollars will/should be targeted towards them.

  • Investor · Moorpark, CA · Member since 2016 · 248 posts · 191 votes
    8y

    @Jim Cummings Slight correction, Thousand Oaks and Ventura County as a whole don’t have rent control, I don’t believe we ever have.

    That said, I agree with you on all points. It’s a scary thought, but I agree with @Amit M. and don’t believe it will pass. Keep fingers crossed.

  • CA · Member since 2016 · 1k+ posts · 1k+ votes
    8y
    Well make sure you vote against to make sure it does not pass... don’t sit on your hands and expect other people to vote it down... cast your own !!!!!!!
  • Rental Property Investor · Central U. S. A. · Member since 2013 · 296 posts · 149 votes
    7y

    Here's another article on the subject: 

    https://www.nationalreview.com/magazine/2018/11/12...

  • Fresno, CA · Member since 2015 · 552 posts · 181 votes
    7y

    http://www.longbeach.gov/officials/

    Call the city council on the links on the right

    They are trying to pass rent controls to the city. And they are going to be making landlords do 90 day notices and $6500 fees the landlord pays the tenant. I asked can you take repairs off of the $6500 if the tenant damages your property and the answer is NO!

    Mike Murchison, lobbyist/advocate for Small Property Owners Alliance (SPOA), working with the CA Apartment ***'n, Pacific West Realtors, Apt. of ***'n of California Southern Cities and Better Housing For Long Beach.) In March 26 statement to LBREPORT.com, Mr. Murchison says SPOA opposes city staff's recommendations for a rent cap on property owners and city-imposed payments to tenants. "We believe this is a form of rent control whether described as this or not." He continued: "We believe voters spoke loud and clear last year in declining to support an attempted Long Beach rent control measure and an attempted statewide repeal of the long-standing Costa-Hawkins law. Just Cause Eviction removes the ability of a landlord to get rid of problem tenants thus impacting not only the landlord but the remaining tenants. We believe the ordinance proposal stemmed from conditions in 2017 through early 2018 when some syndicators/investors bought multi-unit buildings, raised rents and caused displacements. Since then, the market has changed. Long Beach vacancies are up and Long Beach rents are lower than other L.A. County beach cities. Accordingly, we believe it would be very unwise if the City Council were to take actions now that will prove harmful to needed investment in Long Beach; specifically, downtown has old housing stock thus Long Beach should be very supportive of redeveloping these buildings, so that we continue to see the vast improvements already underway for years to come."

    https://la.curbed.com/2019/4/3/18293098/long-beach-rent-control-assistance-city-council

    The city of Long Beach staff created a document which basically follows San Francisco and Los Angeles Rent controls which have actually created less affordable housing as these units are demoed or taken off the market by landlords  Often home owners in rent controlled cities suffer from blighted neighborhoods and increases in crime because gang members cannot be removed

    Tenants together and the Democratic SOCIALIST Party of Los Angeles are joinging with Tenant Unions and Tenant welfare groups.  

    They're trying to make Long Beach the foothold for rent control and a gateway to Orange county cities  Next is Garden Grove, Santa Ana, Irvine, and other beach cities.  Their future goals are even Torrance and North Cities after Long Beach.

    https://lbpost.com/news/renters-housing-evictions-assistance/

  • Developer · Oakland, CA · Member since 2016 · 13 posts · 4 votes
    7y

    This is a great topic. Thanks for keeping us all updated. I live in Oakland and own rental properties here. I also lived in San Francisco for many years. Lawmakers in California are following the trends of Oakland and San Francisco because they are pandering to the majority of their urban voters who rent. Most large urban cities in California will have some form of rent control eventually. As property owners and landlords we make make easy targets for urban political smear campaigns. Urban voters are very easily swayed to vote for Rent Control because they believe landlords are inherently bad and treat renters poorly. They've never owned property and don't understand how much investment is required for upkeep and maintenance. Homeownership in California is trending down from 60% in 2006 to 55% in 2018. More and more voters say their rent causes financial hardship. Their politicians listen. Our population is becoming more urban. Homelessness and the housing crisis make great click bait and headlines. Voters remember these headlines. Urban cities in California are also voting against short term rentals like Airbnb because they feel these services take away from rental inventory. This was passed in San Francisco where Airbnb was founded and has their HQ. Listings dropped by 75%. This further limits our ability as property owners to control the assets in which we invest. Unfortunately the political marketing machines of property owners and our supporters aren't sophisticated enough win in dense urban areas. I hope they can evolve to support our needs. 

  • Realtor · Oakland, CA and a Real Estate Investor with Multi-Family Units and a Self Storage Facility · Member since 2016 · 2k+ posts · 2k+ votes
    7y

    Hmmm............so long term tenants here in the Bay Area want Rent Control.....AirBNB listings have dropped dramatically because The City of SF got greedy....in Richmond you literally have to pay for your tenant to move out if you no longer make your rental property a rental property.....

    1. Y'all may not like this,...but that's why both my rentals here in the Bay Area are to Section 8 tenants that I personally screened.....Don't have to worry about some "entitled thinking person" saying, I'm not going to pay you rent this month.....Those checks come from the housing authority like clockwork the 1st of the month.....EVEN DURING THE GOVERNMENT SHUTDOWN. 

    2. In Oakland, when a tenant's rent is subsidized by the government (As in Section 8!), you are not held to the same restrictions of rent control.

    3. I also invest out of state in Cleveland......very general rule of thumb is if it's a republican state, it is more landlord friendly. I have a small portfolio (2 duplexes and 2 SFR's in Cleveland) out of state and all are at least the two percent rule. You will not find anything in the entire state of California meeting the 2% rule.

    4. As previous posters have said.....VOTE in November and make sure we don't let this nonsense of a measure pass. 

  • Rental Property Investor · Austin, TX · Member since 2018 · 214 posts · 270 votes
    7y
    Originally posted by @Brian Garlington:

    Hmmm............so long term tenants here in the Bay Area want Rent Control.....AirBNB listings have dropped dramatically because The City of SF got greedy....in Richmond you literally have to pay for your tenant to move out if you no longer make your rental property a rental property.....

    1. Y'all may not like this,...but that's why both my rentals here in the Bay Area are to Section 8 tenants that I personally screened.....Don't have to worry about some "entitled thinking person" saying, I'm not going to pay you rent this month.....Those checks come from the housing authority like clockwork the 1st of the month.....EVEN DURING THE GOVERNMENT SHUTDOWN. 

    2. In Oakland, when a tenant's rent is subsidized by the government (As in Section 8!), you are not held to the same restrictions of rent control.

    3. I also invest out of state in Cleveland......very general rule of thumb is if it's a republican state, it is more landlord friendly. I have a small portfolio (2 duplexes and 2 SFR's in Cleveland) out of state and all are at least the two percent rule. You will not find anything in the entire state of California meeting the 2% rule.

    4. As previous posters have said.....VOTE in November and make sure we don't let this nonsense of a measure pass. 

    I have a section 8 tenant in the sole Bay Area rental property I have currently also... and it works out great. If she moves out, I will sell the property rather than re-rent it.

    But on the OH thing... for the record, it's a swing state, not a republican state. It can go either way in an election, depending on the year.

  • Realtor · Oakland, CA and a Real Estate Investor with Multi-Family Units and a Self Storage Facility · Member since 2016 · 2k+ posts · 2k+ votes
    7y

    @Robert Matelski

    Forgot to mention......the spreads that you can get in "C" Neighborhoods in Cleveland are what also did it for me as well.......looked at Columbus, Memphis, KC, St. Louis and other spots in the midwest as comparisons...........Milwaukee, and Detroit also look like great areas for those kind of spreads, but I went with Cleveland 

  • Fresno, CA · Member since 2015 · 552 posts · 181 votes
    7y

    https://web.stanford.edu/~diamondr/DMQ.pdf

    What's funny is all the local politicians know that Rent Controls don't work.  See this Stanford University Study from 2017-2019 they concluded that Rent control doesn't work for those in need. It can actually lead to gentrification, and less affordable housing.  The incentives are for luxury condos and small lot developments luxury builds so it makes there even less affordable for blue collar rent class people

    So Share this study with your local and state governors

    Gavin the new governor is going to be pushing for state wide rent control and to repeal the Costa hawkins which protects most small home owners and small mom and pop landlords and investors

  • Fresno, CA · Member since 2015 · 552 posts · 181 votes
    7y

    https://www.mercurynews.com/2017/11/02/rent-control-policy-likely-fueled-the-gentrification-of-san-francisco-study-finds/

    Also rent control leads to pushing out both small landlords and small investors and pushes in BIG DEVELOPERS and

    Rent controls dont work keep writng the state senators they will be voting in 2020 soon on this if you own a house or plan to own a house they can also take away your propert tax rights.  They're trying to get rid of prop 13

  • Fresno, CA · Member since 2015 · 552 posts · 181 votes
    7y

    http://www.tenantstogether.org/resources/housing-long-beach tenant union group with big money from unions promoting rent control

    https://ocweekly.com/rent-control-wont-be-on-the-november-ballot-in-santa-ana-but-activists-press-on/

    OC Santa Ana

    Why rent controls actually make less housing and why there's such low inventory due to rent controls and over government regulations in california and most blue states. They make business hard so there's less incentive to create new housing or invest in properties.  That's why there's low inventory in LA SF OC and a lot of the blue state big cities

    http://freakonomics.com/podcast/rent-control/

  • Fresno, CA · Member since 2015 · 552 posts · 181 votes
    7y
  • Member since 2018 · 80 posts · 21 votes
    7y

    Ok,so now the 5% rent cap,AB 1482 passed the committee,in April,along with another tenant eviction protection law just in the last couple of days.It seems like the odds are pretty good it’s going to pass.Im so screwed.I had to redo all the stucco and the structure on the outside,and I didn’t evict the tenants.Instead I gave them a rent break.I recently found out all the bathrooms where done on greenboard and pretty much had to redo those.what should I do?

  • Rachid AbadliBusiness Member
    Investor · Sacramento, CA · Member since 2024 · 129 posts · 36 votes
    2mo

    One reminder with August 1 approaching: the statewide AB 1482 rent cap changes with the new CPI numbers, so timing your rent increase matters.

    A notice served before August 1 uses the current cap. Wait until August and the new statewide cap applies—but you still need to satisfy the required notice period.

    The part that catches people is that cities like Oakland, San Francisco, Los Angeles, Berkeley, and San Jose often have local caps that are lower than the state limit. The more restrictive rule always wins.

    I got tired of checking each city's rules manually, so I built a calculator that handles both statewide AB 1482 and local rent-control caps before serving a notice.

    LeaseBase.ai
    View Page
Join the conversationCreate a free account to reply, vote on answers and follow this thread.