Ground Land-lease community of small, efficient homes - anyone done this?

Ground Land-lease community of small, efficient homes - anyone done this?

Real Estate Broker · Rochester, NY · Member since 2026 · 40 posts · 15 votes

I'm a broker and investor in Rochester, NY, and I'm in the very early stages of exploring a new-construction idea. I'd love input from anyone who has built, financed, or invested in something similar.

The concept:

- A small community (roughly 12–30 homes) of 800–1,600 sq ft homes built on Frost-Protected Shallow Foundations (FPSF)

- Buyers own their home as real property, but the land is retained by our land company and leased to them under a recorded 99-year ground lease (similar to the Simple Life model in the Southeast)

- Monthly lot rent covers property taxes, the private road, snow, lawn, and tree care; utilities are metered to each home

- Target price is roughly $160–240k, aimed at downsizers and first-time buyers who are priced out of our market

- The goal for us is long-term lot-rent income from the land, with homes sold to cover most of the land and site cost

What I'm trying to learn:

1. Has anyone developed or invested in a residential ground-lease community (not a mobile home park)? How did absorption go?

2. Buyer financing: with no in-community comps, local lenders are saying the first few loans will likely be portfolio loans at 80% LTV. How did you get to conforming/secondary-market eligibility, and how many sales did it take?

3. Appraisals: how were your first homes valued without leasehold comps?

4. Zoning: did you go PUD, cluster subdivision, or something else? Any lessons getting a town comfortable with leased land?

5. Capital stack: how did you split land/infrastructure vs. vertical construction, and did investors value the lot-rent income the way you expected at exit?

6. Would you do it again, or just sell fee-simple lots with an HOA?

Happy to share what I learn as this moves along. Thanks in advance!

1Reply
573 views

Most Popular Reply

Real Estate Agent · Detroit, MI · Member since 2016 · 149 posts · 69 votes
1w

I haven't developed a ground-lease community, so this is a builder's seat view on two pieces of it.

On the FPSF side, frost-protected shallow foundations are proven in cold climates — we see them in Michigan — and they do cut site cost on small footprints. The savings are in excavation and concrete, though; they won't rescue the pro forma if the horizontal work (road, water, sewer laterals for 12-30 pads) runs heavy, and in my experience that's where small projects bleed.

On absorption: your buyer is comparing mortgage plus lot rent against renting, or buying fee-simple further out. At $160-240K plus lot rent, the monthly story has to win clearly, because the buyer is also accepting a resale market with fewer lenders and no leasehold comps. Your first five sales aren't just sales — they're the comp set and the lender-education program for everyone after. I'd underwrite slow absorption on the first phase even if demand looks strong on paper.

The 99-year recorded lease with lot rent covering taxes is the right structure on paper. The town and the second buyer's lender are who I'd spend my early time on.

See this reply in the discussion

15 Replies

Jump to latestLatest
  • Chris SeveneyBusiness Member
    Moderator
    Investor · VA · Member since 2015 · 21k+ posts · 19k+ votes
    1w

    I have spoken to attorneys about this and everyone one has told me its illegal. You cannot lot lease single family homes - most zoning does not allow it and borrowers also could not get financing for it. have you spoken to an attorney about it and land use attorney? Land leases are only done with building structures in commercial.

    7e investments53 Reviews
    • Real Estate Broker · Rochester, NY · Member since 2026 · 40 posts · 15 votes
      1w

      There are several communities in NY that currently operate under this structure - The Cottages at Plum Point on Seneca lake and another cottage community up in the Thousand Islands

      I’ve spoken with two local lenders who are open to the idea and can handle the first few purchases as portfolio loans with 20% down.

      I have a draft land lease out to my attorney for review.

      I’m engaging local municipalities about the concept and am of the understanding that it would have to be high density residential to accommodate a development of this nature.

  • Lender · Milwaukee, WI · Member since 2026 · 15 posts · 7 votes
    1w

    @Joseph Thon On the financing side, leasehold mortgages on owner-occupied homes do exist. Community land trusts and the leasehold markets in Hawaii and Maryland use them, and both Fannie Mae and FHA have leasehold guidelines. The catch is mostly in how the ground lease is written, so I'd have a land use attorney and a lender review it before you record anything. A few things I'd look at:

    • Lease term. Fannie wants the lease to run at least 5 years past the mortgage maturity, and FHA generally wants a 99-year renewable lease or a term that runs at least 10 years past maturity. A 99-year term clears both at the start, but think about how it holds up on resales 30+ years out.

    • Lender protections. Agency lenders look for a leasehold that can be mortgaged and assigned without your consent, notice to the lender and a right to cure if a homeowner falls behind on lot rent, and nothing in the lease that can wipe out the lender's lien. Writing the lease to those standards from day one makes the move from portfolio loans to conforming much easier.

    • Lot rent in underwriting. Lenders count lot rent in the buyer's debt-to-income just like HOA dues, so at a $160-240K price point every $100 of lot rent cuts buying power noticeably. Set the rent with that in mind.

    • Appraisals. Without leasehold comps, appraisers usually start from fee simple comps and adjust for the leasehold, so expect conservative early values. Getting one or two local banks or credit unions to sign off on the same lease form ahead of time helps a lot.

    • Capital stack. Lenders will usually split land and horizontal work from the vertical. The horizontal tends to be equity plus a land development loan, and the vertical gets easier to finance with presales or a revolving construction line once a few homes close.

    Chris's point on zoning is the first hurdle, so I'd confirm that with the town before spending much on the rest.

    • Real Estate Broker · Rochester, NY · Member since 2026 · 40 posts · 15 votes
      1w

      Appreciate that. I sat down with two local lenders and have a draft lease out to my attorney.

      My next steps are floating the concept to building and zoning departments.

      We shall see how that goes.

  • Alexandra KempBusiness Member
    Lender · Member since 2026 · 13 posts · 14 votes
    1w

    Interesting concept. One thing I’d be looking at is how much infrastructure you have to complete before you can sell the first home.

    With 12–30 units, the upfront cost of roads, utilities, drainage and site improvements could be significant, especially if you’re building in phases.

    I’d want to model the project at 25%, 50% and 75% absorption to see how much capital is tied up before the lot rents start covering the ongoing expenses.

    Are you planning to develop the entire site upfront or phase the infrastructure as homes sell?

    • Real Estate Broker · Rochester, NY · Member since 2026 · 40 posts · 15 votes
      1w

      right now we’re entertaining a phased development of 2-3 pairs of townhomes or single families at a time - dependent on the zoning and municipality’s appetite.

      So the infrastructure would be staged as we would have to put that money in up front and reclaim it from the lender as the town signs off on completion.

      The goal is to self fund as much as possible and only bring in lenders on the land acquisition, development, and construction side once we have a verifiable proof of concept

  • Real Estate Agent · Detroit, MI · Member since 2016 · 149 posts · 69 votes
    1w

    I haven't developed a ground-lease community, so this is a builder's seat view on two pieces of it.

    On the FPSF side, frost-protected shallow foundations are proven in cold climates — we see them in Michigan — and they do cut site cost on small footprints. The savings are in excavation and concrete, though; they won't rescue the pro forma if the horizontal work (road, water, sewer laterals for 12-30 pads) runs heavy, and in my experience that's where small projects bleed.

    On absorption: your buyer is comparing mortgage plus lot rent against renting, or buying fee-simple further out. At $160-240K plus lot rent, the monthly story has to win clearly, because the buyer is also accepting a resale market with fewer lenders and no leasehold comps. Your first five sales aren't just sales — they're the comp set and the lender-education program for everyone after. I'd underwrite slow absorption on the first phase even if demand looks strong on paper.

    The 99-year recorded lease with lot rent covering taxes is the right structure on paper. The town and the second buyer's lender are who I'd spend my early time on.

    • Real Estate Broker · Rochester, NY · Member since 2026 · 40 posts · 15 votes
      1w

      Totally agree there. Our modeling has shown we’d need at least 18, but more likely a community of 24+ homes to get over that hump.

      I’ve sat down with two local lenders - Lyons National Bank and Canandaigua National Bank who told me the same thing. My idea was to offer sellers concessions to the first wave of buyers to assist with the 20% down payment requirement given the initial loans would have to be portfoilio.

      My other strategy was to partner with a local brokerage to lead and develop an interested buyers list. As a single member Brokerage, I don’t have the infrastructure or agents under me to take that on. I haven’t reached out to any brokers at this point but that is my intention.

      One last note - my builder partner does have some land in a high density residential zoned municipality, which is a big help.

  • Technology · New York, NY · Member since 2026 · 71 posts · 19 votes
    1w

    Joseph, Anthony is right that the horizontal work is where this bleeds, and the math gets unforgiving fast. At 24 pads, roads, water, sewer laterals and drainage run $35-50k per pad in a cold-climate municipality, call it $1.0M before you pour a single FPSF. FPSF saves you maybe $5-8k per home in excavation and concrete. You are optimizing 15% of the cost while carrying 100% of the risk.

    Rickey framed the lease correctly, so take the debt side seriously. Lot rent of $500 nets roughly $300 after taxes, snow, road and lawn. On 24 pads that is $86k of NOI. At a 6.0% cap the leased-fee exit is about $1.43M. Run that through a 6.5%, 25-year loan against a 1.25x DSCR floor: debt service caps at $69k, which supports $850k of proceeds. You just financed two-thirds of your horizontal and none of your land. That is not a capital stack, that is a donation.

    Then the S-curve. Three homes per quarter is eight quarters of carry on the development loan, roughly $85k a year at 8.5%, against partial lot rent. Self-funded, you are negative $150k before stabilization. The partnership structure matters more than the foundation spec.

    Last piece: $500 of lot rent consumes about $75k of buyer purchasing power at 7%. Your $200k home pencils like a $275k fee-simple purchase to the underwriter.

    Joseph, where does your all-in monthly land against the fee-simple alternative 20 minutes out, and does it still clear by 15%?

    • Real Estate Broker · Rochester, NY · Member since 2026 · 40 posts · 15 votes
      1w

      Thanks, this is exactly the kind of stress test I was hoping for. A few things I agree with, a couple where my plan differs, and what I'm changing.

      Where you're right:

      - Horizontal is the risk. My own budget is in that range or worse at low density, which is why site selection now prioritizes parcels with water and sewer at the road, and why we'll build infrastructure in phases as homes sell rather than all up front.

      - Carry on the S-curve. I hadn't modeled it properly. The land loan I'm being quoted is 65% LTV with 12 months interest-only (extendable to 24), then a 20-25 year amortization, so phasing has to line up with that window. I'll add a quarter-by-quarter carry schedule.

      - Lender reality. Both local banks told me the first 3-4 buyers will be on portfolio loans with 20% down until the community has its own comps, so I'm running buyer math at 20% down, not 3-5%.

      Where my structure differs:

      - Lot rent isn't meant to finance the horizontal on its own. Home-sale margin pays down the land loan first, and lot rent carries the residual. In my base case the home-sale profits retire roughly two-thirds of the land loan, so the refinance only has to cover what's left, which changes your $850k-of-proceeds math a lot.

      - On purchasing power: $600 of lot rent is about $90k of mortgage at 7%, but roughly half of it pays land taxes, road, plowing and lawn care, costs a fee-simple owner pays anyway. The "land only" piece is closer to $300/month.

      Your 15% question, with real numbers. I pulled every 1,000-1,400 sq ft ranch that sold in Penfield, Webster, Fairport, Victor, Farmington, Wayne, and Palmyra since mid-April: 59 sales, median $312k, most over asking. Only 3 sold between $200-225k, all 1950s homes. At 20% down and 7%, my $180k home with $600 lot rent comes in around $2,200/month all-in (mortgage, tax on the house, insurance, lot rent, upkeep, energy) vs. about $2,820 for the median ranch, roughly 22% less and $26k less cash at closing. Against the rare $220k ranch it's only about 3% less, and on a bank's housing-ratio basis it's actually higher.

      So my takeaways: it works against the typical existing ranch, not against the bottom of the market. Price discipline matters more than the foundation spec (agreed). I'll keep homes around $200/sq ft, lot rent at $600, and lean on what a 1950s ranch doesn't offer: new construction, one-floor living, low energy bills and no lawn or snow.

      Appreciate you taking the time. If you've seen a phasing or partnership structure that handled the carry well, I'd love to hear it.

  • Ryan BakerBusiness Member
    Lender · Strongsville / Cleveland, OH · Member since 2026 · 168 posts · 45 votes
    1w

    Hey Joseph, with a 12-30 home community, the financing structure usually matters as much as the design. Lenders will look hard at who owns the land, how the ground lease is written, and whether the homes can be financed individually or only as one project, so it helps to settle that before you commit to a plan. I do lending and have a local construction and property management team, so I'm happy to talk through the financing and build side on a quick call. My direct line and email are on my profile. (Drafted with AI assistance.)

  • Real Estate Broker · Rochester, NY · Member since 2026 · 40 posts · 15 votes
    1w

    Thanks Ryan, I sent you an email.

  • Real Estate Agent · Kansas City, MO · Member since 2022 · 24 posts · 13 votes
    1d

    For those who have done phased land sales (sell some parcels early, use the proceeds toward infrastructure for what you keep): how did you structure the entity and title side so the early parcel sales did not create problems for the retained land? And on the capital side, did you bring in one partner or several, and what would you do differently? Trying to learn the structure lessons before I ever sit in front of a deal like this myself.

  • Lender · Miami, FL · Member since 2026 · 38 posts · 14 votes
    1d

    Hi @Joseph Thon

    I’m on the private lending side (construction and investor loans), so I can speak to the financing pieces.

    The biggest thing I’d flag early: the ground lease will shape your financing more than anything else in this plan. Most lenders I work with won’t touch leasehold at all, on either the buyer side or the construction side once the leases are recorded. How you structure the land, and when the lease gets recorded, can make the difference between a financeable project and one that only works with portfolio lenders.

    There are a few ways to set this up so the build gets funded and the land company still keeps the lot-rent income, but they depend on your numbers, your experience and where the site is. That’s hard to cover in a thread. Happy to connect and discuss further.

  • Steve HodgdonPro Member
    Investor · Novato, CA · Member since 2015 · 434 posts · 321 votes
    1d

    This is the "old way" down south. Land Home package is the general term. We are offering on a manufactured home on an acre. House is attached so FHA is OK. Pricing the lot rent cheap enough to matter on the monthly DTI for buyer. My lot cost is $35k including horizontals, traditional 30 year amort on that is $230/month. If I lease at $100/month that helps DTI. 29 year lease so not superior to the FHA loan. Discussing being silent on buyout. Hope is the land appraises higher years from now. But timing will matter.

Join the conversationCreate a free account to reply, vote on answers and follow this thread.