Real Estate Broker · Austin, TX · Member since 2022 · 30 posts · 24 votes
Perhaps I am overthinking this, but I'm wondering how to properly account for airbnb's new 15.5% service fee in proformas derived from airdna revenue estimates. The airdna estimates don't include the service fees, and the estimates are based on 2025 revenue. Theoretically, the assumption was that hosts would raise rates to cover this fee, not sure how much this is actually happening. Should the 15.5% fee just be added as an expense line item to create a conservative proforma?
You're not overthinking it - this is exactly what's killing STR deals right now. Most hosts are eating 8-10% of that fee because guests are price-sensitive, so I'd model it as a 10% expense hit minimum. The rate increases only work in premium markets where you have pricing power. What occupancy rates are you using in your models - pre or post fee implementation?
Perhaps I am overthinking this, but I'm wondering how to properly account for airbnb's new 15.5% service fee in proformas derived from airdna revenue estimates. The airdna estimates don't include the service fees, and the estimates are based on 2025 revenue. Theoretically, the assumption was that hosts would raise rates to cover this fee, not sure how much this is actually happening. Should the 15.5% fee just be added as an expense line item to create a conservative proforma?
Doesn't it just lower your Net payout? This is what I count from Vrbo and Airbnb. Then I keep all my Vrbo and Airbnb tax forms to substantiate this.
Perhaps I am overthinking this, but I'm wondering how to properly account for airbnb's new 15.5% service fee in proformas derived from airdna revenue estimates. The airdna estimates don't include the service fees, and the estimates are based on 2025 revenue. Theoretically, the assumption was that hosts would raise rates to cover this fee, not sure how much this is actually happening. Should the 15.5% fee just be added as an expense line item to create a conservative proforma?
Doesn't it just lower your Net payout? This is what I count from Vrbo and Airbnb. Then I keep all my Vrbo and Airbnb tax forms to substantiate this.
He's talking about underwriting. The service fee shift will lead to inflated revenue supported on sites like AirDNA since those did not account for the guest service fee added on top.
IE on a $1000 booking previously Airbnb would charge the guest $1140 ($1000 + $140 service fee), and AirDNA would report $1000.
Now the host has to market up the amount to $1150, and then Airbnb's fee is subtracted. So on the same net revenue AirDNA is now reporting $1150 instead of $1000.
Broadly you understanding it correctly. AirDNA does not capture the guest service fee on top so did not count it as revenue, but when the host is instead baking that into their rates, it shows up in revenue.
So the same $50k in bookings under the single fee model would previously have been reported as $43k under the split fee model.
The problem is that the change is not universal. It only affects hosts using PMS systems, which are still a minority of hosts. So if you're underwriting for 2026 you do need to make a change compared to 2025, but probably not the full 15% since many hosts are still on the split fee model. I would maybe knock it down 5-7% as a middle ground.
You're not overthinking it - this is exactly what's killing STR deals right now. Most hosts are eating 8-10% of that fee because guests are price-sensitive, so I'd model it as a 10% expense hit minimum. The rate increases only work in premium markets where you have pricing power. What occupancy rates are you using in your models - pre or post fee implementation?
You're not overthinking it - this is exactly what's killing STR deals right now. Most hosts are eating 8-10% of that fee because guests are price-sensitive, so I'd model it as a 10% expense hit minimum. The rate increases only work in premium markets where you have pricing power. What occupancy rates are you using in your models - pre or post fee implementation?
my model is toggle based either using actual numbers or airdna projections; if it's projections it's predominantly based on revenue rather than ADR X Occupancy Rate, thus the fee deduction should theoretically address the occupancy rate concerns
The day the fee change became effective we raised our base rates to compensate. For about 2 weeks bookings were a little rough, then it evened out as the laggards got in line.
AirDNA is essentially a trailing 12. I am not exactly sure when they update their data (i.e. the first of every month?) but yes, the revenue will be inflated and need to be adjusted, but you cannot just discount by 15% now because it has not been a full year yet, so sort of prorate the line item by a percentage that accounts for when it went into effect would be how I do it.
Thank you! They update their data about 20 days post end of month. I've been waiting for December numbers to create a comprehensive annual report and they just released those.