New to Real Estate · WI · Member since 2021 · 20 posts · 9 votes
As my wife and I research options for our first short-term vacation rental property, we are looking very closely into local regulations in each of the markets/destinations we are interested in.
What happens if you have an established short-term vacation rental business in an area, but then the local municipality decides it no longer wants to be AirBnB friendly, and enacts new regulations that could put you out of business? Has anyone here experienced this? Do local governments typically “grandfather” established businesses in, or do you simply risk losing your investment?
I have the same concerns, and one of the ways I'm dealing with this is by investing in a mature market with a lot of STR's. My thinking is that the more money coming into a town/municipality via STR's, the less likely they'll be to outlaw them.
I have the same concerns, and one of the ways I'm dealing with this is by investing in a mature market with a lot of STR's. My thinking is that the more money coming into a town/municipality via STR's, the less likely they'll be to outlaw them.
I have the same concerns, and one of the ways I'm dealing with this is by investing in a mature market with a lot of STR's. My thinking is that the more money coming into a town/municipality via STR's, the less likely they'll be to outlaw them.
Good luck!
This is my thoughts as well - involve ourselves in an established market. One of our regions of interest has a few municipalities that have recently become “unfriendly” towards STVRs, and in one location (according to some locals) this is primarily due to the local politician also just happening to be a traditional hotel owner and operator. I just wonder what kind of power these municipalities have in affecting business that already operate in these locations. It would be good to know, barring illegal operations, that an established business is somewhat insulated from future political changes/vendettas.
It would be highly unusual for an area to be re-zoned. But if it did happen, it is also highly unlikely that existing STRs wouldn’t be grandfathered. In the unlikely event that you have both of these highly unlikely events happen, then you’re in trouble.
The far bigger risk is running a STR in an area NOT zoned for it, and the municipality decides to enforce their own code. Moral of the story: Don't run a STR in an area zoned residential-only (typically called R-1).
If the market is at least mature enough that you have to get a permit to run your STR then typically any changes will only impact new permits and you will be grandfathered in. Typically. But not always.
It would be highly unusual for an area to be re-zoned. But if it did happen, it is also highly unlikely that existing STRs wouldn’t be grandfathered. In the unlikely event that you have both of these highly unlikely events happen, then you’re in trouble.
The far bigger risk is running a STR in an area NOT zoned for it, and the municipality decides to enforce their own code. Moral of the story: Don't run a STR in an area zoned residential-only (typically called R-1).
This logic doesn't work. STR, by definition, falls under the same definition that hotels are under, which is Lodging. So the only zones that would be "safe" for STR are commercial zoned area. Or small overlay areas that allow for Lodging. This is the logic that the anti-STR crowd is using to get bans for STRs.
Thus areas don't have to be re-zoned to ban STRs. They just have to add new regulations to the existing zones. Adding new regulation is WAY easier than re-zoning. New regulations are narrowly focused whereas re-zoning has a very broad impact.
As my wife and I research options for our first short-term vacation rental property, we are looking very closely into local regulations in each of the markets/destinations we are interested in.
What happens if you have an established short-term vacation rental business in an area, but then the local municipality decides it no longer wants to be AirBnB friendly, and enacts new regulations that could put you out of business? Has anyone here experienced this? Do local governments typically “grandfather” established businesses in, or do you simply risk losing your investment?
Thanks!
In August we visited Branson MO, Gatlinburg TN, Asheville NC, Isl of Palms SC, and Rosemary Beach Fl, and a few lesser knowns, to see if we wanted to invest in one or two. It's inconceivable to me that since in each case the whole town's economy is tourism and STR's make that possible, that the locals would allow any changes that would kill the town.
Replacing the STRs with hotels can't/won't happen for a variety of reasons and since the locals depend on the visitors for their livelihoods, it wouldn't even be brought up at town hall meetings and I'm sure the thought would not be tolerated anyway.
Your bigger concern should be your competition in running a clean, smooth, appealing, and enjoyable "experience". It was "hit or miss" for a couple of the VRBOs we stayed at. The pictures showed one thing but once we were in the STR things were quite different in a couple of cases.
There was mold in the corner of the bathroom in one, bathroom towels were thin and cheap, there were electrical cover plates missing and wires hanging out of the wall in another. In one the cooking pots and pans were all warped and about 40 years old & no spatula to flip my eggs in the morning. Do these people eat their eggs raw? Just asking. anyway, a LOT of details were missed in some of the stays.
I'd stay in each area again, I just wouldn't return to a couple of the specific STRs since there are so many others I can pick from and hopefully find a better managed place. I think too many people leave it to a property manager and don't actually check in to seee how things look and run at the STR. When you are paying 20% to 30% in management fees, you deserve better.
Depends on the market. Vacation markets are more accepting of short term rentals, because that is the main industry in the area. Areas that implement restrictions will often grand father in existing businesses. This is all the more reason to make sure you are properly registering your STR with the city if required.
I agree with the above and find that I am looking for future investments in established areas that already have short-term vacation rental regulations in place. One problem that I've seen is that great vacation spots start to become "touristy" and then the city gets push back about STRs from the year round residents who don't like to see their town change. Another thing to pay attention to is HOAs as they may have different rules than the city. A friend of mine had a legal STR where the city allowed STRs and then her HOA voted and decided they would no longer allow rentals for less than 30 days. They did not grandfather her in, but they did allow her to complete her bookings for the remainder of the year. Typically, but not always, you see larger municipalities grandfather in current permits after a regulation change.
Your property would become a legal nonconforming use if the rules changed. For most regulatory changes this allows the use to continue so long as it is not expanded. However, some local governments have added amortization clauses that start the clock for future enforcement. There was a Texas case that found such regulations to be unconstitutional. But in other states similar rules have been upheld. In NC, there is a pending court of appeals case on the legality of STR regs.
In my experience, it is typically the local full-time residents that lead the charge in getting an STR ban adopted. Like others have said, do your homework and look to those markets that have supported STRs long before AirBNB and VRBO existed.
@David Taylor, I'm not an STR investor, so take this worth a grain of salt. But your question implies that you are buying a property based on inflated STR income numbers. If you buy based on other fundamentals like the underlying value of the property (buying at a slight discount), or regular long term rental numbers, then you will have one or two other exit strategies at least if things go south on the regulations. If you buy based on hotel-type returns, I think that's a much riskier proposition.
@David Taylor very normal concerns, and likely what keep a lot of people of of STR's. Like many have said, areas like where I have my cabin (Smoky Mountain), it is highly unlikely that any regulations would change due to that being the primary driving force for the local economy. This will likely be the same for most established "vacation markets". So one way for you to sleep better at night, is to focus on an area that is an established market with already good regulations (FYI, no regulations isn't always a good sign for a market).
Now another way to look at it, is if you are just wanting to run a STR, and not necessarily a STVR, then you actually might have a more protected asset if you buy correctly in a flexible area. In the market, are you able to "flex" your STR into a mid term rental for traveling professionals? How about furnished rooms for college students? Normal LTR? And if none of these work for you, then hopefully you have an awesome staged property ready to put on the market.
Consider who your target guest is. Vacationers, military, medical professionals, business travelers, event guest, job relocations, etc..
Hey @David Taylor I agree with everything thats been said so far. Here are my suggestions:
1.) Only buy in areas that have a short term rental permit. This gives you a legal right to do what you are doing. The risky areas are small towns that haven't addressed the short term rental issue yet.
2.) Join your voice with others. The best source I know of for this is VRMB (Vacation Rental Marketing Blog) by Matt Landau. There are a lot of strong short term rental voices on there and joining your voice with theirs is the best defense in my opinion.
Every day I see more and more cities looking at regulating AirBnB and implementing restrictions. They even have conferences about this...I recently posted one virtual one you could attend for FREE. My guess is no grandfathering.
Probably your best places are in the country where you will not disturb or get complaints from the neighbors....or that have a very very robust STR community....where it is the norm, not the exception...but even that is no guarantee.
Be prepared and make sure your numbers work to turn it into a long term rental vs STR. Risky to buy only basing your decision on STR numbers unless you can make back your money very very quickly.
I like the people that have done it in small towns that need help....maybe where 1/2 the downtown stores are empty. You may not kill it, but still can make some good green. I'm thinking hunting destinations, or places that have no/few hotels/motels. Save a building or a house from being vacant and abandoned. Help revitalize the town/neighborhood. Be a positive influence...a giver, not a taker.
Hey There, You would be grandfathered in, in some cases. I am grandfathered in to a few different listings where the county changed the laws. Though in South Lake Tahoe, CA its been completely phased out..no grandfather. In Los Angeles they changed the laws so you could only STR new construction buildings....so my team has built new adu's which have STR permits as they are new construction. It's risky, you need to stay on your toes. As a rule I make sure any property I target to STR would also cashflow as a longterm rental within 3-5 years so If things change it's still a good investment.
As a general guideline, if you are operating a STR in an area that you question whether it would be allowed (residential), you are probably sitting on a time bomb. It is probably zoned R1, and your neighbors probably hate you.
@David Taylor Run the numbers as a long-term rental and see if it still makes enough money to meet your goals. Real estate investors have to be flexible and be able to adjust as markets and political climates change. As one door closes, another door opens. Best of luck and keep us updated on your progress!
@David Taylor you should know the current regulations and be aware of the upcoming regulations. In Philadelphia they changed regulation a couple of months ago potentially impacting 90% of all STR operators. The regulation enforcement goes in effect in April 2022.
Question for the experienced operators/investors in STR market
1. Are 30 day minimum rentals to say traveling professionals considered part of the STR market?
2. In the majority of municipalities that placed severe restrictions/conditions on STRs have the 30+ days rentals been subject to the same restrictions?
3. Have most large cities followed the NYC example which exempts rentals of 30 days or more from STR regulation and restrictions?
- I disagree with the idea of only buying in locations that already have a permitting system. The start of permitting here in Asheville was a sign of more extreme restrictions to come. - I would focus on border communities, close enough to the action but less regulated, perhaps with a view or other outdoors attraction. - You could also lessen your risk by avoiding properties that are ultra different/special yet hard to sell or comp (ex: container homes). - I agree that you should worry just as much about HOA's, even small, almost non-existent ones. It only takes one motivated neighbor to cause change. - I agree that you can take comfort that you should still be able to cashflow if you have to flip to a furnished month-to-month approach. The demand seems poised to continue to rise for a while.