No not because she had an affair, but because she's focusing full time on a Presidential run in 2012. She's burned her ships. There's something you need to understand about a woman like Sarah. When a woman like her gets attacked, she doesn't cower in hurt. She gets motivated. You can't win giving a person like this negative energy. They only convert it to motivation and the more you attack, the more you support them.
Happy Fourth of July!
Tim
I couldn't disagree more and I can't wait for the chance to see it. Obama is as big of a joke as this country has ever seen.
From bowing down to the saudi king, to declaring that we are "Not a Christian nation", to disarming our military, to not not doing ANYTHING about north korea etc.
This guy is more of a national security risk then Bin Laden because he is killing our country from the inside.
Jeff
If Brittany Spears was seriously planning to run for President, I have a feeling we'd have just as long of a thread...but that doesn't make her qualified...
The funny thing is, that analogy works on so many levels...
:)
How can we not be scared of the fact that we could have the most unqualified President in the history of our country starting in 2013. The only bright side is that she'd likely quit after a year or two in office.
Come to think of it, I haven't been this scared since W. was up for re-election in 2004.
And once again, the analogy works on so many levels.
No apology given, as you were the one that I quoted originally when you announced the question to begin with. But I did notice that in order to support your new question claim you go to a blog and not the original article.
Now I have responded according to how you originally posted things and have not gone to any original story myself so I do not know who is twisting this story and for what purpose. But there can be no doubt that you have stated things three different ways now. interesting.
I did attempt to go back to pull out your quote, but the Topic summary only goes back so far while doing this post so I will have to find it later for you.
And I find it interesting that you accept an apology that was never given or implied. But do reserve the right to reply to any of your posts AS POSTED, twisted, true, false, or misrepresented. It is your post content that I am speaking to.
Good try again, but no luck.
You indeed twisted the quote that I responded to, and your twist may indeed be what was actually said, I do not know.
But the point about the intent behind the way the original question, as posted, was phrased can not be denied. And her response, as posted, was perfectly adequate and intellegent, given the question and answer as posted.
Ok,
I'm calling out right BULLSH-- on this claim that Sarah Palin "couldn't" name what newspapers or magazines she's read. I watched the original tape. She WOULDN'T name them. There's a big difference and a person who's trying to pull a free newspaper plug out of a national figure knows damn well what that is. This is another bullsh-- liberal argument again brought by another one of the 3 liberal amigos. How surprising. :roll:
Tim
What are you talking about? You brought this up yourself when you were trying to defend Palin's intelligence? Are you telling me that you were defending her based on how I worded a statement, not based on her own statement!?!?
Wow.
What are you talking about? The link above has a VIDEO of her saying it!!!
Are you going to say that the blogger doctored the video?!?! Because you can find the video on hundreds of websites.
You really have trouble admitting when you're wrong, even in the face of video evidence. That's just sad.
No, you were supposed to be defending Palin based on what she said, not on how I summarized what she said. This is called doing research. Due diligence.
Do you even know anything about Sarah Palin? Or are you just supporting/defending her because she's a Republican?
That's just really sad.
I thought Jawsette's defense that she was "avoiding a trap" was the most ridiculous defense I've heard of this issue, but yours is much, much funnier.
(turns out Jawsette didn't even watch the tape, at least you did)
And yeah, Palin didn't answer because she didn't want to give a plug to any specific newspapers. What's she going to do when when she holds a press conference, call on the person in the front row and say, "Question from the woman who works for that paper in New York that has 4 words in its title?"
Tim - You're so desperate not to have to admit Palin is not cut out for Federal government, you'll say anything, won't you? I certainly hope her advisers can come up with better defense of her stupid comments than you can...she'll need it.
Okay, I'm off on vacation...so whatever ridiculousness you write next will have to wait a few days. Have a great weekend!
No I was commenting on what was claimed that she said. I admitted that I did not hear or see the acutal quote, so therefore can only comment on the actual post, which you then changed when you challanged my ascertation of that post. Therefore I challanged your changing of the question that was being commented about.
Its called keeping things in context.
I will not go to any other site while at work here, because I will not chance their affecting my jobs system with any sort of virus, especially when it is a blog. Therefore I told you that I would not trust any blog (except BP here) as you never know for sure what you will find in those sites.
I have no problem admitting when I am wrong as many on this site have noticed, when challanged on some on my RE posts that were incorrect.
Just like I admitted that I was wrong when I atributted the original post to you when it actually the other poster that I quoted.
I dont care about Sarah, or Bush, or Obama in and of themselves. But I will point out to anyone trashing them that their statement(s) could have been taken out of context by those with an apparent agenda against them.
J, you cannot confuse those people, you need to fit into a box! If you don't fit into the box where they can stick a label on you, their wires get crossed, sparKs start flying all over the place and it can be very dangerous!!! PLEASE, FIT INTO A BOX!!!
I have been saying this for over a year now, and I will be saying it for at least the next 3.5 years.
For anyone to say that Sarah Palin is NOT qualified for National Office and that Barack Obama IS qualified for National Office, is not using logical and sound reasoning. A community organizer and freshman senator does not make as many executive decisions as a State Governor. The problem with Sarah Palin is that she did not get a law degree or go to Law School, therefore, she does not know how to doublespeak, how to lie and how to manipulate people.
The last six months, Obama has proven to us just how inept he really is. Along with his plummet in approval ratings, he has increased the National Debt by MORE than $1T, he has apologized for the United States being the World's protector, bread basket and bastion of freedom, he bows to other Country Leaders, and is generally a laughing stock around the world. I would much rather have a DO NOTHING president than a DO HE WRONG THING president. When it is all said and done, Barack Obama is going to make George W Bush look like the Albert Einstein of presidents.
As for Sarah Palin, her resigning as Governor is a very unusual move, but the media's attack of not only her, but her children is inexcusable. I can't wait for Obama's children to become teenagers and tell their daddy "NO"!! I will be laughing in the aisle!!