Health Care Reform Yes or No?

Health Care Reform Yes or No?

Real Estate Investor · brighton, MI · Member since 2009 · 56 posts · 12 votes

Should we refom health care? Do we leave thing the way they are? Do we pay $800 co-pay per month and then bail out banks? Are we listening to our president or do we disagree just to disagree? Please share how you feel.

0Reply
481 views

Most Popular Reply

Residential Real Estate Broker · Chicago, IL · Member since 2009 · 6 posts · 5 votes
17y

"...When there was a fire, all private insurance companies would send their fire crews to see if it was their customer and those that were other companies fire crews would have to get out of the way of the company who was the fire crew for that customer..."

Well, thanks for the history lesson. Actually, in some towns if you hadn't paid a seperate "fire tax" they wouldn't show up at all. In any event, you can continue to hold on to your ideological trappings while the system burns (sorry, couldn't help myself) or, you can join the rest of the civilized world in the 21st century in acknowledging that government involvment is REQUIRED in making health care benefits available to most of us. The notion that you can leave the care of the sick in the hands of for profit health care insurance companies is just, well, nuts. It's a bit like the Medieval notion that the world was flat. You can say it, you can believe it, you can pray that it is so, but the Earth will still NOT be flat.

I confess, I like most services I get from my government. They're not perfect, but who is? I took a shower this morning and made my coffee with water treated by the government and piped to my front door. I didn't worry about drinking it either. I flushed the toilet and they are processing that, as we work. Here in Chicago where I live, if I get sick the city will send an ambulance and EMT's to take me to the hospital (and they have). If the house is on fire, they'll send firefighters. If one of our local freaks tries to break in, the police will come and not inquire as to my home owner's insurance. At the federal level, our soldiers, sailors and Marines are protecting me and, I think, do a pretty good job for a bunch of federal employees. I know most conservatives might think they'd be better off with a .45 and a posse, but I like the military.

So, do nothing, hold on to your values. It won't belong before the system totally implodes. Then the politicians of both parties can all look around and wonder what happened. Naturally, one will blame the other, but there'll be plenty of blame to go around. In the meantime, they'll continue to enjoy tax payer funded government health care. Why America is afraid of tackling this issue is both sad and disconcerting. But, in the near term this will all come home to roost.

See this reply in the discussion

139 Replies

Jump to latestLatest
  • J ScottPro Member
    Moderator
    Investor · Sarasota, FL · Member since 2008 · 18k+ posts · 17k+ votes
    17y
    Originally posted by M. Jones:

    ...the fear in almost every politician to bring up the need for reform.


    This we agree on...there needs to be reform and we can't be afraid to stand up and demand it.
  • J ScottPro Member
    Moderator
    Investor · Sarasota, FL · Member since 2008 · 18k+ posts · 17k+ votes
    17y
    Originally posted by Tim Wieneke:
    I have nothing against the VA. In fact I think it should get better funding.


    More funding for a socialist system? Good to know you feel that way...
  • Real Estate Investor · NC · Member since 2008 · 28 posts · 3 votes
    17y

    Are you saying that you agree that the massive entitlement programs Medicaid and Medicare need reform?

  • Residential Real Estate Broker · Chicago, IL · Member since 2009 · 6 posts · 5 votes
    17y

    I have never understood why the treatment of disease or relief for the suffering should be tied to a specific economic therory, in this case capitalism. I don't know why treatment should mean a profit for some, care for some and nothing for many. Two hundred years ago, if you did not purchase private fire insurance (or could not afford it) and displayed a permit, the town fire department let your house burn down. We can't imagine that today.

    For all of you clinging to your personal POLITICAL theory, please show me the word "capitalism" anywhere in the constitution or the Declaration of Independence. (Hint: Don't bother.)

    I can't imagine putting treatment for an illness in the same catagory with a TV.

  • Residential Real Estate Broker · Chicago, IL · Member since 2009 · 6 posts · 5 votes
    17y

    Oh, one more thing. (I don't mean to take up too much space.) You're going to have to do something about this hodge-podge of competing insurance delivery systems and soon, so you may as well get to it.

    You've got private, for profit risked based insurance that cherry picks their clients and their risk. Then you've got Medicaid, VA and Medicare, all government run, as well as government programs for millions of politicians and government workers. None of them with much control and running wild.

    Starting next year, the first of millions of boomers will bloat the rolls of Medicare over the next ten years. (I'm one of them.)

    Seniors, for the most part, can't get private, for profit policies, even if they wanted them and could pay. They are cut out of the system, by the system. This is the largest, single, expanding sytem of health care in the country, government or private. Now, I don't like irritating my conservative friends, but you can't stick your heads in the sand on this for long. All your Glenn Beck/Sarah Palin ranting and photo opps at these silly town hall meetings won't solve the problem. They make you feel better and you can all give a round of applause to the fat lady mocking Nancy Pelosi, but she's the one whose health is probably the worst, and who will need care the soonest. If you all think the seniors will EVER stand for your cutting back Medicare, you've not learned your lesson from last November. These people vote in droves.

    It's time to stop the shouting and those silly Nazi signs and get down to work. We are America. We can handle this.

  • Attorney · Raleigh, NC · Member since 2008 · 4k+ posts · 1k+ votes
    17y
    Originally posted by J Scott:
    Originally posted by Tim Wieneke:
    I have nothing against the VA. In fact I think it should get better funding.


    More funding for a socialist system? Good to know you feel that way...



    :roll: Oh lord. There is no comparison. A socialist system "cares" for all people regardless of whether or not they've earned it. Veterans have given back and have earned it. They deserve free healthcare for life. It's part of the "pension".
  • Attorney · Raleigh, NC · Member since 2008 · 4k+ posts · 1k+ votes
    17y
    Originally posted by Hugh James:
    Two hundred years ago, if you did not purchase private fire insurance (or could not afford it) and displayed a permit, the town fire department let your house burn down.


    Close but not quite. The fire protection system was a combination of private "cooperatives" who had a Fire Insurance Mark (basically a plaque) that displayed which private insurance company held their fire insurance. When there was a fire, all private insurance companies would send their fire crews to see if it was their customer and those that were other companies fire crews would have to get out of the way of the company who was the fire crew for that customer.

    It was a logistical mess for a fire which requires immediate response to mitigate further damage.

    For health care we have that in place already and it is government run already. CDC, FEMA, Health Departments, etc.... If we have a health crisis that requires immediate response to prevent further damage throughout the population, the government is already set up to respond.

    This bill is about routine care. The fire insurance equivalent of this is government employees coming into your house to check your smoke detectors, make sure you have approved fire extinguishers, ask your family about your plan during a fire, check your house wiring, etc.... That kind of government intrusion into our homes is unthinkable to most of us today.

    Tim
  • J ScottPro Member
    Moderator
    Investor · Sarasota, FL · Member since 2008 · 18k+ posts · 17k+ votes
    17y
    Originally posted by Tim Wieneke:
    Veterans have given back and have earned it. They deserve free healthcare for life. It's part of the "pension".


    So, an 18 year old kid who spent 1995-1998 hanging out on a military base in the midwest training and shooting guns deserves to have free health care for the rest of his life, even if he chooses to spend the rest of his life sitting on his couch, getting fat, and running up his health care costs? (yes, I used to know this person and there are plenty more like him)

    You think that's a better use of your tax dollars than paying the health care costs of the woman who works two jobs, 12 hours a day, just to make ends meet?

    You have it backwards...we should be rewarding hard work, not laziness...

  • Residential Real Estate Broker · Chicago, IL · Member since 2009 · 6 posts · 5 votes
    17y

    "...When there was a fire, all private insurance companies would send their fire crews to see if it was their customer and those that were other companies fire crews would have to get out of the way of the company who was the fire crew for that customer..."

    Well, thanks for the history lesson. Actually, in some towns if you hadn't paid a seperate "fire tax" they wouldn't show up at all. In any event, you can continue to hold on to your ideological trappings while the system burns (sorry, couldn't help myself) or, you can join the rest of the civilized world in the 21st century in acknowledging that government involvment is REQUIRED in making health care benefits available to most of us. The notion that you can leave the care of the sick in the hands of for profit health care insurance companies is just, well, nuts. It's a bit like the Medieval notion that the world was flat. You can say it, you can believe it, you can pray that it is so, but the Earth will still NOT be flat.

    I confess, I like most services I get from my government. They're not perfect, but who is? I took a shower this morning and made my coffee with water treated by the government and piped to my front door. I didn't worry about drinking it either. I flushed the toilet and they are processing that, as we work. Here in Chicago where I live, if I get sick the city will send an ambulance and EMT's to take me to the hospital (and they have). If the house is on fire, they'll send firefighters. If one of our local freaks tries to break in, the police will come and not inquire as to my home owner's insurance. At the federal level, our soldiers, sailors and Marines are protecting me and, I think, do a pretty good job for a bunch of federal employees. I know most conservatives might think they'd be better off with a .45 and a posse, but I like the military.

    So, do nothing, hold on to your values. It won't belong before the system totally implodes. Then the politicians of both parties can all look around and wonder what happened. Naturally, one will blame the other, but there'll be plenty of blame to go around. In the meantime, they'll continue to enjoy tax payer funded government health care. Why America is afraid of tackling this issue is both sad and disconcerting. But, in the near term this will all come home to roost.

  • Attorney · Raleigh, NC · Member since 2008 · 4k+ posts · 1k+ votes
    17y
    Originally posted by Hugh James:
    In any event, you can continue to hold on to your ideological trappings while the system burns (sorry, couldn't help myself) or, you can join the rest of the civilized world in the 21st century in acknowledging that government involvment is REQUIRED in making health care benefits available to most of us. The notion that you can leave the care of the sick in the hands of for profit health care insurance companies is just, well, nuts.


    OK Hugh. You live in Chicago. You go ahead and trust your health to John Stroeger hospital. Have a ball. John Stroeger himself, when he needed emergency care, would not go to the hospital he was named after. Instead he had himself taken to a privatem, expensive northside hospital.
  • Attorney · Raleigh, NC · Member since 2008 · 4k+ posts · 1k+ votes
    17y
    Originally posted by Hugh James:
    Here in Chicago where I live, if I get sick the city will send an ambulance and EMT's to take me to the hospital (and they have). If the house is on fire, they'll send firefighters. If one of our local freaks tries to break in, the police will come and not inquire as to my home owner's insurance. At the federal level, our soldiers, sailors and Marines are protecting me and, I think, do a pretty good job for a bunch of federal employees. I know most conservatives might think they'd be better off with a .45 and a posse, but I like the military.


    I looked at this again Hugh. I brought up the CDC as an example of the health care equivalent of services like the military and police and you completely ignored it and are trying to present this argument as if I don't recognize the partial role the government has to play in emergency services. It makes me wonder if you're really debating with me and what I am saying or your preconceived notion of what a conservative is and what you want to believe I'm saying. What's the point in debating any further?

    BTW - if you get sick and it's a non-emergency ambulance ride, it's contracted out to one of at least 7 private ambulance companies operating in Chicago that are paid by your private insurance.
  • Attorney · Raleigh, NC · Member since 2008 · 4k+ posts · 1k+ votes
    17y

    I know I'm going to piss some people off with this, but why stop now I guess. Amidst all this no one has thought of the recent story of Natasha Richardson. A helicpoter medivac would have saved her life. Her ER doctor admitted to this. How much would Liam Neeson have paid for that helicopter? How much would you have paid for it? Want to know why it couldn't be done? Canada's social healthcare system didn't have it and would not provide it as an option.

    Our system's not perfect, but this is America and you have the option to become rich and make enough money to buy care above the average. In socialized healthcare, it doesn't matter if you're willing to spend 10 million to save a loved one - you're getting the lowest common denominator of care by the cheapest government bidder.

  • J ScottPro Member
    Moderator
    Investor · Sarasota, FL · Member since 2008 · 18k+ posts · 17k+ votes
    17y
    Originally posted by Tim Wieneke:
    It makes me wonder if you're really debating with me and what I am saying or your preconceived notion of what a [insert political party] is and what you want to believe I'm saying. What's the point in debating any further?


    Yeah Tim, it sucks to get some of your own medicine...

    Now you know why so many people get annoyed trying to argue with you...

  • Real Estate Investor · ten mile, TN · Member since 2009 · 1k+ posts · 374 votes
    17y

    And let's not forget that when Congressmen were asked if they are willing to give up the governmental insurance they have now, in favor of what they want us all to have, they all said no.

    If they wont accept it then why should we?

  • J ScottPro Member
    Moderator
    Investor · Sarasota, FL · Member since 2008 · 18k+ posts · 17k+ votes
    17y
    Originally posted by Tim Wieneke:
    Amidst all this no one has thought of the recent story of Natasha Richardson. A helicpoter medivac would have saved her life.


    Tim -

    Again, just making things up...

    You do realize that SHE REFUSED MEDICAL TREATMENT when the paramedics arrived. Taken from Wikipedia (and corroborated by the AP and other sources):

    "Paramedics and an ambulance which initially responded to the accident were told they were not needed and left. Refusing medical attention, she returned to her hotel room and about three hours later was taken to a local hospital in Sainte-Agathe-des-Monts after complaining of a headache."

    But, if you insist on using individual anecdotes to support your case, how about these two examples of wonderful U.S. healthcare:

    http://www.cnn.com/2008/US/07/01/waiting.room.death/index.html

    http://articles.latimes.com/2008/dec/04/local/me-king4

    Do you really want to argue that Canada's healthcare system is worse because they don't have medivac helicopters, when we have people dying in emergency room waiting areas and then still being ignored for an hour!

    By the way, can you cite some evidence of there being a private healthcare "option" for medivac helicopters in the current U.S. heathcare system that won't exist under healthcare reform as it has been proposed? Who said anything about taking away private options?

    Time to stop listening to druggie talk show hosts like Rush Limbaugh and join the real world, Tim...
  • Investor · Mableton, GA · Member since 2009 · 1k+ posts · 465 votes
    17y
    Originally posted by Tim Wieneke:
    Originally posted by J Scott:
    Originally posted by Tim Wieneke:
    I have nothing against the VA. In fact I think it should get better funding.


    More funding for a socialist system? Good to know you feel that way...



    :roll: Oh lord. There is no comparison. A socialist system "cares" for all people regardless of whether or not they've earned it. Veterans have given back and have earned it. They deserve free healthcare for life. It's part of the "pension".

    That, off course can be one argument, however, another argument could be that since the cancelation of the draft back in the seventies, no one is forced to serve. Joining the arm forces is voluntarily and therefor, the risks are known in advance.
    I, personally agree that soldiers and veterans should get the utmost and the best care if only to encourage young people to serve.
  • Investor · Mableton, GA · Member since 2009 · 1k+ posts · 465 votes
    17y
    Originally posted by jawsette:
    And let's not forget that when Congressmen were asked if they are willing to give up the governmental insurance they have now, in favor of what they want us all to have, they all said no.

    If they wont accept it then why should we?


    How about the other way around. Why won't we all get the congress' health care? If it so good, shouldn't we all enjoy it? :wink:
  • J ScottPro Member
    Moderator
    Investor · Sarasota, FL · Member since 2008 · 18k+ posts · 17k+ votes
    17y
    Originally posted by jawsette:
    And let's not forget that when Congressmen were asked if they are willing to give up the governmental insurance they have now, in favor of what they want us all to have, they all said no.

    If they wont accept it then why should we?

    Who said they "want us all to have" the same thing? Nobody is suggesting that they will take away the private healthcare options that you have now...if you think your current plan is better than the government-sponsored one, then keep yours.

    I find it hard to debate on legislation when it's clear the other party hasn't even read it...stop being lazy and do some research, please...

  • Attorney · Raleigh, NC · Member since 2008 · 4k+ posts · 1k+ votes
    17y
    Originally posted by J Scott:
    Again, just making things up...

    You do realize that SHE REFUSED MEDICAL TREATMENT when the paramedics arrived. Taken from Wikipedia (and corroborated by the AP and other sources):

    "Paramedics and an ambulance which initially responded to the accident were told they were not needed and left. Refusing medical attention, she returned to her hotel room and about three hours later was taken to a local hospital in Sainte-Agathe-des-Monts after complaining of a headache."


    Nope. It was the time between the pain she was feeling when she called paramedics back and the ride to the hospital that was lethal. That's when the helicopter medivac would have saved her life.
    Originally posted by J Scott:
    Who said anything about taking away private options?

    That would be President Obama himself. "Maybe your better off not having the surgery but taking the painkiller."

    Maybe it our decision what we do with our bodies Jason! I seem to recall that being a fundamental ideology of a certain "Right to Die" thread that every liberal here is falling over themselves to show their support for.

  • Attorney · Raleigh, NC · Member since 2008 · 4k+ posts · 1k+ votes
    17y
    Originally posted by Eddie Ziv:
    How about the other way around. Why won't we all get the congress' health care? If it so good, shouldn't we all enjoy it? :wink:


    How bout that pension too? 4 years of work and a lifetime of $150,000 a year.... Man, it's almost enough to tempt me to fake being a blue dog democrat for 5 years to get it then retire and write some b.s. book "Every Blue Dog has his day" or some crap like that.
  • Residential Real Estate Broker · Chicago, IL · Member since 2009 · 6 posts · 5 votes
    17y

    I say we Democrats give up. The republiscams did nothing on this when they were in charge of both Congress and the White House, but now that the President is taking serious run at this, they have ALL the answers. The President has pursued this silly bi-partisan thing to the point that no one's happy. Well, you can't please everybody.

    So I say we toss this one over to the conservatives and let them do as they please. No more arguing. No more pointless shouting at these useless town hall photo opps. I say let the conservatives show us all how to really solve these kinds of problems. They can have all the credit and take all the blame even if their decision is to do nothing at all.

    I would be willing to bet, however, that they fall flat over the next few years. Give them enough ideological rope and they'll not only hang themselves but they'll probably like it. Then we liberal Democrats can step over their inconsequential, lifeless party and put through the single payer system we ought to have now.

    So, I am officially giving up. Whatever you conservative capitalists want is fine with me. I don't think I'll have long to wait.

  • Residential Real Estate Broker · Chicago, IL · Member since 2009 · 6 posts · 5 votes
    17y

    "...OK Hugh. You live in Chicago. You go ahead and trust your health to John Stroeger hospital. Have a ball. John Stroeger himself, when he needed emergency care, would not go to the hospital he was named after. Instead he had himself taken to a privatem, expensive northside hospital. .."

    OK Tim, you pontificating know-it-all, I'm ticked.

    Two years ago I WAS treated at Stroger Hospital. My insurance reached it's limits and I had no where else to go. The care was fantastic! Over nine months and two hospitalizations they saved my left leg from an amputation due to diabetes. They also gave me the $600 a month in prescriptions I could no longer afford to cover my heart disease. I wouldn't be alive without them, and that is NO exaggeration.

    Frankly, I don't give a fat rat's thing what happened to John Stroger, but I can tell you I now have coverage through I-CHIP and I would GLADLY return to Stroger Hospital and their staff any day. They were caring and respectful and very, very good. If you were to visit Stroger you would see what a disaster our "system" has become, however. Their people and resources are strained to the limit and they still perform beautifully.

    Frankly, on this point, you don't know what you're talking about.

  • J ScottPro Member
    Moderator
    Investor · Sarasota, FL · Member since 2008 · 18k+ posts · 17k+ votes
    17y
    Originally posted by Tim Wieneke:

    Nope. It was the time between the pain she was feeling when she called paramedics back and the ride to the hospital that was lethal. That's when the helicopter medivac would have saved her life.

    So, why didn't they charter a private Medevac helicopter service!?!? They're widely available in Canada as a private option!

    Isn't that what you support...private health care options? Well, that's what they have...you should be thrilled with the Canadian system...

    It seems to prove my point...not yours...way to go, Tim...

    Originally posted by Tim Wieneke:

    Originally posted by J Scott:
    Who said anything about taking away private options?


    That would be President Obama himself. "Maybe your better off not having the surgery but taking the painkiller."


    Okay, Tim, enlighten me with your awesome reading comprehension skills...since you are an English Lit major...

    Where in this statement from Obama does he say (or even imply) that he will be taking away any private options from people who are paying for their own medical care?

    In terms of substance, Obama's comment was very similar to JFK's "Ask not what your country can do for you..." comment (though JFK was a bit more eloquent).


    I seem to recall that being a fundamental ideology of a certain "Right to Die" thread that every liberal here is falling over themselves to show their support for.


    I agree with that (and so do other Conservatives on this forum who responded and agreed with me on that thread, btw).

    If you can point out anywhere that Obama says he will be taking away our ability to pay for private medical care, I will fight just as hard as you against any health care reform that comes out of this administration...

    Come on Tim...you make a big claim above that Obama is taking away our private options, let's see you support it! Point me to something he's said. Point me to something written in legislation. Point me to anything!

    This is the point in the thread where I say, "Let's see you back up your ridiculous statements."
  • Real Estate Investor · Kansas CIty, MO · Member since 2009 · 93 posts · 8 votes
    17y

    Back to point:

    Health Care Reform Yes or No? No. (Assuming a socialist/fascist style of reform)

    Health Care Reform Yes or No? Yes
    (Assuming free market reform, no government involvement whatsoever)

    I take my views from the most honest man in congress, a defender of the constitution, Ron Paul, who also happens to be a doctor himself.

    Please watch and behold common sense:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FqR-QzJUnvg

  • J ScottPro Member
    Moderator
    Investor · Sarasota, FL · Member since 2008 · 18k+ posts · 17k+ votes
    17y
    Originally posted by Tony Thompson:

    I take my views from the most honest man in congress, a defender of the constitution, Ron Paul, who also happens to be a doctor himself.

    Ditto on that...


    Please watch and behold common sense:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FqR-QzJUnvg


    In my opinion, I don't think Paul's plan is ideal, but it's far better than A) what we have now, and B) what is currently being proposed by the Obama administration.

    If you're not going to ensure that everyone has coverage, at least ensure that coverage is affordable and real *insurance* is available.

    It absolutely amazes me that so many people don't understand how bad our current healthcare system is...my guess is that most of those people have never had a major medical problem where they had to rely on their insurance company to do the right thing for the patient...

Join the conversationCreate a free account to reply, vote on answers and follow this thread.