Lender · Houston, TX · Member since 2025 · 45 posts · 28 votes
I'm curious where everyone stands on this.
When financing an investment property—buy & hold or fix & flip—do you actually prefer a traditional appraisal, or would you rather work with a lender that can use an alternative valuation method when possible?
I can see both sides.
Reasons to want an appraisal:
Third-party opinion of value
More confidence that you're not overpaying
Can help validate your ARV on a flip
Reasons to avoid one:
Saves time before closing
Eliminates the appraisal fee
One less hurdle that could delay the transaction
Avoids situations where a conservative appraisal changes the economics of the deal
For those who have done multiple investment deals:
Have appraisals ever saved you from a bad purchase?
Or have they mostly been an extra expense and delay?
If you had the choice on every deal, which route would you take and why?
Hey Ravi, good question. For me personally, I'd lean toward skipping the appraisal when possible. Time isn't really the issue — it's that a conservative appraisal can undercut numbers that were already conservative going in, and that changes the deal economics after the fact rather than before.
I just went through this on a DSCR refinance — we used a conservative in-house estimate going in, but the appraisal came back lower because the appraiser couldn't find comps nearby and ended up pulling from about 5 miles out. Not exactly reflective of the immediate market, but that's how it landed.
So if you've got non-appraisal DSCR options (AVM-based, desktop, or otherwise), I'd be interested in hearing more about what you offer — happy to connect and see how it could fit into what I'm doing.
One of my lenders requires a full appraisal for hard money loans. I appreciate confirming our ARV before we begin rehab. If the appraisal comes in lower than our ARV we adjust the rehab a bit. If the appraisal comes in above our ARV we know which appraiser we will be using during the re-fi.