Rehab with HELOC vs Hard money
Hi BP community,
I'm in the process of buying my first rental property and would appreciate some guidance on how you would approach the financing considering my current resources.
Context: my plan is to BRRR the property and keep it as a long-term rental. I currently have ~$200K liquid cash reserves and an unused HELOC with a $350K credit limit (it's actually an SBLOC but pretty much same thing).
Assumptions for the deal based on what I'm seeing in the market:
- $180K purchase price
- $60K rehab (includes 15% cash for contingencies)
- 3-month rehab
- $260K ARV
I'm torn on how much money I should borrow -if any at all- during the purchase + rehab phase given I technically have enough cash ¬ considering conventional despite my 800 credit score wouldn't be possible given minimum seasoning period is 6 to 12 months based on my research) to cover those expenses myself.
What approach would you take?
A) fund myself: Buy with cash, rehab with HELOC, refinance with DSCR loan
B) partial funding: Buy with hard money, rehab with HELOC, refinance with DSCR loan
C) outsource funding: Buy+Rehab with hard money, then refinance
Pros of borrowing: I would have more cash reserves for emergencies. Cons: I would have to pay interests on the hard money loan (at ~10 interest rate).
I chatted with 3 lenders (brokers), and they suggested using the path C (I.e. not using my own funds and going through the hard-money route instead) claiming that would help me get more money out of the deal through the DSCR cash-out refinance. They claimed with path C I'm more likely to secure 80% back in the cash out refinance (keeping only 20% down whereas path A and B would likely lead to me getting 70 or 75% back in the cash-out refinance. They claimed that lenders are less likely to let you keep only 20% down if you paid for the whole thing in cash. Is this accurate? What path would you choose with all the above considerations/assumptions?
Thanks!